Werewolf XXXIX: The Lady of La Rochelle–GAME OVER.

[Fouts]

14 players left

Players we have some role information about;
2 st.cronin
6 Lathum
9 Blade6119
12 Fouts
21 Dubb93

Semi-cleared due to night actions;
18 LoneStarGirl
20 hoopsguy

Players we have no role information on;
3 DaddyTorgo
4 Jonathan Ezarik
5 path12
8 Tyrith
11 ntndeacon
14 BrianD
15 Coffee Warlord

[Blade6119]

Originally Posted by dubb93

That is the whole hangup. Unless I'm missing something there is no way Blade scanned Hoops on night 1. I guess his story could pass in that he never visited Hoops, but I have information telling me that if the person a send a lady of the night to is scanned by a seer that scan attempt will be blocked. And in the same breathe Blade is claiming to have scanned hoops on a night he was with one of my ladies.

I think alan was the seer, one who would investigate their rooms while they slept. I am a partial seer, and my knowledge does not pertain to myself or my servant visiting any players.

As i said, i have spoken what i can...if you still deny the honesty of my claims accept my duel and let the blade decide who speaks most earnestly(or pistol i suppose)

[Fouts]

Originally Posted by dubb93

I'm thinking I may just have to step up and pimp slap Blade. I'm going to think about this over a smoke. I'm retiring to my quarters for a bit.

Your call. On one hand his story sounds plausible, but blade has been known to make up stories.

On the other hand, how many seers do we have? Alan was the investigator.

[Blade6119]

Fouts was the duke(move the lynch to whomever you want), lathum a partial duke...

Alan was the seer, i amd a partial seer.

You are calling me a liar, and i have challenged you to a duel. That is what this all amounts to.

[Blade6119]

I expect him to accept, though i dont think he is bad...such is though, i dont think you can rescind challenges

[dubb93]

Originally Posted by Blade6119

As i said, i have spoken what i can...if you still deny the honesty of my claims accept my duel and let the blade decide who speaks most earnestly(or pistol i suppose)

I don't deny that either Hoops are LSG are musketeers. In fact, before you posted anything about hoops post night action I came out and said that Hoops was not implicated by me last night. Night one he was with a lady and 2 die. Night two he was with no lady of mine and 2 die(unless you count Sun, but he was killed trying to kill so I don't count him in my numbers here).

Our information vibes Blade and I think you are telling the truth about Hoops atleast. My only fear is you are a seer for the musketeers, but I will say:

Today Blade, neither of us will find a final resting place by the others blade. I cannot risk killing you in the event that you are telling the truth. Prehaps tomorrow we will test our skills against each other. I deny your request to duel today.

[Fouts]

Originally Posted by dubb93

Our information vibes Blade and I think you are telling the truth about Hoops atleast. My only fear is you are a seer for the musketeers, but I will say:

Quite possible. Each side gets a duke type and a seer type. That seems like game balance to me.

[Mr. Wednesday]

Boo on being dead on night 2.

I'm going to withhold well-wishes (or evil-wishes) in deference to the lack of information that Gram provided about my role.

[DaddyTorgo]

off to bed. i'll be at work tomorrow till 5:30/6pm EST so I won't be posting till around 7pm EST or so likely (dinner and such).

[dubb93]

Originally Posted by Fouts

Quite possible. Each side gets a duke type and a seer type. That seems like game balance to me.

Is it really possible that the other musketeers are Blade and either you or Lathum? Seems unlikely to me.

[Fouts]

Originally Posted by dubb93

Is it really possible that the other musketeers are Blade and either you or Lathum? Seems unlikely to me.

Me too. That would be too easy. We don't know anything about half the people in this game.

[Blade6119]

If there is a third seer(cronin?), scan me tonight. Save me the trouble of disposing with dubb tomorrow.

[dubb93]

Originally Posted by Blade6119

Save me the trouble of disposing with dubb tomorrow.

Blade, I am going to warn you, you challenge me again for any reason and I will accept. That to me will tell me all I need to know about your agenda. I declined not for fear of your laughable skills, but to keep a seer around in the event you are one. I must warn you I am outstanding with my blade.

[Blade6119]

As am i, so it would surely make for an interesting duel. You said tomorrow we might test our skills against each other...if your honest about your sword skills, we can ill afford to lose a great swordsman(and that means either of us). I want any other role that can check me to do so tonight so we can avoid the need to blood tomorrow between us.

[hoopsguy]

I don't believe I have ever received this much backing in a game. Which means I'm a dead man on Night 3.

All in all, a very strong night for the Guard. We took out the brutal wolf, as well as a probable neutral/sympathizer role.

