08-21-2006, 04:50 PM | #1751 | |
Unregistered
Join Date: May 2004
|
Quote:
I totally agree with the bolded part. I think his role reveal is a plot to get us off of the molson trail. I think he's banking that some people vote for molson and maybe 1 towards him, but that the majority of the votes go towards Gramm. I see it as a last minute tactic to save molson. |
|
08-21-2006, 04:53 PM | #1752 | |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
Quote:
Well, I have no real read on SnDvls at all, and as mentioned I am quite suspicious of Molson myself. I have actually voted for both SnDvls (Day 2) and Molson (Day 5, yesterday) in this game too for what it's worth. My reveal is certainly no vindication on their behalf. As for the Reimann, well I guess that's a possibility, I can't say that if I was on the other side I wouldn't suspect it myself. But if I were Reimann, I wouldn't have tried anything as bold as a fake reveal when there are still 10 players in the game. The odds are still most probably 70/30 we lynch a villager today, not even accounting for the informed votes of the wolves and Reimann. Surely the more sensible play would be to stay in the background and continue manipulation. Even if we do hit on a wolf today, I'd say the bad guys are still the favourites to win, so why risk it? |
|
08-21-2006, 04:56 PM | #1753 |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
dola
Also if I am lying why not come out and say Grammaticus is 100% a wolf? It would be pretty weak to fake-reveal that someone is maybe a wolf, at least from where I'm standing. |
08-21-2006, 04:57 PM | #1754 |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
double dola
And I really don't get why people are saying I'm saving Molson. 1) He isn't even in the lead at this point. 2) I VOTE FOR HIM YESTERDAY TO PUT HIM IN A TIE FOR THE LEAD. He was in second place, I vote and potentially place him in a tie, so he could have been potentially lynched by the Masons if things stayed as they were. As it happened of course Grammaticus SWITCHED HIS VOTE KILLED A VILLAGER. |
08-21-2006, 04:59 PM | #1755 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
Quote:
true. and with Barkeep's math (posted earlier) voting for Gram, even if it's a setup, may be the best option. If Gram turns up good then we have just lost 2 players but are still up 5-3 and then know that tangle is bad and lynch him and end up 4-2 at the end of that day (presuming tangle is a wolf and the wolves don't kill reiman...although I may have messed up that little bit of math, the 4-2 is worst case). If Gram ends up bad then we know tangle was telling the truth, and even with his role-reveal and subsequent presumed death we end up bettering our odds and end up ahead 6-2, with all of our masons still in play. |
|
08-21-2006, 05:01 PM | #1756 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
Quote:
now that's a great point that bears repeating again and again |
|
08-21-2006, 05:16 PM | #1757 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Not too far away
|
I'm finding it hard to believe Tangle is good. I would rather LYNCH tangle first and then go from there. I mean if Tangle IS a good guy he was going to die tonight anyway. The games Tangle could play as Dr. R are great. Being Dr. R acts the same as being a seer, in essence and I simply do not think there are secret roles in this game. Therefore someone claiming to have a secret role? Likely bad. And in this case there is a way to reconcile what Tangle is telling us with what we do know, as fact.
Therefore, I Unvote Grammaticus Vote Tanglewood I would normally not do this, but with my coming up with a plausible scenario for how a fake reveal by Tangle wins the game, in essence, I think we should lynch first ask questions later. The most important part of this banks on the idea that there are NO SECRET ROLES. Either side would likely have found one by now if there was one. So if you believe there are no secret roles, as I do, then Tangle is Dr. R and should be disposed of before we go on our way. And if I'm wrong? Well then we lynch Grammaticus tomorrow in a landslide vote and are in good shape at 5-2. |
08-21-2006, 05:20 PM | #1758 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
Quote:
I agree with this line of reasoning, particularly the probability of us finding secret roles if any existed already. I'd like to think I contributed to your figuring this out at least a lil Barkeep. VOTE TANGLEWOOD |
|
08-21-2006, 05:21 PM | #1759 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Not too far away
|
Just to follow up on the last post:
I think we need to stop looking at molson and sndvls for today. By the very nature of the situation either Tangle or Grammaticus has to be bad. Our votes should be cast as such. I have gone with Tangle, but could understand (though not support right now) those going with Grammaticus. But let's focus our votes there. The other two people in the mix simply mean it's more likely that a bad guy can slip through the net. |
08-21-2006, 05:22 PM | #1760 |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
What a turn of events. I'm pretty much a believer in the tanglewood reveal at the moment because 1 - I know Gram's completely wrong about me, and 2 -. I've been saying/thinking for a while that the game seemed unbalanced with the one-sided roles. I'll have to take a closer look at everything after work.
