Front Office Football Central  

Go Back   Front Office Football Central > Archives > FOFC Archive
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Statistics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-06-2010, 04:59 PM   #51
lungs
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Prairie du Sac, WI
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonInMiddleGA View Post
I'd like nothing more than to see these fucking criminals executed on their second possession arrest. They're less than vermin afaic & I've got no real use for those who try to excuse their behavior either.

God damn! I'd be one step away from execution!

Looking through the laws by country, not even the Muslim countries execute for simple possession.

Thankfully people that think like you are being marginalized more and more every day.

lungs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2010, 05:24 PM   #52
RendeR
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Buffalo, NY
Jim's a smoker, so one of two things is going to happen:

A. He smokes himself to death. WIN!

B. They finally label Tobacco a narcotic and he gets tossed in Jail for his huge stash of Pall Malls. WIN!


Either way this is WIN WIN.

JiMG is a fucking tool.
RendeR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2010, 05:30 PM   #53
Toddzilla
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Burke, VA
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuervo72 View Post
Yeah, c'mon guys, screw that dog. It clearly should have been literate enough to read SWAT on the uniforms to determine that these were officers of the law and not armed intruders. It's his problem for being ignorant and illiterate.
Had to think long and hard about who you were talking about...
Toddzilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2010, 05:32 PM   #54
Toddzilla
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Burke, VA
Wait, so is this socialism gone wrone? Are we for the police or against them? I thought we didn't want to live in a police state...

...man, being a wingnut is so confusing.
Toddzilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2010, 05:37 PM   #55
molson
General Manager
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toddzilla View Post
Wait, so is this socialism gone wrone? Are we for the police or against them? I thought we didn't want to live in a police state...

...man, being a wingnut is so confusing.

My general understanding is that the far left wants the government to tell everyone what to do EXCEPT criminals.
molson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2010, 05:44 PM   #56
Glengoyne
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Fresno, CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by RainMaker View Post
If you feel this is a threat to you, then yes, you are a raging pussy.

I'm gonna go with RainMaker here.

I can't imagine anyone with a weapon seriously believing they were threatened by a corgi. Pretty much even if a dog like this bites you...you can end the threat short of gunfire.

My corgis once cornered a rabbit. They are herding dogs, and the damn rabbit kept moving. Once they got it seriously cornered, the rabbit charged one of them. The dog couldn't back pedal fast enough. These aren't threatening dogs.
Glengoyne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2010, 05:51 PM   #57
EagleFan
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mays Landing, NJ USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanGarion View Post

He asked for a news story, not a "glorified blog"...
EagleFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2010, 05:53 PM   #58
EagleFan
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mays Landing, NJ USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glengoyne View Post
I'm gonna go with RainMaker here.

I can't imagine anyone with a weapon seriously believing they were threatened by a corgi. Pretty much even if a dog like this bites you...you can end the threat short of gunfire.

My corgis once cornered a rabbit. They are herding dogs, and the damn rabbit kept moving. Once they got it seriously cornered, the rabbit charged one of them. The dog couldn't back pedal fast enough. These aren't threatening dogs.

Somehow I doubt they had a purebred. Probably a mix and a mix with what would depend on the answer to the question but it makes better news calling it a corgi.
EagleFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2010, 05:55 PM   #59
Ronnie Dobbs2
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Bahston Mass
Quote:
Originally Posted by EagleFan View Post
Somehow I doubt they had a purebred. Probably a mix and a mix with what would depend on the answer to the question but it makes better news calling it a corgi.

On one hand, reason.com's investigation, where they have actually looked into the matter, is insufficient.

