06-02-2011, 12:50 PM | #51 | ||
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Catonsville, MD
|
I'm not required to get a Driver's License, but I would object to having to piss in a cup in order to get one.
__________________
Check out my two current weekly Magic columns! https://www.coolstuffinc.com/a/?action=search&page=1&author[]=Abe%20Sargent |
||
06-02-2011, 12:52 PM | #52 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Bath, ME
|
I think that's very state by state, I know people who have had food stamps and they were very restricted as to what they could buy. We've been on WIC, for example, and can only buy very particular items.
|
06-02-2011, 12:57 PM | #53 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2003
|
I don't think this holds up for very long.
I'm with the folks who say welfare needs to be reformed, reformed into non-existence. |
06-02-2011, 12:58 PM | #54 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
|
Not that hard really, a matter of coding items in the grocers checkout database best I can tell. Here in GA there's a number of restrictions on what can/can't be bought, although it isn't junk food. Instead it's "prepared foods" that are off-limits, i.e. things like the pre-made sandwiches in the deli case, a 10 pc fried chicken from the Kroger deli is a no-no, IIRC there's certain bottled waters that are ineligible, etc, etc. Restricting them is fairly easy on paper ... but along with the mom & pop stores that ring up a lot of "miscellaneous" merchandise there's also a black market for the cards that goes with it, traded for lesser value in cash (which is used for booze, cigs, drugs, the cell phone bill, whatever), then resold at a profit to a third party.
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis Last edited by JonInMiddleGA : 06-02-2011 at 12:59 PM. |
06-02-2011, 01:01 PM | #55 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the yo'
|
Quote:
Wic is for like milk, cheese, etc. Foodstamps you can buy doritos, pepsi, and 1000s of other horrible foods. |
|
06-02-2011, 01:08 PM | #56 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Bath, ME
|
Quote:
I may be confused, but for example when I lived in Vermont I believe my friends that were on foodstamps had a lot of restrictions on what they could buy. Maybe they could buy Pepsi, I don't know, but it certainly wasn't anything and everything. You'd have a hard time getting anyone to agree on what healthy food is, but it seems that in some states at least there are some limits. |
|
06-02-2011, 01:12 PM | #57 |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
I think there's a difference between random drug testing of a class of people receiving one kind of government benefit and requiring some type of action or status before you qualify for the benefit in the first place. Every government benefit is going to require some kind of action or status to qualify (age,registering for selective service, number of kids, eyesight, income level, criminal record, place of residence, passport photos, employment, providing physical proof of things and filling out applications.)
Last edited by molson : 06-02-2011 at 01:15 PM. |
06-02-2011, 01:26 PM | #58 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pittsburgh
|
Quote:
Yeah, even back in the early 90's, while working at a grocery store in HS, the computer did all the work. You scanned, and if the customer was using food stamps, you could request a food stamp total. Certain things didn't qualify-- pet food, etc. Always got people who were pissed when their cigarettes were covered...and I had the audacity to ask for cash for the balance!!
__________________
"Do you guys play fast tempos with odd time signatures?" "Yeah" "Cool!!" |
|
06-02-2011, 01:33 PM | #59 | |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: MA
|
Quote:
Never claimed they should be happy. |
|
06-02-2011, 02:27 PM | #60 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: PDX
|
Meh. This bill would make perfect sense if you could completely ignore that:
Random drug testing is not going to detect all users. Drug tests are not hard to pass for seasoned drug users. Drug tests paid for out of a welfare recipients pocket are still being paid for by the taxpayer. This bill wouldn't stop subsidizing drug use, so much as it would stop subsidizing drug use for a percentage of abusers, while still subsidizing drug use and/or testing evasion for another percentage, and additionally subsidizing the random testing of everybody receiving welfare in the country.
