|
View Poll Results: How is Obama doing? (poll started 6/6) | |||
Great - above my expectations | 18 | 6.87% | |
Good - met most of my expectations | 66 | 25.19% | |
Average - so so, disappointed a little | 64 | 24.43% | |
Bad - sold us out | 101 | 38.55% | |
Trout - don't know yet | 13 | 4.96% | |
Voters: 262. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools |
08-19-2009, 09:11 PM | #4001 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
|
Because we can't regulate any companies. Oh no. That's why our industrial food production is exactly like Upton Sinclair said it was (not saying its good, but its a far sight better than "The Jungle").
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages" -Tennessee Williams |
08-19-2009, 09:12 PM | #4002 |
Grey Dog Software
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Phoenix, AZ by way of Belleville, IL
|
No, what I am saying is this:
You (with your PPO) and a medicare patient come in for a MRI. Medicare sets a cap on how much that doctor/hospital can charge for the MRI. So, to offset that cost, the hospital charges your private PPO (and potentially you) more to makeup the cost difference on the medicare patient. Another big issue is the payment process by the government on these poverty plans. They have been notoriously late/under pay causing many doctors not to accept them. It's better to just setup guidelines for private insurance and have regulations for people who take the stipend for coverage. |
08-19-2009, 09:12 PM | #4003 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
insurance companies are fucking scum. insurance is a massive fucking racket.
when i was looking for jobs i had very little i said i wouldn't do, but one thing i said was that i'd never work for an insurance company.
__________________
Get bent whoever hacked my pw and changed my signature. |
08-19-2009, 09:14 PM | #4004 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
Quote:
I'm sure the insurance companies have their hands in the new bill as well. That might explain why the public option is so relatively small and restrictive. |
|
08-19-2009, 09:16 PM | #4005 | |
Grey Dog Software
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Phoenix, AZ by way of Belleville, IL
|
Quote:
|
|
08-19-2009, 09:17 PM | #4006 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
Quote:
very moderate first step towards the ultimate nirvana which would be single-payer
__________________
Get bent whoever hacked my pw and changed my signature. |
|
08-19-2009, 09:18 PM | #4007 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
|
Quote:
Insurance companies dictate to the doctor what they will pay for treatment. Those who don't have insurance have to pay much more to cover that cost. Find out one day what the insurance company actually paid for your treatment as opposed to what they billed you. I'm also pretty sure part of the reform for Medicare was a system for faster payments to doctors. Another thing you want in this bill that you oppose. Last edited by RainMaker : 08-19-2009 at 09:20 PM. |
|
08-19-2009, 09:19 PM | #4008 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
Quote:
I thought that until I saw how few people the public option is apparently going to cover. If a middle class person loses their job, or if their employer drops health care, they'll have to pay out of pocket for a private company - they can't get the public option. (I think, my understanding of this changes every day). |
|
08-19-2009, 09:19 PM | #4009 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
|
Quote:
You mean like set levels for how much of premiums go to medical claims, LIKE IN THIS BILL? I realize that you really just want a single payer system, but considering that it has a 0% chance of passing, you just need to get over that.
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages" -Tennessee Williams |
|
08-19-2009, 09:21 PM | #4010 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
|
Quote:
I'd rather have private competition with a strong public regulatory layer over a one-size-fits-all single payer government controlled medical system. Basically, more Switzerland, less UK.
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages" -Tennessee Williams |
|
08-19-2009, 09:21 PM | #4011 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Georgia
|
I'm amused that we're going all the way back to The Jungle, which is somehow supposed to trump the very recent examples of intense corruption in the private sector.
__________________
Top 10 Songs of the Year 1955-Present (1976 Added) Franchise Portfolio Draft Winner Fictional Character Draft Winner Television Family Draft Winner Build Your Own Hollywood Studio Draft Winner |
08-19-2009, 09:21 PM | #4012 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
Quote:
good...because for-profit insurance companies in the healthcare space have no fucking business being in business. are you really comfortable with your healthcare being at the whim of Wall Street and subject to corporate profits? the insurance companies now are trying to get the reimbursement rate changed to a 35% floor - so you'd be paying 35% of your own healthcare costs out of your own pocket!! wouldn't you much rather have a not-for-profit entity overseeing it that didn't have an economic motive to minimize the amount of money spent on your care? honestly, not trying to belittle anybody, but i don't understand how, when looking at it that way, anyone could ever pick the "for profit" option. there's absolutely no benefit to it.
__________________
Get bent whoever hacked my pw and changed my signature. Last edited by DaddyTorgo : 08-19-2009 at 09:25 PM. |
|
08-19-2009, 09:22 PM | #4013 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
|
Quote:
Last edited by RainMaker : 08-19-2009 at 09:22 PM. |
|
08-19-2009, 09:24 PM | #4014 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
|
Quote:
Mostly because they'd rather not the government control 100% of health care. Considering there are already very successful private/public partnerships in the would out there.
