01-29-2007, 02:43 PM | #401 |
Unregistered
Join Date: May 2004
|
Hmm... Lathum, you were the second vote on me (day2), wvufan (day4), and now spleen. Interesting and you didn't vote for Jeebs.
|
01-29-2007, 02:46 PM | #402 | |
Unregistered
Join Date: May 2004
|
Quote:
Is that right, mind letting us in on it? |
|
01-29-2007, 02:54 PM | #403 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2003
|
I'm up your ass because you've been up mine. You said early, day 2 or 3, that I posted something that made you suspicious. You vote for me and every else does. Then, late in the day, you switch, then every else does. That happened two days in a row.
Why? Because I think you have a strategy and you're getting the rest of the group to follow along somehow. You just voted for me because you said it was the obvious choice. Tell me why I'm the obvious choice. |
01-29-2007, 02:54 PM | #404 | |
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
Quote:
this whole second vote thing is over rated. The day I was the second vote for you there were 9 people left to vote, my vote was hardly signing your death sentance. If you want to use vote logic the day you were lynched the vote was 4-4-1 when path cast the fifth vote for you with 2 people left. Far more damning then my vote. shrug. As for the jeeber vote I cast my vote for WVUfan that day. The run on jeeber was pretty rapid, had I changed my vote it would have been percieved as bandwagoning, so like saldana said, damned if you do and damned if you dont. My vote for spleen today is obvious. He has gone after me for 3 days with no good reason despite the fact that our seer said he trusts me. I can only assume he is going to vote for me today so I need to counter that. |
|
01-29-2007, 03:00 PM | #405 | ||
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
Quote:
Quote:
ok, first point. You made me suspicous because I indicated I suspected who the seer was and you attempted to get me to reveal that information. I don't see how I have gotten anyone to follow along with me. I posted my trust list an opinions and updated them as we went along. I have in no way come out strongly against anyone or tried to sway the vote. If you think otherwise please direct me to the post # I even unvoted you and backed off my vote for you. You are the obvious vote for me today because I can only assume you are going to vote for me. |
||
01-29-2007, 03:03 PM | #406 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2003
|
Quote:
Show me a post where the seer says they just you more than me. The last time he posted any trust list, you and I were equal. |
|
01-29-2007, 03:03 PM | #407 | |
Unregistered
Join Date: May 2004
|
Quote:
Lathum,is this the post you're referring to when you say our seer trusted you? I don't see "slightly elevated" to mean completely trusted and you seem to be pushing that quite a bit. unvote saldana vote lathum |
|
01-29-2007, 03:03 PM | #408 | |
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
Quote:
I'm wondering if this was pointed out because mrskippy was out doing a conversion. If there was gonna be a conversion this seems like the best time. We just lost the BG so there was a free shot at whoever they wanted. |
|
01-29-2007, 03:04 PM | #409 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2003
|
|
01-29-2007, 03:04 PM | #410 |
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
|
01-29-2007, 03:06 PM | #411 | |
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
Quote:
exibit 1 |
|
01-29-2007, 03:07 PM | #412 |
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
|
01-29-2007, 03:09 PM | #413 |
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
|
01-29-2007, 03:09 PM | #414 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2003
|
Quote:
Sorry. Wrong Answer. With post 264 he unvoted me the one time he was voting for me. With post 275 be posted his trust list where you and I are equal on that list. With post 309 he votes for Jeeber. He never gets to vote again because you killed him that night! |
|
01-29-2007, 03:10 PM | #415 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2003
|
|
01-29-2007, 03:11 PM | #416 | |
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
Quote:
exibit 3. I don't see your name on that list. To be fair I don't know if where he says "i suppose" refers solely to me or to all 4 on that list |
|
01-29-2007, 03:11 PM | #417 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2003
|
|
01-29-2007, 03:14 PM | #418 | |
Unregistered
Join Date: May 2004
|
Quote:
Lathum, that is incorrect. If you pull up DT's most recent trust list the next person he voted for was JeeberD and ended up dying the same night. |
|
01-29-2007, 03:15 PM | #419 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Quote:
I was referring to the other game, sorry. And I have been doing some catching up but am busier today than I had planned. I hope to be in thread for awhile by mid-afternoon.