On the other hand, "somehow I doubt" is supposed to be credible?
__________________
There's no I in Teamocil, at least not where you'd think
Ronnie Dobbs2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2010, 05:58 PM   #60
JPhillips
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
From what I've read it was a mix of Corgi and communist tiger.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers
JPhillips is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2010, 06:03 PM   #61
NorvTurnerOverdrive
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
over/under that 7 year old goes on to found project mayhem?
NorvTurnerOverdrive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2010, 06:11 PM   #62
MizzouRah
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Troy, Mo
All of that for pot? What's next, SWAT teams busting down doors because you have too much beer in your refridgerator?
MizzouRah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2010, 06:16 PM   #63
Tigercat
College Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Federal Way, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by molson View Post
My general understanding is that the far left wants the government to tell everyone what to do EXCEPT criminals.

Cause if we are going to polarize every debate, the political left is really the side of the spectrum that has been against civil liberties (and therefor telling people what to do), really? Really?! I guess it is having the government "telling people what to do" when it is an issue one doesn't agree with.
Tigercat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2010, 06:25 PM   #64
RedKingGold
College Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Sigh
RedKingGold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2010, 06:41 PM   #65
RainMaker
General Manager
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Quote:
Originally Posted by molson View Post
My general understanding is that the far left wants the government to tell everyone what to do EXCEPT criminals.
No, the left wants to tell you what to do with your money, the right wants to tell you to do with your lives.
RainMaker is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2010, 06:44 PM   #66
RendeR
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Buffalo, NY
No excuse what so ever for what the police did in this situation. None. Unacceptable on every level.
RendeR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2010, 06:45 PM   #67
larrymcg421
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Georgia
Quote:
Originally Posted by molson View Post
My general understanding is that the far left wants the government to tell everyone what to do EXCEPT criminals.

More like they want fewer people to be considered criminals
__________________
Top 10 Songs of the Year 1955-Present (1976 Added)

Franchise Portfolio Draft Winner
Fictional Character Draft Winner
Television Family Draft Winner
Build Your Own Hollywood Studio Draft Winner
larrymcg421 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2010, 07:08 PM   #68
JonInMiddleGA
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
Quote:
Originally Posted by RendeR View Post
JiMG is a fucking tool.

Yippee, I've been dissed by our resident whackadoo. My life is now complete.
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis
JonInMiddleGA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2010, 07:09 PM   #69
JonInMiddleGA
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
Quote:
Originally Posted by EagleFan View Post
He asked for a news story, not a "glorified blog"...

Gonna be more difficult to find that, since this isn't particularly newsworthy. Hell, it's already 3 months old before it even fans the lefty flames of FOFC.
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis
JonInMiddleGA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2010, 07:21 PM   #70
M GO BLUE!!!
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by RainMaker View Post
If you feel this is a threat to you, then yes, you are a raging pussy.

To be fair, that's a German Sheppard named "Dorf."
M GO BLUE!!! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2010, 07:27 PM   #71
DanGarion
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Great Northwest
Quote:
Originally Posted by EagleFan View Post
He asked for a news story, not a "glorified blog"...

That's why I said there were news stories linked in the "blog".
__________________
Los Angeles Dodgers
Check out the FOFC Groups on Facebook! and Reddit!
DON'T REPORT ME BRO!
DanGarion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2010, 08:22 PM   #72
flere-imsaho
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland
This must be the "B" SWAT team.

After reading all the articles that have been written on this, I think we can conclude the following:

First, they demonstrate abysmally poor reconnaissance skills. After first being given direction to conduct a day raid so there was less chance the wife and child would be home, they call that off and perform a night raid without ascertaining if the wife and child are still home.

Second, they fail threat assessment. Guys in kevlar feel threatened enough by a pit bull to shoot it to kill, in close quarters where they might kill a child? Quality decision-making, guys.

Third, they exhibit a lack of fire control, evidenced by shooting the corgi after the pit bull. You want these guys to operate in residential areas? Really? Hope your legal defense fund is in good shape.

Some lawyer's going to have a field day with this.
flere-imsaho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2010, 08:59 PM   #73
Drake
assmaster
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bloomington, IN
I'm pretty sure that if my neighbor's pit bull was being as "aggressive" as that one and, say, endangering my child and I shot it (on the owner's property, no less) with that little provocation, I would get sued and I would lose.

