werewolf LIV! Terror at the country club (GAME OVER WOLVES WIN)

[Barkeep49]

It's great to be around such good chaps. At least I hope you're all good chaps just like me.

[hoopsguy]

I would like to applaud our moderator for his fine work on the PM.

Hint - it did not say "vinegar" like Pass has posted.

[Lathum]

note:

if you possess a golf club or a serving tray it will be automaticaly activated, you do not need to submit an order to use those items

[Telle]

Vanilla villager checking in.

[path12]

Originally Posted by molson

Color coding is awseome - I'm not voting for Alan T.

Exactly what he wants you to think.

Checking in. Also checking into work after some time off, so don't expect much till afternoon.....

[DaddyTorgo]

checking in.

and i swear, if you assholes lynch me on D1 AGAIN I'll scream!

[hoopsguy]

So tempting to vote for DT based off of Post #56

[DaddyTorgo]

Originally Posted by hoopsguy

So tempting to vote for DT based off of Post #56

go for it. *shrug*

[molson]

Before we get too much info, I always lean towards voting for someone who's been around longer, rather than a newbie. Great players are more dangerous as wolves than they are helpful as vineagar, IMO.

[st.cronin]

One comment about Alan's list, I think EagleFan has played more than just a couple of games. I may be wrong, though.

[Alan T]

Originally Posted by st.cronin

One comment about Alan's list, I think EagleFan has played more than just a couple of games. I may be wrong, though.

Eaglesfan27 used to play a bunch back a year or longer ago.. this is a different EagleFan that I don't -think- has played with us before.. I could be wrong on that though.

[st.cronin]

Originally Posted by Alan T

Eaglesfan27 used to play a bunch back a year or longer ago.. this is a different EagleFan that I don't -think- has played with us before.. I could be wrong on that though.

I'm pretty sure he was one of my teammates in the Survivor game, and I don't think that was his first game.

[st.cronin]

Originally Posted by molson

Before we get too much info, I always lean towards voting for someone who's been around longer, rather than a newbie. Great players are more dangerous as wolves than they are helpful as vineagar, IMO.

I disagree with your premise that I bolded, but on day 1 I do prefer to vote for somebody that has played a few games.

[Alan T]

Originally Posted by st.cronin

I'm pretty sure he was one of my teammates in the Survivor game, and I don't think that was his first game.

He wasn't in the survivor game, but I fully well may be wrong and missed some games he played in or just don't remember it right.. That old age thing setting in causes that at times for me

[Passacaglia]

Yeah, I think it's just bad form to vote out new people. It just doesn't encourage new blood if we vote them out on D1, when we usually have no reason.

[st.cronin]

Originally Posted by Alan T

He wasn't in the survivor game, but I fully well may be wrong and missed some games he played in or just don't remember it right.. That old age thing setting in causes that at times for me

Its just as likely me that's gone senile. Wasn't somebody compiling an encyclopedia of werewolf players at one point?

[Passacaglia]

Originally Posted by hoopsguy

I would like to applaud our moderator for his fine work on the PM.

Hint - it did not say "vinegar" like Pass has posted.

What? I was just telling everyone the name of my fantasy football team!

[hoopsguy]

Day 1 approaches:
1.) Get out an early vote based on whatever - see what kind of momentum emerges around candidates
2.) Vote based on random.org
3.) Wait until later in the day to see if you can interpret the momentum around existing candidates
4.) Insert your own logic here

I'll never go with approach #2, as I think random.org is a cop-out. I like to fool myself into believing there is some thread of logic to be discerned in every day and random.org is basically bailing out on trying to find that potentially emerging pattern.

Approach #3 is my usual approach, but I haven't had as much luck with it early in games as I would like so I'm inclined to try #1 today and see if I can force some of the action.

Cronin, I don't think EagleFan has played in any more than one other game - I'm pretty sure I have not played with him previously.

[molson]

Originally Posted by st.cronin

I disagree with your premise that I bolded, but on day 1 I do prefer to vote for somebody that has played a few games.

From my experiences (some) veteran players have a tendency to think they've figured everything out, when they haven't. They state their conclusions is definititve terms, and everyone goes along with them. More often then not, they're wrong - and game over.

It probably hasn't happened enough to me to use it as a firm strategy, but I have very little to go on.

[RendeR]

VOTE HOOPSGUY



He's being entirel;y too helpful. Its obviously a ploy.

[ArlingtonColt]

Thanks for the welcome... I suppose I'm supposed to check in :P I'm gonna go study some previous werewolf games to get a gist of what I'm supposed to be doing!

[Alan T]

Originally Posted by RendeR

VOTE HOOPSGUY



He's being entirel;y too helpful. Its obviously a ploy.

Hoops is always helpful as both a villager and as a wolf. He's one of those guys that I'll usually give a little slack to at the beginning in case they are on my team. If Hoops is good, he is an excellent villager to have on our side. His being helpful isn't really something that you can go by on day 1.

Worst case scenerio, he ends up being a wolf and gets found out in a few days. He tends to get scanned earlier by a seer than alot of other people, so no real reason in my mind to usually vote him day 1 unless he just slips up somewhere.

[SnDvls]

nevermind: I thought I had signed up for this game and I guess I didn't and forgot...my bad ;(

[Barkeep49]

Originally Posted by ArlingtonColt

Thanks for the welcome... I suppose I'm supposed to check in :P I'm gonna go study some previous werewolf games to get a gist of what I'm supposed to be doing!