No visitors last night, so I'm hoping others can come forward with info. I'm also very interested in taking a look at voting records to see where SnDvls threw his vote. I'm guessing the muskateers were trying to avoid bunching, so without knowing much in terms of true trust lists right now I'll be looking there to try and form "lack of associations" if that makes sense.

I'm going to be slammed with meetings today, but will be online with the little bit of time I do have before heading home for the day. So please don't take my (relative) quiet play as a sign that I'm ducking anything.

[Barkeep49]

I knew I'd do OK in a sword fight.

[BrianD]

Hey all, I'm probably out most of the day today working on a project at work. I'll try to jump on once or twice, but I probably won't be here until about 6:30 or 7:00 EST.

Too bad because it looks like today will be interesting.

[SnDvls]

well it was fun...I might last until night 3/4 one of these games

[Coffee Warlord]

Originally Posted by Fouts

Quite possible. Each side gets a duke type and a seer type. That seems like game balance to me.

Why on earth would the musketeers need a seer?

[Lathum]

I'll be gone most of the day but I wanted to do a quick write up

Trusted:
Lathum
Fouts( I know I am good so my assumption is he is also)
Blade
Dubb
Hoops
LSG ( hoops and LSG were vouched by blade)

Unknown:
St. Cronin- yet to really be a part of the game

Not trusted
Jonathan- been pushing for things that would help the wolves
DT- no real feel for him
Path-unsure but has made some comments that got my attention
Tyriyh-started all that trouble with Dubb, my least likely wolf candidate
CW- been pretty nuetrual
BrianD been kind of UTR but IMO thats not a huge crime


IMO Jonathan is my candidate today. HE has been pushing for things that will help the wolves such as duels, etc...

unless some new info comes forward

vote jonathan

[Lathum]

dola- I'll be gona most of the afternoon.

[SnDvls]

Originally Posted by Barkeep49

I knew I'd do OK in a sword fight.

you should have brought a gun too

[Tyrith]

Well, I might be the only person around today with all these people gone all day :P

I didn't have anything interesting happen last night.

[Alan T]

Originally Posted by Tyrith

Well, I might be the only person around today with all these people gone all day :P

I didn't have anything interesting happen last night.

I'm here all day! (rotting away)

[Tyrith]

Random questions:

-What do we think barkeep's role means?

-Who killed Mr.W? The bad guys didn't get two sword kills night one, but there was that whole double targeting Alan thing...

[Jonathan Ezarik]

That's two days in a row where I'm the first one voted against. Yea me!

I'm not looking to turn this into another day of Lathum v. Fouts (even though I think one of them is evil), so I'm going to ignore his vote against me.

I'm trusting Blade right now. This might come back and bite me in the buttocks, but I find it hard to believe a musketeer would actually admit to being a former musketeer. And his story makes some sense to me.

I'm also trusting Dubb. And because of that, I'm voting against path today. Path claimed that someone visited him the other night, but it wasn't Dubb who sent the visitor. Is it possible that Dubb's role is duplicated? Could be, but I doubt it. If someone steps forward and vouches for him, I'll reconsider. But for now,

VOTE PATH

[ntndeacon]

I like your trusted list Lathum as it pretty muchgels with mine. I am going to vote in a different direction though. Daddy Torgo and Tyrith have been after me both days so far with Tyrith starting the voting against me both days. However the thing that really stands out about their crusade is Daddy Torgo's claims yesterday that I had not given any pertinent information. Those were untrue claims as I wasn't that UTR in day one, and came up with a couple of interesting possiblilities. Whether his mistatements were based out of ignorance or malice ido not know but I definately have someone to vote for today.

Vote Daddy Torgo

[BrianD]

Did anyone else get a special visitor last night (other than Barkeep)? We supposedly had two on night 1, but only Dubb admitted sending a visitor. Should we be looking at Path today, or did someone else get a visitor?

[Jonathan Ezarik]

Originally Posted by Tyrith

Random questions:

-What do we think barkeep's role means?

-Who killed Mr.W? The bad guys didn't get two sword kills night one, but there was that whole double targeting Alan thing...

I think Barkeep's studying to be a fencing master was an attempt to level up.

It's possible that the Order killed Mr. W because he was British scum, but if so, how did they find out? Or was this another kill by the Musketeers. Izulde's throat was slashed (SnDvls possibly?) while Mr. W had a sword hole in his throat. Using a sword to murder someone seems rather clumsy to me. Why not use your dagger?

[Tyrith]

Level up to what was the question, Jonathan :P

[Jonathan Ezarik]

Go from being good at fencing to Unbeatable, I guess.