__________________
Last edited by thesloppy : Today at 05:35 PM. Last edited by thesloppy : 06-02-2011 at 02:33 PM. |
06-02-2011, 02:39 PM | #61 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
Quote:
The whole drug treatment/drug testing through the courts and government is a pretty good scam. You'd be amazed at what "government approved treatment providers" charge to the government to provide absolutely no successful treatment for criminals. I've thought about parlaying my undergraduate psychology degree into a lucrative "anger management" practice. Nobody would pay for such nonsense from such an unqualified individual except governments, who are happy to pay you whatever you want (if you can forge the right relationships with the right judges and the right government officials.) Last edited by molson : 06-02-2011 at 02:40 PM. |
|
06-02-2011, 02:52 PM | #62 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
Quote:
And forging those relationships is as easy as arranging a few kickbacks.
__________________
Get bent whoever hacked my pw and changed my signature. |
|
06-02-2011, 03:03 PM | #63 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
Quote:
Sure, as long as everybody knows how to keep their mouth shut! (Unlike that PA judge that got caught accepting $2+ million in kickbacks from a juvenile treatment provider.) I don't think most of them get caught though, you gotta be a little more subtle. Sometimes just being friends is enough to get that business. Last edited by molson : 06-02-2011 at 03:04 PM. |
|
06-02-2011, 03:26 PM | #64 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: PDX
|
If this is the road we're heading down, I'd prefer we start with random drug testing of every publicly elected official and political office holder in the US government.
__________________
Last edited by thesloppy : Today at 05:35 PM. Last edited by thesloppy : 06-02-2011 at 03:26 PM. |
06-02-2011, 03:32 PM | #65 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
Quote:
They're trying that in Florida right now too, for all state employees. The ACLU has filed suit. Some police officers and firefighters are randomly tested. Some teachers are too, but that gets more opposition. Last edited by molson : 06-02-2011 at 03:39 PM. |
|
06-02-2011, 04:09 PM | #66 | |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: SF
|
Quote:
You really think these purchases are being made in grocery stores? Better yet, you really think all these junk food people are within safe walking distance to a grocery store? There are way too many non-poor people benefiting from poor people for there to be honest reform. So laws like thins will have to do |
|
06-02-2011, 04:22 PM | #67 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the yo'
|
Quote:
The main restriction that I know of is that it could not be hot prepared food. Cold prepared food, such as a turkey sub, could be purchased with food stamps. And cold prepared coffee drinks were eligible as well. I had a bad stint where I was working at a Sheetz gas station, and the stuff that was food stamp eligible was truly amazing. I am not opposed to food stamps in general, but I think that, especially with gov't supplied hand in hand, it's not unreasonable to limit food stamp purchases to more healthy type foods. And while agreeing to what is healthy, and what is not is a hard thing, generally eliminating high sugar/fat items would be a good start. |
|
06-02-2011, 04:31 PM | #68 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
|
Quote:
I wasn't really planning to list every possible outlet, but having lived in two places with very high food stamp (or whatever its called these days) eligibility & use, the majority of transactions would seem likely to take place in stores that are at least franchise operations with standardized transaction systems, i.e. similar to grocery stores. Taking c-stores as a highly likely junk food outlet, I'm not sure there's even a non-chain convenience (type) store left in all of Athens. The dominant franchise in our lowest income neighborhoods is Golden Gallon (kind of what they're known for in some towns, being where no one else wants to be & charging double for everything), followed by Shell, with BP probably third. All of them scan everything at the register, just like Kroger. And yeah, these are the walking distance places from the housing projects, not to mention having a bus stop within a stone's throw of the door. Ditto the small town I lived before, where roughly half the population was on some form of "welfare" or another. Only two grocery stores in town, both with modern check out systems. Half dozen c-stores, all but one on modern(ish) check out equipment and it was probably 3rd or 4th in sales, no better than third with the food stamp crowd (it was two blocks from my house & I knew the owner, hard not to be able to gauge the clientele, y'know). I'm sure there's some areas where it isn't quite as true - some of the ethnic neighborhoods in parts of Atlanta come to mind as examples - but the ethnic aspect is relevant here not because of the customers or any correlation between ethnicity/food stamps but because they're among the few places I know in Georgia where any independently owned corner store/c-store/ neighborhood grocer operations still exist. Most are long since out of business.