Make sure you also check out The Beginner's Guide.

I am going to follow through and give telle her sand

Vote Telle

[RendeR]

UNVOTE HOOPSGUY
VOTE ALAN T


Ok now Alan is defending hoops, thats obviously a ploy.

[DaddyTorgo]

schizo render-voting...fun times!

[RendeR]

UNVOTE ALAN T
VOTE DADDYTORGO


Don't mess with me mister, just because I'm PARANOID doesn't mean no one is out to get me.

[RPI-Fan]

VOTE OLIEGIRL

Hasn't checked in yet, so why not. Open for change if given a reason.

[MrBug708]

Just checking in guys, simple villager checking in to see what's the word on the street

[oliegirl]

Originally Posted by RPI-Fan

VOTE OLIEGIRL

Hasn't checked in yet, so why not. Open for change if given a reason.

Check post #46...I was one of the first ones to check in.

[DaddyTorgo]

*shrug* okay

i'd rather have you vote me than alan or hoops anyways

[hoopsguy]

I'll vote for a guy with a few games under his belt who is normally not in the mix for early scans and is a pretty hard guy to pin down on either side.

VOTE RPI-FAN

[MrBug708]

On a side note, I was kind of upset that that I was seagreen instead of blue for my participating I thought I had more games under my belt...

[MrBug708]

Anyone want to go out on teh course for a foursome? Preferably with Telle and Oliegirl and one of their friends. I much prefer someone about 5'5 34C, nice ass, and blond.

Or a round of golf would be fine

[Alan T]

Originally Posted by MrBug708

On a side note, I was kind of upset that that I was seagreen instead of blue for my participating I thought I had more games under my belt...

Sorry! I honestly don't remember how many games you had played, and it had been a while.

[MrBug708]

It's ok, it probably was 5 or 6 so it might have qualified anyway

[st.cronin]

Vote RendeR

Maybe its just the usual render madness, but me no likey.

[oliegirl]

Originally Posted by MrBug708

Anyone want to go out on teh course for a foursome? Preferably with Telle and Oliegirl and one of their friends. I much prefer someone about 5'5 34C, nice ass, and blond.

Or a round of golf would be fine

I volunteer to drive the golf cart, but I don't know that I meet your measurement requirements...34C I'm not, though you'll have to take your chances on whether what I have to offer would be better or worse than that Oh, and I'm not blonde...

[MrBug708]

I think for a "foursome" I think that I probably would throw everything out the window

[oliegirl]

Glad to know you are willing to relax your standards a bit

Throw me the keys for the golf cart then!!!! FORE!

LOL - couldn't resist...

[Telle]

Originally Posted by MrBug708

Anyone want to go out on teh course for a foursome? Preferably with Telle and Oliegirl and one of their friends. I much prefer someone about 5'5 34C, nice ass, and blond.

Or a round of golf would be fine

Hmmm.. got three of the four...

[Telle]

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo

schizo render-voting...fun times!

That's kinda funny coming from you.

[MrBug708]

Originally Posted by Telle

Hmmm.. got three of the four...

Is there another girl in this? Maybe I missed them or someone is masquerading as a guy?

[oliegirl]

She meant three of the four "requirements" you laid out...

[RendeR]

Originally Posted by st.cronin

Vote RendeR

Maybe its just the usual render madness, but me no likey.

UNVOTE DADDYTORGO
VOTE ST. CRONIN


You always find a reason to vote for me. Damn you man, damn you to hell.

[MrBug708]

Originally Posted by oliegirl

She meant three of the four "requirements" you laid out...

True. So now we need one of your sisters, friend, cousin et al and we can play!

[RendeR]

Originally Posted by oliegirl

She meant three of the four "requirements" you laid out...

huhuh hhuuh huhuhhhuhh

She said "Laid" huhuhhhuhuhuhuhuh

[Telle]

Yet to check in: Crim, Chief Rum, Mr.DNA, Eaglefan, Raiders Army

Current vote count:
Telle - 1 - Barkeep (74)
Oliegirl - 1 - RPI-Fan (78)
RPI-Fan - 1 - Hoopsguy (82)
RendeR - 1 - St.Cronin (87)
St.Cronin - 1 - RendeR (95)

[Passacaglia]

Originally Posted by molson

From my experiences (some) veteran players have a tendency to think they've figured everything out, when they haven't. They state their conclusions is definititve terms, and everyone goes along with them. More often then not, they're wrong - and game over.

It probably hasn't happened enough to me to use it as a firm strategy, but I have very little to go on.

I disagree. I think rookies are the ones who think they know it all, or at least have a sneaking suspicion that they have caught not just one wolf, but two or three in some convoluted chain of protections and communications. However, you're right that people tend to listen to veterans more. I guess a good veteran needs to know that people will agree with them, and the rate at which they agree will not necessarily correlate with how likely they are to be correct.

Anyway, pretty weird Day 1 so far.

[Telle]

Originally Posted by Passacaglia

I disagree. I think rookies are the ones who think they know it all, or at least have a sneaking suspicion that they have caught not just one wolf, but two or three in some convoluted chain of protections and communications. However, you're right that people tend to listen to veterans more. I guess a good veteran needs to know that people will agree with them, and the rate at which they agree will not necessarily correlate with how likely they are to be correct.

Anyway, pretty weird Day 1 so far.

Ooooh! Oooh! I've done that!!!