12-02-2010, 05:22 PM | #101 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
|
It's kind of a real stretch to call Azerbaijan a Middle East country. I mean, they are up in the Caucasus!
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages" -Tennessee Williams |
12-02-2010, 05:25 PM | #102 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
|
Quote:
I thought it was basically known that the Salt Lake City Olympics had huge bribes going on. It caused people to resign when it became outed: 2002 Winter Olympic bid scandal - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia That is the reason Romney was hired to head the Olympic Committee, to clean it up.
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages" -Tennessee Williams |
|
12-02-2010, 05:57 PM | #103 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Where Hip Hop lives
|
Quote:
I'm well aware of the SLC bribery scandals. Take a look at the chain of posts that lead up to my exchange. GE says the US didn't bribe the voters enough, noting that even though FIFA the organization would make money hand over fist having the Cup in the US, the voters themselves would not get anything. To which Abe responded that that's BS because the SLC bid was accepted because of money. This actually makes no sense no matter how you read it, because if Abe is talking about the SLC bribes, he's actually agreeing with GE (USA didn't offer up as much money to the voters as Qatar). But clearly he's not agreeing. Which can only mean he's saying the SLC bid was awarded because of all the money the IOC could make from a US Olympics. But then that doesn't make sense because, A) GE was talking about bribes, and B) clearly that wasn't true today--FIFA ignored the US money windfall to go with Qatar. That's why I asked Abe to clarify because his response didn't make sense either way that you interpreted it.
__________________
. . I would rather be wrong...Than live in the shadows of your song...My mind is open wide...And now I'm ready to start...You're not sure...You open the door...And step out into the dark...Now I'm ready. |
|
12-02-2010, 06:58 PM | #104 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: St. Louis
|
A late arrival to this thread but I haven't seen this question asked. How exactly did the USA become a "soccer country" worthy of hosting soccer's biggest event? I know a lot of the people in this thread are big soccer fans... great but this country isn't. I would say it goes NFL, MLB, college football, college basketball, NBA, NHL, golf, soccer. Sure we have the money and stadiums but we don't have the fans.
|
12-02-2010, 07:01 PM | #105 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hog Country
|
You are aware we have hosted it before, right?
|
12-02-2010, 07:03 PM | #106 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: St. Louis
|
|
12-02-2010, 07:04 PM | #107 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Out of Grad School Hell :)
|
Quote:
History would refute that. If I'm not mistaken, the 1994 was the most attended WC in history. It's obviously not just the host country fans that attend, but our infrastructure allows for fans from all over the world to get here, and travel around rather easily.
__________________
“I don’t like the Cubs,” Joey Votto said. “And I’m not going to pat anybody with a Cubs uniform on the back." |
|
12-02-2010, 07:18 PM | #108 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
Quote:
I think I'd put NASCAR ahead of soccer, and probably golf and the NHL too. But we do have a shitload of people here, and I'm sure we could fill up any stadium for a world cup game - but ticket sales are not FIFA's priority. (And I think Qatar will do fine ticket-wise, they're going to blow the world away with obnoxious presentation, and people in the region, and Europe, will flood there to see it). |
|
12-02-2010, 07:19 PM | #109 | |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2005
|
Quote:
Yeah, 1994 was the most attended WC in history even though the format changed from 24 to 32 teams (with two more groups so twelve extra games) in 1998. |
|
12-02-2010, 07:26 PM | #110 | |
Strategy Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: North Carolina
|
Quote:
You've already been smacked down with data. But i'll pile on. You're totally wrong. 94 is STILL the highest attended WC ever, and that's with 12 fewer games than all tournaments since. If we host again we will shatter that record and set one that will be unbreakable by any other nation in it's place. USA bought the most tickets of any traveling nation for South Africa 2010. |
|
12-02-2010, 07:28 PM | #111 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
Quote:
Is that just because we used football stadiums? I have no idea what the typical capacity is for a foreign soccer venue, just asking. |
|
12-02-2010, 07:29 PM | #112 | |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: St. Louis
|
Quote:
But they still chose Qatar, right? And everyone in this thread seems to think the only expanation is bribes. I happen to think its because soccer is a second class sport in this country. |
|
12-02-2010, 07:37 PM | #113 | |
Strategy Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: North Carolina
