Front Office Football Central  

Go Back   Front Office Football Central > Main Forums > Off Topic
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Statistics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-28-2015, 06:51 PM   #201
BillJasper
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Northern Kentucky
Quote:
Originally Posted by Galaril View Post
I agree with that and many including me think it was a move to get Manning to hang it up over the offseason.

A power play to make your best offensive player walk away doesn't seem very smart.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kodos View Post
When has Kubiak been impressive as a head coach? He seems like a very good OC, but I haven't been impressed with him as the HC.

Not even sure about the OC role. Prior to Baltimore, I don't think he ever called the plays as the offensive coordinator. Pretty sure Shanahan did it in Denver.
__________________
The Confederacy lost, it is time to dismantle it.
BillJasper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2015, 09:11 PM   #202
Honolulu_Blue
Hockey Boy
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mizzou B-ball fan View Post
Interested to see if KC can remain the only NFL team to never lose at Lambeau.

Not looking likely.
__________________
Steve Yzerman: 1,755 points in 1,514 regular season games. 185 points in 196 postseason games. A First-Team All-Star, Conn Smythe Trophy winner, Selke Trophy winner, Masterton Trophy winner, member of the Hockey Hall of Fame, Olympic gold medallist, and a three-time Stanley Cup Champion. Longest serving captain of one team in the history of the NHL (19 seasons).
Honolulu_Blue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2015, 09:28 PM   #203
Abe Sargent
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Catonsville, MD
Quote:
Originally Posted by EagleFan View Post
Has any one of those commercials left you with a positive feeling towards DirecTV?

Football on your Phone did!
__________________
Check out my two current weekly Magic columns!

https://www.coolstuffinc.com/a/?action=search&page=1&author[]=Abe%20Sargent
Abe Sargent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2015, 09:29 PM   #204
Abe Sargent
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Catonsville, MD
Why are te Bears doing a fire sale o their defense right now?
__________________
Check out my two current weekly Magic columns!

https://www.coolstuffinc.com/a/?action=search&page=1&author[]=Abe%20Sargent
Abe Sargent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2015, 09:41 PM   #205
Coffee Warlord
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Colorado Springs
Wow. Allen and Bostic gone in a day, for a pair of 6ths. Think Gase is admitting he may as well blow this thing up now.
Coffee Warlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2015, 10:19 PM   #206
BillJasper
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Northern Kentucky
Is TE the first/only read for the QB in the KC passing game?
__________________
The Confederacy lost, it is time to dismantle it.
BillJasper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2015, 10:22 PM   #207
Atocep
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Puyallup, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abe Sargent View Post
Why are te Bears doing a fire sale o their defense right now?

Because the team is old, bad, and has a new coaching staff and scheme. Both Bostic and Allen are poor fits for the 3-4. The team needs to go all in on a full scale rebuild.
Atocep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2015, 10:53 PM   #208
MizzouRah
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Troy, Mo
These Packers are going to beat the Rams 56-10
MizzouRah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2015, 11:08 PM   #210
bhlloy
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Hey, maybe on the next drive they will realize they shouldn't be dropping off Cobb at the goal line? Fourth time lucky
bhlloy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2015, 11:19 PM   #211
Suicane75
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NJ
Crazy rule change suggestion. Outlaw hitting. Make people actually tackle.
Suicane75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2015, 11:24 PM   #212
Suicane75
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NJ
Why was that not a safety on the kickoff?
Suicane75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2015, 11:29 PM   #213
Arles
Grey Dog Software
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Phoenix, AZ by way of Belleville, IL
It's the "momentum" rule. If the momentum of the catch takes you in the end zone, it's a touchback.
__________________
Developer of Bowl Bound College Football
http://www.greydogsoftware.com
Arles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2015, 11:39 PM   #214
Suicane75
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NJ
Did not know that.
Suicane75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2015, 11:40 PM   #215
EagleFan
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mays Landing, NJ USA
That was a really poor spot on that 4th down play. Why didn't they even measure that? It was close even with the bad spot.
EagleFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2015, 11:43 PM   #216
Suicane75
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NJ
Packers had no challenges. Refs are dumb.
Classic Andy Reid clock management, waste one of your timeouts. Jesus.
Suicane75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2015, 11:45 PM   #217
Suicane75
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NJ
Welp, you've wasted a timeout, and burned through the 2 minute warning. Bless him, but his teams are awful at this stuff.
Suicane75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2015, 11:46 PM   #218
BishopMVP
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Concord, MA/UMass
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coffee Warlord View Post
Wow. Allen and Bostic gone in a day, for a pair of 6ths. Think Gase is admitting he may as well blow this thing up now.
I'd like to see the details on the "conditional" part - f.e. if the Bears are picking up $11 million and the Panthers only paying $850k you'd think they could get more than a 6th. But maybe Jared Allen's fallen off more than I realized.
BishopMVP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2015, 11:53 PM   #219
Atocep
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Puyallup, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by BishopMVP View Post
I'd like to see the details on the "conditional" part - f.e. if the Bears are picking up $11 million and the Panthers only paying $850k you'd think they could get more than a 6th. But maybe Jared Allen's fallen off more than I realized.