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis Last edited by JonInMiddleGA : 06-02-2011 at 04:32 PM. |
|
06-02-2011, 06:44 PM | #69 | |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Seattle
|
Quote:
You seem to be a black & white rather than shades of gray person Jon - how do you determine what is an ethical and moral drug vs. one that is not? |
|
06-02-2011, 08:14 PM | #70 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
|
Quote:
My credentials as an unapologetic authoritarian I believe are established enough here to be stipulated at this point I think. I've got nothing but contempt for illegal users ... and in the U.S. that covers the vast majority of them. It's a complete disregard for the rule of law & order, a primary basis for anything resembling a civilized society. But to abandon that principal because there's been a lack of courage in enforcing those laws (by failing to put remotely adequate teeth in them) is the more disturbing bankruptcy I was referring to up the thread.
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis |
|
06-02-2011, 08:19 PM | #71 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Jacksonville, FL
|
Quote:
but to get tested you already have to have the dough....
__________________
Jacksonville-florida-homes-for-sale Putting a New Spin on Real Estate! ----------------------------------------------------------- Commissioner of the USFL USFL |
|
06-02-2011, 08:51 PM | #72 | |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Seattle
|
Quote:
|
|
06-02-2011, 09:08 PM | #73 | |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Backwoods, SC
|
Quote:
I'm enjoying the read. Lets not destroy it with this argument, please. While this is probaly the one issue I disagree vehemenently (sp) with Jon on, its been long establishd that if coffee were outlawed tomorrow Jon would probably kill himself to solve the internal conflict. His view (as I understand it) is that if it is illgal today it is off limits, if tomorrow it is legalized he has carte blanche to smoke a fatty with whomever he chooses. The problem with his argument from my point of view is it starts with the presumption that those in charge of making laws are more inteligent/better qualified than I to make decisions for me. While I wish that were the case, with rigged ballot boxes, manipulated poles and stats, and judges on the take I dont trust any of the bastards. To the point that if a speed limit says 55 I drive 56 to make sure someone doesnt run into my ass. IOW he doesnt consider the why, only that it is. At least thats my take. |
|
06-02-2011, 11:44 PM | #74 | |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Seattle
|
Quote:
Didn't mean to sidetrack the thread, just genuinely curious what Jon's thinking is on this particular aspect. |
|
06-03-2011, 10:12 PM | #75 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Madison, WI
|
All it means, I think, is that his personal ethical/moral code is tied to legality. That may strike someone oddly (since that code would vary on geography, time, and other circumstances), but it's not crazy to think like that -- it'll keep you out of trouble.
|
06-03-2011, 10:23 PM | #76 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Seattle
|
I agree that tends to be how he thinks, but the wording suggests more than that; if it were strictly a question of following whatever is currently legal, then it would follow that the statement would be that it's an ethical & moral failure to take illegal drugs. Instead, the statement seemed to imply that it would be an ethical and moral failure to change the legal status of those drugs.
|
06-03-2011, 10:29 PM | #77 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Madison, WI
|
Quote:
IMO, that perception of failure would derive from the ethical/moral view he has based on the current ruleset. |
|
06-05-2011, 02:46 AM | #78 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Buffalo, NY
|
Jon's initial statement perports a personal belief that drugs are unethical and immoral.