I haven't seen Sndvls back since his self-vote - hopefully that's not the deciding vote. |
08-21-2006, 05:23 PM | #1761 |
Unregistered
Join Date: May 2004
|
I'm a little confused on the Dr. Reiman role. Is Dr. Reiman evil? First page says it counts as a "human" victory.
|
08-21-2006, 05:24 PM | #1762 |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
And Gram's ridiculous for point out my switched votes. His raw list of switched votes is extremely misleading. I switched to noddadrop day 1 - so what. I switched day 2 in a vote that had no impact. Meanwhile, Gram's late voting has directly killed two villagers.
|
08-21-2006, 05:25 PM | #1763 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
Quote:
You're right on both counts. He's evil, trying to help the wolves, and if the wolves win he wins. But he also happens to count as a human. Hmmm, that would explain the sndvls self-vote, would'nt it? |
|
08-21-2006, 05:26 PM | #1764 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Not too far away
|
Quote:
|
|
08-21-2006, 05:28 PM | #1765 |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
Is it too obvious now that Sundvls is Dr. R? Wouldn't it be in Dr. Rs interest to get himself killed at this point? Sorry if this has been pointed out.
Don't vote Sundvls! Vote Gram! |
08-21-2006, 05:28 PM | #1766 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
if your math is correct barkeep, then everyone good ought to vote Tangle today. It really gives us the best chance of coming out of the situation with the most knowledge and potential kills. because if tangle is good and we err in killing him...the wolves would have got him anyways and they still have the chance of hitting Dr. R anyways in the night action and we know the following day that we have a guarenteed kill in gram.
but if tangle is bad then we've eliminated him and the wolves will likely take out gram anyways since he will be fairly clearly trusted by virtue of being implicated by tangle. |
08-21-2006, 05:29 PM | #1767 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
dola
and in the second case, if the wolves elect to leave gram they could still hit reiman |
08-21-2006, 05:30 PM | #1768 |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
But, if Tangle is Dr. R, faking a seerer role would be a pretty good way to have the wolves lynch you - which would help their side.
|
08-21-2006, 05:32 PM | #1769 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Not too far away
|
Quote:
Daddy: While we don't know the exact number of bad guys we can pretty much assume it is correct. I too feel my math is right and as such feel that voting tangle is not only the correct move in terms of the evidence we have, but in terms of the math. |
|
08-21-2006, 05:32 PM | #1770 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
so either we kill tangle or the wolves kill tangle. seems like it's immaterial at this point. and if we avoid voting for gram we at least hold out the possibility that gram stays alive if he is a mason.
|
08-21-2006, 05:32 PM | #1771 |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
Well I'm dissapointed in you Barkeep, I know you're a good guy you need to make the right decision.
Which way of finding out helps the bad guys more? If we lynch Grammaticus first then we get a bad guy today, a potential wolf today. We cannot rule out the possibility that there are actually 4 wolves and not three as we have been presuming. If that is the case, then we will lose if we lynch a good guy today. Heck, even if you want to assume that I am a bad guy think logically man. There is no way I am a wolf, it just doesn't make sense for a wolf to try a fake reveal at this point, it's way too risky. So, even if I am Dr. Reimann, we are still lynching a human today, which could lose the game for us. On the other hand, if I am telling the truth and you lynch me first, we could lose, even if my lynch proved Gramm is a bad guy. It could be too late. It just doesn't make sense. But then I guess it never seems to make sense when you know you are right and see people you know who are good making the wrong decision. It's simple: 1. Grammaticus is a bad guy. You don't even need my reveal to tell you that. He was odd the first few days, then as he got heat dropped back and let Blade/Lathum take over. He has regullary switched votes. Yesterday, when two major suspects, Molson and SnDvls, were tied and could be potentially lynched by the Masons, he switches his vote right at the deadline and takes out a villager. The guy is already guilty! Then the seer comes out and says he scaneed him die to above suspocious behaviour and confirms him as bad. How much more clear could it be? 2. Even if you for some reason doubt this, lynching me first makes no sense for the village. EVEN IF I AM LYING I AM A HUMAN. LYNCHING ME IS BAD REGARDLESS. IF WE LYNCH GRAMM FIRST WE GET A BAD GUY AND PROBABLY A WOLF (3/4 or 4/5 chance). IF YOU LYNCH ME WE MIGHT LOSE. For god sake. I don't know why I am even having to go into such a silly hypothetical. Gramm is a bad guy!!!! |
08-21-2006, 05:34 PM | #1772 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Not too far away
|
Lots of people have been disappointed with me this game tangle. I suppose I could win "most disappointing player".
