Scariest Man on Earth

Oilers9911 · 01-19-2006, 01:19 PM

Ok so Macleans magazine in Canada had a cover this week with the President of Iran and the headline Scariest Man on Earth. So who do you think is the scariest man on Earth?

flere-imsaho · 01-19-2006, 01:20 PM

SkyDog. It's the patriotic undies.

Maple Leafs · 01-19-2006, 01:21 PM

Chuck Norris?

miked · 01-19-2006, 01:22 PM

Mr. T. I hear even if you've never met him, there is an 80% chance he's pitying you right now.

Raiders Army · 01-19-2006, 01:23 PM

I'd go for Chuck.

rkmsuf · 01-19-2006, 01:23 PM

Carrot Top in a runaway.

Swaggs · 01-19-2006, 01:56 PM

Kim Jong Il has nukes and seems to have the least accountability. He scares me.

gottimd · 01-19-2006, 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Swaggs

Kim Jong Il has nukes and seems to have the least accountability. He scares me.

Yes but Carrot top has props that he uses in inappropriate ways, and he seems to have gone on the All you can Inject Steroid diet as well.

PackerFanatic · 01-19-2006, 02:00 PM

I've seen Carrot Top live...

*kills self*

GreenMonster · 01-19-2006, 02:07 PM

Tie between the Mike's.. Tyson and Jackson..

gottimd · 01-19-2006, 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GreenMonster

Tie between the Mike's.. Tyson and Jackson..

hmmmm, not on the poll.....

	What was it we had for dinner tonight?
	Well, we had a choice: steak or fish.
	Yes, yes, I remember, I had lasagna.

sabotai · 01-19-2006, 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Swaggs

Kim Jong Il has nukes and seems to have the least accountability. He scares me.

He also seems to be the least mentally stable.

GreenMonster · 01-19-2006, 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gottimd

hmmmm, not on the poll.....

	What was it we had for dinner tonight?
	Well, we had a choice: steak or fish.
	Yes, yes, I remember, I had lasagna.

I guess Chuck, Mr. T, and Skydog were just added.. Thanx for informing me how polls work. Does this poll have a spot for other, or is it for certain the scariest man alive is on that list...?

Bee · 01-19-2006, 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sabotai

He also seems to be the least mentally stable.

You obviously missed Carrot Top in the poll...

gottimd · 01-19-2006, 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GreenMonster

I guess Chuck, Mr. T, and Skydog were just added..

They are givens...

Quote:

Originally Posted by GreenMonster

Thanx for informing me how polls work. ..

You are quite welcome.

Quote:

Originally Posted by GreenMonster

Does this poll have a spot for other.

unfortunately not

Quote:

Originally Posted by GreenMonster

is it for certain the scariest man alive is on that list...?

According to Oilers9911, this is it.

Anthony · 01-19-2006, 03:36 PM

carnies.

they have small hands. smell like cabbage.

Tigercat · 01-19-2006, 03:39 PM

Everytime you actually find a way to win a stuffed animal a carny steals a piece of your soul.

yabanci · 01-19-2006, 03:41 PM

Khatami is not the president of Iran.

gottimd · 01-19-2006, 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yabanci

Khatami is not the president of Iran.

Maybe its short for Preschooler? Lil Mo' is the baddest and meanest preschooler in Iran.

PackerFanatic · 01-19-2006, 03:52 PM

How can Carrot Top be more scary than W?! Come on people!!

Pumpy Tudors · 01-19-2006, 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by miked

Mr. T. I hear even if you've never met him, there is an 80% chance he's pitying you right now.

Thank God I'm safe.

PSUColonel · 01-19-2006, 04:56 PM

Voting for Bush is absoutely rediculous. The only people who vote for him are those that feel war is almost NEVER justified, regardless of the situation. Which do you fear more: nuclear weapons in the hands of Bush and the U.S., or nuclear weapons in the hands of N. Korea or Iran. Give me a break.

timmae · 01-19-2006, 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PSUColonel

Which do you fear more: nuclear weapons in the hands of Bush and the U.S., or nuclear weapons in the hands of N. Korea or Iran. Give me a break.

I think you missed quite a few months between the war starting and present day known quantities...

Oilers9911 · 01-19-2006, 11:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yabanci

Khatami is not the president of Iran.

Sorry, my bad...he was the past president. Can a poll be edited to "Whoever the fuckwit President of Iran is"?

hoopsguy · 01-20-2006, 05:46 AM

Preach on, Hell Atlantic!

