04-05-2007, 03:38 PM | #1 | ||
Pro Starter
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Cary, NC
|
Question for my game
I've been kicking around a few ideas for the game I'll be running shortly, and I'm not sure which one I should go with. My question is, without a lot of detail, would people be interested in a more experimental game which changes some of the basic rules of WW, but has the potential drawback of playing out strangely or at least differently? Or would people want something more traditional but with a usual twist, interesting roles, etc.
Just trying to take the temperature of the boards. |
||
04-05-2007, 03:44 PM | #2 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Conyers GA
|
Definitely something experimental and new.
|
04-05-2007, 03:46 PM | #3 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Not too far away
|
Experimental and new are good.
|
04-05-2007, 03:48 PM | #4 |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Mexico
|
Generally I prefer traditional and simple.
|
04-05-2007, 03:55 PM | #5 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
|
VOTE NEW
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia. Last edited by path12 : 04-05-2007 at 03:55 PM. |
04-05-2007, 03:56 PM | #6 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Conyers GA
|
|
04-05-2007, 03:58 PM | #7 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
|
It was experimental.
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia. |
04-05-2007, 05:10 PM | #8 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
|
I like new stuff...it allows for a more open game and people don't get into the same groove of playing like BK's survivor game did
|
04-05-2007, 11:36 PM | #9 |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago
|
I generally like stuff that pushes the boundaries a little bit.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|