Front Office Football Central  

Go Back   Front Office Football Central > Main Forums > Off Topic
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Statistics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-11-2014, 10:12 AM   #1
DougW
High School Varsity
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Downriver, MI
Anarchy. What would it be like ?

I mean, complete anarchy. No government at all. No police, no court. Nothing.

DougW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2014, 10:14 AM   #2
BYU 14
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The scorched Desert
Somalia comes to mind
BYU 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2014, 10:27 AM   #3
Scarecrow
College Prospect
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Flatlands of America
Have you been following the Browns front office soap opera?
__________________
Post Count: Eleventy Billion - so deal with it!
Scarecrow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2014, 10:39 AM   #4
path12
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Lots of squabbling fiefdoms.
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
path12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2014, 10:39 AM   #5
Marc Vaughan
SI Games
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Melbourne, FL
Very brief for most of us
Marc Vaughan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2014, 10:46 AM   #6
panerd
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: St. Louis
I assume the question is about the United States? If it happened tomorrow? Obviously since everyone is used to a central government that provides close to everything from birth until death it would be a major collapse.

If it were to happen gradually over time? I would say more like the Wild West or some of the early colonies. The introduction of Somalia into any discussion ignores the fact that Africa has its own sets of problems that exist in most of the sub saharan countries with central governments. Sudan has problems bigger than Somalia and would be considered the exact opposite of an anarchist society.

EDIT: Not advocating it one bit. I enjoy sitting at home watching tv with my internet and air conditionting. I also don't think it would neccessarly become Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome.

Last edited by panerd : 02-11-2014 at 10:47 AM.
panerd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2014, 11:30 AM   #7
DougW
High School Varsity
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Downriver, MI
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marc Vaughan View Post
Very brief for most of us
Haha. Probably true.

Quote:
Originally Posted by panerd View Post
I assume the question is about the United States?.

Yes, my bad. I definitely should have been specific.

My question was in regards to the U.S. And obviously, a "tomorrow is Anarchy day" would be problematic. But, as you say - if it happened slowly, so people had a chance to adapt.

I think, as it was happening, violence would be high. But, I think eventually it'd calm down. People would learn to defuse, they'd know if you stabbed your neighbor because his dog shit on your lawn .. his brother would find you.

Last edited by DougW : 02-11-2014 at 11:31 AM.
DougW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2014, 11:31 AM   #8
Qwikshot
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: ...down the gravity well
Quote:
Originally Posted by DougW View Post
I mean, complete anarchy. No government at all. No police, no court. Nothing.

Read Cormac McCarthy's "The Road", I'm pretty sure it'll be like that.
__________________
"General Woundwort's body was never found. It could be that he still lives his fierce life somewhere else, but from that day on, mother rabbits would tell their kittens that if they did not do as they were told, the General would get them. Such was Woundwort's monument, and perhaps it would not have displeased him." Watership Down, Richard Adams
Qwikshot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2014, 11:39 AM   #9
lungs
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Prairie du Sac, WI
Clans and tribes would form around who has the food.
lungs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2014, 11:57 AM   #10
BishopMVP
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Concord, MA/UMass
Quote:
Originally Posted by Qwikshot View Post
Read Cormac McCarthy's "The Road", I'm pretty sure it'll be like that.
Nah, I don't think people would be resorting to cannibalism that soon. Plus if anything our cultural obsession with doomsday media would have prepared us a little better - you'd have people setting up various communities and power structures in no time. The show was horrible, and I'm not sure cities would turn out that well, but if anything Under the Dome hits the mark closer than The Road imo.

Of course, that also leads to questions about why the government just collapsed, and whether there's some incipient catastrophe like in The Road. Kinda hard to predict without knowing what the fundamental change was.
BishopMVP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2014, 11:59 AM   #11
cartman
Death Herald
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Le stelle la notte sono grandi e luminose nel cuore profondo del Texas
I am an anti-Christ
I am an anarchist,
Don't know what I want
But I know how to get it.
I wanna destroy the passerby
'Cos I wanna be anarchy
__________________
Thinkin' of a master plan
'Cuz ain't nuthin' but sweat inside my hand
So I dig into my pocket, all my money is spent
So I dig deeper but still comin' up with lint
cartman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2014, 12:02 PM   #12
molson
General Manager
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
Quote:
Originally Posted by BishopMVP View Post
Nah, I don't think people would be resorting to cannibalism that soon.

