Front Office Football Central  

Go Back   Front Office Football Central > Main Forums > Off Topic
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Statistics

View Poll Results: Who Goes on the Yankees Mount Rushmore? (choose 4 - should go without saying)
Yogi Berra 3 2.83%
Joe DiMaggio 95 89.62%
Whitey Ford 4 3.77%
Lou Gehrig 92 86.79%
Derek Jeter 15 14.15%
Mickey Mantle 94 88.68%
Don Mattingly 1 0.94%
Mariano Rivera 4 3.77%
Babe Ruth 103 97.17%
Trout 3 2.83%
Other (explain below) 0 0%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 106. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-09-2013, 11:01 AM   #1
Pyser
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Settle a Bar Debate: Yankees Mount Rushmore

title pretty much says it all. i'm not a yankee fan at all, but it's a pretty easy debate. who would go on the yankees mount rushmore. the biggest argument last night was actually over mariano rivera, so curious to see the thoughts here.

poll coming, if i can figure out how.

Pyser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2013, 11:03 AM   #2
rowech
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Ruth, Gehrig, DiMaggio, Mantle

Don't possibly know how it can be anybody else.
rowech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2013, 11:05 AM   #3
Sun Tzu
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: In the thick of it.
Giambi
Tartabull
Key
Ruth
__________________
I'm still here. Don't touch my fucking bacon.
Sun Tzu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2013, 11:24 AM   #4
mckerney
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by rowech View Post
Ruth, Gehrig, DiMaggio, Mantle

Don't possibly know how it can be anybody else.

Voted this and even if one of the modern guys were to get on there I'd have to say it would be Jeter. Sure, I could see arguments that Rivera has been better/more valuable, but Jeter has been the face of the franchise as long as I can remember his being there. He's been the iconic member of the Yankees recent success which to me matters for the the Mount Rushmore debate.
mckerney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2013, 11:25 AM   #5
Comey
College Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: CT via PA via CA via PA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sun Tzu View Post
Giambi
Tartabull
Key
Ruth

You forgot Ken Phelps.
__________________

Comey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2013, 11:25 AM   #6
Comey
College Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: CT via PA via CA via PA
Quote:
Originally Posted by rowech View Post
Ruth, Gehrig, DiMaggio, Mantle

Don't possibly know how it can be anybody else.

And agreed. How crazy is it that Mantle would be the most likely to be moved to make way for Jeter?
__________________

Comey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2013, 11:29 AM   #7
Desnudo
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Here and There
Jeter is on the Rushmore of unnecessary jump throws
Desnudo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2013, 11:29 AM   #8
Sun Tzu
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: In the thick of it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Comey View Post
You forgot Ken Phelps.

That would just be silly.
__________________
I'm still here. Don't touch my fucking bacon.
Sun Tzu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2013, 11:38 AM   #9
Lathum
Favored Bitch #1
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
The problem is Rivera needs to be on there but who gets left off?
Lathum is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2013, 11:49 AM   #10
Blackadar
Retired
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fantasyland
Billy Martin
Billy Martin
Billy Martin
and...
Billy Martin

If it was good enough for Steinbrenner, it's good enough for me!
Blackadar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2013, 12:15 PM   #11
rowech
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Maybe Yankees should have pre 1960 and post 1960.
rowech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2013, 12:33 PM   #12
revrew
Team Chaplain
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Just outside Des Moines, IA
Quote:
Originally Posted by rowech View Post
Ruth, Gehrig, DiMaggio, Mantle

Don't possibly know how it can be anybody else.

This.
__________________
Winner of 6 FOFC Scribe Awards, including 3 Gold Scribes
Founder of the ZFL, 2004 Golden Scribe Dynasty of the Year
Now bringing The Des Moines Dragons back to life, and the joke's on YOU, NFL!
I came to the Crossroad. I took it. And that has made all the difference.
revrew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2013, 12:52 PM   #13
murrayyyyy
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Las Vegas
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lathum View Post
The problem is Rivera needs to be on there but who gets left off?

Why would Rivera go before Whitey Ford?
murrayyyyy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2013, 01:32 PM   #14
vex
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Tulsa
Rivera might be last out of all of the possible selections here. That's nothing against him, just the reality of the situation.

And there is no way to not vote Ruth, DiMaggio, Mantle, Gehrig.
vex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2013, 02:49 PM   #15
korme
Go Reds
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Bloodbuzz Ohio
Yeah, it's the four who are leading and everybody else can be on the 2nd tier of mount Rushmore.

