Front Office Football Central  

Go Back   Front Office Football Central > Main Forums > Off Topic
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Statistics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-24-2014, 11:34 AM   #151
AENeuman
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: SF
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo View Post
Ugh.

Don't need Sandoval & Hanley for $200m.

Shades of AGon & Carl Crawford.

Need PITCHING. Like...4 SPs. Or at least 3.

First, Im not trolling here, legit question:

This morning on the local talk radio there was the claim that Boston is a very hard place for minorities, save a token few superstars. I'm not sure how/why the AGon tenure went down, but he clearly can put up superstar stats and not at all a bust in la. Crawford just seems like an injury bust.

So, are you/Boston fandom worried that these signings will be disappointing because of the lack of history of minorities thriving in Boston?
AENeuman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 11:43 AM   #152
cartman
Death Herald
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Le stelle la notte sono grandi e luminose nel cuore profondo del Texas
Here's the players on this year's HoF ballot.

First timers:
Rich Aurillia
Aaron Boone
Tony Clark
Carlos Delgado
Jermaine Dye
Darin Erstad
Cliff Floyd
Nomar Garciaparra
Brian Giles
Tom Gordon
Eddie Guardado
Randy Johnson
Pedro Martinez
Troy Percival
Jason Schmidt
Gary Sheffield
John Smoltz

Last year's holdovers:
Craig Biggio, 74.8 percent
Mike Piazza, 62.2
Jeff Bagwell, 54.3
Tim Raines, 46.1
Roger Clemens, 35.4
Barry Bonds, 34.7
Lee Smith, 29.9
Curt Schilling, 29.2
Edgar Martinez, 25.2
Alan Trammell, 20.8
Mike Mussina, 20.3
Jeff Kent, 15.2
Fred McGriff, 11.7
Mark McGwire, 11
Larry Walker, 10.2
Don Mattingly, 8.2
Sammy Sosa, 7.2
__________________
Thinkin' of a master plan
'Cuz ain't nuthin' but sweat inside my hand
So I dig into my pocket, all my money is spent
So I dig deeper but still comin' up with lint
cartman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 11:43 AM   #153
claphamsa
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: non white trash MD
It was my understanding that AGon was the price of dumping the 2 bad contracts, not a bust.
__________________
Dominating Warewolf for 0 games!

GIT R DUN!!!
claphamsa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 11:47 AM   #154
Logan
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NYC
Quote:
Originally Posted by claphamsa View Post
Kyle Seager is worth 100M?

I won't claim to be as big of a baseball fan as I used to, but I legitimately had no clue who this guy was. My first thought when I heard the name was the guy who played basketball for Duke a couple years ago.
Logan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 11:49 AM   #155
Logan
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NYC
I thought of the Mets when hearing Boegarts might be available but my quick research indicates it would cost Wheeler or deGrom. No thanks.
Logan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 12:28 PM   #156
DaddyTorgo
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Quote:
Originally Posted by AENeuman View Post
First, Im not trolling here, legit question:

This morning on the local talk radio there was the claim that Boston is a very hard place for minorities, save a token few superstars. I'm not sure how/why the AGon tenure went down, but he clearly can put up superstar stats and not at all a bust in la. Crawford just seems like an injury bust.

So, are you/Boston fandom worried that these signings will be disappointing because of the lack of history of minorities thriving in Boston?

I wasn't trying to claim AGon was a bust - just that they heralded him and signed him to a big money deal and then shipped him out of town when they decided to change direction (whether it was the price of dumping the other contracts or not). The point was more like "don't get overawed by big splashy big money moves" kinda.

I wouldn't say I'm worried about it because of the lack of history of minorities thriving - I think when they're athletes they're in a totally different category than your average person obviously, and I think a lot of this is over-hyped at this point anyways.

Historically-speaking maybe, but I mean we're removed from that period time-wise at this point I'd say.

Last edited by DaddyTorgo : 11-24-2014 at 12:30 PM.
DaddyTorgo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 12:42 PM   #157
molson
General Manager
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
I wouldn't say the Red Sox dumped Adrian Gonzalez, or that he was in any way a bust, he was the good player the the Red Sox had to give up in order for LA to take all those bad contracts.