[path12]

I would like M. Grammaticus to know that I much prefered my night 1 visitor to last night's.

[Tyrith]

Path, explica!

[path12]

Originally Posted by Tyrith

Path, explica!

Well, night 1 was a beautiful woman. Last night was a midget of indeterminate sex wearing a dress. Suffice to say I was not satisfied.

I am almost positive that dubb is not the one sending these guests to me. I still do not know who is, however.

I also have no idea where to go with a vote, unlike yesterday when I correctly named the bad guy in the Fouts voters. I lean trust on dubb, hoops, lsg, fouts and lathum.

So that said:

VOTE HOOPSGUY

My mind cannot be changed.

[Tyrith]

Some sort of mind control?

[Tyrith]

Dola, or possibly blackmail?

[path12]

I don't think I can comment on either of those incredibly astute guesses.

[Jonathan Ezarik]

Originally Posted by path12

I lean trust on dubb, hoops, lsg, fouts and lathum.

So that said:

VOTE HOOPSGUY

My mind cannot be changed.

You trust him but are voting for him?

[path12]

Originally Posted by Jonathan Ezarik

You trust him but are voting for him?

Odd, isn't it? My mind cannot be changed.

[Tyrith]

No one has voted for two confirmed good guys yet. I'd rather use the day 2 votes as my determinant because of how day 1 works in general. I also want to start working on the group of unknowns that I happen to be in myself, so I'm going to vote for someone who has voted for a confirmed good, the person I trust the most right now, and hasn't had much pressure put on them yet.

VOTE COFFEE WARLORD

[SnDvls]

Originally Posted by path12

I would like M. Grammaticus to know that I much prefered my night 1 visitor to last night's.

LOL

[Tyrith]

Path, that must have been one horrific experience last night if this is what happens afterwards :P

[path12]

Originally Posted by Tyrith

Path, that must have been one horrific experience last night if this is what happens afterwards :P

Believe me, M. Tyrith, although I chased the beast from my quarters immediately, I have been trying to block the incident from my memory ever since.

I do hope that someone goes back to my comment yesterday morning regarding M. AlanT.

[Coffee Warlord]

Originally Posted by Tyrith

No one has voted for two confirmed good guys yet. I'd rather use the day 2 votes as my determinant because of how day 1 works in general. I also want to start working on the group of unknowns that I happen to be in myself, so I'm going to vote for someone who has voted for a confirmed good, the person I trust the most right now, and hasn't had much pressure put on them yet.

Not a big deal, but I voted Anxiety day 2, and made it abundantly clear why I did. Despite the fact he turned out to be on our side (unless that secret order thing is a third faction of some sort with their own agenda), I still will find anyone gunning for Fouts highly suspect.

[Tyrith]

Originally Posted by Coffee Warlord

Not a big deal, but I voted Anxiety day 2, and made it abundantly clear why I did. Despite the fact he turned out to be on our side (unless that secret order thing is a third faction of some sort with their own agenda), I still will find anyone gunning for Fouts highly suspect.

I know. But I ain't got anything better going on right now.

[Coffee Warlord]

Like I said, not a big deal. But I support my decisions, even when I'm wrong.

Frankly, I'm at a loss at where to go from here as well. I do wonder about that late pile on vote last night, however. A lot of votes were moved fairly rapidly, which is always cause for concern.

No one right now is really sticking out as a major candidate. Blade seems to be on the up and up (although isn't he supposed to die from a sectoid rifle sometime soon?), hoops is awfully quiet. From what dubb has posted/done, and the responses from other players on his actions, I think he's my most trusted person right now, followed by Fouts.

[Jonathan Ezarik]

Originally Posted by path12

I do hope that someone goes back to my comment yesterday morning regarding M. AlanT.

I have been thinking about this, but I can't see where it leads. Was your vote yesterday against SnDvls your own choosing, or were you talked into it like today's vote?

[path12]

Originally Posted by Jonathan Ezarik

I have been thinking about this, but I can't see where it leads. Was your vote yesterday against SnDvls your own choosing, or were you talked into it like today's vote?

I could have been persuaded to move elsewhere from the SnDvls vote.

[Jonathan Ezarik]

UNVOTE PATH

I'm not sure what's going on with him, but I'm going to take him at his word and see how things go.

[LoneStarGirl]

My first instinct is to vote for Path, but he is acting really weird, so I am going to stay away from him. Thanks for clearing my Blade. ITs hard to clear yourself when you have nothing special to your name. I am an above average fighter and cannot resist a duel, so hopefully I will be called to duel soon so I can prove myself.