AlexB · 01-20-2006, 07:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sabotai

He also seems to be the least mentally stable.

Did you miss GWB being on the list?

AlexB · 01-20-2006, 07:30 AM

Dola,

Quote:

Originally Posted by Swaggs

Kim Jong Il has nukes and seems to have the least accountability. He scares me.

I'd argue that GWB has the least accountability - N.Korea, along with every other country in the world, are extremely unlikely to start a serious fight with the US because at the end of the day they know they will get their ass kicked. Therefore they have an indirect accountability - their own political and personal survival.

All of the posturing of N.Korea is exactly that - so they can produce propoganda saying they stood up to the mighty bullies of America, but if it came to the point of actual war, they would back down sharpish.

This is the same throughout the world, which actually makes the US the least accountable to a certain extent, as the govt knows that no-state will invade them and likely win, while they can attack anybody they see as an annoyance or for public opinion purposes - see Iraq: GWB & Blair flew in the face of the UN, who are the body to whom they are supposedly accountable.

Klinglerware · 01-20-2006, 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jari Rantanen's Shorts

Dola,

I'd argue that GWB has the least accountability - N.Korea, along with every other country in the world, are extremely unlikely to start a serious fight with the US because at the end of the day they know they will get their ass kicked. Therefore they have an indirect accountability - their own political and personal survival.

All of the posturing of N.Korea is exactly that - so they can produce propoganda saying they stood up to the mighty bullies of America, but if it came to the point of actual war, they would back down sharpish.

This is the same throughout the world, which actually makes the US the least accountable to a certain extent, as the govt knows that no-state will invade them and likely win, while they can attack anybody they see as an annoyance or for public opinion purposes - see Iraq: GWB & Blair flew in the face of the UN, who are the body to whom they are supposedly accountable.

I would agree with this dispassionate analysis--in a nutshell, GWB already has the track record that the other men (probably including Carrot Top) do not. He is the most powerful, has demonstrated the will to use that power, and is accountable to no one in the international community (and arguably, even domestically to some extent).

I'm not moralizing here, that is just the nature of international politics where the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must (Thucydides).

Desnudo · 01-20-2006, 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jari Rantanen's Shorts

Dola,

I'd argue that GWB has the least accountability - N.Korea, along with every other country in the world, are extremely unlikely to start a serious fight with the US because at the end of the day they know they will get their ass kicked. Therefore they have an indirect accountability - their own political and personal survival.

All of the posturing of N.Korea is exactly that - so they can produce propoganda saying they stood up to the mighty bullies of America, but if it came to the point of actual war, they would back down sharpish.

This is the same throughout the world, which actually makes the US the least accountable to a certain extent, as the govt knows that no-state will invade them and likely win, while they can attack anybody they see as an annoyance or for public opinion purposes - see Iraq: GWB & Blair flew in the face of the UN, who are the body to whom they are supposedly accountable.

Here's the problem, Kim Il Jong is completely bonkers. It's like the old days with a crazy duke living in a castle. Except this time the crazy duke has nuclear technology and likes to fund terrorism. China would keep him from launching nukes, but they won't stop him from working with terrorists.

I said Carrot Top though. I believe he's the biggest threat to our national safety.

Klinglerware · 01-20-2006, 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Desnudo

Except this time the crazy duke has nuclear technology and likes to fund terrorism. China would keep him from launching nukes, but they won't stop him from working with terrorists.

I said Carrot Top though. I believe he's the biggest threat to our national safety.

Not true on the terrorism point--the North Koreans haven't funded terrorist groups in years, although they do sell military technology to states that do.

I'm still on the fence re Carrot Top...

Desnudo · 01-20-2006, 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Klinglerware

Not true on the terrorism point--the North Koreans haven't funded terrorist groups in years, although they do sell military technology to states that do.

I'm still on the fence re Carrot Top...

Which makes it different how?

Klinglerware · 01-20-2006, 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Desnudo

Which makes it different how?

The direction the money flows. North Korea is taking money in from states with questionable reputations, but it is not disbursing money to terrorist groups.

duckman · 01-20-2006, 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Klinglerware

The direction the money flows. North Korea is taking money in from states with questionable reputations, but it is not disbursing money to terrorist groups.

But he is providing weapons to states that give those same weapons to terrorist groups. They're just using a middle man and making a profit while doing it.

Desnudo · 01-20-2006, 12:01 PM

It still means they are funding terrorism, albeit indirectly. I don't think the technology they sell is being applied to building windmills and tractors.