Last edited by molson : 11-24-2014 at 12:56 PM.
molson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 12:51 PM   #158
cartman
Death Herald
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Le stelle la notte sono grandi e luminose nel cuore profondo del Texas
Sound like the Rangers and Braves are working on a deal to send Justin Upton to Arlington.
__________________
Thinkin' of a master plan
'Cuz ain't nuthin' but sweat inside my hand
So I dig into my pocket, all my money is spent
So I dig deeper but still comin' up with lint
cartman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 01:01 PM   #159
stevew
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the yo'
They should just BoGo the Uptons together.
stevew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 01:04 PM   #160
miked
College Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The Dirty
Hopefully the deal is the Rangers take both. I can't imagine how putrid this offense will be without Heyward and the good Upton. Seems like they are going to mail in this year and make some big splashes for the new stadium in 2016.
__________________
Commish of the United Baseball League (OOTP 6.5)
miked is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 01:05 PM   #161
Grover
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Lisboa, ME
Quote:
Originally Posted by miked View Post
So what happens with Bogaerts and Middlebrooks? All my Sox fans were lecturing me 2 years ago that these guys were the future of the Sox and the reason why they let a bunch of veterans walk.

Middlebrooks is garbage.
__________________
Come On You Irons!
West Ham United | Philadelphia Flyers | Cincinnati Bengals | Kansas City Royals

FOFC Greatest Band Draft Runner Up
FOFC Movie Remake Draft Winner
FOFC Movie Comedy Draft Winner
Grover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 01:39 PM   #162
Scarecrow
College Prospect
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Flatlands of America
Quote:
Originally Posted by claphamsa View Post
Kyle Seager is worth 100M?

Everytime I see a contract like this, I wonder how much longer until Sal Perez holds out. Dayton Moore take alot of crap at times, but what he locked Salvi up for in 2013 is downright genius...

2013 - $1M
2014 - $1.5M
2015 - $1.75M
2016 - $2M
2017 - $3.75M (team option)
2018 - $5M (team option)
2019 - $6M (team option)

for a grand total of 7 years/$21M!!!
__________________
Post Count: Eleventy Billion - so deal with it!
Scarecrow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 01:49 PM   #163
sterlingice
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Back in Houston!
Playing his number of games per year at catcher, he'll be in a wheelchair by 2020

SI
__________________
Houston Hippopotami, III.3: 20th Anniversary Thread - All former HT players are encouraged to check it out!

Janos: "Only America could produce an imbecile of your caliber!"
Freakazoid: "That's because we make lots of things better than other people!"



Last edited by sterlingice : 11-24-2014 at 01:49 PM.
sterlingice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 01:53 PM   #164
Easy Mac
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Here
Quote:
Originally Posted by cartman View Post
Sound like the Rangers and Braves are working on a deal to send Justin Upton to Arlington.

Maybe they can get Elvis Andrus back. Maybe three team it to get Texiera back.
Easy Mac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 02:33 PM   #165
BishopMVP
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Concord, MA/UMass
Quote:
Originally Posted by miked View Post
So what happens with Bogaerts and Middlebrooks? All my Sox fans were lecturing me 2 years ago that these guys were the future of the Sox and the reason why they let a bunch of veterans walk.
I don't think Bogaerts is going anywhere. Xander had a great first couple months, a horrific 2-3 months, then adjusted and put up an .800+ OPS in September. Hanley will play LF, possibly take over at DH when Ortiz retires, and Bogaerts will stay at SS. OF's need to go - Cespedes for sure, maybe Betts... I don't want to see him go, but this increases the chance he's the center piece of a trade for a pitcher.

Middlebrooks is gone. He's cheap, has power, and plays above-average D, so someone should take a flier on him and try to fix his contact issues, but it won't be here.

Hopefully we sign Lester too so we only need to trade for one pitcher, and can use Cespedes+prospects, and hold on to Mookie.
BishopMVP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 02:36 PM   #166
DaddyTorgo
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Quote:
Originally Posted by BishopMVP View Post
I don't think Bogaerts is going anywhere. Xander had a great first couple months, a horrific 2-3 months, then adjusted and put up an .800+ OPS in September. Hanley will play LF, possibly take over at DH when Ortiz retires, and Bogaerts will stay at SS. OF's need to go - Cespedes for sure, maybe Betts... I don't want to see him go, but this increases the chance he's the center piece of a trade for a pitcher.

