05-12-2009, 11:09 AM | #3801 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Not too far away
|
Quote:
So my realization is that the only thing we have on ourside is our workers. We don't want to run out of workers, but we can't afford to keep losing rounds and so I think we should send out even more than the 2500 we sent yesterday. Maybe after a victory we can start to reassess but I really feel like we need to use the resources at hand and that just happens to be the workers. |
|
05-12-2009, 11:10 AM | #3802 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DeKalb, IL
|
I think they hit deadline. Let me expand on what I posted earlier, even though BK isn't here.
WW is very much a game about balance, and I think that is something that Abe strives for very hard in his games. Those first two actions by the wolves, if they have either similar or superior number of soldiers OR a decent number of wolves, would make this endgame imbalanced and I don't believe Abe would let that happen. That leads me to believe that the wolves need wins to even stay in this thing. Looking at some of the research (which RendeR said he did as well), I wouldn't be surprised that the wolves may have two more tricks up their sleeve (from what I read, possible use of machine guns and a second bombing run). This would fall in line with some of the descriptions. The miners went in with 13-15000 troops (we're close) against unknown numbers but, frankly, it doesn't look like it could've been more than 2000 private soldiers. So given that we're at the low end of that ballpark, let's assume the miners are right at 2000 soldiers. I would like to see us test the waters a bit here, just to see if they have another card to play. I don't think a token force is necessarily what we want but I don't think we risk overwhelming them in case they have another block. What about 1500? If I were a wolf here, I would probably send 500 soldiers (IF they are sending soldiers) just to see the battle play out since they seem to have limited numbers BUT their soldiers are better than ours. |
05-12-2009, 11:10 AM | #3803 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Jul 2001
|
Yep BK, I was thinking the same and suggested 5k on the last page.
|
05-12-2009, 11:12 AM | #3804 | |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DeKalb, IL
|
Quote:
Just read this, took me awhile to post mine. We can certainly go bigger, we have approx. 10000 workers left and we need two, possibly three wins? So what about sending 4000? BK, read over what I wrote, I'm not arguing your logic because I trust you but see what you think of my read. |
|
05-12-2009, 11:13 AM | #3805 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Not too far away
|
PB: If you feel like we're up against 2500 soldiers we should never send less than that amount, as we basically can afford to keep sending out that many against any reasonable amount of wolves.
|
05-12-2009, 11:14 AM | #3806 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Not too far away
|
By never sending less I mean more than the idea of sending out 6 or so. There is, at some point, still sense in doing that. Just not at this point I feel.
|
05-12-2009, 11:15 AM | #3807 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DeKalb, IL
|
No, I mean 2000 TOTAL men is all they have. I support going above that but once they're out of soldiers, it's game over anyway, so they can't send them all. Going big sounds fine here, I'm probably erring on the side of caution which isn't likely the way to win.
|
05-12-2009, 11:16 AM | #3808 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DeKalb, IL
|
Ahhh, I gotcha BK. Well then I think I would certainly support sending between 2500-4000 (somewhere between 25% and 40% of what we have left).
|
05-12-2009, 11:17 AM | #3809 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Jul 2001
|
If we go 5k, that leaves us with 5k for the rest of the game, right?
|
05-12-2009, 11:17 AM | #3810 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DeKalb, IL
|
Yeah Danny, that would leave us 5 k the rest of the way, but how much longer can there really be.
|
05-12-2009, 11:18 AM | #3811 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Jul 2001
|
I still think big or small is a better strategy then going in the middle.
|
05-12-2009, 11:18 AM | #3812 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DeKalb, IL
|
Danny may be on to something by sending half our forces to confront them. Worst case scenario is they send a token force and we lose 5k or they block and we lose 5 k but that still leaves us 5k to take on whatever they have left.
|
05-12-2009, 11:19 AM | #3813 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Jul 2001
|
I don't really see much point in going 2-3k, I'm thinking the wolves will easily cover that for when they send in their troops as opposed to doing their insta win.
|
05-12-2009, 11:19 AM | #3814 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DeKalb, IL
|
By block, I mean they use one of their actions that we've seen.
|
05-12-2009, 11:20 AM | #3815 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Jul 2001
|
The other alternative, is to send a few hundred. At this point we're still 5-3 worst case and can afford another loss.
|
05-12-2009, 11:21 AM | #3816 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Not too far away
|
While I agree we can't have too much longer to go, depeleting our stores by half right now seems excessive.
|
05-12-2009, 11:21 AM | #3817 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DeKalb, IL
|
I like going high I think, like I said, we dwindle our numbers but as BK pointed out, we're sort of wealthy with manpower.
