WW C - Sign-ups - Page 2

claphamsa · 08-13-2009, 02:32 PM

I like the pink idea :P

SnDvls · 08-13-2009, 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo

toying with the thought of a rule where everyday the person with the least # of posts gets removed from the game...

sorry if this rule gets in you get a lot of crap posts from me that mean nothing and will probally piss alot of people off to have to go through pages of one word post from me.

The simple answer to this is vote to lynch those people if you must, but we all have our different styles. I choose not to add to the mess and confusion if I have nothing to add to a conversation. I suppose I could just say "I agree" and quote peoples posts I guess, but that still won't help.

my 2 cents

RendeR · 08-13-2009, 03:40 PM

In!

Mobster: Each day the Mobster may (put someone on ice) for 24 hours. The person may not post in the thread until after the following night's deadline.

Barkeep49 · 08-13-2009, 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jeheinz72

In!

For my role, I'd like to see the Fool in play. Always a fun one. Pretty standard, person who thinks he's the Seer but always sees the opposite.

Fool scans Wolf gets Villager
Fool scans Villager gets Wolf
Fool scans Seer gets Fool

Seer scans Fool gets Fool

Rather than having straight opposite can it be %, based on the remaining proportion? I think the straight opposite in effect adds a second seer as it becomes clear who the fool is.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danny

What about this as a role? A player who every day he is alive accumulates one extra vote to his potential total, then he can use it when he chooses and the counter resets. For example, I decide not to use my power and live through night 1-3, I could then add 3 votes to my day 4 total if I want. If I do, my bonus goes back to 0 and I have to start over accumulating points.

I have no problem with this and think it works well in concert with a majority vote game. Do you want this to be your rule?

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo

toying with the thought of a rule where everyday the person with the least # of posts gets removed from the game...

While I admire the spirit, I agree that in practice the rule becomes unworkable as people post meaningless posts causing me to have to keep a manual count of "real" posts. I would really prefer not to have to judge all that.

JAG · 08-13-2009, 04:00 PM

I'm in. I'll think of a rule in the next 24 hrs so you'll have time to do balancing.

Abe Sargent · 08-13-2009, 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Jackal

I have to agree with dubb there. You could think of something else, like the person with the least amount of posts each day has to post in pink the entire next day, or something like that.

Man, only PB can be eligible for that!!!

Abe Sargent · 08-13-2009, 04:31 PM

We don;t even have a bodyguard yet.

The Jackal · 08-13-2009, 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Abe Sargent

We don;t even have a bodyguard yet.

Where's Kevin Costner when you need him?

JAG · 08-13-2009, 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Abe Sargent

We don;t even have a bodyguard yet.

Boring!

I liked a couple of roles you came up with for the last big game, I might go with one of those.

Abe Sargent · 08-13-2009, 05:08 PM

I would be honored

ntndeacon · 08-13-2009, 07:22 PM

In

I like the Idea of a role of Thief who can steal the role or steal an item designed for the role. like stealing seer's cloak or fool's hat or Wolves claws or gun or something.

dubb93 · 08-13-2009, 08:55 PM

Do I need to submit a rule in addition to the role I submitted?

Barkeep49 · 08-14-2009, 12:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dubb93

Do I need to submit a rule in addition to the role I submitted?

No. It's either or.

Danny · 08-14-2009, 03:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dubb93

I fear that may do two things:

1. Discourage our less active posters not to sign up. This would hit the overseas players the hardest(MartinD comes to mind here). I would hate to discourage active players like him who never miss deadlines and never fail to get their actions in to not be able to play just because he lives overseas and is sleeping during the peak game hours.

2. Encourage players to post just for the sake of posting. I could see posts such as,

Repeated multiple times just to avoid a lynch.

How about person with the most posts in invulnerable to being lynched or night killed. I WOULD NEVER DIE!!!

Danny · 08-14-2009, 03:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barkeep49

I have no problem with this and think it works well in concert with a majority vote game. Do you want this to be your rule?

Let's go with this for my addition.