Middlebrooks is gone. He's cheap, has power, and plays above-average D, so someone should take a flier on him and try to fix his contact issues, but it won't be here.

Hopefully we sign Lester too so we only need to trade for one pitcher, and can use Cespedes+prospects, and hold on to Mookie.

Even if we sign Lester don't we need 2 or preferably 3 more SPs? And at least one more #1/#2 caliber guy.
DaddyTorgo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 02:43 PM   #167
BishopMVP
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Concord, MA/UMass
Quote:
Originally Posted by AENeuman View Post
First, Im not trolling here, legit question:

This morning on the local talk radio there was the claim that Boston is a very hard place for minorities, save a token few superstars. I'm not sure how/why the AGon tenure went down, but he clearly can put up superstar stats and not at all a bust in la. Crawford just seems like an injury bust.

So, are you/Boston fandom worried that these signings will be disappointing because of the lack of history of minorities thriving in Boston?
This isn't the 1970's anymore... The most popular Red Sox of the past 20 years are Ortiz, Pedro and Manny/Nomar for most of their time. Expand it to other sports and Paul Pierce, Kevin Garnett, Vince Wilfork, etc have all been embraced wholeheartedly.

There is definitely heightened media pressure at times which affects some players (Crawford for one), but Sandoval's postseason success indicates that he doesn't let pressure get in his head too much. I still don't love the deal because Sandoval needs to play 3B to be worth it (while Hanley's bat, when healthy, is good enough to carry him anywhere), but if either deal doesn't work out it won't be because of skin color.
BishopMVP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 02:59 PM   #168
DaddyTorgo
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Quote:
Originally Posted by BishopMVP View Post
This isn't the 1970's anymore... The most popular Red Sox of the past 20 years are Ortiz, Pedro and Manny/Nomar for most of their time. Expand it to other sports and Paul Pierce, Kevin Garnett, Vince Wilfork, etc have all been embraced wholeheartedly.

There is definitely heightened media pressure at times which affects some players (Crawford for one), but Sandoval's postseason success indicates that he doesn't let pressure get in his head too much. I still don't love the deal because Sandoval needs to play 3B to be worth it (while Hanley's bat, when healthy, is good enough to carry him anywhere), but if either deal doesn't work out it won't be because of skin color.

I'm not the baseball guy, but my reaction was more because as Bishop said, that seems like an overpay for a guy who's heavy and will have to transition to DH (where he's not worth that kind of $$ yet). Especially given that they need so much pitching.
DaddyTorgo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 03:02 PM   #169
BishopMVP
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Concord, MA/UMass
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo View Post
Even if we sign Lester don't we need 2 or preferably 3 more SPs? And at least one more #1/#2 caliber guy.

1 - Lester
2 - ?
3 - Buchholz (really, could be a 1, could pitch 50 innings)
4 - Kelly
5 - De La Rosa

Even if you're convinced like me that Workman and Ranaudo are bullpen arms, you've still got Webster, Barnes, Owens and Brian Johnson by mid season, Steven Wright if you believe in him (I do), as possible injury replacements. Now, some of those guys (or Eduardo Rodriguez) will be included in whatever deals we make to get that #2, but that's more than enough pitching depth.
BishopMVP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 03:07 PM   #170
DaddyTorgo
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Quote:
Originally Posted by BishopMVP View Post
1 - Lester
2 - ?
3 - Buchholz (really, could be a 1, could pitch 50 innings)
4 - Kelly
5 - De La Rosa

Even if you're convinced like me that Workman and Ranaudo are bullpen arms, you've still got Webster, Barnes, Owens and Brian Johnson by mid season, Steven Wright if you believe in him (I do), as possible injury replacements. Now, some of those guys (or Eduardo Rodriguez) will be included in whatever deals we make to get that #2, but that's more than enough pitching depth.

I'd rather see Bucholz as the #4 given his injury/inconsistency issues. Certainly more than I'd rather see Sandoval get paid $100m. And "Oh here's all these rookies and young guys" doesn't inspire in me a lot of confidence. Sure...one or two could be future #1s, or they could all flame out and be useless. As the resident pessimist want to guess which way I'm leaning?