That line made me laugh for some reason. I haven't seen the road, but some of my neighbors do look delicious, I'm not sure how long I could hold out.
molson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2014, 12:08 PM   #13
Qwikshot
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: ...down the gravity well
Quote:
Originally Posted by BishopMVP View Post
Nah, I don't think people would be resorting to cannibalism that soon. Plus if anything our cultural obsession with doomsday media would have prepared us a little better - you'd have people setting up various communities and power structures in no time. The show was horrible, and I'm not sure cities would turn out that well, but if anything Under the Dome hits the mark closer than The Road imo.

Of course, that also leads to questions about why the government just collapsed, and whether there's some incipient catastrophe like in The Road. Kinda hard to predict without knowing what the fundamental change was.

Anarchy just isn't sustainable long-term, ultimately there would be some power structure. But I would believe if you wanted anarchy, it would be due a calamity that could not be resolved in a short-term timeframe.

Anarchy's endgame would very much be like "The Road" as everyone would be out for themselves and scavaging resources.
__________________
"General Woundwort's body was never found. It could be that he still lives his fierce life somewhere else, but from that day on, mother rabbits would tell their kittens that if they did not do as they were told, the General would get them. Such was Woundwort's monument, and perhaps it would not have displeased him." Watership Down, Richard Adams
Qwikshot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2014, 12:21 PM   #14
markprior22
High School Varsity
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: springfield, il
All you gotta do is see the people at a Wal Mart the day a big snow storm is predicted. If that doesn't make you think how bad things could be, I don't know what would.
markprior22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2014, 12:29 PM   #15
TroyF
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
True anarchy wouldn't exist for that long. Someone would make a power grab and plenty of people would create their own police forces. If it all started tomorrow, there would be areas that would disintegrate quickly. There are smaller communities in the midwest that would not see an immediate, massive change.

Within a few months, new power structures would be in place (with lots of infighting in certain areas for that power) Those of us that made it after the first few months would probably start to find some normalcy quicker than most would imagine.
TroyF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2014, 12:57 PM   #16
BishopMVP
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Concord, MA/UMass
Quote:
Originally Posted by Qwikshot View Post
Anarchy just isn't sustainable long-term, ultimately there would be some power structure. But I would believe if you wanted anarchy, it would be due a calamity that could not be resolved in a short-term timeframe.

Anarchy's endgame would very much be like "The Road" as everyone would be out for themselves and scavaging resources.
The Road also had the volcanic eruptions or whatever that killed off all plants and animals. Barring that, I have no doubt there would be some structural shocks and possibly fighting over resources initially, but I think most of us are smart enough to realize that having some sort of stability where one person can grow food and another process it is better than just running into their field and eating the seeds and will provide a better outcome for all of us.

I mean, humans went from hunter-gatherers to an agrarian society even though an agrarian society was much much harder back then (both compared to the present day and compared to contemporary hunter-gathering) and there was no prior history of a "civilized" society. I have no doubt that most people today would be even quicker to grasp the concept that creating at least a decent sized community and taking advantage of economies of scale is preferable to every man for himself.

Plus, the most likely government collapse imo would come about due to some sort of bio-infection that wiped out a large % of the population - which would drive people apart initially, but make the competition for resources much less of an issue.

Either way, I'm going to my fort-island and learning to love the taste of fish, but I'd hope that a decent portion of my neighbors are up there too, particularly because that gets you past the initial distrust stage. You guys are welcome to come too as long as you can carry your weight and we all agree Tom Brady is better than Peyton Manning. Or at least Eli.
BishopMVP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2014, 01:03 PM   #17
nilodor
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: calgary, AB
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marc Vaughan View Post
Very brief for most of us

Sad agree. I feel like things would go very last of us style. Roving bandits. People doing crazy things they convince themselves are for the greater good. Not a pleasant place to be.
nilodor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2014, 01:08 PM   #18
britrock88
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Madison, WI
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marc Vaughan View Post
Very brief for most of us

This, I suspect.
britrock88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2014, 02:27 PM   #19
sterlingice
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Back in Houston!
Quote:
Originally Posted by BishopMVP View Post
Either way, I'm going to my fort-island and learning to love the taste of fish, but I'd hope that a decent portion of my neighbors are up there too, particularly because that gets you past the initial distrust stage. You guys are welcome to come too as long as you can carry your weight and we all agree Tom Brady is better than Peyton Manning. Or at least Eli.