As a side note, I'm not sure if these abilities we are adding are specifically villager or if they can be wolf/villager? Should the wolves get roles that go either way from the ones players have listed here and the non use of the traditional roles brutal, cunning etc...? This way we can avoid a mass reveal. Normally the wolves would have a list of roles not in the game, but I'm not sure that works here because people can probably assume their chosen is in the game. Or if not, how are we going to handle this?

Barkeep49 · 08-14-2009, 05:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danny

Let's go with this for my addition.

As a side note, I'm not sure if these abilities we are adding are specifically villager or if they can be wolf/villager? Should the wolves get roles that go either way from the ones players have listed here and the non use of the traditional roles brutal, cunning etc...? This way we can avoid a mass reveal. Normally the wolves would have a list of roles not in the game, but I'm not sure that works here because people can probably assume their chosen is in the game. Or if not, how are we going to handle this?

Great questions. I have been adding some as either villager or wolf roles when it seems ambigous. People can correct me if they intended for their role to go one way or another. But this question, one that's certainly been on my mind, certainly seems like a great area for someone to create a rule or role about.

DaddyTorgo · 08-14-2009, 02:08 PM

yeah, that's why i said toying with the idea...not sure it's workable. probably isn't the more i've thought about it. still thinking on a rule.

SnDvls · 08-14-2009, 02:27 PM

So I probally should modify my role/rule to exclude wolves (only villager/villager paring)...unless we get a bodyguard role in the game.

Barkeep49 · 08-14-2009, 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo

yeah, that's why i said toying with the idea...not sure it's workable. probably isn't the more i've thought about it. still thinking on a rule.

Sounds good.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SnDvls

So I probally should modify my role/rule to exclude wolves (only villager/villager paring)...unless we get a bodyguard role in the game.

I'd prefer the flexibility, but am happy to honor your request either way.

JAG · 08-14-2009, 03:00 PM

So would this work for a rule?

At the start of day 4, the winning condition of one wolf and one villager (both randomly chosen) are swapped (so the wolf wins with the village, the villager wins with the wolves).

BK, if you want to sort out the details of that, feel free. I'll just throw some ideas after the basic one in case you want to use any of them but don't feel like you have to. In particular I'm unsure how to handle the wolf who learns that he now wins with the village.

Option a. Neither of these players know that their winning condition has been changed. (I don't support this option if it can be avoided, I don't think it's fun to try your best to win only to find out you really were hurting yourself)

Option b. For the villager who wins with the wolves, if all the remaining real wolves are killed off then they become the final wolf.

Option c. Only a 50% chance that this swap occurs.

Option d. The wolves have one opportunity to immediately kill who they perceive to be their traitor (has to be unanimous minus one). If they are correct, they immediately kill (3? 4?) additional villagers. Essentially this is the only way I could think of disuading the traitor wolf from doing a full reveal of the other wolves.

If you don't think this would work well, let me know and I'll come up with something else.

saldana · 08-14-2009, 04:56 PM

i would like in, rule to follow

Lathum · 08-14-2009, 05:18 PM

Darth Vilus · 08-14-2009, 05:48 PM

Hello everyone, I'm the friend Danny was talking about earlier. I'll sign up for the 100th if there's still room. I know how the game works but since I haven't actually played one before and don't have strategy yet I don't think I should really add a rule or role to the game. Thanks.

Abe Sargent · 08-14-2009, 06:04 PM

Yay, welcome!

Darth Vilus · 08-14-2009, 06:29 PM

Thanks so much Sargent :-)

hoopsguy · 08-14-2009, 07:04 PM

Darth, welcome to FOFC/OS werewolf. Looking forward to playing with you (and J23) this game.

Danny · 08-14-2009, 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JAG

So would this work for a rule?

At the start of day 4, the winning condition of one wolf and one villager (both randomly chosen) are swapped (so the wolf wins with the village, the villager wins with the wolves).