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages" -Tennessee Williams |
|
08-19-2009, 09:26 PM | #4015 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
|
Quote:
You realize what the term "more Switzerland" means, yes?
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages" -Tennessee Williams |
|
08-19-2009, 09:26 PM | #4016 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
Quote:
Looking at it that way, sure. But you're just taking the best aspects of government and the worst of private. There's also the worst of government and the best of private. Maybe government wins out with healthcare, it's possible, but it's the complete invalidation of any drawbacks or risks that make me wonder if there's too much idealism here and not enough reality. Last edited by molson : 08-19-2009 at 09:27 PM. |
|
08-19-2009, 09:27 PM | #4017 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
yeah. we'll never get good regulation like that to limit profits because too many lobbyists and senators are bought and paid for by insurance companies. so single-payer or an "anybody opt-in" public option (eventually) is the only possible solution that we'll see
__________________
Get bent whoever hacked my pw and changed my signature. |
08-19-2009, 09:27 PM | #4018 | |
Grey Dog Software
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Phoenix, AZ by way of Belleville, IL
|
Quote:
It's cheaper just to set requirements and outsource it. |
|
08-19-2009, 09:28 PM | #4019 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
Quote:
i don't think i'm taking the best of one and worst of the other. i think i'm making a broad statement about each of their respective motives for providing health insurance.
__________________
Get bent whoever hacked my pw and changed my signature. |
|
08-19-2009, 09:29 PM | #4020 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
Quote:
because you'll never get the regulations due to all the congresspeople being bought-off
__________________
Get bent whoever hacked my pw and changed my signature. |
|
08-19-2009, 09:31 PM | #4021 |
Grey Dog Software
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Phoenix, AZ by way of Belleville, IL
|
Assuming we have a federal budget, there's no difference in motives. Both want to provide the most coverage options possible by staying within budget. The difference is that the government can change the rules as we go to fit its paradigm whereas individual private companies have to meet a certain set of regulations/quality/cost or they lose patients.
|
08-19-2009, 09:32 PM | #4022 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
Quote:
Still a very idealistic view of government. On the individual level, they're just looking to advance their careers, just like those in the private sector. Corporations are tainted by profit-seeking, government is tainted by politics. Neither are looking out for your best interest. Last edited by molson : 08-19-2009 at 09:35 PM. |
|
08-19-2009, 09:34 PM | #4023 |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
|
08-19-2009, 09:35 PM | #4024 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
|
And, as someone who works for the federal government, I think we do a Hell of a better job regulating abuses than we do in running things.
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages" -Tennessee Williams |
08-19-2009, 09:35 PM | #4025 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
|
LOL! Priceless .
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages" -Tennessee Williams |
08-19-2009, 09:37 PM | #4026 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
Quote:
Though one of their gigantic failures is regulating medicaid fraud. Seriously, if you commit medicaid fraud for less than say $50k, nobody will bat an eye. |
|
08-19-2009, 09:38 PM | #4027 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
|
Btw, one thing. I know there have been some on the left who yell, "Why can't we be on your plan" to Congressmen and the like... y'all do know that the federal plan is through insurance providers right?
The Federal Employees Health Benefits Plan is basically like any other employer. The US Government negotiates with insurance companies for a number of different health plans and then offers them up to government employers for them to pick the one that works for them. So for those who believe the federal government has a self-funded plan. That isn't the case. Even the federal government realizes it is better to be an insurance broker and provide individual workers with a choice than a one-size-fits-all.
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages" -Tennessee Williams |
08-19-2009, 09:39 PM | #4028 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
Quote:
pretty much what Steve said here.
__________________
Get bent whoever hacked my pw and changed my signature. |
|
08-19-2009, 09:39 PM | #4029 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
Quote:
Will Obama's plan address that? I don't see the public option as true competition anymore, since it's apparently uber-restricted. |
|
08-19-2009, 09:40 PM | #4030 | |
Grey Dog Software
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Phoenix, AZ by way of Belleville, IL
|
Quote:
If it were a private company in its current state, it would be filing for bankruptcy. So, you can throw around 5% vs 20% or any numbers cherry picked, but that's the cold reality. Medicare spending has grown from $250 billion in 2002 to $440 billion in 2007 without significantly increasing the number of people covered. If a private company had a 75% increase in costs over 5-6 years without significantly increasing the revenue coming in, it would be out of business. Right now, Medicare amounts to 16% of our entire federal budget and you act like it's some kind of roaring success. When you can print money, you can cover up all kinds of cost issues. I just don't want to see Medicare (covers 43 million people) on a 300 million person scale. That has a chance to setup a debt we will never be able to pay off and kill our economy. |
|
08-19-2009, 09:45 PM | #4031 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
|
Quote:
Based on 40 quarters of "premiums". I'm betting if private insurance had that much built up cash that they were mandated to spend on care, they'd have much higher approval ratings too, I'd bet. Of course, even then Medicare is in danger of running out of money (being, like Social Security, the beneficiaries getting paid for by the future beneficiaries). It's a retirement health plan based by current working Americans. As much a ponzi scheme as Society Security. You think a single payer or public health plan is going to have that much cash?!!