Last edited by DaddyTorgo : 11-24-2014 at 03:08 PM.
DaddyTorgo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 03:08 PM   #171
ISiddiqui
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
Quote:
Originally Posted by claphamsa View Post
Kyle Seager is worth 100M?

Fangraphs apparently believes so .

Mariners Pay Kyle Seager Like The Player He Is | FanGraphs Baseball

They make a compelling case that over the last three years Seager and Sandoval are very comparable players.
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages"
-Tennessee Williams
ISiddiqui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 03:34 PM   #172
BishopMVP
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Concord, MA/UMass
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo View Post
I'd rather see Bucholz as the #4 given his injury/inconsistency issues. Certainly more than I'd rather see Sandoval get paid $100m. And "Oh here's all these rookies and young guys" doesn't inspire in me a lot of confidence. Sure...one or two could be future #1s, or they could all flame out and be useless. As the resident pessimist want to guess which way I'm leaning?
I'd like to have Lester, Kershaw, Bumgarner and Felix Hernandez with Buchholz as the 5, but at a certain point even the Red Sox have a budget and limited trade assets. At a certain point, you need some gambles to go your way, and gambling on the pitcher who had the lowest ERA of any pitcher with >100 IP in 2013, and a bunch of young pitchers for one rotation spot (and a couple in the bullpen) seems like a solid gamble. The key there being that there are multiple candidates, so its not like we're relying on only 1 pitching prospect.
BishopMVP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 03:34 PM   #173
molson
General Manager
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
I think we do have to remember that every year during free agency, we all wonder what teams are thinking when they give guys so much money. How many open market free agency deals are seen generally by the media or this board as being bargains? If we think most of the deals are too high, than we're probably underestimating these guys' value, and how rich these teams are.
molson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 03:54 PM   #174
Vince, Pt. II
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere More Familiar
I think everyone is making a bit much out of Pablo's potential inability to play 3B. Sure, he's a big dude - but he played gold glove caliber defense this season and he's only 28.

Last edited by Vince, Pt. II : 11-24-2014 at 03:54 PM.
Vince, Pt. II is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 04:01 PM   #175
ISiddiqui
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
Hmmm... I haven't heard much against Sandoval playing 3B myself. More that Hanley shouldn't be playing SS.
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages"
-Tennessee Williams
ISiddiqui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 04:32 PM   #176
Galaril
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by BishopMVP View Post

1 - Lester
2 - ?
3 - Buchholz (really, could be a 1, could pitch 50 innings)
4 - Kelly
5 - De La Rosa

Even if you're convinced like me that Workman and Ranaudo are bullpen arms, you've still got Webster, Barnes, Owens and Brian Johnson by mid season, Steven Wright if you believe in him (I do), as possible injury replacements. Now, some of those guys (or Eduardo Rodriguez) will be included in whatever deals we make to get that #2, but that's more than enough pitching depth.

I guess it will depend who they can get in a trade for that #2 spot and if Lester and Buchholz pitch well but the #4 and #5 spots scare the shit out of me and have no confidence in those guys or any others mentioned in the bottom .
Galaril is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 04:37 PM   #177
DaddyTorgo
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Galaril View Post
I guess it will depend who they can get in a trade for that #2 spot and if Lester and Buchholz pitch well but the #4 and #5 spots scare the shit out of me and have no confidence in those guys or any others mentioned in the bottom .

Indeed.
DaddyTorgo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 04:41 PM   #178
DaddyTorgo
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Quote:
Originally Posted by BishopMVP View Post
1 - Lester
2 - ?
3 - Buchholz (really, could be a 1, could pitch 50 innings)
4 - Kelly
5 - De La Rosa

Even if you're convinced like me that Workman and Ranaudo are bullpen arms, you've still got Webster, Barnes, Owens and Brian Johnson by mid season, Steven Wright if you believe in him (I do), as possible injury replacements. Now, some of those guys (or Eduardo Rodriguez) will be included in whatever deals we make to get that #2, but that's more than enough pitching depth.

