04-29-2004, 03:54 PM | #1 | |||
College Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Beantown
|
OT: Keeping score puzzle (ANSWER)
Quote:
The answer is Tennis I don't like it, I'm not grasping the 5 to 3 score as a game score.
__________________
Boston Bashers - III.14 - (8347) |
|||
04-29-2004, 03:58 PM | #2 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Maryland
|
so 5 to 3 is the score? I'm not following here, where's the explanation?
__________________
null |
04-29-2004, 04:01 PM | #3 |
College Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
|
The next score is 4-4 or deuce.
__________________
"It's a great day for hockey" - "Badger" Bob Johnson |
04-29-2004, 04:02 PM | #4 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Maryland
|
Quote:
Who the hell refers to scores in tennis as 3, 4, or 5?
__________________
null |
|
04-29-2004, 04:02 PM | #5 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2002
|
Henry, could we get a more-detailed explanation?
Edit: Never mind, hadn't noticed that Henry had posted it in another thread.
__________________
Down Goes Brown: Toronto Maple Leafs Humor and Analysis Last edited by Maple Leafs : 04-29-2004 at 04:04 PM. |
04-29-2004, 04:04 PM | #6 |
College Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
|
Check my other post....
The answer to Quiksand's puzzle is deuce from tennis. You typically her the scoring go 15,30,40,game, but often people go 5,3,4. The scoring went 30-15 (3 to 5), 40-15 (4 to 5) then 40-30 (4 to 3). If the game is still going on the person with 30 would win the point and have 40-40 (4 to 4) or deuce. If the person with 40 wins the point the game is over and since Q said the game was still going on it is 4-4. Todd
__________________
"It's a great day for hockey" - "Badger" Bob Johnson |
04-29-2004, 04:07 PM | #7 | |
Hokie, Hokie, Hokie, Hi
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Kennesaw, GA
|
Quote:
Maybe I've been sheltered my whole life.... Maybe tennis people don't like me... Why don't tennis people like me?? Someone hold me please... |
|
04-29-2004, 04:09 PM | #8 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Maryland
|
Quote:
This is a damned elitist puzzle. I've never heard Bud Collins use '5', '3', or '4' on any tennis telecasts I've seen.
__________________
null |
|
04-29-2004, 04:12 PM | #9 |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
If you haven't played tennis very much, then I recognize that you lack the essential bit of information necesary to solve the puzzle.
However, the 0-5-3-4 scoring convention is very common among those who play a lot. Even if you're not a regular player, it's likely you have played with someone or beside someone who has scored this way. Sorry if it doesn't sit well with you if you're in the "never heard of it" boat. I still like the puzzle, but didn't mean any undue stress, of course. |
04-29-2004, 04:15 PM | #10 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2002
|
I've never heard of that scoring system, but I've never played much tennis either.
I guess my question would be: for those who do know the scoring system, did you get the puzzle right away or did it still require some "puzzling" to figure out?
__________________
Down Goes Brown: Toronto Maple Leafs Humor and Analysis |
04-29-2004, 04:18 PM | #11 | |
College Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Beantown
|
Quote:
__________________
Boston Bashers - III.14 - (8347) |
|
04-29-2004, 04:19 PM | #12 |
Hokie, Hokie, Hokie, Hi
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Kennesaw, GA
|
Sounds like more of a riddle than a puzzle...
|
04-29-2004, 04:21 PM | #13 |
Torchbearer
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: On Lake Harriet
|
What if the puzzle had read as follows
This is part of two spectators' conversation as a game progresses. - - - - - A: What's the score now? B: It's y to z, Jones leads. ...a few seconds pass... A: What's the score now? B: It's x to z, Jones leads. ...a few seconds pass... A: What's the score now? B: It's x to y, Jones leads. If we wait until after one more score, and the game is still going on at that point - what will be the score? Would people have gotten tennis that way? |
04-29-2004, 04:22 PM | #14 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2002
|
I think the big problem with the puzzle is that it's unrealistic. It should have been presented like this:
A: What's the score now? B: It's three to five, Jones leads. ...a few seconds pass... A: What's the score now? B: It's four to five, Jones leads. ...a few seconds pass... A: What's the score now? B: Sweet mother of christ, would you pay attention! The game is being played right in front of you! Either watch the damn game or shut up about it already! (Where, of course, B is me and A is my wife.)