BK, if you want to sort out the details of that, feel free. I'll just throw some ideas after the basic one in case you want to use any of them but don't feel like you have to. In particular I'm unsure how to handle the wolf who learns that he now wins with the village.

Option a. Neither of these players know that their winning condition has been changed. (I don't support this option if it can be avoided, I don't think it's fun to try your best to win only to find out you really were hurting yourself)

Option b. For the villager who wins with the wolves, if all the remaining real wolves are killed off then they become the final wolf.

Option c. Only a 50% chance that this swap occurs.

Option d. The wolves have one opportunity to immediately kill who they perceive to be their traitor (has to be unanimous minus one). If they are correct, they immediately kill (3? 4?) additional villagers. Essentially this is the only way I could think of disuading the traitor wolf from doing a full reveal of the other wolves.

If you don't think this would work well, let me know and I'll come up with something else.

Honestly, the villager becoming wolf this is fine because it's like a convert, but I'm not sure any of the above mechanics will work out with a wolf becoming a villager.

EagleFan · 08-14-2009, 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoopsguy

Darth, welcome to FOFC/OS werewolf. Looking forward to playing with you (and J23) this game.

So you're not looking forward to playing with the rest of us? Bastard....

hoopsguy · 08-14-2009, 09:51 PM

Eh, I can take or leave you guys

Alan T · 08-14-2009, 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoopsguy

Eh, I can take or leave you guys

I knew I should have put a role in that specifically said you had the ability to kill Hoopsguy at any time in the game you wish for the person who received that power.

hoopsguy · 08-14-2009, 10:50 PM

Careful, other people are still naming roles.

I already named a role that has that ability, although I should have put in a clause that it could not be used against Hoopsguy.

nfg22 · 08-14-2009, 11:36 PM

Im in.
My role will be one of my favorite...
Psycho- Thinks they are psychic(seer) and will scan as a seer up on any and all role reveals but only has a 50% chance of being right on any scan. They will be given one scan a night and told they are the Seer.

nfg22 · 08-14-2009, 11:36 PM

If that is not ok then let me know.

nfg22 · 08-14-2009, 11:37 PM

They only have a 50% chance to be right on any of their seer scans. If that want clear enough.

SnDvls · 08-14-2009, 11:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barkeep49

Sounds good.

I'd prefer the flexibility, but am happy to honor your request either way.

it's your game. I was just thinking that without a BG and with a fool seer it might better balance the game...if you feel it's ok to have a possible wolf/villager combo then go for it.

SnDvls · 08-14-2009, 11:45 PM

dola - and with the added psycho role I think going back to my original rule/role would be better.

Darth Vilus · 08-15-2009, 12:05 AM

Thanks, I appreciate it Hoopsguy :-)

Danny · 08-15-2009, 12:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darth Vilus

Thanks, I appreciate it Hoopsguy :-)

Hey, I don't think I told you, it's ok since nothing has started, but during a WW game we can't edit our posts.

Also don't trust AlanT, Hoopsguy, Lathum or Dubb or really anyone else for that matter

Darth Vilus · 08-15-2009, 12:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danny

Hey, I don't think I told you, it's ok since nothing has started, but during a WW game we can't edit our posts.

Also don't trust AlanT, Hoopsguy, Lathum or Dubb or really anyone else for that matter

Alrighty, gotcha

The Jackal · 08-15-2009, 12:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nfg22

Im in.
My role will be one of my favorite...
Psycho- Thinks they are psychic(seer) and will scan as a seer up on any and all role reveals but only has a 50% chance of being right on any scan. They will be given one scan a night and told they are the Seer.

Pretty sure heinz added a role that's exactly like this one.

The Jackal · 08-15-2009, 12:46 AM

Welcome aboard Darth.

Darth Vilus · 08-15-2009, 12:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Jackal

Welcome aboard Darth.

Gracias :-)

JAG · 08-15-2009, 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danny

Honestly, the villager becoming wolf this is fine because it's like a convert, but I'm not sure any of the above mechanics will work out with a wolf becoming a villager.