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia. |
|
01-29-2007, 03:16 PM | #420 | |
Unregistered
Join Date: May 2004
|
Quote:
DOH, got to it before I did. |
|
01-29-2007, 03:16 PM | #421 |
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
|
01-29-2007, 03:18 PM | #422 | |
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
Quote:
OK, listen. I understand all of that. I know he unvoted spleen and he had him on his elevated trust list. I realize that. My point is that he voted for him before all that which means THERE IS NO WAY SPLEEN COULD HAVE BEEN SCANNED BY DT. |
|
01-29-2007, 03:28 PM | #423 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2003
|
|
01-29-2007, 03:29 PM | #424 |
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
Probibility of being scanned by DT before he died
1. Chief Rum--Banned Night 1- not likely, I assume if he was DT would have witnessed the kill 2. Dodgerchick- Cleared as skydog day 2- not likely 3. spleen1015- DT's original vote day 3 not likely unless he was scanned a bad 4. Barkeep49--probably night 1 scan 5. WVUFan--possible night 2 scan 6. LoneStarGirl- possible night 2 scan 7. Lathum- possible night 2 scan 8. DaddyTorgo duh! 9. saldana- blade's actions pretty much cleared him- not likely 10. path12- not likely since DT mentioned he suspected him in a post 11. JeeberD (mrskippy)--duh 12. GoldenEagle (Hell Atlantic)--Banned by SkyDog Day 2- not likely night one scan 13. Alan T--Banned Night 2-possible night 2 scan but like I mentioned with chief rum, I think it possible DT would have witnessed the kill |
01-29-2007, 03:31 PM | #425 |
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
that leaves LSG, WVUFAN, Lathum. Of those 3 I am the only one our seer mentioned with elevated trust.
|
01-29-2007, 03:33 PM | #426 | |
Unregistered
Join Date: May 2004
|
Hmm... I see where you're coming from Lathum, I re-read Daddy's posts involving spleen
Quote:
The bold part makes me think that DT might have scanned you. And yes, DT did vote for spleen but unvoted him which makes me think he probably didn't know what spleen was. Hmmm... not sure where to go here. unvote lathum (sorry RA) |
|
01-29-2007, 04:28 PM | #427 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2003
|
We're in a touch spot. We're 5 vanilla villagers fighting a lone wolf.
We'll just have to get lucky. The below comments will probably seal my fate for today. I think we should go no lynch today. We have 6 people left. With a lynch today and a night kill tonight, we're at 4. Lynch tomorrow and night kill ends the game. That's assuming we don't get the wolf ahead of time. If we don't kill today, then we get to decide the game with a lynch vote on Day 7 instead of a night kill on Night 6. Essentially, our odds are better avoiding a lynch today and waiting for Day 7. Today we have a 1 in 5 shot getting the wolf. We could delay that to 50-50 on Day 7 if things go the right way. |
01-29-2007, 04:33 PM | #428 |
College Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Little Rock, AR
|
For now
Lynch Lathum DC has brought up some great points and since she is the only one I trust... |
01-29-2007, 04:36 PM | #429 |
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
|
01-29-2007, 04:36 PM | #430 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2003
|
|
01-29-2007, 04:39 PM | #431 |
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
BTW I think it's very possible the remaining wolf or wolves are sitting back and laughting at me and spleen
|
01-29-2007, 04:42 PM | #432 |
Unregistered
Join Date: May 2004
|
|
01-29-2007, 04:44 PM | #433 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2003
|
|
01-29-2007, 04:48 PM | #434 |
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
UNVOTE SPLEEN
VOTE LONESTARGIRL her vote for me set off all kind of alarm bells plus the fact that she pointed out she was the first one to vote for Jeeber. DC made a good point about that not meaning much. |
01-29-2007, 04:51 PM | #435 |
Unregistered
Join Date: May 2004
|
|
01-29-2007, 05:00 PM | #436 | |
Unregistered
Join Date: May 2004
|
Quote:
I was thinking about that but wasn't sure if I posted or not. Okay, I just looked back and yes, she was the first to vote on Jeeber and never checked back. Her post after he got banned was something about "Thank you call me Mrs. Werewolf" or something. I kinda wonder if she casted her vote meaning it as a "throwaway" and didn't realize he'd actually be on the chopping block. |
|
01-29-2007, 05:03 PM | #437 | |
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
Quote:
I dunno, all I know is I have seen WAY to many of these games where 2 villegars were going at one another while the baddies sat back, watched, dropped in with a vote, then stayed out of the way. Path and LSG fit that profile |
|
01-29-2007, 05:12 PM | #438 |
Unregistered
Join Date: May 2004
|
|
01-29-2007, 05:24 PM | #439 |
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
here is why LSG's vote set off alarm bells.
