![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Which QB had the better game? | |||
| QB1: 25 for 35 (71.4%), 300 yards, 2 TD, 1 INT. (104.46 QB Rating) |
|
29 | 49.15% |
| QB2: 20 for 41 (48.8%), 300 yards, 4 TDs, 0 INT. (105.74 QB Rating) |
|
23 | 38.98% |
| Pretty much a tie. |
|
7 | 11.86% |
| Voters: 59. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#51 | |||
|
Pro Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
|
Quote:
The point went the other way. You missed it. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Minnesota
|
Id take QB2's game but I have a feeling QB1 is the better quarterback.
I dont think QB2 would be able to put up that kind of 4/0 TD/Int ratio over time being this inaccurate. Reminds me a a debate baseball people have a lot about runs/rbis as compared to some more advanced stats. |
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
College Starter
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The Dirty
|
I vote Johnstone.
__________________
Commish of the United Baseball League (OOTP 6.5) |
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
n00b
Join Date: Jun 2003
|
I would have to question where QB1 got his completions and yards. Was a large percentage of completions between the 20's? Once inside the redzone is that when the incompletions and INT occurred?
Everyone assumes that he threw for 2 Tds and a RB punched in additional TDs. But if he threw a Pic, thus costing his team a scoring chance and or failed to convert in the redzone and his team had to settle for field goals, then in my opinion he did not perform as well as QB2. |
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
High School Varsity
Join Date: Jan 2007
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|