Mantle being the first off doesn't sound that crazy, considering who he's going up against.
korme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2013, 02:58 PM   #16
Swaggs
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Rickey wants to know why Rickey is not on the ballot?
__________________
DOWN WITH HATTRICK!!!
The RWBL
Are you reading In The Bleachers?
Swaggs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2013, 03:10 PM   #17
cuervo72
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Maryland
Quote:
Originally Posted by rowech View Post
Ruth, Gehrig, DiMaggio, Mantle

Don't possibly know how it can be anybody else.

Yep.
__________________
null
cuervo72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2013, 03:10 PM   #18
stevew
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the yo'
Modern-
Rivera
Jeter
Pettite
The 4th spot is hard. I could see cases for ARod, Bernie, Posada, and even Paul O'Neil and (edit) obviously Torre.

Last edited by stevew : 03-09-2013 at 03:30 PM.
stevew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2013, 03:30 PM   #19
stevew
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the yo'
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swaggs View Post
Rickey wants to know why Rickey is not on the ballot?

I would associate Rickey with the A's if Rickey had this question.
stevew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2013, 03:52 PM   #20
murrayyyyy
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Las Vegas
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevew View Post
Modern-
Rivera
Jeter
Pettite
The 4th spot is hard. I could see cases for ARod, Bernie, Posada, and even Paul O'Neil and (edit) obviously Torre.

Don Mattingly? I'd probably have him before Posada or O'Neil.
murrayyyyy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2013, 04:32 PM   #21
ISiddiqui
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
Interestingly enough I think its a slight bit closer than thought (then again, I've always been of a the opinion that DiMaggio, while one of the greats is highly overrated - Mantle is a better player). Though the 4 seem fairly clear (though I threw on Rivera just because what he's done has been phenomenal for a CL - easy #1 for his position all time).

Anyways, saying that - Career WAR (BR's version):

Ruth 178.3 (1st all time)
Gehrig 108.5 (18th)
Mantle 105.5 (20th)
DiMaggio 75.1 (66th)

Jeter 69.3 (83rd)
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages"
-Tennessee Williams
ISiddiqui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2013, 04:50 PM   #22
Vince, Pt. II
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere More Familiar
Yeah, I was going to say that off the top of my head DiMaggio would be the first I kick off the mountain, but the only one even close is Jeter. I don't think he outclasses DiMaggio.
Vince, Pt. II is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2013, 04:57 PM   #23
Ryan S
Quarterback
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: London, England
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevew View Post
Modern-
Rivera
Jeter
Pettite
The 4th spot is hard. I could see cases for ARod, Bernie, Posada, and even Paul O'Neil and (edit) obviously Torre.

When does the Modern Era start? If it is 1970 onwards you could make cases for Don Mattingly, Reggie Jackson or Thurman Munson

Last edited by Ryan S : 03-09-2013 at 05:07 PM. Reason: Spelling!
Ryan S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2013, 04:59 PM   #24
stevew
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the yo'
Quote:
Originally Posted by murrayyyyy View Post
Don Mattingly? I'd probably have him before Posada or O'Neil.

Yeah, I guess he's modern. Winfield and Reggie(if he's considered a Yankee) as well
stevew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2013, 05:15 PM   #25
rowech
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevew View Post
Yeah, I guess he's modern. Winfield and Reggie(if he's considered a Yankee) as well

Reggie comes to mind quickly but he really wasn't there very long at all.
rowech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2013, 05:53 PM   #26
Pyser
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
yeah reggie was only like 4 or 5 years.

not nearly as much love for jeter and mariano as i expected. i suspect in 20 years, and then in 40, this will probably look different. should be cool to see something like this evolve
Pyser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2013, 06:11 PM   #27
kcchief19
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Kansas City, MO
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lathum View Post
The problem is Rivera needs to be on there but who gets left off?
Rivera's great and all, but the Yankees won 27 titles before the closer was ever invented. Would the Yankees have won as many titles with a lesser closer? Probably yes.

Would the Yankees have won the titles they did without DiMaggio and Mantle? Probably no.

Ruth and Gehrig aren't even debatable.
kcchief19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2013, 06:21 PM   #28
stevew
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the yo'
I don't think any teams will win with the frequency of past concentrations. The Celtics winning 11 in 13 years is just absurd.
stevew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2013, 06:24 PM   #29
Atocep
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Puyallup, WA
I know the popular thing to do now is gush over how awesome Rivera has been but he has just over 1200 innings pitched for his career. He's hands down the best closer ever and all, but he still has 100 less innings pitched in his career than Brandon Webb had.