I, for one, welcome my new fort island overlords and their ideals that stress a correct assessment of Eli Manning

SI
__________________
Houston Hippopotami, III.3: 20th Anniversary Thread - All former HT players are encouraged to check it out!

Janos: "Only America could produce an imbecile of your caliber!"
Freakazoid: "That's because we make lots of things better than other people!"


sterlingice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2014, 02:27 PM   #20
sterlingice
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Back in Houston!
Quote:
Originally Posted by panerd View Post
I assume the question is about the United States? If it happened tomorrow? Obviously since everyone is used to a central government that provides close to everything from birth until death it would be a major collapse.

Obviously!

SI
__________________
Houston Hippopotami, III.3: 20th Anniversary Thread - All former HT players are encouraged to check it out!

Janos: "Only America could produce an imbecile of your caliber!"
Freakazoid: "That's because we make lots of things better than other people!"


sterlingice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2014, 03:13 PM   #21
panerd
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: St. Louis
Quote:
Originally Posted by sterlingice View Post
Obviously!

SI



This is the reaction to only austerity measures with a government still in place and a police force. Not sure how a complete elimination of the government overnight would not cause a total collapse. Are we disagreeing on the use of the term obviously or the fact that the federal government pretty much covers every basic need from birth until death? (Food, water, shelter, clothing)

Last edited by panerd : 02-11-2014 at 03:17 PM.
panerd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2014, 03:15 PM   #22
cartman
Death Herald
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Le stelle la notte sono grandi e luminose nel cuore profondo del Texas
Regulation is not the same thing as provides. Or did I somehow miss out on a clothing ration from Uncle Sam?
__________________
Thinkin' of a master plan
'Cuz ain't nuthin' but sweat inside my hand
So I dig into my pocket, all my money is spent
So I dig deeper but still comin' up with lint
cartman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2014, 03:21 PM   #23
panerd
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: St. Louis
Quote:
Originally Posted by cartman View Post
Regulation is not the same thing as provides. Or did I somehow miss out on a clothing ration from Uncle Sam?

Dear lord the statists can't handle a simple discussion of complete anarchy without getting their panties in a wad over semantics. I think the United States would be in trouble if the government collapsed overnight. However I'm sure you and SI have some correction to my wording. Hooray! You win! Yeah!

Last edited by panerd : 02-11-2014 at 03:22 PM.
panerd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2014, 03:26 PM   #24
cartman
Death Herald
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Le stelle la notte sono grandi e luminose nel cuore profondo del Texas
Someone's panties are in a wad alright. But not mine, I'm commando at the moment.

Semantics would be arguing the use of 'oversight' versus 'regulation'. You are positing that the government itself is providing those things to the majority of the population. Which in the US is not a true statement.

I agree that any society would be in trouble if the government disappeared overnight. The reasons things function rather well is that the government takes care of things so that individuals and business don't have to worry about, like policing, backing a currency, and maintaining transportation infrastructure. Food, clothing, water and shelter would still be available in the event of a government collapse. But acquiring and retaining these things would be infinitely more difficult.
__________________
Thinkin' of a master plan
'Cuz ain't nuthin' but sweat inside my hand
So I dig into my pocket, all my money is spent
So I dig deeper but still comin' up with lint

Last edited by cartman : 02-11-2014 at 03:32 PM.
cartman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2014, 03:32 PM   #25
sterlingice
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Back in Houston!
Quote:
Originally Posted by panerd View Post
This is the reaction to only austerity measures with a government still in place and a police force. Not sure how a complete elimination of the government overnight would not cause a total collapse. Are we disagreeing on the use of the term obviously or the fact that the federal government pretty much covers every basic need from birth until death? (Food, water, shelter, clothing)

Cartman's initial response pretty much hits the nail on the head: regulation does not mean providing. Just because you receive some segment of government assistance does not mean the government provides you with every need. Is the tax deduction for my mortgage interest providing for my shelter? How about that I have a job at a government institution this year? Does that mean everything I get is from the government? How about the 7 years before that where I worked at a private corporation? Was I then a "maker" and not a "taker"? What if that corporation was FedEx? Does the fact that the government provides FedEx roads to drive and deliver on count as assistance?

