![]() |
|
|
#51 | ||
|
College Starter
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Roseville, CA
|
Pulp Fiction. Definitely. Never saw the appeal.
Ah, and tigercat reminded me...Training Day and Monster's Ball. While I think Denzel and Halle have had Emmy contending performances, these 2 were not them. Overrated movies or not, they were not Emmy winning performances. Source of good Dave Chappelle scripts, though.... Last edited by rjolley : 11-05-2004 at 10:17 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2004
|
I will go with Lost in Translation as well.
Although I do now understand Japanese Porn. Untill I watched Lost in Translation I could not figure out why every clip of Japanese porn just seemed to be one rape scene after another. Now, I understand that to the Japanese, Rape is a huge turn-on. Hire a prostitue in Japan and you will have to have sex with her as she is yelling, screaming , and crying. I don't get it, but hey what ever floats your boat. |
|
|
|
|
|
#54 | |
|
Roster Filler
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Cicero
|
Quote:
Agreed here. Actually, I would expand the list to include anything by Kubrick. It takes a man with rare talent for boring to make Nicole Kidman naked boring. This guy had it.
__________________
http://www.nateandellie.net Now featuring twice the babies for the same low price! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Resident Alien
Join Date: Jun 2001
|
Damn. Got through the first page and a half without Pulp Fiction being mentioned. Then the landslide began. What a piece of shit movie. One of about 2 movies that I've ever walked out on. Horrid worthless piece of shit. I don't understand Tarantino's popularity at all.
And Gladiator was just a third-rate imitation of Braveheart that was inferior in every way to Gibson's flick. |
|
|
|
|
|
#56 | |
|
Roster Filler
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Cicero
|
Quote:
Agree with your second paragraph wholeheartedly. But, then again, Pulp Fiction is my favorite non star wars movie, so you lose points there.
__________________
http://www.nateandellie.net Now featuring twice the babies for the same low price! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#57 | |
|
College Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Federal Way, WA
|
Quote:
I think she had to be some degree of boring or not as appealing as she could be. The options of sex outside of Cruise's household had to look appealing, as the movie is pretty much through his eyes. You don't want the audience thinking, whats wrong with that man, hes got Nicole Kidman at home! Who cares if she said some displeasing things, go back home and hit THAT! Its like the opening scene, you start with Kidman getting naked, but theres something so clinical about it, like shes posing for a statue or shes one of her Dr husband's patients getting undressed. Eyes wide shut can be a really neat movie to think about and ponder about. To think about relationships and the meaning of sex in and out of relationships. If sex is suppose to have inherit danger and mystery and what happens when you cross the line of too much or too little of either. Its a shame theres lots of people look at it as some kind of softcore skin flick. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 | |
|
Resident Alien
Join Date: Jun 2001
|
Quote:
I just finished watching the trilogy on DVD last weekend. I just can't comprehend how a guy who made three great movies like that could be the same guy who produced the worthless and utterly un-entertaining prequels. The originals were quick moving, funny, and had all sorts of surprises. And then we get Jar Jar in the prequels? It just doesn't make sense... ![]() |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|