__________________
Down Goes Brown: Toronto Maple Leafs Humor and Analysis |
04-29-2004, 04:27 PM | #15 | |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
Quote:
It's not that the actual score is 5... it's still 15. 3 for 30, 4 for 40. It's just an abbreviation. It's widely used, honestly. Sorry that doesn't sit well with you. But more on point... yes, I suppose it would be less moronic. But it's not what they do. If I based the puzzle around a set of abbreviations that I personally find appealing but never told anyone about -- I think you'd be perfectly well grounded in attacing me for such a stupid puzzle. I didn't pick the abbreviations. I just used the facts that (a) they are in wide use, and (b) they are obviously moronic to construct a puzzle from them. Last edited by QuikSand : 04-29-2004 at 04:34 PM. |
|
04-29-2004, 04:29 PM | #16 | |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
Quote:
If you point is that I just picked some numbers out of my ass and plugged them into this puzzle, you are missing the point. Millions of tennis players announce scores in these exact terms on the tennis court-- saying "4 to 5" when the actual score is 40 to 15. It is very common. |
|
04-29-2004, 04:31 PM | #17 | |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
Quote:
For what it's worth, I got two correct answers by PM within the first 15 minutes of posting the puzzle, two more some time later (though I can't tell when those people started thinking about it) and another after a hint or two. |
|
04-29-2004, 04:34 PM | #18 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2002
|
I don't think there's really any way around the fact that people who don't know that particular fact about tennis are just SOL when it comes to this puzzle. I don't think there's any way you can rephrase it to make it work for those folks.
If there's enough people who do know that factoid, and they get a challenge from solving the puzzle, then that's enough to make it worthwhile.
__________________
Down Goes Brown: Toronto Maple Leafs Humor and Analysis |
04-29-2004, 04:37 PM | #19 | |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
Quote:
Well put, and I agree. It's essentially a part puzzle, part trivia exercise... but if you don't know the trivia, you won't be able to solve it. I really don't have a basic objection to a puzzle of this sort (actually, some of the best "lateral thinking" puzzles depend on this sort of twist as well) but it's a level beyond something that's pure logic or mathematics, I recognize. |
|
04-29-2004, 04:37 PM | #20 | |
Torchbearer
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: On Lake Harriet
|
Quote:
I am familiar with using the abbreviated terminology. (I'm more familiar with the use of 5 instead of 15 and calling the score 5-40 or 30-5. I've only heard 3 and 4 used on occasion.) My posting the question was simply a thought exercise on my part--I was wondering if people were getting thrown off by the specific terminology used because a) they weren't familiar with tennis at all or b) they weren't familiar with this specific tennis abbreviation. The progression from that thought was to step back and wonder if you could solve the puzzle without reference to the terminology. There were other hints there, the use of the terms game and point, for example. I guess the people who fell into category a) would still be out of luck, but those in category b) might have been able to use the other clues to solve the puzzle. Last edited by digamma : 04-29-2004 at 04:38 PM. |
|
04-29-2004, 04:39 PM | #21 | |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
Quote:
My mistake - I thought you were joining the attack. |
|
04-29-2004, 04:47 PM | #22 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2002
|
Quote:
__________________
Down Goes Brown: Toronto Maple Leafs Humor and Analysis |
|
04-29-2004, 04:48 PM | #23 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: North Carolina
|
There may be a way to make a variation of this puzzle . . .
What's the score: 3-5 Jones What's the score: 4-5 Jones What's the score: 3-1 Smith Between Q2 and Q3, Jones won the game. The next question then asked what the score was, and the respondent answered with the fact that Smith was leading 3 sets to 1--something that would be a natural answer to the two parties to the conversation. |
04-29-2004, 08:55 PM | #24 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Maryland
|
Quote:
I guess my whole frustration with the puzzle was that I didn't know the terminology, so I had to rack my brain to try to come up with an answer which I just wasn't going to get (I had played tennis on occasion as a kid - my grandfather was and is still a regular tennis player, and he's 80 - and am generally familiar with the scoring). Then, the link was referred to someone else who I guess had tennis knowledge, and he immediately knew what the puzzle was getting at. I would think that with that knowledge, it really isn't a puzzle but just a brief mental exercise. I actually like the basic premise and setup of the puzzle, yet at the same time it seems flawed (sorry) because it hinges on one piece of knowledge.
__________________
null |
|
04-29-2004, 09:39 PM | #25 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Iowa City, IA
|
I was actually thinking that it was tennis... but then I figured I was wrong.
Guess I wasn't |
04-30-2004, 07:08 AM | #26 | |
College Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Beantown
|
Quote:
I consider myself a pretty decent tennis fan and I've never heard of this scoring.
__________________
Boston Bashers - III.14 - (8347) |
|
04-30-2004, 07:11 AM | #27 |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Nov 2003
|
I've played some tennis, but didn't know the convention.