Edit: you keep saying groups, but I never used that word.

Klinglerware · 01-20-2006, 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duckman

But he is providing weapons to states that give those same weapons to terrorist groups. They're just using a middle man and making a profit while doing it.

Fair point, but that is not the same as sponsorship. The weapons trade makes for some very strange bedfellows--in fact, Israel and Iran had a secret armaments trade relationship in the 80s.

As for the North Koreans, they don't care who they sell to, so I am not sure there is direct intent. I am sure that they do not mind the indirect connection to terrorist groups, but the primary intention is to raise hard currency. This reminds me of a friend of mine from Texas (and quite the gun collector) who once told me that even American civilians can get their hands on North Korean produced weaponry. To circumvent the American trade embargo, the North Koreans sell AK-47 rounds, for example, to a middle man country who then legally sells to Americans...

SFL Cat · 01-20-2006, 12:24 PM

I think Janet Reno would be a scary man.

flere-imsaho · 01-20-2006, 01:24 PM

What North Korea allows explicitly (not caring with whom money/technology is traded) the governments of Pakistan & Saudi Arabia allow implicitly (not trying all that hard to curb the transfer of money/technology to third parties).

One could argue that Musharraf's come much closer to the brink with India than North Korea has come (in recent history) with any of its neighbors. Plus, China has a vested interest in keeping North Korea from destabilizing the region. Musharraf has no such limiting power.

One could argue that the House of Saud has allowed an exponentionally greater outflow of money to terrorist organizations than North Korea has (or even can). Furthermore, unlike Kim Il Jong, who will eventually die, opening the possibility for a more reasonable head of state, the House of Saud is likely to continue its policies, no matter whom is at its head.

PackerFanatic · 01-20-2006, 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SFL Cat

I think Janet Reno would be a scary man.

Janet Reno IS a scary man.

moriarty · 01-20-2006, 01:54 PM

I vote for "other: Dick Cheney". He convinced Mr. Gullible to kick off a war in Iraq so he could get secret kickbacks from his Halliburton (sp?) buddies in exchange for lucrative contracts. I just can't prove it.

Telle · 01-20-2006, 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PSUColonel

Voting for Bush is absoutely rediculous. The only people who vote for him are those that feel war is almost NEVER justified, regardless of the situation. Which do you fear more: nuclear weapons in the hands of Bush and the U.S., or nuclear weapons in the hands of N. Korea or Iran. Give me a break.

I fear a president who has the diplomacy of a gnat doing something stupid that provokes one of the others into using their nuclear weapons.

AlexB · 01-20-2006, 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Klinglerware

GWB is.... accountable to no one in the international community (and arguably, even domestically to some extent).

This was one of two accountabilities GWB had - the aim to get re-elected, for which he needed the support of the US public. Now he does not have this personal accountability, as he is in his 2nd term, but the party as a whole will want to stay after GWB goes, so the internal advisors who will want to keep their jobs under a new administration would be to some level holding him back if he had the sudden urge to do something stupid, like for example bombing Al Jazeera

cthomer5000 · 01-20-2006, 03:27 PM

Michael Jackson would receive my vote.

Bubba Wheels · 01-20-2006, 07:07 PM

The Burger King Guy.

Klinglerware · 01-20-2006, 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bubba Wheels

The Burger King Guy.

Well, the King does have amazing speed and escapability...

Bubba Wheels · 01-20-2006, 08:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Klinglerware

Well, the King does have amazing speed and escapability...

Guy calls into a sports radio show. Says "I've got a guy we need to trade for, can play qb, receiver and db. Very impressive on film."

When the host asks 'who' caller says...you got it.

Sissy that I am, though, I was watching that 'Skating with Stars' special the other night. And the secret is out. The Burger King Guy is really...Bruce Jenner!

GreenMonster · 01-20-2006, 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cthomer5000

Michael Jackson would receive my vote.

He would have recieved my vote also, but gottimd set me straight in post #11...
Thanx again for the help.

Bubba Wheels · 01-20-2006, 09:39 PM

Then I change my vote to the Iranian guy. Looks kinda short, and you know what they say about short historical leaders.