No way you can even get him into the discussion for something like this.

Last edited by Atocep : 03-09-2013 at 06:24 PM.
Atocep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2013, 06:36 PM   #30
PilotMan
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Seven miles up
I think the argument has been settled.
__________________
He's just like if Snow White was competitive, horny, and capable of beating the shit out of anyone that called her Pops.

Like Steam?
Join the FOFC Steam group here: http://steamcommunity.com/groups/FOFConSteam



PilotMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2013, 06:46 PM   #31
Marmel
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Manchester, CT
I'm a huge jeter fan, but he is 5th at best
__________________
81-78

Cincinnati basketball writer P. Daugherty, "Connor Barwin playing several minutes against Syracuse is like kids with slingshots taking down Caesar's legions."
Marmel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2013, 06:59 PM   #32
Desnudo
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Here and There
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevew View Post
I don't think any teams will win with the frequency of past concentrations. The Celtics winning 11 in 13 years is just absurd.

I think talking about Rivera in this context is like saying a great 6th man in basketball deserves consideration
Desnudo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2013, 02:15 PM   #33
korme
Go Reds
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Bloodbuzz Ohio
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevew View Post
I don't think any teams will win with the frequency of past concentrations. The Celtics winning 11 in 13 years is just absurd.

Sports history can sometimes be absurd. These records are impressive, but those titles came in a league with 16 teams. You had to be better than 7 teams and you were in the World Series. Same with the Celtics, and even the fuckin Montreal Canadiens who won all those titles in a 6-team (SIX!) league. Woopty doo.
korme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2013, 02:17 PM   #34
korme
Go Reds
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Bloodbuzz Ohio
Not to mention Montreal got first pick every draft of every French Canadian, but that's another topic for another day.
korme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2013, 02:22 PM   #35
Danny
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
FWIW, I did not vote based on performance, but who is considered in the general mindset to be the all time yankees. For that reason I left Gehrig off and put in Jeter.
Danny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2013, 06:24 PM   #36
BYU 14
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The scorched Desert
Ruth, Mantle and Dimaggio are no brainers for me. After that I really want to go Gehrig, and he deserves it, but I gave the 4th vote to Jeter. In this day and age such loyalty to one franchise is rare (yes I know he was rewarded handsomely for it) but he is one that embodies the Yankee legacy as well as any player IMO.

I just wish there was a 5th slot for Gehrig. An argument could be made for Rivera similar to the reasoning I used to add Jeter, but he is a close 6th IMO.

He is for sure the greatest reliever in the history of the game, but I can't put him top 4.
BYU 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2013, 06:42 PM   #37
korme
Go Reds
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Bloodbuzz Ohio
Leaving off Gehrig is inexcusable. Lou fuckin Gehrig!
korme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2013, 06:57 PM   #38
BYU 14
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The scorched Desert
Quote:
Originally Posted by korme View Post
Leaving off Gehrig is inexcusable. Lou fuckin Gehrig!

Yeah, thinking about it more, I would almost have to replace Mantle with Gehrig.

Dammit Mount Rushmore should have a 5th spot!
BYU 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2013, 07:38 PM   #39
rowech
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by BYU 14 View Post
Yeah, thinking about it more, I would almost have to replace Mantle with Gehrig.

Dammit Mount Rushmore should have a 5th spot!

Unless we're counting dating hot women, there is no chance Jeter replaces Mantle. Mantle at the top of his game was better that almost anybody who has ever played the game.

I mean he's top 10 all-time -- top 15 at the worst.
rowech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2013, 08:07 PM   #40
Vince, Pt. II
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere More Familiar
I guess I'm not understanding the DiMaggio love. Yes, he was great. But to me he's clearly the 4th on this list, and it's not even close. Ruth, Mantle and Gehrig are the top three, DiMaggio is a distant 4th and Jeter is a distant 5th behind him. The gap between DiMaggio and Jeter is much smaller than the gap between Gehrig/Mantle and DiMaggio though.
Vince, Pt. II is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2013, 08:17 PM   #41
rowech
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vince, Pt. II View Post
I guess I'm not understanding the DiMaggio love. Yes, he was great. But to me he's clearly the 4th on this list, and it's not even close. Ruth, Mantle and Gehrig are the top three, DiMaggio is a distant 4th and Jeter is a distant 5th behind him. The gap between DiMaggio and Jeter is much smaller than the gap between Gehrig/Mantle and DiMaggio though.