Alright, well maybe forget this rule and I'll think of something else today.

jeheinz72 · 08-15-2009, 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Jackal

Pretty sure heinz added a role that's exactly like this one.

Actually I'll change mine. I really only like the Fool when it's polar opposite. So if NFG likes it at half-chance then he can use that and I'll bite the bullet and add a Bodyguard.

But let's not call him the Bodyguard let's call him the Supreme Being of Safety.

The Jackal · 08-15-2009, 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jeheinz72

Actually I'll change mine. I really only like the Fool when it's polar opposite. So if NFG likes it at half-chance then he can use that and I'll bite the bullet and add a Bodyguard.

But let's not call him the Bodyguard let's call him the Supreme Being of Safety.

Can't we call him Kevin Costner for fun?

nfg22 · 08-15-2009, 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jeheinz72

Actually I'll change mine. I really only like the Fool when it's polar opposite. So if NFG likes it at half-chance then he can use that and I'll bite the bullet and add a Bodyguard.

But let's not call him the Bodyguard let's call him the Supreme Being of Safety.

Sorry I didnt see yours. Mine was a little bit different but if you like yours I can change mine.

SnDvls · 08-15-2009, 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Jackal

Can't we call him Kevin Costner for fun?

+1

jeheinz72 · 08-15-2009, 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nfg22

Sorry I didnt see yours. Mine was a little bit different but if you like yours I can change mine.

Nah it's all good I think BK wanted to basically alter mine to yours anyhow so we're gravy all around.

Abe Sargent · 08-15-2009, 05:38 PM

I am going to have to withdraw from this game. I will not have even the availability that I thought I would have over the next couple of weeks. August has always been tough in my line of work, and this will be even more/

Enjoy!

claphamsa · 08-15-2009, 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darth Vilus

Thanks, I appreciate it Hoopsguy :-)

no editign posts!!!!

08-13-2009, 03:40 PM	#53
RendeR Coordinator Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Buffalo, NY	In! Mobster: Each day the Mobster may (put someone on ice) for 24 hours. The person may not post in the thread until after the following night's deadline. __________________ http://wotlabs.net/s...8/signature.png http://wotlabs.net/sig_dark/na/banichi18/signature.png

08-13-2009, 04:31 PM	#57
Abe Sargent Hall Of Famer Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Catonsville, MD	We don;t even have a bodyguard yet. __________________ Check out my two current weekly Magic columns! https://www.coolstuffinc.com/a/?action=search&page=1&author[]=Abe%20Sargent

08-13-2009, 05:08 PM	#60
Abe Sargent Hall Of Famer Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Catonsville, MD	I would be honored __________________ Check out my two current weekly Magic columns! https://www.coolstuffinc.com/a/?action=search&page=1&author[]=Abe%20Sargent

08-14-2009, 02:08 PM	#67
DaddyTorgo Hall Of Famer Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Massachusetts	yeah, that's why i said toying with the idea...not sure it's workable. probably isn't the more i've thought about it. still thinking on a rule. __________________ If I've ever helped you and you'd like to buy me a coffee, or just to say thanks, I have my Bitcoin and Ethereum addressed listed below :) BTC: bc1qykhsfyn9vw4ntqfgr0svj4n9tjdgufryh2pxn5 ETH: 0x2AcdC5cd88EA537063553F5b240073bE067BaCa9

08-14-2009, 06:04 PM	#74
Abe Sargent Hall Of Famer Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Catonsville, MD	Yay, welcome! __________________ Check out my two current weekly Magic columns! https://www.coolstuffinc.com/a/?action=search&page=1&author[]=Abe%20Sargent

08-13-2009, 04:00 PM	#55
JAG Grizzled Veteran Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: St. Paul, MN	I'm in. I'll think of a rule in the next 24 hrs so you'll have time to do balancing.

08-13-2009, 07:22 PM	#61
ntndeacon Pro Starter Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Alabama	In I like the Idea of a role of Thief who can steal the role or steal an item designed for the role. like stealing seer's cloak or fool's hat or Wolves claws or gun or something.