I suspect you're going to see the same thing happen here. The PD is going to get sued, some officers are going to get suspended for a bit and there'll be some re-training in appropriate decision making.

I'm normally a big fan of cops doing whatever it takes to keep themselves safe, but the way this video plays out, it looks and feels like a training exercise for a bunch of newbie cops gone wrong. Like flere says above, if these were just regular regular cops serving a warrant, I'd be more willing to give them some benefit of the doubt (scared, trigger-happy, adrenaline rush) since they're not generally put in these types of situations.

SWAT is specifically trained to deal with these situations and should be held to a higher standard. In my mind, they didn't meet it, and they put innocents in danger. They shot the dog *before* they'd identified the location of the child (which isn't surprising, since they apparently didn't know the child was in the house...). Their only suspect was the husband, which means they willingly placed innocents in harms way in the interest of making the arrest.

The motto of the police department is Protect and Serve, not Arrest and Detain (which I would call a "corollary, but secondary function." Protect and Serve is their primary charge, and at that, they failed in favor of their secondary objective.
Drake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2010, 09:19 PM   #74
RendeR
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Buffalo, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonInMiddleGA View Post
Yippee, I've been dissed by our resident whackadoo. My life is now complete.


I feel honored, I've gone from a mid-pack melodramatic to a "Resident whackadoo"


THANKS JON!

Every time you post you make all of us look that much better.
RendeR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2010, 09:34 PM   #75
molson
General Manager
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tigercat View Post
Cause if we are going to polarize every debate, the political left is really the side of the spectrum that has been against civil liberties (and therefor telling people what to do), really? Really?! I guess it is having the government "telling people what to do" when it is an issue one doesn't agree with.

I've lost track for who's for civil liberties anymore, I was just saying in a far (extreme) left world, you tend to have a lot of police running around. The lines do get blurred at the fringes. Extreme far right/extreme far left do need a pretty heavy police presence to keep things there.

Last edited by molson : 05-06-2010 at 09:37 PM.
molson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2010, 09:47 PM   #76
Glengoyne
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Fresno, CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by flere-imsaho View Post
This must be the "B" SWAT team.

...


For what it is worth. SWAT ain't what most of us figure it is. In most communities the bar is pretty low for an officer to qualify for a SWAT unit.
Glengoyne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2010, 09:57 PM   #77
Drake
assmaster
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bloomington, IN
That's a good point. My county is small enough that we don't have a SWAT team, but I imagine that the Columbia SWAT wouldn't be confused with the LAPD SWAT or even the St. Louis SWAT.
Drake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2010, 09:00 AM   #78
Poli
FOFC Survivor
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Wentzville, MO
What's all this talk about Jim Sorgi about?
__________________
Cheer for a walk on quarterback! Ardent leads the Vols in the dynasty forum.
Poli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2010, 09:41 AM   #79
MrBug708
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Whittier
To me, the dog would certain be susceptible to gunfire if they inhibited the officers from properly doing their job. The last thing the SWAT officer needs to do is trip over a dog while trying to neutralize a suspect. Not saying it was the right thing to do, but I seriously doubt the officer's intent was to go in there and kill any dog who stood in his way. Or maybe the suspect threw the dog at officers?
MrBug708 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2010, 09:44 AM   #80
Ronnie Dobbs2
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Bahston Mass
Did you even watch the video?

If we're just speculating for justifications, maybe the dog was actually the keymaster from Ghostbusters.
__________________
There's no I in Teamocil, at least not where you'd think
Ronnie Dobbs2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2010, 09:56 AM   #81
SportsDino
College Prospect
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonInMiddleGA View Post
I'd like nothing more than to see these fucking criminals executed on their second possession arrest. They're less than vermin afaic & I've got no real use for those who try to excuse their behavior either.

I feel the same about white collar criminals.
SportsDino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2010, 10:08 AM   #82
MrBug708
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Whittier
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronnie Dobbs2 View Post
Did you even watch the video?

