Trump Indictment/Trial thread-2023

[CrimsonFox]

"Windmills, Dude."

[CrimsonFox]

Originally Posted by Thomkal

Here's a bit of what happened: Trump just seems to think he can name any value he wants for his properties because he was President, and the banks all wanted to do deals with him


meidastouch.com

and that someday he MIGHT builds homes and condos on it which would make it worth more.

[Thomkal]

Originally Posted by CrimsonFox

"Windmills, Dude."

Yes you know all that crazy talk about windmills causing cancer came directly from Scotland denying him the chance to take then down." Every business deal gone bad, every time he tried to deregulate something (asbestos) it was because it had caused his business money at sometime in the past, and that's what his presidency was about-not democracy, just fixing things so he and his businesses would make more money after his Presidency was over.

[Atocep]

Originally Posted by Thomkal

Yes you know all that crazy talk about windmills causing cancer came directly from Scotland denying him the chance to take then down." Every business deal gone bad, every time he tried to deregulate something (asbestos) it was because it had caused his business money at sometime in the past, and that's what his presidency was about-not democracy, just fixing things so he and his businesses would make more money after his Presidency was over.

I genuinely believe he thinks everyone is like this and everyone thinks this way. He believes everything Obama, Biden, and every other president has done was to enrich themselves or punish enemies. That's why he's so open about it. He doesn't realize that being a self absorbed, narcissist isn't normal.

[Thomkal]

Originally Posted by Atocep

I genuinely believe he thinks everyone is like this and everyone thinks this way. He believes everything Obama, Biden, and every other president has done was to enrich themselves or punish enemies. That's why he's so open about it. He doesn't realize that being a self absorbed, narcissist isn't normal.

Yeah I agree with that.

[Ksyrup]

That makes the most sense.

[RainMaker]

Has he complained about toilets? That's a classic.

[GrantDawg]

Ivanka taking the stand in the fraud trial is being met with such ridiculous hype that if she doesn't get up there and say "My dad personally strangled Jeffery Epstein to death" it is going to be a major disappointment.

Sent from my SM-S916U using Tapatalk

[albionmoonlight]

Nothing gets the media more excited that "famous blonde woman does something"

[GrantDawg]

"But look at her outfit while she says she doesn't remember..."

Sent from my SM-S916U using Tapatalk

[Atocep]

The real story is what they're putting her family through by making her testify during the school week.

[Edward64]

I'm sure there were good reasons for the Fed court rule to not allow broadcasting but I'd personally like to see the Trump trial live.

‘Travesty in darkness’: Trump backs drive to televise his D.C. election-subversion trial - POLITICO

The five-page submission to U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan makes no mention of a federal court rule that has been in place for decades prohibiting broadcasting of criminal court proceedings.

Prosecutors from special counsel Jack Smith’s team cited that rule last week in opposing the effort by an array of news outlets, including POLITICO, to win permission to cover the historic trial of a former — or current — president on criminal charges.

Trump's team wants it.

Last month, news organizations filed formal motions with Chutkan seeking permission to offer live video and audio coverage of the trial. The news outlets cited the unusual degree of interest in the trial and the challenges the court is likely to face in trying to accommodate spectators in the courthouse.

The MSM wants it.

Democratic lawmakers and news outlets also asked the policymaking body for the federal courts, the Judicial Conference, to grant an exception to the broadcasting ban so that the Trump D.C. trial could be televised. However, at a meeting last month, a committee of that conference said that it lacked authority to grant an exception and that changing the rule would take years.

The Dems want it.

Smith’s team also said TV coverage would present risks to the trial, potentially intimidating witnesses and jurors.

This argument seems weak to me. Have the witnesses testify behind something then or have the jurors in a separate, enclosed room. Or heck, spend some of my taxpayer money and assign 24x7 juror protection for next 5 years.

[CrimsonFox]

i haven't said this in awhile but he is a crazy prick

[Atocep]

Don Jr’s pick for press secretary is claiming I am a “disloyal harlot” and “going to hell.”

No mention though of Jr’s divorce, his girlfriend’s divorce from Gavin Newsom, or The Best Christian Ever screwing a porn star while his third wife was pregnant.

Apparently true…

— Jenna Ellis (@JennaEllisEsq) November 16, 2023

[Thomkal]

Nevada Grand Jury indicts six Republicans today for their role in the fake elector scheme, including the Party Chairman.