08-14-2009, 02:27 PM	#68
SnDvls Pro Starter Join Date: Jul 2001	So I probally should modify my role/rule to exclude wolves (only villager/villager paring)...unless we get a bodyguard role in the game.

08-14-2009, 03:00 PM	#70
JAG Grizzled Veteran Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: St. Paul, MN	So would this work for a rule? At the start of day 4, the winning condition of one wolf and one villager (both randomly chosen) are swapped (so the wolf wins with the village, the villager wins with the wolves). BK, if you want to sort out the details of that, feel free. I'll just throw some ideas after the basic one in case you want to use any of them but don't feel like you have to. In particular I'm unsure how to handle the wolf who learns that he now wins with the village. Option a. Neither of these players know that their winning condition has been changed. (I don't support this option if it can be avoided, I don't think it's fun to try your best to win only to find out you really were hurting yourself) Option b. For the villager who wins with the wolves, if all the remaining real wolves are killed off then they become the final wolf. Option c. Only a 50% chance that this swap occurs. Option d. The wolves have one opportunity to immediately kill who they perceive to be their traitor (has to be unanimous minus one). If they are correct, they immediately kill (3? 4?) additional villagers. Essentially this is the only way I could think of disuading the traitor wolf from doing a full reveal of the other wolves. If you don't think this would work well, let me know and I'll come up with something else.

08-14-2009, 04:56 PM	#71
saldana Pro Starter Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Bethlehem, Pa	i would like in, rule to follow

08-14-2009, 05:18 PM	#72
Lathum Favored Bitch #1 Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: homeless in NJ	in

08-14-2009, 05:48 PM	#73
Darth Vilus College Benchwarmer Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: SoCal	Hello everyone, I'm the friend Danny was talking about earlier. I'll sign up for the 100th if there's still room. I know how the game works but since I haven't actually played one before and don't have strategy yet I don't think I should really add a rule or role to the game. Thanks.

08-14-2009, 06:29 PM	#75
Darth Vilus College Benchwarmer Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: SoCal	Thanks so much Sargent :-)

08-14-2009, 07:04 PM	#76
hoopsguy General Manager Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Chicago	Darth, welcome to FOFC/OS werewolf. Looking forward to playing with you (and J23) this game.

08-14-2009, 09:51 PM	#79
hoopsguy General Manager Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Chicago	Eh, I can take or leave you guys

08-14-2009, 10:50 PM	#81
hoopsguy General Manager Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Chicago	Careful, other people are still naming roles. I already named a role that has that ability, although I should have put in a clause that it could not be used against Hoopsguy.

08-14-2009, 11:36 PM	#82
nfg22 College Benchwarmer Join Date: Mar 2004	Im in. My role will be one of my favorite... Psycho- Thinks they are psychic(seer) and will scan as a seer up on any and all role reveals but only has a 50% chance of being right on any scan. They will be given one scan a night and told they are the Seer.

08-14-2009, 11:37 PM	#84
nfg22 College Benchwarmer Join Date: Mar 2004	They only have a 50% chance to be right on any of their seer scans. If that want clear enough.

08-14-2009, 11:45 PM	#86
SnDvls Pro Starter Join Date: Jul 2001	dola - and with the added psycho role I think going back to my original rule/role would be better.

08-15-2009, 12:05 AM	#87
Darth Vilus College Benchwarmer Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: SoCal	Thanks, I appreciate it Hoopsguy :-) Last edited by Darth Vilus : 08-15-2009 at 12:06 AM.

08-15-2009, 12:46 AM	#91
The Jackal Coordinator Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: New Hampshire	Welcome aboard Darth.

08-15-2009, 05:38 PM	#99
Abe Sargent Hall Of Famer Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Catonsville, MD	I am going to have to withdraw from this game. I will not have even the availability that I thought I would have over the next couple of weeks. August has always been tough in my line of work, and this will be even more/ Enjoy! __________________ Check out my two current weekly Magic columns! https://www.coolstuffinc.com/a/?action=search&page=1&author[]=Abe%20Sargent

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)