He's 33 and would have been released at the end of this season because there would be no dead money in cutting him. He's still an above average player (or least he was last year with 32 hurries and 20 QB hits), but a bad fit in the new defense. With the white flag going up on this season they probably saw a chance to get something for him and jumped.
Atocep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2015, 12:00 AM   #220
TroyF
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonInMiddleGA View Post
That take on it would require me to believe that this also doesn't involve Elway's ego.


I think Elway does have a massive ego, but I don't think the ego was involved here. It was/is a desire to get some type of running game to take the pressure off of Manning.

The Broncos OLine didn't work well with a zone blocking scheme. Osweiller is more of a rollout type QB as well. So scrap the OLine, tweak the defense a little more and have a second option if the offense wears down.

The early returns on the offense are not good. . . and I'm on record in this thread (and others) as saying if the Oline doesn't improve, Denver is toast. But i don't think this is a massive shock to Elway or Kubiak. I think they expected this was going to take some time and I think they expected the defense to give them enough wins to get through it.

We'll see what happens the rest of the year. I'm not convinced the line is ever going to be good enough. . . . but holy hell if it does get better and the defense avoids major injuries to the pass rushers/corners? This team would be frightening come playoff time. If it doesn't happen, what's the worst thing? We whimper out like last year?

I see the logic in all of this, even if I don't agree with the methods.
TroyF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2015, 12:21 AM   #221
MizzouRah
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Troy, Mo
Hey look.. they can pass to Macklin.. lost in one of my FF leagues by 0.72 because of Rogers.. but someone dropped Macklin and he did quite well for me this week.
MizzouRah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2015, 02:44 AM   #222
Danny
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by MizzouRah View Post
Hey look.. they can pass to Macklin.. lost in one of my FF leagues by 0.72 because of Rogers.. but someone dropped Macklin and he did quite well for me this week.

2 team league?
Danny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2015, 07:29 AM   #223
BillJasper
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Northern Kentucky
Saw another play where Rodgers drew the defense into the neutral zone and his man jumped as well but the play was allowed to continue.
__________________
The Confederacy lost, it is time to dismantle it.
BillJasper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2015, 08:40 AM   #224
Logan
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NYC
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillJasper View Post
Saw another play where Rodgers drew the defense into the neutral zone and his man jumped as well but the play was allowed to continue.

From what I could see on replay, both times the GB linemen moved in concert with the ball being snapped, so it was a good play. Seems like the center is snapping the ball right on the first movement.
Logan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2015, 10:11 AM   #225
Thomkal
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Surfside Beach,SC USA
are my eyes deceiving me? Did a KC WR score a TD last night? A sure sign of the apocalypse.

