1983 FOOL Playoffs! - Page 3

ekcut · 11-10-2008, 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dark Cloud

No. Anyone who played with Valdosta would have the most. There are a few guys who played with St. Louis then later played with other teams, but I don't recall anyone with more than 4 or 5.

So yeah, those guys who played with you and then ended up in Napa have really racked up.

Ahhh, the good old days. I remember when Bosi (or was it catobase) automatically tracked the # of rings in OOTP 6.5

Alan T · 11-10-2008, 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ekcut

Ahhh, the good old days. I remember when Bosi (or was it catobase) automatically tracked the # of rings in OOTP 6.5

Probably cato.

Boy do I miss both cato and Bosi.. some of their various features are integrated into ootp now, but some things I wish were still around.

Anthony · 11-10-2008, 06:14 PM

that San Diego banner looks niiiiiice. i'm gonna have to get the Violators a nice banner in the next few years.

Anthony · 11-10-2008, 06:25 PM

i definitetely think this team is on a 3, 4 year tops timeframe for winning a championship. after that we gotta blow it up and start over. fortunately rebuilding only takes about 5 weeks in this league. lol

Tasan · 11-10-2008, 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anthony

i definitetely think this team is on a 3, 4 year tops timeframe for winning a championship. after that we gotta blow it up and start over. fortunately rebuilding only takes about 5 weeks in this league. lol

Unless you're on the muns plan, then you have 17 seasons of pain ahead.

I do not recommend the muns plan. The muns plan is bad.

Tasan · 11-10-2008, 06:45 PM

Well, except for the 7 straight winning seasons.

TimGuru · 11-10-2008, 07:40 PM

Congrats. Yay, CL!

Young Drachma · 11-10-2008, 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tasan

Well, except for the 7 straight winning seasons.

And two titles.

I'd rather get to the title series every year and lose, than finish second for 20 straight years.

The chance for a title is always better than coming close or being awful forever. Being in the hunt is always better.

ekcut · 11-10-2008, 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dark Cloud

And two titles.

I'd rather get to the title series every year and lose, than finish second for 20 straight years.

The chance for a title is always better than coming close or being awful forever. Being in the hunt is always better.

I'm getting there...4 straight 2nds and 6 in the past 8...

Commo_Soldier · 11-10-2008, 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ekcut

I'm getting there...4 straight 2nds and 6 in the past 8...

At least now second means something.

Anthony · 11-10-2008, 08:56 PM

i'd rather have a shot and come in 2nd and lose a lot and at leat be a consistent playoff team than have 2 championships and then not win anything for the next 30 years. sure, you'll always have those 2 rings, but ask any Raiders or Knicks fan if they care about the championship seasons from several decades ago now. both would rather not win another championship for the next 20 years but at least have a playoff caliber team. everyone is different, but in the end there can only be one winner so all but one team is gonna go home with nothing. in my book if you aren't gonna win a ring the next best thing is at least competing for one, rather than being on the outside looking in. everyone is different when it comes to this. no right or wrong answer.

Anthony · 11-10-2008, 08:56 PM

but yeah - at least now 2nd place means something and you still get to hang a banner in your park.

11-10-2008, 06:45 PM	#106
Tasan College Starter Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Houston, or there about	Well, except for the 7 straight winning seasons. __________________ 2011 Golden Scribes winner for best Interactive Dynasty

11-10-2008, 07:40 PM	#107
TimGuru High School Varsity Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Cape Cod, MA	Congrats. Yay, CL! __________________ FOOL: NY Panthers1974-88 ; Hyannis Patriots 2037-2055 hiatus FOOL-H: NY YANKEES 1903- FOOL-X: Cumberland Defenders 1985-

11-10-2008, 06:14 PM	#103
Anthony Banned Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Astoria, NY, USA	that San Diego banner looks niiiiiice. i'm gonna have to get the Violators a nice banner in the next few years.

11-10-2008, 06:25 PM	#104
Anthony Banned Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Astoria, NY, USA	i definitetely think this team is on a 3, 4 year tops timeframe for winning a championship. after that we gotta blow it up and start over. fortunately rebuilding only takes about 5 weeks in this league. lol

11-10-2008, 08:56 PM	#111
Anthony Banned Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Astoria, NY, USA	i'd rather have a shot and come in 2nd and lose a lot and at leat be a consistent playoff team than have 2 championships and then not win anything for the next 30 years. sure, you'll always have those 2 rings, but ask any Raiders or Knicks fan if they care about the championship seasons from several decades ago now. both would rather not win another championship for the next 20 years but at least have a playoff caliber team. everyone is different, but in the end there can only be one winner so all but one team is gonna go home with nothing. in my book if you aren't gonna win a ring the next best thing is at least competing for one, rather than being on the outside looking in. everyone is different when it comes to this. no right or wrong answer.

11-10-2008, 08:56 PM	#112
Anthony Banned Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Astoria, NY, USA	but yeah - at least now 2nd place means something and you still get to hang a banner in your park.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)