What I see when I look at your post. And scratch your head to try to figure out when the last time a "flier" that the Red Sox took in the SP department paid off with a +WAR player (I honestly have no idea myself. I could probably look but I'm still at work).

Oh here - this article gives insight (thanks Google): Outlook isn’t great for Red Sox pitching rotation prospects - Sports - The Boston Globe

1 - Lester
2 - ?
3 - The corpse of Buchholz (who really could be generic flier #0 for all the consistency he's shown)
4 - Generic flier #1
5 - Generic flier #2

Even if you're convinced like me that Generic flier #3 and Generic flier #4 are bullpen arms, you've still got Generic flier #5, Generic flier #6, Generic flier #7 and Generic flier #8 by mid season, Generic flier #9 if you believe in him (I do), as possible injury replacements. Now, some of those guys (or Generic flier #10) will be included in whatever deals we make to get that #2, but that's more than enough pitching depth.

Last edited by DaddyTorgo : 11-24-2014 at 04:50 PM.
DaddyTorgo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 04:57 PM   #179
JPhillips
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
I think the Reds will make the worst decision and largely stand pat, but with all their upcoming FA pitchers and the Sox prospects, there has to be a deal there.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers
JPhillips is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 04:59 PM   #180
MrBug708
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Whittier
Quote:
Originally Posted by claphamsa View Post
It was my understanding that AGon was the price of dumping the 2 bad contracts, not a bust.

Dodgers have always wanted AGon since his SD days, considering he is Mexican and had power at a position they'd be devoid of it at since Eric Karros. So they had to take CC and Beckett
MrBug708 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 05:02 PM   #181
Chief Rum
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Where Hip Hop lives
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrBug708 View Post
Dodgers have always wanted AGon since his SD days, considering he is Mexican and had power at a position they'd be devoid of it at since Eric Karros. So they had to take CC and Beckett

Go with Crawford rather than "CC". Saying CC in a baseball conversation only adds confusion to your post.
__________________
.
.

I would rather be wrong...Than live in the shadows of your song...My mind is open wide...And now I'm ready to start...You're not sure...You open the door...And step out into the dark...Now I'm ready.
Chief Rum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 05:15 PM   #182
molson
General Manager
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
TIL - Carl Crawford had a higher OPS+ in 2014 than Pablo Sandoval did.
molson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 05:16 PM   #183
Vince, Pt. II
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere More Familiar
Pablo to the Red Sox officially official. Bobby Evans confirmed it on the radio just now.
Vince, Pt. II is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 05:29 PM   #184
kingfc22
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Morgan Hill, CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by molson View Post
TIL - Carl Crawford had a higher OPS+ in 2014 than Pablo Sandoval did.

Pablo in October >>> Pablo in the regular season.
__________________
Fan of SF Giants, 49ers, Sharks, Arsenal
kingfc22 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 05:56 PM   #185
DaddyTorgo
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Quote:
Originally Posted by kingfc22 View Post
Pablo in October >>> Pablo in the regular season.

They have to actually...make it to October first.
DaddyTorgo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 06:08 PM   #186
kingfc22
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Morgan Hill, CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo View Post
They have to actually...make it to October first.

Yea, was more commenting on molson's post. Pablo's OPS has dropped significantly since 2011, but what everyone remembers right now is his fantastic post season. I don't follow the Red Sox, but it sounds like 3B has been a black hole for awhile so he should be a definite upgrade with the bat and his glove was amazing this season. If he can keep the weight off he will be a solid player, but not worth $20M a year.

Of course that salary number is hard to judge in today's MLB as some team's are playing with monopoly money.

Now if the Giants can find a way to use the money saved plus what they already planned on spending to sign a power hitting LF (Yasmani Tomas?), a solid starting pitcher and a serviceable 3B I'll be happy.
__________________
Fan of SF Giants, 49ers, Sharks, Arsenal
kingfc22 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 07:20 PM   #187
BishopMVP
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Concord, MA/UMass
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo View Post
What I see when I look at your post. And scratch your head to try to figure out when the last time a "flier" that the Red Sox took in the SP department paid off with a +WAR player (I honestly have no idea myself. I could probably look but I'm still at work).