Last edited by Thomkal : 09-29-2015 at 03:45 PM.
Thomkal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2015, 12:27 PM   #226
Arles
Grey Dog Software
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Phoenix, AZ by way of Belleville, IL
Quote:
Originally Posted by Logan View Post
From what I could see on replay, both times the GB linemen moved in concert with the ball being snapped, so it was a good play. Seems like the center is snapping the ball right on the first movement.
Yep, if you watch the center on these plays, he's instructed to snap on any defender going into the neutral zone at home (Rodgers also stays "ready" for any snap pre-play). It can be a little dicey as there have been times this season where the snap occurs and the OL isn't really ready. But, what has helped is the defense tends to stop on an offsides too, so it really hasn't bit Green Bay.

If I was an opposing DC, I would instruct my guys to immediately rush the QB on any offsides to prevent his big play. There's a chance Rodgers could be exposed as the center usually snaps quicker than expected and the OL isn't quite ready. Of course, that's a lot easier said than done as it goes against human nature.
__________________
Developer of Bowl Bound College Football
http://www.greydogsoftware.com

Last edited by Arles : 09-29-2015 at 12:28 PM.
Arles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2015, 01:22 PM   #227
Dr. Sak
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Stuck in Yinzerville, PA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arles View Post
It's the "momentum" rule. If the momentum of the catch takes you in the end zone, it's a touchback.

The momentum rule does not give you a touchback. It gives you the ball where you caught it. It only applies from the 5 yard line and in.

I didn't see the play but usually when it's caught at the 1 or inside, by philosophy, a touchback is awarded.
Dr. Sak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2015, 01:26 PM   #228
Arles
Grey Dog Software
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Phoenix, AZ by way of Belleville, IL
OK, the announcers explained that the "momentum rule" made the touchback on the play the correct call. I've seen similar plays before so it made sense.
__________________
Developer of Bowl Bound College Football
http://www.greydogsoftware.com
Arles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2015, 07:23 PM   #229
BishopMVP
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Concord, MA/UMass
Quote:
Originally Posted by TroyF View Post
But i don't think this is a massive shock to Elway or Kubiak. I think they expected this was going to take some time and I think they expected the defense to give them enough wins to get through it.
They scrapped most of their offense by Week 3... I'm pretty sure they figured under center would go better than this. Am I crazy or did this same thing happen in Manning's first season back in 2012, where they tried to "protect him" early, and ended up just letting Manning do what he wanted by the end of the first month, leading to the team's offensive production taking off?
BishopMVP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2015, 06:53 PM   #230
albionmoonlight
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: North Carolina
Saints Trade DE Akiem Hicks to Patriots for TE Michael Hoomanawanui.

Hicks is a physically gifted 3-4 DE who constantly underachieved. Belichick & Co. will probably turn him into a double digit sack guy.
albionmoonlight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 12:34 AM   #231
BishopMVP
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Concord, MA/UMass
Quote:
Originally Posted by albionmoonlight View Post
Saints Trade DE Akiem Hicks to Patriots for TE Michael Hoomanawanui.

Hicks is a physically gifted 3-4 DE who constantly underachieved. Belichick & Co. will probably turn him into a double digit sack guy.
Keshawn Martin touchdown last week (Although I think part of that was it being garbage time, I could see him sliding into the Edelman/Welker role if Edelman goes down.)
BishopMVP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 01:14 AM   #232
TroyF
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by BishopMVP View Post
They scrapped most of their offense by Week 3... I'm pretty sure they figured under center would go better than this. Am I crazy or did this same thing happen in Manning's first season back in 2012, where they tried to "protect him" early, and ended up just letting Manning do what he wanted by the end of the first month, leading to the team's offensive production taking off?


Yes, you're crazy. Mannings first year in Denver, they played the Steelers first. Manning looked good, not great. He had a Thomas screen pass that went 71 yards for a score and the Denver defense iced the game with a TD late.

Then Denver went to Atlanta and Manning threw 3 INT's in the first quarter of the game. This was followed by a loss against Houston at home where he looked poor. After a blowout win against the Raiders, Denver faced the Pats and went down 31-7 before mounting a late comeback. Manning looked great, but turnovers killed the team.