It states that he believes to legalize drugs in any way is to "surrender" in my aforementioned "war on drugs". If his entire argument is truly about legality, then I would suggest he is little more than a hypocrite, because no human being leads a perfect life in relation to the law. We speed, we jaywalk on occasion, we cheat and steal. We, as human beings, are flawed and have weakness. Jon basing his stance purely on legality would be saying he is above all of that and carries none of the inherent human failures. In which case I will simply laugh at him and ignore his stances on almost everything from now on. However. I tend to believe that Jon's positions are more philosophically/spiritually motivated. And while I disagree with him on most things at least I can respect his right to believe as he does if this is the case. For myself, its quite obvious that the war on drugs was lost 20 years ago. It is not a war that can be won, no matter how much money, time, and lives you want to throw at it. It is not surrendering. We're not actually fighting anymore. We're hiding from reality. The United States Anti-drug systems are like a Japanese soldier from 1942 still living in his bunker on a forgotten island in the south pacific. He's there, he still thinks he's fighting the good fight, but the rest of the universe just went on by. Those funds, officers, all of it. Can be better used in other places. Stop wasting my tax dollars swinging at shadows in dark alleys. The shadows kicked your ass long ago. |
08-26-2011, 06:21 AM | #79 |
High School Varsity
Join Date: Oct 2000
|
First results are in from the Florida drug testing:
only 2% tested positive........ nominal savings to Florida.....which may go away when considering staff hours. huge gain for the company that did the test--and the trust in the name of Governor Rick Scott's wife that has some shares still. Link: hxxp: www2.tbo.com/news/politics/2011/aug/24/3/welfare-drug-testing-yields-2-percent-positive-res-ar-252458/ |
08-26-2011, 07:05 AM | #80 |
This guy has posted so much, his fingers are about to fall off.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: In Absentia
|
Bud Selig says 45% of them would have tested positive if not for the drug testing they implemented.
__________________
M's pitcher Miguel Batista: "Now, I feel like I've had everything. I've talked pitching with Sandy Koufax, had Kenny G play for me. Maybe if I could have an interview with God, then I'd be served. I'd be complete." |
08-26-2011, 07:18 AM | #81 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
|
Quote:
And how many didn't apply because they knew they'd fail? The program is also far too limited in scope (only covers TANF) to provide the sort of savings that could be realized by applying it to all benefits - state & federal.
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis |
|
08-26-2011, 07:40 AM | #82 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
Quote:
Yep. If this was applied to people who take the mortgage deduction, student loans and government contracts it would nab more people.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
|
08-26-2011, 07:47 AM | #83 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
|
Quote:
{stares unblinkingly} When you're ready for me to throw in the part about how all information obtained should be turned over to law enforcement for further investigation, just let me know.
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis |
|
08-26-2011, 08:06 AM | #84 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
Quote:
While I think the testing is a waste of resources and just becomes another mini-boondoggle for whoever provides the testing services...I think there is a distinction between having a government benefit & requesting a government benefit. The difference I believe is that I did not actively pursue (or request) a mortgage interest benefit whereas it takes action to pursue food stamps or student loans benefits. And I don't think filling in a tax return form counts as a request for assistance. As for the government contractors...I'm sure there are exceptions depending on the scope & contract but to my knowledge, the government does stipulate that you must be a drug-free workplace. This of course, like most government requirements, is not overly difficult to adhere to for a drug using employee/contractor, but it does have base level requirements and part of that includes pre-employment drug screening as well as the ability to ask somebody to go pee in a cup if suspected of drug use (which could include something as minor as slipping and falling down). So, I guess all I'm saying is that the logic behind drug testing isn't inconsistent to me. A waste because everything government tries to administrate is pretty darn inefficient? Certainly agreed. |
|
08-26-2011, 08:14 AM | #85 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
I just think it should be recognized that most people get some sort of government benefit. It's easy to say "they" should have obstacles, but what if those same obstacles apply to you?
Now Jon would be happy with everyone being tested, and that's at least less discriminatory than Florida's plan.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
08-26-2011, 08:32 AM | #86 |
College Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
I just hold to the logic that any benefit I have is available to others. And any benefit I personally request is going to have requirements to be met.
I just think this is an easy redmeat political topic for Rick Scott to latch onto so he can switch the focus from how little he has done to help the FL economy or housing market. |
08-26-2011, 01:55 PM | #87 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: PDX
|
"another 2 percent are not completing the application process, for reasons unspecified." Altogether, that's a whopping 4%.