Oh here - this article gives insight (thanks Google): Outlook isn’t great for Red Sox pitching rotation prospects - Sports - The Boston Globe

1 - Lester
2 - ?
3 - The corpse of Buchholz (who really could be generic flier #0 for all the consistency he's shown)
4 - Generic flier #1
5 - Generic flier #2

Even if you're convinced like me that Generic flier #3 and Generic flier #4 are bullpen arms, you've still got Generic flier #5, Generic flier #6, Generic flier #7 and Generic flier #8 by mid season, Generic flier #9 if you believe in him (I do), as possible injury replacements. Now, some of those guys (or Generic flier #10) will be included in whatever deals we make to get that #2, but that's more than enough pitching depth.
Joe Kelly's the definition of generic, but he's not really a flier - he has 327 major league innings with a 111 ERA+... Even if you discount that and think he's closer to the 90-95 ERA+ pitcher he was this past year that's perfectly cromulent for a 4/5. And I disagree with the prospects being generic - theres a huge split in the scouting community on Owens, and Rodriguez might fall a little after struggling in the first half post-injury (even though he was lights out once the Sox acquired him), but both are top 50 prospects and the best pitching prospects the Sox have had since Lester/Buchholz(/Papelbon/Sanchez). Then Johnson/Barnes are both in the back half of the top 100. RDLR isn't considered a prospect, but he more or less is on that same level of experience and potential. And Buchholz is impossible to predict, but he didn't just pitch well in 2013, he was arguably the best pitcher in baseball until he got hurt.

Plus, the bar isn't exactly high - the Sox had 119 starts last year from the combination of Buchholz (having his worst season), RDLR, Kelly, Doubront, Workman, Peavy, Webster and Ranaudo, and we only allowed 40 more earned runs than the 2013 WS winning team. And, of course, the veteran fliers haven't exactly torn it up either (Dempster, Peavy, Aaron Cook, Brad Penny, etc), and taking a chance on young guys is the only way you'll end up with a young ace/#2 - teams aren't looking to trade those guys until they're approaching free agency or being paid market value and approaching the age of 30.

Last edited by BishopMVP : 11-24-2014 at 07:22 PM.
BishopMVP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 07:26 PM   #188
molson
General Manager
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
Quote:
Originally Posted by kingfc22 View Post
Pablo in October >>> Pablo in the regular season.

In seems non-Red Soxy to pay for October heroics. It's like Lou Gorman is back.
molson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 07:47 PM   #189
BishopMVP
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Concord, MA/UMass
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPhillips View Post
I think the Reds will make the worst decision and largely stand pat, but with all their upcoming FA pitchers and the Sox prospects, there has to be a deal there.
Plus Cespedes would fit in well at GAP. I don't trust Latos with the injury concerns, but I'm thinking something based around Cespedes + a pitching prospect (and maybe the competitive balance pick we got from Oakland since Cespedes can't be offered a QO) for Mike Leake. I don't even want to get into the ridiculous deals people are throwing around that involve Bogaerts and Betts for a 1-year rental, or where the Red Sox trade Cespedes and spare parts for Sale or Strasbourg or even Hamels.

Kenta Maeda's also a possibility depending on the market for him, Ian Kennedy from San Diego and obviously Hamels because who knows, it's Ruben Amaro, maybe he will trade Hamels for Cespedes and Allen Craig.
BishopMVP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 07:57 PM   #190
JPhillips
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
I'm not high on Cespedes. He may put up better numbers in GABP, but he's just a slightly above average hitter.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers
JPhillips is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 08:20 PM   #191
Easy Mac
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Here
I'm going to be honest, I've never heard the name Kyle Weaver before.
Easy Mac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 08:32 PM   #192
BishopMVP
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Concord, MA/UMass
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPhillips View Post
I'm not high on Cespedes. He may put up better numbers in GABP, but he's just a slightly above average hitter.
I agree, which is why I think people thinking he'll be the centerpiece for a guy like Cueto or Hamels are insane, but Leake seems right in that range (slightly above average pitcher, high IP, no real time missed recently). Cecchini doesnt fit for the Reds, but Devon Marrero's another near MLB ready guy that could fit in to the Reds roster.
BishopMVP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 08:53 PM   #193
Shkspr
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Amarillo, TX
Quote:
Originally Posted by Easy Mac View Post
I'm going to be honest, I've never heard the name Kyle Weaver before.