The following week, the Broncos played the Chargers on Monday night and fell behind 24-0 at halftime. 35 second half points later and Manning was officially back. They really never tried to run to protect him though. He was behind so much the first 6 games, they couldn't have protected him if they had wanted to. (21-0, 31-11, 31-7 and 24-0 were the deficits in the first 6 career games as a Bronco and those did not come because Denver was trying to run the ball)

As for this year, again, I'll say I think the OLine has to improve and I'm not sure their "plan" is going to work. But I do think judgement needs to wait a little bit. There are 4 new starters on that line and one of them didn't play a single snap with the team until opening day.

I'm sure Elway and Kubiak knew damned well the OLine wasn't going to be all that great from the start. If they didn't, they are lunatics. I think the pistol and all of the other stuff is being done in the hopes the line will come together and the running game will come around. It isn't like the team improved the ground game out of the pistol. It was still horrible. This team is averaging 2.6 yards a rush, it isn't pretty.

On the positive side, the Detroit game saw the first time multiple Denver OLineman graded as a positive in PFF rankings. Maybe things are about to turn. Maybe they aren't. Either way, this is not a surprise to me.

The only surprising thing to me is the team is 3-0. I would not have been shocked at 1-2 before the season started. I thought the Ravens and Lions would be coin flips and the Chiefs would win at Arrowhead on a short week.

This is NOT the 3rd best team in the league right now (like most of the power rankings are saying) But the defense is very, very, very good and the offense can only get better. While I could still see this plan ending in disaster BEFORE the playoffs even start, I can see how it can work.

Time will tell the tale.
TroyF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 09:48 AM   #233
MikeVic
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Hometown of Canada
Is there a hurricance that's threatening horrible weather in tonight's game?
MikeVic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 09:50 AM   #234
Grover
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Lisboa, ME
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeVic View Post
Is there a hurricance that's threatening horrible weather in tonight's game?

Not tonight. Hurricane Joaquin Phoenix isn't expected to make US landfall until Saturday. They're predicting a potential of 8-12" of rain in the Myrtle Beach area.

Could effect the Redskins game.
__________________
Come On You Irons!
West Ham United | Philadelphia Flyers | Cincinnati Bengals | Kansas City Royals

FOFC Greatest Band Draft Runner Up
FOFC Movie Remake Draft Winner
FOFC Movie Comedy Draft Winner
Grover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 11:08 AM   #235
Galaril
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by TroyF View Post
Yes, you're crazy. Mannings first year in Denver, they played the Steelers first. Manning looked good, not great. He had a Thomas screen pass that went 71 yards for a score and the Denver defense iced the game with a TD late.

Then Denver went to Atlanta and Manning threw 3 INT's in the first quarter of the game. This was followed by a loss against Houston at home where he looked poor. After a blowout win against the Raiders, Denver faced the Pats and went down 31-7 before mounting a late comeback. Manning looked great, but turnovers killed the team.

The following week, the Broncos played the Chargers on Monday night and fell behind 24-0 at halftime. 35 second half points later and Manning was officially back. They really never tried to run to protect him though. He was behind so much the first 6 games, they couldn't have protected him if they had wanted to. (21-0, 31-11, 31-7 and 24-0 were the deficits in the first 6 career games as a Bronco and those did not come because Denver was trying to run the ball)

As for this year, again, I'll say I think the OLine has to improve and I'm not sure their "plan" is going to work. But I do think judgement needs to wait a little bit. There are 4 new starters on that line and one of them didn't play a single snap with the team until opening day.

I'm sure Elway and Kubiak knew damned well the OLine wasn't going to be all that great from the start. If they didn't, they are lunatics. I think the pistol and all of the other stuff is being done in the hopes the line will come together and the running game will come around. It isn't like the team improved the ground game out of the pistol. It was still horrible. This team is averaging 2.6 yards a rush, it isn't pretty.

On the positive side, the Detroit game saw the first time multiple Denver OLineman graded as a positive in PFF rankings. Maybe things are about to turn. Maybe they aren't. Either way, this is not a surprise to me.