SI
__________________
Houston Hippopotami, III.3: 20th Anniversary Thread - All former HT players are encouraged to check it out!

Janos: "Only America could produce an imbecile of your caliber!"
Freakazoid: "That's because we make lots of things better than other people!"



Last edited by sterlingice : 02-11-2014 at 03:32 PM.
sterlingice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2014, 03:36 PM   #26
sterlingice
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Back in Houston!
Quote:
Originally Posted by panerd View Post
Dear lord the statists can't handle a simple discussion of complete anarchy without getting their panties in a wad over semantics. I think the United States would be in trouble if the government collapsed overnight. However I'm sure you and SI have some correction to my wording. Hooray! You win! Yeah!

I guess I'm "getting my panties in a wad over semantics", by your definition. In my mind, I don't see the government providing close to everything from birth until death (your words). Or as you put it after that: Food, water, shelter, clothing. If that's really the view you have of the majority of the US, no wonder you're so anti-government.

EDIT: That said, they do provide security. So if the idea of rule by might means you get all of those items by force rather than this handy (and, admittedly, flawed) civilization we have now, I guess I could see that.

SI
__________________
Houston Hippopotami, III.3: 20th Anniversary Thread - All former HT players are encouraged to check it out!

Janos: "Only America could produce an imbecile of your caliber!"
Freakazoid: "That's because we make lots of things better than other people!"



Last edited by sterlingice : 02-11-2014 at 03:51 PM.
sterlingice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2014, 03:40 PM   #27
path12
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Gotta side with cartman & SI here.

But I am a euro-friendly socialist type so take that into account.
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
path12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2014, 04:07 PM   #28
BishopMVP
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Concord, MA/UMass
Quote:
Originally Posted by panerd View Post
This is the reaction to only austerity measures with a government still in place and a police force. Not sure how a complete elimination of the government overnight would not cause a total collapse. Are we disagreeing on the use of the term obviously or the fact that the federal government pretty much covers every basic need from birth until death? (Food, water, shelter, clothing)
Kinda ironic you would use the Greek riots as your example, since compared to them the US government is pretty close to Adam Smith or Milton Friedman's ideal. Even beyond that it doesn't work as a comparison because they weren't targeting their neighbors (well, okay, there were some horrific nationalistic stories that came out), but instead demanding the government pay them more. If the government completely disappeared, they wouldn't have been marching in the streets against it.

That's without even getting into the wildly divergent cultural gap. Using a Greek riot would be like watching a Panathanaikos game and assuming that's how Americans act at sporting events.
BishopMVP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2014, 04:30 PM   #29
DaddyTorgo
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Quote:
Originally Posted by BishopMVP View Post
Either way, I'm going to my fort-island and learning to love the taste of fish, but I'd hope that a decent portion of my neighbors are up there too, particularly because that gets you past the initial distrust stage. You guys are welcome to come too as long as you can carry your weight and we all agree Tom Brady is better than Peyton Manning. Or at least Eli.

I'm there - and I'll raid the REI by my place for equipement before I head up. PM me the address so I can put it into my GPS?
__________________
Get bent whoever hacked my pw and changed my signature.
DaddyTorgo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2014, 04:56 PM   #30
Suicane75
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NJ
If anarchy happened tomorrow? The hillbillies and backward slackjaws I call neighbors, who agitate me to no end at the moment, would be my biggest blessing.
Suicane75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2014, 04:59 PM   #31
cartman
Death Herald
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Le stelle la notte sono grandi e luminose nel cuore profondo del Texas
I watch Hillbilly Blood, Survivorman, Doomsday Preppers, Criminal Minds and Spongebob Squarepants. I think I'm sufficiently ready to handle the immediate transition period.
__________________
Thinkin' of a master plan
'Cuz ain't nuthin' but sweat inside my hand
So I dig into my pocket, all my money is spent
So I dig deeper but still comin' up with lint
cartman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2014, 05:15 PM   #32
nilodor
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: calgary, AB
Quote:
Originally Posted by cartman View Post
Food, clothing, water and shelter would still be available in the event of a government collapse. But acquiring and retaining these things would be infinitely more difficult.