Totally agree.
rowech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2013, 10:31 PM   #42
Ramzavail
College Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Strong Island, NY
IMO - DiMaggio was a better hitter and player than Mantle. His career numbers take a hit from losing his prime years due to the war. Therefore, I kept Mantle off and added Ford to have a pitcher on the Mount.

Sure - top 4 hitters are Ruth, Gehrig, Joe D and Mantle - but slided off Mantle to add a pitcher in Ford. And I think Ford is super underrated when you talk about great pitchers. Take deadball pitchers out, Whitey Ford has the lowest ERA of any LHP of all time. All time.
Ramzavail is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2013, 10:40 PM   #43
hoopsguy
General Manager
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago
Quote:
Originally Posted by Comey View Post
You forgot Ken Phelps.

My baseball people loved his bat.
KEN PHELPS! KEN PHELPS!
hoopsguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2013, 11:38 PM   #44
MrBug708
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Whittier
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ramzavail View Post
IMO - DiMaggio was a better hitter and player than Mantle. His career numbers take a hit from losing his prime years due to the war. Therefore, I kept Mantle off and added Ford to have a pitcher on the Mount.

Sure - top 4 hitters are Ruth, Gehrig, Joe D and Mantle - but slided off Mantle to add a pitcher in Ford. And I think Ford is super underrated when you talk about great pitchers. Take deadball pitchers out, Whitey Ford has the lowest ERA of any LHP of all time. All time.

.01 ahead of Koufax, which was a shame since Koufax's ERA was dropping astronomically.
MrBug708 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2013, 11:47 PM   #45
ISiddiqui
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vince, Pt. II View Post
I guess I'm not understanding the DiMaggio love. Yes, he was great. But to me he's clearly the 4th on this list, and it's not even close. Ruth, Mantle and Gehrig are the top three, DiMaggio is a distant 4th and Jeter is a distant 5th behind him. The gap between DiMaggio and Jeter is much smaller than the gap between Gehrig/Mantle and DiMaggio though.

Yep, hence the WAR numbers I posted earlier up thread. DiMaggio is overrated while Mantle is criminally underrated (yes, underrated -that's how good he was).
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages"
-Tennessee Williams
ISiddiqui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2013, 12:22 AM   #46
Atocep
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Puyallup, WA
Ruth, Gehrig, and Mantle are 3 of the top 20 or so players in MLB history. I don't see how you could remove any of them. Dimaggio would be the first guy you'd look to leave off, but he's still just a bit ahead of Jeter.

For me, this is probably one of the easier Mount Rushmores for MLB teams since when I think of the Yankees Ruth, Gehrig, Mantle, and DiMaggio are the first names that come to mind.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Pyser View Post
i suspect in 20 years, and then in 40, this will probably look different. should be cool to see something like this evolve

The most likely thing to happen over that time is Jeter becomes DiMaggio-like in the sense that he's an easy Hall of Fame caliber player that is still grossly overrated by those that remember his playing days fondly.

Last edited by Atocep : 03-11-2013 at 01:02 AM.
Atocep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2013, 12:45 AM   #47
dawgfan
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Seattle
Quote:
Originally Posted by rowech View Post
Ruth, Gehrig, DiMaggio, Mantle

Don't possibly know how it can be anybody else.
This.

Yankees have had some tremendous talent, but this actually pretty easy.
dawgfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2013, 01:12 AM   #48
DougW
High School Varsity
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Downriver, MI
I'm interested in the details of this "debate". Was it just 1 guy trying to get Rivera in ? Did the others at the table agree he was crazy ?

I could see a little bit of Jeter love getting him in the conversation - but, as said above - it has to be Ruth, Gehrig, DiMaggio, Mantle.
DougW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2013, 07:28 PM   #49
Pyser
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Quote:
Originally Posted by DougW View Post
I'm interested in the details of this "debate". Was it just 1 guy trying to get Rivera in ? Did the others at the table agree he was crazy ?

I could see a little bit of Jeter love getting him in the conversation - but, as said above - it has to be Ruth, Gehrig, DiMaggio, Mantle.

yes, was one guy saying rivera belonged. the debate turned pretty quickly from "right now" to "in 50 years", which i think will really change things. no one alive will remember the older group of players. jeter will be on for sure. rivera was the biggest argument. also depends how the role of closers evolve.

i guess a more interesting poll wouldve been "it's 2063, which 4 yankees are on their mount rushmore?"

my bad.
Pyser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2013, 08:40 PM   #50
korme
Go Reds
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Bloodbuzz Ohio
I am alive and don't remember the older group of players now. Still, the stats don't lie: The top 4 are the older group of guys.
korme is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:24 PM.



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.