02-19-2006, 10:00 PM | #101 |
College Starter
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: South Florida
|
We just need to pass legislation to prevent volcanos from erupting. Those suckers belch out more green house gasses in one eruption than mankind produces worldwide in a whole year. Problem solved.
|
02-19-2006, 11:27 PM | #102 | |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Seattle
|
Quote:
However, I think there are reasonable steps we can take reduce our impact - enforcing tougher gas mileage standards would be one area where we could start. But admittedly that's just one piece of a very large puzzle. And unfortunately, some "green" ideas out there don't end up producing a net reduction of greenhouse emmissions, so there is some understandable trepidation about jumping on the "green" bandwagon when it comes to policy. This is an issue that deserves sober, well-reasoned and well-critiqued attention. Unfortunately, that's not a trademark of our short attention span society... |
|
02-19-2006, 11:40 PM | #103 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Edinburg,TX
|
Dudes, global warming was easy to figure out. I did it long ago, it is not my problem if no one listens to me. Here it is....
Global warming is caused by our own frickin' body heat. There are now something like 7 billion people in the world, that's a lot more body heat then there used to be. And even though China and India are well over 1 billion each, the good old U.S. of A. is still the main problem. 1 obese American body heat = 15 Chinese/Indians body heat. It's all proven science my dudes. Stop farting, and god forbid stop making the 400 lb. guys get on the treadmill.
__________________
You Stole Fizzy Lifting drinks! You bumped into the ceiling which now has to be washed and steralized, so you get NOTHING! You lose! |
02-19-2006, 11:42 PM | #104 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Mexico
|
Quote:
Higher gas mileage would have positive economic benefits, I believe. But as I said before, there's a lot more ground to be gained by better enforcement of emission standards. You're telling me nobody can invent a cheap monitor that attaches to the exhaust and can be read by any police officer (instead of having to go to a gas station once a year or less)? Emissions tests right now yield tons of false negatives - those tests are very easy to beat. |
|
02-19-2006, 11:45 PM | #105 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Troy, NY
|
Quote:
Haha, so on the local news, when they show the obligatory 15-minute lead story on the winter storm, you're the guy shoveling gallons of water and loafs of bread into a shopping cart, and getting plywood to board up your windows.
__________________
Quis custodiets ipsos custodes? |
|
02-20-2006, 07:34 AM | #106 | |
High School Varsity
Join Date: Nov 2003
|
Quote:
It must hurt to be that wrong. The total annual CO2 output of all the volcanoes in the world matches only 1% of manmade CO2 output. (read the section titled Atmosphere) |
|
02-20-2006, 09:11 AM | #107 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Not Delaware - hurray!
|
Quote:
To be fair, greenhouse gases include more than just carbon dioxide. However, as you mentioned, man-made sources, by far, create more than natural sources. Interestingly, the decrease in sulfur dioxide emissions (which creates acid rain) has actually hastened the greenhouse effect. Apparently, sulfur dioxide in the atmosphere reflects heat back into space. Therefore, where they've decreased the amounts of sulfur dioxide the most (Great Lakes, the Northeast), they've seen more localized warming. Go figure!
__________________
She loves you, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah! She loves you, yeah! how do you know? how do you know? |
|
02-20-2006, 09:15 AM | #108 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Edinburg,TX
|
Body heat and farts. See, no one believes me.
__________________
You Stole Fizzy Lifting drinks! You bumped into the ceiling which now has to be washed and steralized, so you get NOTHING! You lose! |
02-20-2006, 06:29 PM | #109 | |
Mascot
Join Date: May 2003
|
Quote:
These research funds come from the government. And yes, it's true. If you mention that your research has something to do with Global Warming, you have a much better chance of being funded by the government. And it's true that private companies have their bias, but never forget that the government has its bias, and the government is a lot bigger than any private company. |
|
02-20-2006, 09:20 PM | #110 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Cary, NC
|
Quote:
One of the big scandals starting to break over the last 6 months or so is how much research is skewed or out-and-out falsified just to keep grant money coming in. The South Korean cloning researcher is probably the biggest example, but there have been a couple others and we're likely to see more...
__________________
-- Greg -- Author of various FOF utilities |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|