|
Quote:
1. How closely do you follow world soccer? This is relevant to the discussion, trust me. 2. "Spreading the game" is one of FIFA's main reasons for taking it to places like USA (94), Japan/Korea (2002) and Qatar (2022). They want to turn parts of the world into soccer fans, or give them a big boost in doing so. For example, Major League Soccer has now been around for 15 years. Almost every team has built it's own stadium in that time. It's gone from something literally started out of obligation in order to get the World Cup to a stable league that is clawing out a larger piece of the pie year over year. It's now up to 18 teams and commading $40 million expansion fees. Despite the people who know nothing about it and expect it to fold every day, the league isn't going anywhere. Korea and Japan both have reputable leagues (all very much in the same level of MLS really). Korea's had been around a bit, but Japan was another league basically formed in order to secure the world cup. 3. It's arguable at this point that the USA is sort of ready to take it to the next level, and become a true power in world soccer. We have a league that will be sporting 20+ stable teams by 2022. We have teams that have David Beckham, Thierry Henry, Rafael Marquez in the starting lineups. The US National Team clearly was fully in the mainstream sports spotlight during it's world cup run. TV viewership was at an all-time high for the past world cup. Not only could the US bid, as is, guarantee the biggest payday out there, but it could reasonably be expect to help further the long-term growth in what could eventually by one of the premier markets for consumption of soccer, period. |
|
12-02-2010, 07:44 PM | #114 | |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: St. Louis
|
Quote:
I follow soccer and I would have enjoyed if the World Cup were here. I just don't see everything through the red, white, and blue glasses. The US is not a soccer country. We appear to have a difference of opinion on this. All I will say is that the United States wasn't chosen and I think this is why. |
|
12-02-2010, 07:47 PM | #115 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
Quote:
That being said, outside of the home country of South Africa, more tickets to this year's world cup were sold to US citizens then those of any other nation. |
|
12-02-2010, 09:12 PM | #116 | |
Strategy Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: North Carolina
|
Quote:
This isn't about the US not getting it. It's about what an astoundingly insane decision it is to give it to Qatar. The British Media is not outraged that Russia got it, nor is anyone else. It's a pretty logicial move. Qatar on the other hand doesn't even remotely make sense in the sense of FIFA's "legacy" decisions. There will be no legacy. The stadiums are temporary, and the nation has a citizien population of what...a few hundred thousand? Any other country made a great deal more sense, and the fact that Australia was bounced in the very first round of balloting is at a minimum, bizzare. |
|
12-02-2010, 09:16 PM | #117 |
Strategy Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: North Carolina
|
This is without even getting into the socio-political stuff like women's rights, gay rights, workers rights.... etc.
Qatar is a mind-boggling decision. Period. |
12-02-2010, 09:18 PM | #118 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mays Landing, NJ USA
|
Quote:
+1 |
|
12-02-2010, 09:24 PM | #119 | |
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
Quote:
I think this is a misleading stat. A quick glance of the 32 teams tells me we have a population of roughly 200 million more people than any other county except Brazil. |
|
12-02-2010, 09:25 PM | #120 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Catonsville, MD
|
Quote:
There are sevreal reasons, but obviously some are upset that we lost. Same with the Rio win over us in the Olympics bis. 1). The last world cup was here just 16 years ago, and just 8 years ago in Korea and Japan. That leaves only two bids that are new. f the two, I'd go ith Australia first, but the time differential is awful for Europe. 2). At the end of the day, Fifa is a non-profit. Comments about the wealth gained from commercials, tickets, and stadium attendance don't mean as much to a non-profit. 3). Qatar's bid included some really special tech. Pushing the tech aspect of the game has got to be a priority. 4). The US presentation suffered some flaws. Clinton went off topic and talked about his non profit work, Freeman miscued and skipped a page. 5). The stadiums built by Qatar will be donated to poor countries that need state of the art stadiums. That's a really good point, and something no one else has in their bid. The American bid is all about how much money they'd make. Even our claim that we are diverse boiled down to "So we'll fill the stadium". The Qatar bid is all about how other poor soccer nations can get world class venues. 6). Despite all of the comments about how hard it was to pull off, the South Africa World Cup was a success from most respects. It was historic and I think they felt good about going somewhere else off kilter as well.