View Poll Results: Who is the scariest man on Earth?
Osama Bin Laden	6	6.74%
George W. Bush	25	28.09%
Kim Jong Il	20	22.47%
Mohammad Khatami (Iranian Pres.)	16	17.98%
Carrot Top	22	24.72%
Voters: 89. You may not vote on this poll

01-19-2006, 01:21 PM	#3
Maple Leafs Coordinator Join Date: Jan 2002	Chuck Norris? __________________ Down Goes Brown: Toronto Maple Leafs Humor and Analysis

01-19-2006, 01:23 PM	#6
rkmsuf Head Coach Join Date: Dec 2001	Carrot Top in a runaway. __________________ "Don't you have homes?" -- Judge Smales

01-19-2006, 01:56 PM	#7
Swaggs Coordinator Join Date: Oct 2000	Kim Jong Il has nukes and seems to have the least accountability. He scares me. __________________ DOWN WITH HATTRICK!!! The RWBL Are you reading In The Bleachers?

01-19-2006, 02:00 PM	#9
PackerFanatic Pro Starter Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Appleton, WI	I've seen Carrot Top live... kills self __________________ Commissioner of the RNFL

01-19-2006, 01:20 PM	#2
flere-imsaho Coordinator Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Chicagoland	SkyDog. It's the patriotic undies.

01-19-2006, 01:22 PM	#4
miked College Starter Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: The Dirty	Mr. T. I hear even if you've never met him, there is an 80% chance he's pitying you right now.

01-19-2006, 01:23 PM	#5
Raiders Army Coordinator Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: The Black Hole	I'd go for Chuck.

01-19-2006, 02:07 PM	#10
GreenMonster High School Varsity Join Date: Mar 2005	Tie between the Mike's.. Tyson and Jackson..

01-19-2006, 03:36 PM	#16
Anthony Banned Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Astoria, NY, USA	carnies. they have small hands. smell like cabbage.

01-19-2006, 03:39 PM	#17
Tigercat College Starter Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Federal Way, WA	Everytime you actually find a way to win a stuffed animal a carny steals a piece of your soul.

01-19-2006, 03:41 PM	#18
yabanci College Benchwarmer Join Date: Jun 2003	Khatami is not the president of Iran.

01-19-2006, 03:52 PM	#20
PackerFanatic Pro Starter Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Appleton, WI	How can Carrot Top be more scary than W?! Come on people!! __________________ Commissioner of the RNFL

01-19-2006, 04:56 PM	#22
PSUColonel Banned Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Wayne, PA	Voting for Bush is absoutely rediculous. The only people who vote for him are those that feel war is almost NEVER justified, regardless of the situation. Which do you fear more: nuclear weapons in the hands of Bush and the U.S., or nuclear weapons in the hands of N. Korea or Iran. Give me a break.

01-20-2006, 05:46 AM	#25
hoopsguy General Manager Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Chicago	Preach on, Hell Atlantic!

01-20-2006, 12:01 PM	#34
Desnudo Coordinator Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Here and There	It still means they are funding terrorism, albeit indirectly. I don't think the technology they sell is being applied to building windmills and tractors. Edit: you keep saying groups, but I never used that word. Last edited by Desnudo : 01-20-2006 at 12:01 PM.

01-20-2006, 12:24 PM	#36
SFL Cat College Starter Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: South Florida	I think Janet Reno would be a scary man.

01-20-2006, 01:24 PM	#37
flere-imsaho Coordinator Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Chicagoland	What North Korea allows explicitly (not caring with whom money/technology is traded) the governments of Pakistan & Saudi Arabia allow implicitly (not trying all that hard to curb the transfer of money/technology to third parties). One could argue that Musharraf's come much closer to the brink with India than North Korea has come (in recent history) with any of its neighbors. Plus, China has a vested interest in keeping North Korea from destabilizing the region. Musharraf has no such limiting power. One could argue that the House of Saud has allowed an exponentionally greater outflow of money to terrorist organizations than North Korea has (or even can). Furthermore, unlike Kim Il Jong, who will eventually die, opening the possibility for a more reasonable head of state, the House of Saud is likely to continue its policies, no matter whom is at its head.

01-20-2006, 01:54 PM	#39
moriarty College Starter Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: A negative place	I vote for "other: Dick Cheney". He convinced Mr. Gullible to kick off a war in Iraq so he could get secret kickbacks from his Halliburton (sp?) buddies in exchange for lucrative contracts. I just can't prove it.

01-20-2006, 07:07 PM	#43
Bubba Wheels College Starter Join Date: Jan 2004	The Burger King Guy.

01-20-2006, 09:39 PM	#47
Bubba Wheels College Starter Join Date: Jan 2004	Then I change my vote to the Iranian guy. Looks kinda short, and you know what they say about short historical leaders.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)