|
08-21-2006, 05:35 PM | #1773 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Not too far away
|
Tangle: You're suggesting that there were FOUR wolves plus Dracula plus Dr. 4? So 5 out of 22 starting bad guys? Just making sure this is the theory you're advancing.
|
08-21-2006, 05:36 PM | #1774 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Not too far away
|
Dola -- I meant to say 6 out of 22 starting bad guys or just under 1/3 of the players started as an evil role.
|
08-21-2006, 05:37 PM | #1775 |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
[quote=Barkeep49]I'm confused with what you're saying here.
[quote] Dr. R. wants to die at this point, correct? He has no powers left, and his death greatly help his team. Two players have been engaged in self-destructive behavior yesterday or today. Sndvls with the self-vote (and the attitude), and tanglewood, with the seer revelation. I'm not convined of either, but I'm just throwing it out there. |
08-21-2006, 05:38 PM | #1776 | |
Unregistered
Join Date: May 2004
|
Quote:
This screams "I'm Dr. Reiman". Goddamit, I'm so confused. |
|
08-21-2006, 05:39 PM | #1777 |
Unregistered
Join Date: May 2004
|
darn, hit the submit button too quickly.
So do we wanna eliminate Dr. Reiman? He does count as a human victory. |
08-21-2006, 05:39 PM | #1778 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
[quote=molson][quote=Barkeep49]I'm confused with what you're saying here.
Quote:
so you're saying vote for you molson? cuz you were the other early choice...that screams of self-destruction too |
|
08-21-2006, 05:40 PM | #1779 |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
All I'm saying is that it's a real possibility. Remember, Reimann counts for us in the final tally, so really when it comes to the endgame it is 5/22. And even so, 6/22 is not out of line with some ratios in other games we've played before. Sure, it's just speculation, but I think we could lose the game today.
Infact, even if we don't lose the game today, isn't lynching me still killing a guarenteed human when we are at the most two chances from losing? Isn't that just a bad idea? I'd claim you were all evil kniving wolves voting for me, but it's clear at least one of you is a misguided good guy. Heck, if you want to put it up to a tie and let the masons decide between me and Gramm. At least that way we have some chance of hitting a wolf today. |
08-21-2006, 05:41 PM | #1780 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Not too far away
|
[quote=molson][quote=Barkeep49]I'm confused with what you're saying here.
Quote:
So molson do you believe in secret roles or not? I think there's a lot of reason to think not and so would encourage you to vote for Tangle. |
|
08-21-2006, 05:41 PM | #1781 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
[quote=DaddyTorgo][quote=molson]
Quote:
Well, the other choice for me is obviously Gram, but I have the advantage of knowing my role. But I see your point. |
|
08-21-2006, 05:41 PM | #1782 | |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
Quote:
Well what else can I say? That Gramm is a bad guy is staring you all square in the face, yet you are all trying to kill me for some reason. |
|
08-21-2006, 05:43 PM | #1783 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Not too far away
|
Quote:
|
|
08-21-2006, 05:43 PM | #1784 |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tennessee
|
Look at the day two vote. There is a reason that I won the tie and that I wanted the villagers to keep it on a tie at the end of the day.