By sending a few hundred, we either take a loss to soldiers and they've wasted their's, they block and we only lose a few, or they sent a token few and we steal a victory. |
05-12-2009, 11:22 AM | #3818 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Not too far away
|
This is the key point. With their 2 (or more) insta-wins just how many soldiers do we think they have? I have to lean towards PB at this point and feel if they have instawins they can't be overflowing with soldiers.
|
05-12-2009, 11:24 AM | #3819 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Jul 2001
|
How about we go relatively small here again and make the wolves do something?
|
05-12-2009, 11:24 AM | #3820 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DeKalb, IL
|
The way it read the two places I checked, the companies relied on small private armies and some supplemental help from the U.S. Govt. Everything else they did was basically technology based, like bombs, gas, the armored trains/cars, and machine guns. Their numbers weren't how they really won.
|
05-12-2009, 11:25 AM | #3821 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DeKalb, IL
|
Guys, I'm out, sorry, late for my duty. I'll be on in 45 minutes.
|
05-12-2009, 11:25 AM | #3822 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Jul 2001
|
Ok, so should we go with 2.5 k then?
|
05-12-2009, 11:28 AM | #3823 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Not too far away
|
I'm inclined to do 3k or so. That's been my inclination all along.
|
05-12-2009, 11:29 AM | #3824 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Jul 2001
|
3k is good with me
|
05-12-2009, 11:36 AM | #3825 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Not too far away
|
Commit 3003 Workers
|
05-12-2009, 11:49 AM | #3826 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Jul 2001
|
I'm off for a few hours until our next action.
|
05-12-2009, 11:51 AM | #3827 | |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Fresno, CA
|
Quote:
Hmm. I think we could get by with less, but I'm not going to miss the debate, show up, and critique. So this leaves us with ~7k? That still gives us some flexibility. I do agree with the assessment that there are likely only relatively few miners. So I see two mechanics available. Miners send in wave attacks, that the sympathizers counter with their "specials"...gas, bombs, machine guns...etc. Eventually the sympathizers will run out of those "special" plays. Or-- The miners only chance against the specials is to through a huge rush, smaller efforts simply bounce. I dunno. |
|
05-12-2009, 11:54 AM | #3828 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Not too far away
|
Quote:
Believe me I have thought of that. And if that's the case we're going to lose. I just don't see myself making that kind of high risk/high reward play given the structure of this game. |
|
05-12-2009, 12:29 PM | #3829 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DeKalb, IL
|
Checking and caught up. I'm fine with that number. My thoughts are that if the wolves can beat 3k here and then 3500 or 4k the next time and THEN still beat our remaining 3500 or 3k then we never had a shot to begin with.
|
05-12-2009, 12:35 PM | #3830 | |||
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
jesus, I was just asking about that game since there really isn't anything going on here |
|||
05-12-2009, 12:39 PM | #3831 |
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
I think you guys should send 5K
or 6. |
05-12-2009, 01:05 PM | #3832 |
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
is that deadline?
|
05-12-2009, 01:05 PM | #3833 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Jul 2001
|
Yeah
|
05-12-2009, 01:08 PM | #3834 |
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
Well then Abe needs to get out of GD and stop telling everyone he loves them and get his ass over here.
|
05-12-2009, 01:09 PM | #3835 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DeKalb, IL
|
|
05-12-2009, 01:18 PM | #3836 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: non white trash MD
|
what the hell is GD?
__________________
Dominating Warewolf for 0 games! GIT R DUN!!! |
05-12-2009, 01:19 PM | #3837 |
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
|
05-12-2009, 01:19 PM | #3838 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Not too far away
|
GD = General Discussion
what is now OT = Off Topic |
05-12-2009, 01:21 PM | #3839 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: non white trash MD
|
oh ok. so say OT :P
__________________
Dominating Warewolf for 0 games! GIT R DUN!!! |
05-12-2009, 01:22 PM | #3840 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mays Landing, NJ USA
|
|
05-12-2009, 01:25 PM | #3841 | |
FOFC Survivor
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Wentzville, MO
|
Quote:
__________________
Cheer for a walk on quarterback! Ardent leads the Vols in the dynasty forum. |
|
05-12-2009, 01:40 PM | #3842 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Catonsville, MD
|
I will process momentarily
__________________
Check out my two current weekly Magic columns! https://www.coolstuffinc.com/a/?action=search&page=1&author[]=Abe%20Sargent |
05-12-2009, 01:44 PM | #3843 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Catonsville, MD
|
You decide to commit to another skirmish when scouts report what you believe is an opening. 3003 of your miners move out!
The Sympathizers have sent troops this time as well, and 2250 of their forces smash into yours. The battle is vicious and close, but i the end, they manage to win the victoire. The Sympathizers have won Stage Four. Danny has been killed in the skirmish.
__________________
Check out my two current weekly Magic columns! https://www.coolstuffinc.com/a/?action=search&page=1&author[]=Abe%20Sargent |
05-12-2009, 01:46 PM | #3844 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Jul 2001
|
Grrr, 5k would have done it too.
|
05-12-2009, 01:46 PM | #3845 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Jul 2001
|
Good luck guys.
|
05-12-2009, 01:46 PM | #3846 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: non white trash MD
|
wait... so we sent less people than us... and still won?
__________________
Dominating Warewolf for 0 games! GIT R DUN!!! |
05-12-2009, 01:46 PM | #3847 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: non white trash MD
|
I say we send one and see= what happens... its not like there is any logic behind any of this.
__________________
Dominating Warewolf for 0 games! GIT R DUN!!! |
05-12-2009, 01:47 PM | #3848 |
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
|
05-12-2009, 01:50 PM | #3849 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: non white trash MD
|
I cant see that pic, but I suggest we stuff lathum full of viagra and send him out to do battle.
__________________
Dominating Warewolf for 0 games! GIT R DUN!!! |
05-12-2009, 01:55 PM | #3850 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DeKalb, IL
|
BK, what do you make of this. This is NOT how I assumed things would go. First, they sent 2250 troops (which I'm still assuming is most of their load) AND they sent less than us and they still beat us. So with the two automatic victories and now a decent advantage in quality of troops, what do we have to do here?
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|