He was a guard in the NBA for a couple years, before playing in Israel. Not really a big name.

Now, Kyle Seager, on the other hand...it's pretty clear that the last two years have set a new level of production for Seager, but it's insane to realize that there's so much money out there that $14 million a season isn't an overpay for .270/.340/.450 with good D.
Shkspr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 09:11 PM   #194
JPhillips
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by BishopMVP View Post
I agree, which is why I think people thinking he'll be the centerpiece for a guy like Cueto or Hamels are insane, but Leake seems right in that range (slightly above average pitcher, high IP, no real time missed recently). Cecchini doesnt fit for the Reds, but Devon Marrero's another near MLB ready guy that could fit in to the Reds roster.

Some money would also have to come with that deal. 10.5 is more than the Reds should pay for that kind of production.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers
JPhillips is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 09:32 PM   #195
ISiddiqui
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shkspr View Post
Now, Kyle Seager, on the other hand...it's pretty clear that the last two years have set a new level of production for Seager, but it's insane to realize that there's so much money out there that $14 million a season isn't an overpay for .270/.340/.450 with good D.

You have noticed what his home park is, right?

Seager's OPS+ last season was 127. That is higher than Sandoval in any of the last 3 seasons.

The good defense also made Seager a 5.8 WAR(BR) player last season - that was higher than Juan Uribe, for one.
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages"
-Tennessee Williams
ISiddiqui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 09:45 PM   #196
BishopMVP
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Concord, MA/UMass
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPhillips View Post
Some money would also have to come with that deal. 10.5 is more than the Reds should pay for that kind of production.
Cespedes had 3.4 WAR last season and 8.5 over his 3 seasons... If anything $10.5 with no long-term commitment is an underpay for his production. Plus the Reds would get 6 cheap years of whatever prospect(s) we give up. Now, if we try sending Victorino or Craig I'll assume we need to pick up some of the money.

That same kid on Instagram is saying Lester has a 6-year, $130 million offer, as well as 4 and 5 year offers on the table, and the Red Sox pretty much expect him to sign by tomorrow or they'll move on to Scherzer/Hamels.
BishopMVP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 10:07 PM   #197
Ramzavail
College Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Strong Island, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by Logan View Post
I thought of the Mets when hearing Boegarts might be available but my quick research indicates it would cost Wheeler or deGrom. No thanks.

I agree
Ramzavail is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 10:15 PM   #198
JPhillips
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by BishopMVP View Post
Cespedes had 3.4 WAR last season and 8.5 over his 3 seasons... If anything $10.5 with no long-term commitment is an underpay for his production. Plus the Reds would get 6 cheap years of whatever prospect(s) we give up. Now, if we try sending Victorino or Craig I'll assume we need to pick up some of the money.

And he had a 1.6 the year before that.

Regardless, the Reds aren't adding payroll. That's in large part because too much was spent on shitty bench players and injured relievers, but it is what it is.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers
JPhillips is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2014, 10:40 PM   #199
BishopMVP
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Concord, MA/UMass
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPhillips View Post
And he had a 1.6 the year before that.

Regardless, the Reds aren't adding payroll. That's in large part because too much was spent on shitty bench players and injured relievers, but it is what it is.
Fangraphs had him at 2.2, but even at 1.6, market value of a win is about $7m, so that puts him right at market value with no long-term risk. Either way, I assume Leake will get a raise in arbitration to right about $10-$11m... He was at $7.5m last year iirc, so its not adding anything to the Reds payroll.

If Bogaerts is going to the Mets it's for a Wheeler or Syndegaard... deGrom doesn't have that trade value IMO. But selling low on him would be a huge mistake, and I dont think the Red Sox have soured on him at all, so I don't see any team offering fair value. If you are eager for a SS, Deven Marrero is a Jose Iglesias-type who's near MLB ready and I could see being moved this winter.
BishopMVP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2014, 06:11 AM   #200
stevew
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the yo'
I still think Juan Uribe is Jose Uribe every time I see him in a box score.
stevew is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:05 AM.



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.