If we're just speculating for justifications, maybe the dog was actually the keymaster from Ghostbusters.
Huh?
MrBug708 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2010, 10:15 AM   #83
MacroGuru
Coordinator
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Utah
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrBug708 View Post
Huh?

He is wanting to know if you watched the video...cause the dog was in a completely separate room then where the "suspect" was.
__________________
"forgetting what is in the past, I strive for the future"
MacroGuru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2010, 10:18 AM   #84
Subby
lolzcat
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: sans pants
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronnie Dobbs2 View Post
If we're just speculating for justifications, maybe the dog was actually the keymaster from Ghostbusters.
This is starting to make sense.
__________________
Superman was flying around and saw Wonder Woman getting a tan in the nude on her balcony. Superman said I going to hit that real fast. So he flys down toward Wonder Woman to hit it and their is a loud scream. The Invincible Man scream what just hit me in the ass!!!!!

I do shit, I take pictures, I write about it: chrisshue.com
Subby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2010, 10:29 AM   #85
MrBug708
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Whittier
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacroGuru View Post
He is wanting to know if you watched the video...cause the dog was in a completely separate room then where the "suspect" was.

I watched the video. That doesn't mean the SWAT officer wasnt in danger of tripping over the dog
MrBug708 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2010, 11:02 AM   #86
Drake
assmaster
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bloomington, IN
SWAT officers who trip over dogs in a house with all of the lights on should be fired for lack of appropriate mobility. Those guys weren't even moving double time. If the dog was a tripping danger to any of them, they're not coordinated enough to be handling firearms for a living.
Drake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2010, 11:46 AM   #87
cuervo72
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Maryland
Our house has so many tripping hazards they'd have to firebomb the whole darned thing.
__________________
null
cuervo72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2010, 12:02 PM   #88
Drake
assmaster
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bloomington, IN
When my kids were toddlers, I used to trip over them all the damned time. I guess they go on the list as well.
Drake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2010, 12:39 PM   #89
CU Tiger
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Backwoods, SC
I tend to agree with Jon more than most, and for the most part believe if you break the law you get what you deserve, but this goes beyond excessive.

Admittedly I love my dogs, but if that was one of my Labs, I swear I would hunt and kill everyone of those a**holes....
CU Tiger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2010, 12:47 PM   #90
jeff061
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: MA
They could very well be trained to shoot all dogs during the process of a raid, I don't know. As had been said, they are not trained for pleasantries and the problem isn't what they did, it's why they were even there.
__________________

jeff061 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2010, 01:05 PM   #91
CU Tiger
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Backwoods, SC
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeff061 View Post
They could very well be trained to shoot all dogs during the process of a raid, I don't know. As had been said, they are not trained for pleasantries and the problem isn't what they did, it's why they were even there.


And on this I disagree 100%, break the law and you are subject to arrest.
You are not subject to have your property and pets destroyed/
CU Tiger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2010, 01:14 PM   #92
jeff061
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: MA
I would say we actually agree .

I am not saying they don't deserve to be arrested. I am specifically saying SWAT shouldn't have been sent in on a raid to accomplish it, which equates to the damage you oppose.

So I don't blame SWAT, I blame whatever failure in the system allowed them to be there. If it turns out they really are guilty of dealing huge quantities of drugs and somehow hid things, then I really won't shed a tear over anything.
__________________


Last edited by jeff061 : 05-07-2010 at 01:15 PM.
jeff061 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2010, 01:22 PM   #93
CU Tiger
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Backwoods, SC
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeff061 View Post
I would say we actually agree .

I am not saying they don't deserve to be arrested. I am specifically saying SWAT shouldn't have been sent in on a raid to accomplish it, which equates to the damage you oppose.

So I don't blame SWAT, I blame whatever failure in the system allowed them to be there. If it turns out they really are guilty of dealing huge quantities of drugs and somehow hid things, then I really won't shed a tear over anything.