__________________
Check out my two current weekly Magic columns! https://www.coolstuffinc.com/a/?action=search&page=1&author[]=Abe%20Sargent Last edited by Abe Sargent : 12-02-2010 at 09:27 PM. |
|
12-02-2010, 09:27 PM | #121 |
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
dola- I agree Qatar is an absurd decision.
|
12-02-2010, 09:33 PM | #122 | |
Strategy Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: North Carolina
|
Quote:
how is that a misleading stat? it's a once every four-years event with a finite number of tickets. How else would you propose such a stat be tracked? Raw numbers are all that matter for a one-time event, not the relative % of a nation attending games in a foreign country - it would be negligible for every one of them, i'm sure. |
|
12-02-2010, 09:40 PM | #123 |
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
I don't follow your logic.
A Nation of 300 Million + has a much larger pool of potential buyers than a nation of 50 million. Seems logical they would purchase a larger number of tickets. That doesn't even factor in economic feasibility, even in a recession US consumers have more ,money than most nations. It also seems to me the average US soccer fan likely has a higher income. Again, all this is off the top of my head. |
12-02-2010, 09:51 PM | #124 |
College Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Kalamazoo, MI
|
|
12-02-2010, 09:54 PM | #125 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
|
I wish it was in the US too, but you guys realize the rest of the world doesn't exactly live and breath Americana right (ie, DT's "who the fuck is going to travel there?" bit)? The US hosted it in 1994 - and generally, there's at least a 30 year gap before the same country hosts it again. IE - Germany had to wait 32 years (and soccer is the primary sport there), Italy waited 60 years, etc etc. I mean, FIFA is definitely a joke, but this wasn't the US' "right" or anything similar.
Australia is the legitimate candidate that got screwed here |
12-02-2010, 10:17 PM | #126 |
College Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Kalamazoo, MI
|
Yeah, Australia's boned. They're probably looking at something around 2060-70 to have a legit shot again, since when it gets to Asia again, China will walk away with it.
|
12-02-2010, 10:21 PM | #127 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
Quote:
Depends on how you define success. SI just had an article about how those stadiums are not getting used (rugby teams don't want them due to no luxury boxes, soccer league in South Africa draws less than 1000 fans), and the government is going to be pissing away money to maintain them. |
|
12-02-2010, 10:45 PM | #128 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Catonsville, MD
|
Quote:
I was referring to it from FIFA's vantage point
__________________
Check out my two current weekly Magic columns! https://www.coolstuffinc.com/a/?action=search&page=1&author[]=Abe%20Sargent |
|
12-02-2010, 11:41 PM | #129 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
|
Quote:
Actually it makes perfect sense. The implication, as I saw it, in saying the US didn't bribe enough is that the US is above bribing people for hosting tournaments, when that's not the case at all.
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages" -Tennessee Williams |
|
12-02-2010, 11:48 PM | #130 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
|
Quote:
Well done. I think the tech thing really stood out (some of those stadium will be amazing) and the fact that Qatar is donating part of the stadiums to poor Arab countries will be a great way to build the game in the Middle East. That and a World Cup wants to be able to claim it truly is a 'world' game, which includes hosting it in a variety of locations.
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages" -Tennessee Williams |
|
12-02-2010, 11:51 PM | #131 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sydney, Australia
|
Only reason I have even heard of Qatar is that they are always one of the teams we have to beat to qualify for the world cup.
__________________
Politics, n. Strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles. --Ambrose Bierce |
12-02-2010, 11:59 PM | #132 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
|
So you don't follow the news at all, especially where the US would have briefings for the Iraq War? That may explain things.