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages" -Tennessee Williams |
|
08-19-2009, 09:47 PM | #4032 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
|
Quote:
Exactly. At some point we may want to realize that we have a massive debt and need to do something about. Health care is something important and needs to be done, but not at the expense at leaving us permanently in massive debt up to our eyeballs.
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages" -Tennessee Williams |
|
08-19-2009, 09:48 PM | #4033 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
Quote:
I don't understand that part very well, but I like what I've read about it. (though still can't figure out how much of an "option" the public option is - how many people are allowed to buy in, and how much will it cost). Facilitating choice is an easy reform with zero drawback or risk. Last edited by molson : 08-19-2009 at 09:53 PM. |
|
08-19-2009, 09:50 PM | #4034 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
|
I've heard all these people say the "public option" will keep "insurance companies honest" on price and coverage (with limitless resources and not caring about debt, I guess you can cover everything and keep the price low, but I digress)... if its SOOO restricted as I've heard here, how is it going to keep anything honest as the spin is?
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages" -Tennessee Williams |
08-19-2009, 09:53 PM | #4035 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
|
It is quite assuredly a Ponzi scheme. It's the definition of one. Current beneficiaries get paid by those who are promised benefits in the future. Not saying that's a bad thing, but its a Ponzi scheme. Quote:
And I'd rather not have the government become the sole health provider and try to institute a one-size-fits-all policy, but have various heavily regulated insurance companies provide choice to individuals.
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages" -Tennessee Williams |
|
08-19-2009, 09:55 PM | #4036 | |
Grey Dog Software
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Phoenix, AZ by way of Belleville, IL
|
Quote:
If you extrapolate spending on medicare to 300 million people, you get a cost of roughly $3 trillion. That's equal to our entire federal budget for 2009. Last edited by Arles : 08-19-2009 at 09:58 PM. |
|
08-19-2009, 10:00 PM | #4037 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
|
Quote:
|
|
08-19-2009, 10:02 PM | #4038 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
|
Quote:
Last edited by RainMaker : 08-19-2009 at 10:02 PM. |
|
08-19-2009, 10:03 PM | #4039 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
|
Quote:
|
|
08-19-2009, 10:04 PM | #4040 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
|
Quote:
You mean the Healthy Americans Act, by Wyden (D-OR) and Bennett (R-UT). I actually prefer this bill. Very much so. For one it is revenue neutral as the CBO has evaluated it. Also, it has no public option .
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages" -Tennessee Williams |
|
08-19-2009, 10:06 PM | #4041 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
|
LOL - so this "Lewin Group" that is providing all the facts and figures to anti healthcare reform Republicans - is a subsidiary of a wholly-owned subsidiary of United Health (2nd largest healthcare corporation in the country).
No bias there though, right?
__________________
Get bent whoever hacked my pw and changed my signature. Last edited by DaddyTorgo : 08-19-2009 at 10:10 PM. |
08-19-2009, 10:07 PM | #4042 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
Quote:
That cost number is very misleading. In that time they added prescription drug coverage. It didn't go up that much just due to inflated costs.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
|
08-20-2009, 06:34 PM | #4043 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
Watch out you Canuck bastards, David Vitter is out to destroy you.
Quote:
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
|
08-20-2009, 07:13 PM | #4044 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Bath, ME
|
That market share report is interesting. It has meant everything in the states I've lived in in recent years, #4 and #6 on that list. Prices have gone through the roof and up every year because there's essentially one supplier in the state. It's horrendous.
|
08-21-2009, 04:53 AM | #4045 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
|
|
08-21-2009, 05:58 AM | #4046 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
|
Quote:
All that shows is people don't want to lose what they have and they fear the government is trying to take it. |
|
08-21-2009, 07:13 AM | #4047 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
Quote:
Funny...I was thinking the exact opposite thing...how I've lived in # 33, 41, & 42 (mostly #42) over the past 15+ years of adulthood. For those that disagree with allowing for inter-state competition between insurance companies...what is the feared scenario(s) of this? And is that not correctable via new regulations? |
|
08-21-2009, 07:14 AM | #4048 |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Good article clarifying that Obama's claim that you can keep your current insurance if you want to do so isn't as accurate as he'd lead you to believe...........
Keep Your Insurance? Not Everyone. | FactCheck.org |
08-21-2009, 07:50 AM | #4049 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
I don't have much fear that businesses will start shedding their insurance plans, especially with all the restrictions on the public option. Why don't businesses shed health plans now when they don't face a fine?
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers |
08-21-2009, 08:43 AM | #4050 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
Quote:
I understand that concern but similar to the way mant (most?) companies are incorporated in Delaware...why can't states also insist that insurance companies offering policies in their state must also adhere to their own regulations? Or if that isn't plausible enough (or loopholes still exist), why not federally mandate this? I definitely see the issue with lack of competition but also don't see why we can't try this step first. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 9 (0 members and 9 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|