The only surprising thing to me is the team is 3-0. I would not have been shocked at 1-2 before the season started. I thought the Ravens and Lions would be coin flips and the Chiefs would win at Arrowhead on a short week.

This is NOT the 3rd best team in the league right now (like most of the power rankings are saying) But the defense is very, very, very good and the offense can only get better. While I could still see this plan ending in disaster BEFORE the playoffs even start, I can see how it can work.

Time will tell the tale.

I heard this morning most around the country are discounting the Broncos 3-0 start since we have played teams with a combined 1-8 mark. I think these teams we have played who were all playoff teams last year and picked to be contenders this year are alot better than the records they have at this point. I also agree I am not sure the 'plan" will work this season with Manning and that oline. But ,I also believe with that defense the Kubiak style offense is the offense we need to make work longterm here whether it is with Oswelier or another mobile QB.
Galaril is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 11:17 AM   #236
Honolulu_Blue
Hockey Boy
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Quote:
Originally Posted by Galaril View Post
I heard this morning most around the country are discounting the Broncos 3-0 start since we have played teams with a combined 1-8 mark. I think these teams we have played who were all playoff teams last year and picked to be contenders this year are alot better than the records they have at this point.

Not the Lions. They are pretty much what their record indicates at this point. They are horrible.
__________________
Steve Yzerman: 1,755 points in 1,514 regular season games. 185 points in 196 postseason games. A First-Team All-Star, Conn Smythe Trophy winner, Selke Trophy winner, Masterton Trophy winner, member of the Hockey Hall of Fame, Olympic gold medallist, and a three-time Stanley Cup Champion. Longest serving captain of one team in the history of the NHL (19 seasons).
Honolulu_Blue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 11:21 AM   #237
Galaril
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Honolulu_Blue View Post
Not the Lions. They are pretty much what their record indicates at this point. They are horrible.

Yeah that is fairly accurate. Still they are at least 6 or 7 win team by end of season maybe 8-8. They got the talent.
Galaril is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 12:52 PM   #238
Logan
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NYC
Cardinals are also 3-0 against teams currently 1-8, and the one win in there was by the Niners which was obviously a fluke.
Logan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 12:53 PM   #239
Honolulu_Blue
Hockey Boy
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Royal Oak, MI
I think the Lions best shot at winning a game is in three weeks when they play Chicago. By that time, they will be 0-5.
__________________
Steve Yzerman: 1,755 points in 1,514 regular season games. 185 points in 196 postseason games. A First-Team All-Star, Conn Smythe Trophy winner, Selke Trophy winner, Masterton Trophy winner, member of the Hockey Hall of Fame, Olympic gold medallist, and a three-time Stanley Cup Champion. Longest serving captain of one team in the history of the NHL (19 seasons).
Honolulu_Blue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 02:23 PM   #240
Thomkal
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Surfside Beach,SC USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Logan View Post
Cardinals are also 3-0 against teams currently 1-8, and the one win in there was by the Niners which was obviously a fluke.

Not likely to change things this week with the Rams coming to town-though they did beat the Seahawks. I'm more worried about injuries, Palmer and Stanton suffered their season enders in Rams games
Thomkal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2015, 01:40 AM   #241
TroyF
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by Galaril View Post
I heard this morning most around the country are discounting the Broncos 3-0 start since we have played teams with a combined 1-8 mark. I think these teams we have played who were all playoff teams last year and picked to be contenders this year are alot better than the records they have at this point. I also agree I am not sure the 'plan" will work this season with Manning and that oline. But ,I also believe with that defense the Kubiak style offense is the offense we need to make work longterm here whether it is with Oswelier or another mobile QB.

Of course everyone is looking down on the team due to the record of the teams we have played.

None of it matters anyway. 3-0 is 3-0. Denver will play the Packers, the Patriots, the Colts and the Bengals before the year is out. If they are frauds, they will be proven as such.

We should all know by now that it doesn't really matter how you look right now. The Patriots came out of week 4 last year looking like washed up clowns who would never contend for anything. How did that turn out exactly?

I don't care much about power rankings this early in the season.
TroyF is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:47 AM.



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.