Would they still be available? For our levels of consumption these necessities are produced by specialists. Farming as a general concept may be the same but it has evolved quite a bit since the early 1900's, same with resourcing raw materials for shelter construction and clothing. I'd imagine if the government came crashing down the ability to produce these necessities to satisfy demand would come into question.
nilodor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2014, 05:48 PM   #33
cartman
Death Herald
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Le stelle la notte sono grandi e luminose nel cuore profondo del Texas
Sure you likely aren't going to be able to go down to the store and pick up your favorite beer and beef jerky. But that doesn't mean that it won't still be possible to make beer and beef jerky, or find someone who does. Hence the statement that acquiring things we take for granted would be infinitely more difficult.
__________________
Thinkin' of a master plan
'Cuz ain't nuthin' but sweat inside my hand
So I dig into my pocket, all my money is spent
So I dig deeper but still comin' up with lint
cartman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2014, 06:00 PM   #34
CU Tiger
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Backwoods, SC
For me and my family, life wouldnt change a great deal in the immediate.
Now bigger picture, longer term I could see it being a major inconvenience. Certainly not a survive or perish equation.
CU Tiger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2014, 10:13 PM   #35
BishopMVP
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Concord, MA/UMass
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo View Post
I'm there - and I'll raid the REI by my place for equipment before I head up. PM me the address so I can put it into my GPS?
Just drive to downtown Portland and look out for the fort in the middle of the harbor.



Don't forget about the Freeport outlets on the way up - I know LL Bean is there, and I thought REI had a store there now as well. That does bring up an interesting question - in a true anarchy situation, do you target a store or two to raid, and if so, which one? A lot of people love to say a Gun store, but those would seem to be heavily protected by people with guns. An REI or LLBean isn't a bad choice - outdoor survival gear always comes in handy as a last resort. Getting some water purifying and/or desalinating equipment would be huge - there's always wells, but if you have to move around you don't want to worry about lugging water in bulk. Especially because I feel like the best food to stockpile early on would be like pasta/oatmeal - small, decently nutritious, very long shelf life - and you need water for those. It'd also probably be wise to stock up on some basic antibiotics from a hospital, but that could get dicey.
BishopMVP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2014, 10:27 PM   #36
DaddyTorgo
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Quote:
Originally Posted by BishopMVP View Post
Just drive to downtown Portland and look out for the fort in the middle of the harbor.



Don't forget about the Freeport outlets on the way up - I know LL Bean is there, and I thought REI had a store there now as well. That does bring up an interesting question - in a true anarchy situation, do you target a store or two to raid, and if so, which one? A lot of people love to say a Gun store, but those would seem to be heavily protected by people with guns. An REI or LLBean isn't a bad choice - outdoor survival gear always comes in handy as a last resort. Getting some water purifying and/or desalinating equipment would be huge - there's always wells, but if you have to move around you don't want to worry about lugging water in bulk. Especially because I feel like the best food to stockpile early on would be like pasta/oatmeal - small, decently nutritious, very long shelf life - and you need water for those. It'd also probably be wise to stock up on some basic antibiotics from a hospital, but that could get dicey.

I'll totally tear apart the REI. They sell bows and arrows and hunting knives there too if I'm not mistaken.

Definitely fishing gear.
__________________
Get bent whoever hacked my pw and changed my signature.
DaddyTorgo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2014, 10:34 PM   #37
ColtCrazy
College Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Midwest
Small midwest town where Walmart would be a killing ground. I'd hit Ace Hardware here which has a little of everything: guns, bows, outdoor clothing, tools, seeds. I live in a close knit subdivision that would definitely band together to protect their own.
ColtCrazy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2014, 10:35 PM   #38
JPhillips
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
Easily the worst part would be losing posts.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers
JPhillips is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:24 PM.



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.