Again, I am sure this is a minority view point. But I dont care if they were dealing cargo ships full, there is no excuse for murdering their dog, unless he was actively mule-ing the dope. I dont care who they send, but they do need to act professionally not like a bunch of drunk fat boys on a panty raid.
CU Tiger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2010, 01:27 PM   #94
jeff061
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: MA
Oh yeah, easily disagree there. Its not about punishment, it's about mitigating risk in an unknown environment for the safety of the raiding party.

I'm not sure why anyone would think steps should be taken that endanger the cops while protecting the criminal's personal property.

That said, this certainly doesn't apply to a recreational pot smoker. There are plenty of options on how to accomplish that safely, like not pinching them in a house.
__________________


Last edited by jeff061 : 05-07-2010 at 01:28 PM.
jeff061 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2010, 02:45 PM   #95
RainMaker
General Manager
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
RainMaker is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2010, 02:48 PM   #96
Karlifornia
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: San Jose, CA
Where's that picture from? It's funny.
__________________
Look into the mind of a crazy man (NSFW)
http://www.whitepowerupdate.wordpress.com
Karlifornia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2010, 02:50 PM   #97
bigmike75
n00b
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Let me caveat my statement...
I would consider myself to be more conservative than any other viewpoint..
I also have a background in the type of thing you saw conducted in that video except at a much different level...
Um...yeah that SWAT Team is basically a band of hillbilly retards with zero clue how to clear a house.
To say that what happened was embarrassing is a slight understatement. Endstate should be Commander fired, trigger puller(s) fired..They did a shitsuck job..Also fuck the guy who got arrested, he broke the law so I gives a damn about him going to jail..But if he's got to pay so do the "SWAT"(seriously these guys are about as highly trained as..well they just suck)Team Members..
JMG..I understand you have seen dudes lost for various reasons...been there brother done that..Don't make 12 dudes kitted up with submachine guns layin waste to Scruffy right..Sorry..

Fuck that guy for dealing drugs and fuck that SWAT team for their horrible decision making...It's a lose lose!
bigmike75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2010, 02:55 PM   #98
bigmike75
n00b
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Also my language was atrocious, I apologize
bigmike75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2010, 03:00 PM   #99
DaddyTorgo
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigmike75 View Post
Let me caveat my statement...
I would consider myself to be more conservative than any other viewpoint..
I also have a background in the type of thing you saw conducted in that video except at a much different level...
Um...yeah that SWAT Team is basically a band of hillbilly retards with zero clue how to clear a house.
To say that what happened was embarrassing is a slight understatement. Endstate should be Commander fired, trigger puller(s) fired..They did a shitsuck job..Also fuck the guy who got arrested, he broke the law so I gives a damn about him going to jail..But if he's got to pay so do the "SWAT"(seriously these guys are about as highly trained as..well they just suck)Team Members..
JMG..I understand you have seen dudes lost for various reasons...been there brother done that..Don't make 12 dudes kitted up with submachine guns layin waste to Scruffy right..Sorry..

Fuck that guy for dealing drugs and fuck that SWAT team for their horrible decision making...It's a lose lose!

bigmike wins.

errr wait - can you define "a background in those things that you saw, except at a much different level" more clearly for us please?
__________________
If I've ever helped you and you'd like to buy me a coffee, or just to say thanks, I have my Bitcoin and Ethereum addressed listed below :)
BTC: bc1qykhsfyn9vw4ntqfgr0svj4n9tjdgufryh2pxn5
ETH: 0x2AcdC5cd88EA537063553F5b240073bE067BaCa9
DaddyTorgo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2010, 03:13 PM   #100
bigmike75
n00b
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Haha no, I won't get into that, if you're really curious ill get with you off the forum about it..Obviously I don't want to start a piss contest here since this is a board related to football text simulations! However the first time I saw this video was on this forum (love this forum by the way) and it was so ridiculous I couldn't hold back..
bigmike75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:25 PM.



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.