__________________
Last edited by thesloppy : Today at 05:35 PM. |
08-26-2011, 02:06 PM | #88 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
|
Quote:
4% + those who won't apply because of the long overdue new rules, a number that can't be captured in a tiny test in about a month. Let's be honest though, I've got no problem with this if it's even remotely close to revenue neutral.
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis |
|
08-26-2011, 02:25 PM | #89 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the yo'
|
I don't really care about this specific program.
But when like a million births per year are done on Medicaid and an alarming amount of kids are on food assistance, something needs to change in this country. |
08-26-2011, 02:40 PM | #90 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: PDX
|
Are these folks being refused benefits for testing positive for alcohol or cigarettes? As ridiculous as that sounds, I'm sure the number of welfare recipients abusing alcohol far outweighs those abusing illegal drugs, and smoking is an incredible waste of resources with no benefit, that has the potential to exponentially increase the recipient's healthcare costs. I'm not a big fan of the testing plan in the first place, but it seems like a pretty mixed message if you can swill a fifth of whiskey every day, burn through three packs of smokes, and you're cool in the state's eyes.
Really, the point I take from these results is the critical flaw in this process that (apparently) very few non-users realize: it's not hard to pass a drug test. Many hard drugs leave your system in the course of a few hours. There are a wide variety of masking agents available for purchase from your local "tobacco shop", with variable success rates. There are a wide variety of synthetic "substitution" products that have near 100% success rates. According to these results, either welfare recipients aren't using drugs even at a rate that is comparable to the national average, or an incredibly high percentage of those that are using drugs know how to beat the test. Either way, it seems like a pretty inefficient way to spend state monies, in tough times.
__________________
Last edited by thesloppy : Today at 05:35 PM. Last edited by thesloppy : 08-26-2011 at 02:41 PM. |
08-26-2011, 02:44 PM | #91 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Seattle
|
|
08-26-2011, 02:50 PM | #92 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: San Diego via Sausalito via San Jose via San Diego
|
Quote:
I don't think they're extinct. I think they are hiding from the tea party. The tea party are like the Terminators, they don't feel any compassion, they have no remorse, there's no bargaining with them, there's no reasoning with them.
__________________
I'm no longer a Chargers fan, they are dead to me Coming this summer to a movie theater near you: The Adventures of Jedikooter: Part 4 |
|
08-26-2011, 03:09 PM | #93 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Buffalo, NY
|
Thats because they're fucking nutcases. Most people described the way you just did the Tea Party are institutionalized.
|
08-26-2011, 03:46 PM | #94 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: PDX
|
I've come to a kind of "chicken or the egg" understanding of the Tea Party. I think that "this stuff is MINE and I gotta protect it" is a lot more prevalent in the whole world today, but the Tea Party is just the most obvious about their actions and motivations. I see just as many of my supposedly 'liberal' friends pulling the same kind of "circle your wagons" mentality in terms of finances, and being just as rabidly stubborn or exclusionary in their social politics. I think that the Tea Party is just another result of that (maybe post 9/11?) paranoid attitude that has affected our entire country in recent years, rather than a fount/source of crazy representing only a few wackos.
As much as I don't particularly care for the specifics of what the Tea Party represents, it also makes me uncomfortable to see them repeatedly presented as out-of-touch nuts, because at their roots I don't think they're that far removed from any other American who's just been simply scared by the financial/geopolitical uncertainties of the last decade. I don't think it does the rest of us, on either side, any good to pretend they're the only crazy ones, and then be just as rabid about wishing them away. ...all of which is neither hear nor there, and doesn't have much to do with the thread at hand. Man, I am turning into my rambling ol' grandad.