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages" -Tennessee Williams |
12-03-2010, 12:07 AM | #133 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Minnesota
|
Seems like an interesting place to have the world cup. 110-120 degree heat during the time when this is going on. It doesnt sound like an ideal vacation spot to me.
Id end up a lobster. Last edited by jbergey22 : 12-03-2010 at 01:40 AM. |
12-03-2010, 12:42 AM | #134 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Whittier
|
|
12-03-2010, 01:31 AM | #135 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
Quote:
My comment was legit. I'm traveling with a Brit right now (Brit citizen living in Australia). It was his comment. None of the European soccer fans (who all love getting drunk and being rowdy and watching games) are going to want to go to Qatar he said.
__________________
Get bent whoever hacked my pw and changed my signature. |
|
12-03-2010, 03:00 AM | #136 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toledo - Spain
|
Russia and Quatar... no surprise as they can bribe more than the other countries right now, mafia and oil money ready to be expended.
Englad or Spain & Portugal that could host a WC tomorrow if needed as have already top soccer stadiums. Of course no new stadiums building means less money to go to FIFA pockets. FIFA is a corrupt joke as is the Olympics Organization. Yeah i'm bitter and probably biased.
__________________
Last edited by Icy : 12-03-2010 at 03:00 AM. |
12-03-2010, 03:01 AM | #137 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Newbury, England
|
Quote:
You're right, but the other factor is I think the British media have realised that their actions/attitudes did not help our cause in any way whatsoever, and are trying to wind their necks in a little [although we still seeing stories of how the voting process is unfair, blah blah blah])
__________________
'A song is a beautiful lie', Idlewild, Self Healer. When you're smiling, the whole world smiles with you. Sports! |
|
12-03-2010, 04:12 AM | #138 |
Dark Cloud
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
Qatar makes no sense. Ditch the US if you want, but there is absolutely no way the decision makes any sense at all. Luckily, it's nearly 11 yrs away. both votes scream oil money.
__________________
FBCB / FPB3 Mods |
12-03-2010, 06:50 AM | #139 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: San Jose, CA
|
Australia should have been the pick. Qatar is small time and the US had one less than two decades ago.
__________________
Look into the mind of a crazy man (NSFW) http://www.whitepowerupdate.wordpress.com |
12-03-2010, 08:02 AM | #140 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Parañaque, Philippines
|
Quote:
The tech thing definitely stood out. Of course, it doesn't hurt that Doha is just a beautiful city to visit. A friend works overseas in Doha, and he says that the nightlife is great if you've got the cash to spend. Next to Dubai, it's 2nd on my list of Middle East cities my fiance and I are considering going to.
__________________
Come and see. Last edited by Neon_Chaos : 12-03-2010 at 08:05 AM. |
|
12-03-2010, 08:56 AM | #141 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Arlington, VA
|
Quote:
I add the US to this as well, and I wonder what effect this has AGAINST their bids. Every time it looked like South Africa may not be able to pull it off, you'd see some press talk about making a late shift to the US because it has the stadium, travel and security infrastructure to handle a huge event like this with little advanced notice. Does anyone else think that a FIFA voter might have looked at it like "I'm going to vote for Russia and Qatar because they are new venues and would have a big regional impact for soccer if they can pull it off; and, if either of them F it up, we've still got the UK/US able to step up?" |
|
12-03-2010, 09:55 AM | #142 |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Location, Location, Location
|
Why was the bid from England and not from Great Britain? Including Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland so games could have been played in Edinburgh, Glasgow and Belfast (what's a big city in Wales?) seems much more attractive to the world in general. Making a joint bid that included Ireland (Dublin) would have been even smarter.
An England=only bid gave the finger to Scotland, did it not? And why are Scotland, Wales and No Ireland allowed to have 'national' teams in soccer when the Olympics -- rightly-- only recognize Great Britain? The selfishness of the England-only bid is offensive, and reason enough to toss it out the door at first sight.
