WW LXXIV Killer Kittens on Mount FujiMori day (GAME OVER- KITTENS WIN)

[st.cronin]

moar funny pictures

[claphamsa]

Hoops- Oliegril #185, Eagle Fan #203, Passacaglia #299
Perdue Brad- St. Cronin # 174, chief Rum #201, alan T #209
Heizne- Hoops #250
Kwhitt- the Jackyl #140
Olie girl- Coffee warlord #188
Coffee Warlord- Seolian #193
Lathum-Dangerion #204
Mcolloins- PB #232 Lathum #235
St.Cronin- Heinze #270,mccolins #283, Kwhitt #288

[Coffee Warlord]

Lordy. Decisions decisions.

[PurdueBrad]

Originally Posted by st.cronin

moar funny pictures

Holy christ that's funny!

[claphamsa]

Originally Posted by PurdueBrad

Holy christ that's funny!

Dude serioulsy, you need to check out the website more Its pure gold!

[Lathum]

I'm not ready to string Cronin up yet for exploring a different line of thinking

[jeheinz72]

Originally Posted by Lathum

I'm not ready to string Cronin up yet for exploring a different line of thinking

Would that be because you were exploring it as well or ...?

[Lathum]

Originally Posted by jeheinz72

Would that be because you were exploring it as well or ...?

not sure what you are getting at but I am always a fan of narrowing down the candidates on the first day.

[st.cronin]

I wasn't really exploring an alternate way of thinking. I just recognized that somebody needed to put a 2nd vote on somebody, and it might as well be me. If that gets me lynched, so be it.

[PurdueBrad]

Not as cute, but meaningful nonetheless:

[Coffee Warlord]

Alright, I was gonna wait till closer to the deadline, but I wanna see how certain people react.

unvote olie
Vote PurdueBrad

Sorry, PB. Do realize, this isn't as much suspicion of you as it is who is voting for who. Two people who, to me, have aroused suspicion (as much as you can in day 1), are on cronin. I've got nothing on Chief and Alan.

Still may swap if this provokes anything more.

[claphamsa]

Hoops- Oliegril #185, Eagle Fan #203, Passacaglia #299
Perdue Brad- St. Cronin # 174, chief Rum #201, alan T #209, Coffee Warlord #311
Heizne- Hoops #250
Kwhitt- the Jackyl #140
Coffee Warlord- Seolian #193
Lathum-Dangerion #204
Mcolloins- PB #232 Lathum #235
St.Cronin- Heinze #270,mccolins #283, Kwhitt #288

[PurdueBrad]

This is an obvious

unvote Mccollins

[Lathum]

unvote McCollins
Vote Hoopsguy

[Lathum]

well that looks bad

[st.cronin]

Why hoopsguy?

[Coffee Warlord]

Heh.

You know, if we can rally 1 or 2 more people, I'd vote mccolins in a heartbeat.

[hoopsguy]

OK, I'll play along as long as I'm allowed to do so without significant fear for my life:

UNVOTE JEHEINZ
VOTE CRONIN

That said, if I'm able to be around at deadline I'm pretty likely to move the vote where I feel it belongs rather than trying to create action like I'm doing right now.

[st.cronin]

mccollins seems like a better candidate than hoops. Unless somebody is being protected.

[hoopsguy]

Hmm, now that I've picked up another vote this feels a little less cool.

I think that squares us all at four right now.

[Coffee Warlord]

Mccollins is one of the 2 on you I don't feel right about, cronin. I feel way better about voting him than PB.

[hoopsguy]

So right now I'm letting Purdue choose between me and Cronin. Hmm.

[Passacaglia]

Originally Posted by Coffee Warlord

Heh.

You know, if we can rally 1 or 2 more people, I'd vote mccolins in a heartbeat.

Why? And why wait until two people have unvoted him to mention it?

[claphamsa]

Hoops- Oliegril #185, Eagle Fan #203, Passacaglia #299, Lathum #314
Perdue Brad- St. Cronin # 174, chief Rum #201, alan T #209, Coffee Warlord #311
Kwhitt- the Jackyl #140
Coffee Warlord- Seolian #193
Lathum-Dangerion #204
St.Cronin- Heinze #270,mccolins #283, Kwhitt #288, Hoops #318

[Passacaglia]

Originally Posted by hoopsguy

So right now I'm letting Purdue choose between me and Cronin. Hmm.

There's still plenty of time -- I don't think that's how it will play out.

[st.cronin]

I'm not coming off PB unless the numbers dictate such a move would save a villager (ie me). I don't like the votes on hoopsguy, though.

