06-20-2006, 01:01 PM | #51 | |||
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: North Carolina
|
Quote:
I think that it actually gets to the issue of what it means to "belong in a national championship tournament." I see two main ways of looking at playoff tournaments. First, you can try to find the best (say) 16 teams in the country and put them in the tournament with no regard to conference championships or the like. Pick a method of ranking teams, and put #s 1-16 in the tourney and be done with it. Second, you can look at the tournement as a reward for a great season and as a way of trying to make sure that as many teams as possible have at least a theoretical chance of actually competing for a national championship--as a chance to put as many teams' destinies into their own hands as possible. I tend to fall into the second group. If you win your conference, you have earned the right to go swim in the big kids' pool. If you finish 2nd in a "power" conference and are frozen out of the playoffs--well, maybe you shouldn't have finished second. I have no doubt that the best bubble team left out of the NCAA tournament would beat the worst conference champ in the tournament 9 years out of 10. But I still prefer the system where the conference champs get to go to the show over the first bubble team left out. Maybe the best way to phrase it: Are you looking to find the best team, or are you looking to find the National Champion. Sometimes, those are not the same thing. |
|||
06-20-2006, 01:04 PM | #52 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Conyers GA
|
Quote:
You can always play the X beat Y and Y beat Z and Z is a playoff team, so X should be too (or whatever), but we're talking about 2 bubble teams that actually played each other and Auburn handily beat Georgia at Georgia. Oh yeah, and Auburn has fewer losses, too. The strength of schedule is nowhere near enough to overcome those facts. |
|
06-20-2006, 01:14 PM | #53 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Big Ten Country
|
Quote:
Well, maybe not COMPLETELY across the board. |
|
06-20-2006, 01:16 PM | #54 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Big Ten Country
|
Quote:
That may be true, but if our philosophy has been to make sure each conference is represented, shouldn't there be an argument that states that, at least in close cases, each division should be represented as well? |
|
06-20-2006, 01:21 PM | #55 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Conyers GA
|
Quote:
Uh, no. If that's the case, what's the point of the Championship Game? |
|
06-20-2006, 01:24 PM | #56 | |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tennessee
|
Quote:
But really, the differences are not that much. I won’t cry over AUB getting in. In fact, I hope they whip azz for the SEC. Plus, AUB beat me, so it makes me look a little bit better. |
|
06-20-2006, 03:10 PM | #57 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Big Ten Country
|
Quote:
Uh, apparently to give one team an extra loss, and eliminate them from the playoffs. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|