__________________
Last edited by thesloppy : Today at 05:35 PM. Last edited by thesloppy : 08-26-2011 at 03:53 PM. |
08-26-2011, 04:05 PM | #95 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: San Diego via Sausalito via San Jose via San Diego
|
It's their absolutist, racist, historical revisionist, constitutional revisionist, gay hating agenda that is the problem. They get the brunt of the vitriol because of how much they have forced themselves out into the public eye. They wanted the publicity, they got it. What comes with publicity, always has the potential for backlash. For the lines that they've drawn in the sand, they deserve the ridicule that they've brought upon themselves. You speak like a crazy person, you deserve to be treated like a crazy person. It's that simple to me. And that treatment goes for any group or person regardless of their political leanings.
Are there other groups from the other side of the political spectrum? You bet. The big difference is, they don't have a candidate trying to win a major party presidential nomination. The other difference is, I can't name one other group other than the tea party, from any side of the political fence, that is like the tea party. Granted, I'm not one to really keep up with fringe groups unless they've been getting media attention. Their latest claim to fame: "Hey, at least we're not as disliked as NAMBLA". Sane people would see a problem with that and make the needed changes.
__________________
I'm no longer a Chargers fan, they are dead to me Coming this summer to a movie theater near you: The Adventures of Jedikooter: Part 4 |
08-26-2011, 04:36 PM | #96 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: PDX
|
That's a fair point. While I've met equally loony individuals of every and any stripe, none of them have mobilized their combined lunacy/paranoia. I still stand by the assertion that the response/reaction to the Tea Party is nearly as paranoid and divisively angry as the Tea Party themselves, and that nothing good can come from continually fostering that kind of political/social conflict. That said, I'm certainly not scolding anyone for not wanting/being able to ignore the Tea Party, or their political nemesis of choice.....easier said than done, and all that....and I don't wanna suggest that folks shouldn't be put on the hook for their own idiocy....it's just disheartening to see that the only answer to people getting angry and scared, is getting angry and scared. Considering history, I guess I can't really claim to be surprised, but perhaps I can still maintain a little shock that political discourse actually seems to be getting worse and less sophisticated as our society advances
__________________
Last edited by thesloppy : Today at 05:35 PM. Last edited by thesloppy : 08-26-2011 at 04:40 PM. |
08-26-2011, 05:04 PM | #97 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: San Diego via Sausalito via San Jose via San Diego
|
I've got to give them credit though. They got noticed and have outlasted their 15 minutes of fame, while a lot of other groups lose steam or just fade away.
Me personally though, sometimes you can't really coddle groups like the tea party with niceties. Sometimes good old fashioned uncensored criticism and mockery is the answer. There's just certain groups that have earned the right to sit down and have a civil conversation with and there's some that have not. Well, hopefully, some well thought out, factually based, sane arguments against groups like the tea party is what prevails. Unfortunately, they tend to get drowned out by the more sensational stuff and that's what gets picked up by the media.
__________________
I'm no longer a Chargers fan, they are dead to me Coming this summer to a movie theater near you: The Adventures of Jedikooter: Part 4 |
08-26-2011, 06:23 PM | #98 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
Quote:
I've always viewed the Tea Party as that uncle (cousin,brother-in-law,neighbor...take your pick) who, while brilliantly succinct in his opinions at times, is also a bit off. He engages you with his view of stupid crap the government does...which you agree with. Then notes all of the waste going on at the DMV...which you have seen as well. Then comments how we shouldn't even be fighting wars for people who don't want us there...and you nod in agreement. Then drops the hammer by stating we should nuke the middle east or something...and you are so disappointed that you actually agreed with the rest of his observations that you now must re-evaluate all of your personal opinions as you couldn't possibly hold the same opinion as the crazy guy. |
|
08-26-2011, 07:09 PM | #99 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
|
Quote:
You're right that this doesn't fix the problem, having people who can't afford kids having less is. Last edited by RainMaker : 08-26-2011 at 07:15 PM. |
|
08-26-2011, 07:48 PM | #100 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
And getting people jobs.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|