In these games, I have seen tie's decided in two ways. Either someone gets to change the vote via a Duke like role and you know the vote was moved. Or the tie breakers cause a break based on who they voted for. In the day two vote, those who voted for "Chubby" won the vote. Look at the day 5 vote. I know a tie was bad so I moved the vote. If it had stayed a tie as the votes were laid out, No lynch would have occurred. I did not feel good about lynching SnDvls, because I felt uncertain. I knew if I moved to Molson, Tangle and Molson would counter and SnDvls would get lynched. So I moved to Farrah as my only other option and I felt she could have been a wolf. |
08-21-2006, 05:44 PM | #1785 | |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
[quote=Barkeep49][quote=molson]
Quote:
But if I am Dr. R why am I wanting you all to not lynch me? Why am I complaining so much when you are all voting for me?!?!?!? Arrrghh!!! Why can't you people use logic! |
|
08-21-2006, 05:44 PM | #1786 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Not too far away
|
Quote:
|
|
08-21-2006, 05:45 PM | #1787 | |
Unregistered
Join Date: May 2004
|
Quote:
If you're Dr. Reiman, I'm not sure I'd want to get rid of you. You said you're a seer, isn't Dr. R's role somewhat of an evil seer? |
|
08-21-2006, 05:45 PM | #1788 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Not too far away
|
[quote=tanglewood][quote=Barkeep49]
Quote:
As Dr. R you want to be alive to use your vote to help the wolves. I am not suggesting that you have a suicide wish. |
|
08-21-2006, 05:46 PM | #1789 |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tennessee
|
It is the best route to vote Molson. Tangle came out with his fake role reveal only after I suggested a Molson vote and backed it up with analysis.
Molson is their fear point right now. Tangle is likely Dr. Raimen and should be saved for later. |
08-21-2006, 05:46 PM | #1790 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
Quote:
and if he's lying and a wolf then he's dead...and if he's lying and dr. r then he's dead and maybe the wolves kill someone like me or dodgerchick instead of Gram/barkeep, who may be more useful. |
|
08-21-2006, 05:47 PM | #1791 | |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tennessee
|
[quote=tanglewood][quote=Barkeep49]
Quote:
|
|
08-21-2006, 05:47 PM | #1792 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
Quote:
why save for tomorrow what you can do tonight? if we axe tangle and he's reiman we can still go after molson tomorrow based on this, without letting raimen scan anymore of us...and i don't think we're that close to the end that the wolf/human ratio matters that much |
|
08-21-2006, 05:51 PM | #1793 | |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tennessee
|
Quote:
|
|
08-21-2006, 05:52 PM | #1794 |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
Well, so everything today has turned out to be pretty shit. Let's spell it out again...
1) I am the Seer: Should we lynch me? NO. 2) I am Dr. Reimann: Should we lynch me? NO. I am not trying to scaremonger regarding the whole there might be 4 wolves thing either, I am genuinly fearful of it. I mean come on. Seriously. |
08-21-2006, 05:53 PM | #1795 |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
The whole fact that I'm having to argue that I might be evil in order to kill someone who is evil is absurd. Werewolf is a game invented by Dadists.
|
08-21-2006, 05:53 PM | #1796 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
Quote:
ROFLOLAPIMP |
|
08-21-2006, 05:55 PM | #1797 |
Unregistered
Join Date: May 2004
|
It seems Sndvls in the lead with 3 votes, counting his own of course. I think we should keep tanglewood, for now as I have a strong suspicion he is Dr. Reiman.
Vote molson |
08-21-2006, 06:04 PM | #1798 |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tennessee
|
Day two vote recap:
Chubby: Blade, BulletS, Dodgerschick, Grammaticus Gramm: GoldenEagles, Fouts, Swaggs, AlanT Chubby wins the lynch vote and Grammaticus wins the tie surviving. Why do you think that happened? Blade, GE, Fouts and AlanT are all dead. |
08-21-2006, 06:21 PM | #1799 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: TX
|
umm i just read all this... one minute to process. im going to go to my throne room to think about it, be back in 10 to give my 2c
|
08-21-2006, 06:26 PM | #1800 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mass.
|
Current vote as I see it:
3 - SnDvls - Swaggs, ChiefRum, SnDvls 2 - molson - Grammaticus, Dodgerchick 2 - Grammaticus - molson, tanglewood 2 - Tanglewood - Barkeep, Daddytorgo 1 - Swaggs - bulletsponge |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|