At that point spleen had 2 votes LSG was under the impression DC had voted for me. Spleen already claimed he wanted to be the deciding vote. LSG's vote would make it 2-2. That pretty much forces path to do 3 things. Vote for a third party and let spleen vote for me, vote spleen and force spleen to vote for me creating a tie, vote me and let spleen top it off. All 3 outcomes favorable to the bad guy (s). A clever way to hide your vote |
01-29-2007, 05:29 PM | #440 | |
Unregistered
Join Date: May 2004
|
Quote:
Niiiiice, I can go with that logic vote lonestargirl |
|
01-29-2007, 06:02 PM | #441 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
|
LSG's vote smells bad.
VOTE LSG Usual caveat that I always read LSG as bad, though.
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia. |
01-29-2007, 06:16 PM | #442 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Quote:
If there was a conversion, obviously the cleared list changes. Was that night 3? If so, then DT's clears are suspect, as well as DC. If you were going to convert, who would it be? I don't think it would be DC because I think that's just a little too obvious. Barkeep, yes. Spleen, no (too much heat). Lathum, yes. Saldana (knowing Blade gained some trust by dropping out of the game), yes. WVU we know is a no. I know I'm a no. I think we're down to a matter of elimination here. I really think LSG is our best choice right now. If that's not right I think it's a little more dicey. At that point I think it would be useful to start looking at changes in posts/voting irregularities. But without a seer this devolves into a guessing game somewhat, especially if the wolf decides to just stay under the radar (and yes, I realize that fits my personality this game perfectly. I have no excuse, in hindsight I should have known I wasn't going to be able to give this the attention it deserves and I would certainly understand a lynch my way. It would at least be helpful in the sense that you would have another clear, but unhelpful in the sense that we'd be getting down to numbers at that point).
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia. |
|
01-29-2007, 06:44 PM | #443 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Bethlehem, Pa
|
ok lathum, i will buy your logic on LSG's vote which is the only reason i am changing, but if she ends up good, it will be an easy choice for me tomorrow.
unvote spleen vote lsg |
01-29-2007, 06:57 PM | #444 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Quote:
My main reason I suspect Lathum is because I don't know that I've ever seen him do so much analysis in thread (not to say you don't analyze, but usually don't post it a ton). It makes me worry about the Alan helpful villager ploy. My God, can this post be any more meta? Bleah. Never mind.
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia. |
|
01-29-2007, 08:07 PM | #445 | |
Favored Bitch #1
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
|
Quote:
your pretty much right but I have had some extra time during this game and the basic games are always much easier for me to follow. |
|
01-29-2007, 08:27 PM | #446 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2003
|
VOTE LoneStarGirl
|
01-29-2007, 09:58 PM | #447 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Black Hole
|
After wavering back and forth in the beginning of the day, the decision is overwhelmingly to ban LoneStarGirl. SkyDog types in the command to ban her.
...she is not HornsManiac. Night 5 begins. |
01-29-2007, 10:00 PM | #448 |
Unregistered
Join Date: May 2004
|
Well shit
|
01-29-2007, 10:01 PM | #449 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Black Hole
|
After a short night, you realize that saldana cannot post any messages. He is BANNED!
Day 6 begins and votes are due by 10 PM EST Tuesday. |
01-29-2007, 10:05 PM | #450 |
Unregistered
Join Date: May 2004
|
vote lathum
Quite simply, he led the charge against LSG and she came up good. Dammit, we had a lot of evidence against him and we let him slide. Grrr... |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|