[Coffee Warlord]

Originally Posted by Passacaglia

Why? And why wait until two people have unvoted him to mention it?

I mentioned it earlier. I don't vibe with the 'totally random vote' thing on EF (who I believe had 0 votes at that point) that late in the cycle. The first few people voting, no problem. Someone throwing on a vote latish against a un-voted target on day 1 doesn't sit well with me.

[Coffee Warlord]

Dola, and to be honest, it didn't click that there was a chance at pushing a meaningful block onto mccollins until I saw the two unvotes.

[mccollins]

Originally Posted by Coffee Warlord

I mentioned it earlier. I don't vibe with the 'totally random vote' thing on EF (who I believe had 0 votes at that point) that late in the cycle. The first few people voting, no problem. Someone throwing on a vote latish against a un-voted target on day 1 doesn't sit well with me.

Ask claphamsa, I told him this morning - I had a job interview yesterday afternoon and then I wasn't able to get on last night because we have people over every Thursday night.

[hoopsguy]

Originally Posted by Passacaglia

There's still plenty of time -- I don't think that's how it will play out.

I know, I'm just not sure how much time I have ... I'm heading back to my support call now and probably can't check in again until after deadline.

[claphamsa]

maybe you should post that in the thread then

[Lathum]

[IMG][/IMG]

[jeheinz72]

friggin Lathum man...hahah

[st.cronin]

I feel like this late move to hoops stinks like somebody's being protected. That would be either me or PB.

[PurdueBrad]

Has RendeR not voted yet?

[mccollins]

I swear, you can have an argument made against you no matter what you do.

If you vote for a leading vote-getter, you can be accused of just going with the crowd to try to blend in and not be noticed.

I chose to do the opposite because - as previously stated - I didn't want to vote for hoops or PB, everyone else with a vote only had 1 vote, and I didn't want to lead the charge on anyone when no one really has a clue who is a dog.

If that's unsettling, string up this kitteh and lose a vanilla villager.

[st.cronin]

If I had to bet on TWO players both being dogs, it would be Purduebrad and Pass.

[Coffee Warlord]

Originally Posted by mccollins

I swear, you can have an argument made against you no matter what you do.

If you vote for a leading vote-getter, you can be accused of just going with the crowd to try to blend in and not be noticed.

I chose to do the opposite because - as previously stated - I didn't want to vote for hoops or PB, everyone else with a vote only had 1 vote, and I didn't want to lead the charge on anyone when no one really has a clue who is a dog.

If that's unsettling, string up this kitteh and lose a vanilla villager.

Welcome to Day 1.

[mccollins]

Originally Posted by claphamsa

maybe you should post that in the thread then

tru dat. my bad.

[Coffee Warlord]

Originally Posted by st.cronin

If I had to bet on TWO players both being dogs, it would be Purduebrad and Pass.

Why PB?

[Coffee Warlord]

Are we tied again?

[st.cronin]

Because, as I said above, the later votes for hoops look like somebody is being protected. That would be either PB or myself. I know I'm a kitteh.

[hoopsguy]

Guys, I'm not going to be able to get back in again. I'll leave my vote where it is and hope that I don't get sniped.

I don't have any super-cool role, so if there is a late reveal and you need to take someone out I'm as good as anyone, I guess.

Good luck, hope to be able to follow up in another hour or so.

[PurdueBrad]

You've been stubbornly on me for more than just any vote movements.

[Coffee Warlord]

So what's the verdict here, kids?

We're absolutely not leaving this as a tie.

[st.cronin]

PB - its nothing personal, my eyes are open and I'm willing to consider a move - but it has to be for a genuine reason, not simply to manipulate the vote.

[PurdueBrad]

Originally Posted by Coffee Warlord

So what's the verdict here, kids?

We're absolutely not leaving this as a tie.

I have a vote still so it won't likely be a tie but I don't like either choice and yet if I had to pick the two people I most worry about being wolves, it is these two.

[Passacaglia]

Originally Posted by Coffee Warlord

Are we tied again?

yeah, we're at 4-4-4

[mccollins]

Originally Posted by Coffee Warlord

Are we tied again?

It looks like we're 3-way tied if the last vote count is right.

Claphamsa has stated he hates no lynches so if I had to guess, I'd bet the tiebreaker mechanic would be to have all voting leaders be lynched.

I might move my vote off so that we don't end up losing *3* kittehs...

[PurdueBrad]

Originally Posted by st.cronin

PB - its nothing personal, my eyes are open and I'm willing to consider a move - but it has to be for a genuine reason, not simply to manipulate the vote.

Christ...I have 10 minutes till I have to decide?