__________________
"The case of Great Britain is the most astonishing in this matter of inequality of rights in world soccer championships. The way they explained it to me as a child, God is one but He's three: Father, Son and Holy Ghost. I could never understand it. And I still don't understand why Great Britain is one but she's four....while [others] continue to be no more than one despite the diverse nationalities that make them up." Eduardo Galeano, SOCCER IN SUN AND SHADOW Last edited by OldGiants : 12-03-2010 at 09:56 AM. |
12-03-2010, 10:17 AM | #143 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
|
England, Scotland, etc have always been seperate in football. I don't think that was the reason people voted against the English.
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages" -Tennessee Williams |
12-03-2010, 10:32 AM | #144 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Maassluis, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
|
Oh well, at least we beat England in the voting.
__________________
* 2005 Golden Scribe winner for best FOF Dynasty about IHOF's Maassluis Merchantmen * Former GM of GEFL's Houston Oilers and WOOF's Curacao Cocktail |
12-03-2010, 11:07 AM | #145 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Nov 2003
|
The English FA doesn't necessarily get on with the Welsh and Scottish FA's so that's probably a big reason why. A bid that included the Millenium Stadium in Wales and Hampden & Ibrox/Celtic Park in Scotland might have been more attractive in terms of stadia and location but like ISiddiqui says above, wouldn't have really made a difference I don't think.
These WC's were going to "new", developing markets whether we like it or not I think. Going to be a while before traditional markets like the US and UK get another shot now. |
12-03-2010, 11:30 AM | #146 | |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Location, Location, Location
|
Quote:
I didn't mean to imply that doing this would have gotten England the bid, simply pointing out that this was not the bid of a country (or joint bid) but only a bid from one part of Great Britain. There is no reason to have Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland on an equal basis with 'real' countries. There is no need for separate FAs in those tiny places, nor any reason for the rest of the world to have to allow sections of Great Britain to compete on an equal footing with nations. The time to remove automatic Champs League -- even at the preliminary stage -- from No Ireland, Wales and Scotland is now. No way are they sovereign nation states deserving of special treatment. I understand this was really an English FA bid, but there should not be a separate English FA. It should represent all Great Britain, just like in the Olympics.
__________________
"The case of Great Britain is the most astonishing in this matter of inequality of rights in world soccer championships. The way they explained it to me as a child, God is one but He's three: Father, Son and Holy Ghost. I could never understand it. And I still don't understand why Great Britain is one but she's four....while [others] continue to be no more than one despite the diverse nationalities that make them up." Eduardo Galeano, SOCCER IN SUN AND SHADOW |
|
12-03-2010, 11:35 AM | #147 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Newbury, England
|
Quote:
This is very much an outsiders view looking in . Nothing wrong with that view, but it will never happen in team sports for a multitude of historical, political and religious reasons.
__________________
'A song is a beautiful lie', Idlewild, Self Healer. When you're smiling, the whole world smiles with you. Sports! |
|
12-03-2010, 11:43 AM | #148 | |
Death Herald
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Le stelle la notte sono grandi e luminose nel cuore profondo del Texas
|
Quote:
But there is a pretty big difference between FIFA and the IOC. The rules of soccer are made by FIFA and the English, Welsh, Scottish, and Northern Ireland FAs. They make up the International Football Association Board.
__________________
Thinkin' of a master plan 'Cuz ain't nuthin' but sweat inside my hand So I dig into my pocket, all my money is spent So I dig deeper but still comin' up with lint |
|
12-03-2010, 02:46 PM | #149 | |
Quarterback
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: London, England
|
Quote:
There is no way that this would fly in Scotland. You should have heard the wailing from the press and fans when someone suggested a UK team should take part in the Olympic soccer tournament. FIFA has a number of member associations which are not sovereign nations. I think the only other one in Europe is the Faroe Islands, but there are a few more in Asia and the Americas. |
|
12-03-2010, 03:08 PM | #150 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Catonsville, MD
|
Quote:
There are a lot of parts of nations that compete as a part, and not as the whole. Examples below: Curacao Reunion Faeroe Islands Greenland Hong Kong Bermuda And that's just off my head
__________________
Check out my two current weekly Magic columns! https://www.coolstuffinc.com/a/?action=search&page=1&author[]=Abe%20Sargent |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|