At least I learned something today. Good puzzle, Quik. |
04-30-2004, 07:20 AM | #28 |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Nov 2003
|
dola-
I just "got" all the references to games in Quik's initial post. I thought it was a little fishy that he kept referring to it as a game -- too many times, as if he was trying to draw attention to the term. (edit: Well, I guess it was only twice. But they were conspicuous.) And still I didn't put it all together. Argh. Last edited by corbes : 04-30-2004 at 07:21 AM. |
04-30-2004, 07:41 AM | #29 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Cary, NC
|
Quote:
I was thrown off by the terminology (I used to play tennis, and had never heard the abbreviation system). Look at the discussion: I for one was trying to come up with a game where you LOST points, but shuffleboard and curling just didn't fit the scoring system used. If you don't know the terminology, it does throw you, because it looks like someone lost points during a round.
__________________
-- Greg -- Author of various FOF utilities |
|
04-30-2004, 08:33 AM | #30 | |
Roster Filler
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Cicero
|
Quote:
I have never heard that before.
__________________
http://www.nateandellie.net Now featuring twice the babies for the same low price! |
|
04-30-2004, 01:14 PM | #31 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Cary, NC
|
Surprisingly, this site: http://tennis.about.com/cs/beginners...innerscore.htm does talk about an alternate scoring system, but it uses "1,2,3" in place of "15,30,40". That's the first reference I've found yet to an alternate score reporting for tennis. I can't find any mention of the 5,3,4 system.
__________________
-- Greg -- Author of various FOF utilities |
04-30-2004, 01:23 PM | #32 | |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
Quote:
It's not a system. They are not the actual scores. They are just the words people say to shorten the discussion. Abbreviations. It's not what Bud Collins would say on television, nor what they would say in the scoring of an official match in any kind of formal setting. But if you have two regular players, playing down at the country club against one another, odds are pretty good that they are announcing the score to one another as "four-five" when it's forty to fifteen. |
|
04-30-2004, 01:26 PM | #33 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Troy, NY
|
Whenever I've played (four years of high school), I used "five" for "fifteen", but had never heard anybody substitute for "fourty" and "thirty". Not complaining, guess it's just a regional-type barrier, or something.
*shurg*
__________________
Quis custodiets ipsos custodes? |
04-30-2004, 01:41 PM | #34 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Maryland
|
Quote:
This puzzle was culturally biased!
__________________
null |
|
04-30-2004, 01:56 PM | #35 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Cary, NC
|
Quote:
Not trying to be a nit, but I really am curious about the system. I've been doing web searches off and on during the morning (lots of compiles ) and I just can't find any mention of the system other than here. Others know about it, though, so it must exist, I just have no idea where it came from, where it gets used, etc. It's admittedly been about 10 years since I played tennis with anyone outside my immediate family, but I had never heard anybody do this. I'm curious to find out if this is limited to one region (like cuervo said, cultural bias) or if it is in fact widespread. It's more of a trivia exercise for me now than any commentary on the particular puzzle. I was interested to find mention of a shorthand scoring system that wasn't this one...
__________________
-- Greg -- Author of various FOF utilities |
|
04-30-2004, 02:03 PM | #36 |
lolzcat
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
|
I don't have any idea where to direct you, other than perhaps your local park or rec center, where they'd have tennis courts. I can't even count the number of times that I have been out playing tennis when the neighboring players (especially if they are fairly serious male players) can be overheard using this scoring method. Four-five, three-five, etc.
I'm not too surprised that it's difficult to document on the internet -- it's definitely unofficial, just an abbreviation rather than a true alternative scoring system. Sorry I'm getting defensive -- as you know tone doesn't carry over well in this setting, and it's hard to tell the difference between curiosity and criticism. I'm tired and cranky today anyway for other reasons... didn't mean to bite back needlessly. |
04-30-2004, 02:07 PM | #37 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Dec 2001
|
sooo saying something like "tennis is stupid anyway" is probably a bad thing?
__________________
"Don't you have homes?" -- Judge Smales |
04-30-2004, 02:10 PM | #38 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Dayton, OH
|
I've heard people use this scoring system. But then I played a lot of tennis through high school and college.
And I can't believe this thread is 37 posts long.
__________________
My listening habits |
04-30-2004, 02:11 PM | #39 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Cary, NC
|
Quote:
Well, that and you posted a puzzle to entertain us and we're all crying "no fair!" I have found one officemate who has heard of 5-for-15, but that's it. I'll continue searching. I can't believe the Internet is letting me down on this. You can find a video with a kid playing out his Star Wars fantasy, but I can't find a list of alternate tennis scoring rules...
__________________
-- Greg -- Author of various FOF utilities |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|