Front Office Football Central  

Go Back   Front Office Football Central > Archives > FOFC Archive
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Statistics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-05-2009, 09:17 AM   #201
Lathum
Favored Bitch #1
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
I think it is a bad deal for the M's. Figgins will be 32 when the season starts and has only played one full season the last three. Four years for an injury prone, 32 year old guy is a lot. I think it may work out the first two years, but I can see them getting really stuck on the back end of this deal.
Lathum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2009, 07:49 PM   #202
JPhillips
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
Sometimes it works to have two different sets of rules for stars and everybody else. This is Sparky's first spring training speech as told in Posnanski's new book on the Big Red Machine.

Quote:
"He announced that the Machine was made up of two different kinds of players. First, there were the superstars. To be more specific, Sparky said, there were four superstars - Pete Rose, Johnny Bench, Joe Morgan, and Tony Perez. Those four made their own rules.... Those four were royalty.

"The rest of you," Sparky said, "are turds."
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers
JPhillips is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2009, 01:04 AM   #203
dawgfan
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Seattle
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lathum View Post
I think it is a bad deal for the M's. Figgins will be 32 when the season starts and has only played one full season the last three. Four years for an injury prone, 32 year old guy is a lot. I think it may work out the first two years, but I can see them getting really stuck on the back end of this deal.
I'm not terribly concerned about that. Even considering the economic downturn, $9M per season for Figgins is likely undervaluing him. Even if he regresses a bit from last year's hitting numbers, he'll still be worth the money.
dawgfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2009, 01:07 AM   #204
dawgfan
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Seattle
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief Rum View Post
You'll really like him on a personal level, dawgfan. He's always been a good guy, a guy you root for. And he has really improved, a plus defender at 3B and 2B, and he could play SS or any OF spot as well and not embarass himself. Plus, the speed, of course, and his growth as a more patient hitter now. He turned himself from a slap hitter with speed to an elite level leadoff guy.

Him and Ichiro would be a fantastic 1-2 punch for the M's.
It's always cool to have guys that are easy to root for on a personal level - Edgar Martinez will always be beloved in Seattle for much more than his great hitting - but what really excites me about Figgins is getting another patient bat in the lineup and a good on-base guy for the top of the lineup.

I would suspect that Ichiro remains the leadoff hitter, but either way you go it's nice to have those two at the top of the lineup.
dawgfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2009, 09:43 AM   #205
sterlingice
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Back in Houston!
That got me thinking (Ichiro/Figgins). I think I'd rather have Figgins 1st and Ichiro 2nd. Figgins is about 10 points below Ichiro for career OBP but the spread between his BA and OBP is about 70 points where as Ichiro's is only 40 since he doesn't take many walks. So, over the course of the season, I think 10 points of OBP would be wiped out by the extra bases a fast runner like Figgins would take on an extra 30 points in hits.

SI
__________________
Houston Hippopotami, III.3: 20th Anniversary Thread - All former HT players are encouraged to check it out!

Janos: "Only America could produce an imbecile of your caliber!"
Freakazoid: "That's because we make lots of things better than other people!"


sterlingice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2009, 03:47 PM   #206
Chief Rum
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Where Hip Hop lives
Quote:
Originally Posted by sterlingice View Post
That got me thinking (Ichiro/Figgins). I think I'd rather have Figgins 1st and Ichiro 2nd. Figgins is about 10 points below Ichiro for career OBP but the spread between his BA and OBP is about 70 points where as Ichiro's is only 40 since he doesn't take many walks. So, over the course of the season, I think 10 points of OBP would be wiped out by the extra bases a fast runner like Figgins would take on an extra 30 points in hits.

SI

Also, although Ichiro is fast, too, and steals bases, he doesn't seem to create the kind of trepidation/fear from batteries that Figgins does, who is more along the lines of a Crawford or an Ellsbury in impression/impact. So Ichiro at the #2 would see a lot more fastballs. And he would be able to do more with them than Figgins. A lot of fastballs to Ichiro == nothing good for teams playing the M's.
__________________
.
.

I would rather be wrong...Than live in the shadows of your song...My mind is open wide...And now I'm ready to start...You're not sure...You open the door...And step out into the dark...Now I'm ready.
Chief Rum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 12:01 PM   #207
Dr. Sak
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Stuck in Yinzerville, PA
So Pat Burrell has been reportedly traded to the Cubs who have in turn traded him to the Mets.

If true...poor Pat, he's gone from the Penthouse to the shithouse in little over a year.

Edit: There are some sources denying it so. Hopefully the denials are true.

Last edited by Dr. Sak : 12-07-2009 at 12:03 PM.
Dr. Sak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 12:05 PM   #208
Logan
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NYC
Too bad we don't play in Shea anymore.
Logan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 12:21 PM   #209
Lathum
Favored Bitch #1
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
Quote:
Originally Posted by Logan View Post
Too bad we don't play in Shea anymore.

my thought exact.
Lathum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 12:33 PM   #210
RedKingGold
College Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
It'll be interesting to see how Philly fans treat Pat the Bat.
RedKingGold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 12:54 PM   #211
JS19
College Prospect
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: NY
I remember hearing a while ago about a deal involving the Cubs, Mets and Rays that involved Burrell, Bradley and Castillo. Pretty much just exchanging one problem for another.... wonder if there is any truth to it.
JS19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 12:56 PM   #212
Atocep
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Puyallup, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by JS19 View Post
I remember hearing a while ago about a deal involving the Cubs, Mets and Rays that involved Burrell, Bradley and Castillo. Pretty much just exchanging one problem for another.... wonder if there is any truth to it.

From what I read it was discussed a little, but nothing serious ever came of it. Every team seems to want the cubs to pay some of Bradley's salary and the Cubs are only offering around $5 million.

Last edited by Atocep : 12-07-2009 at 12:57 PM.
Atocep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 02:07 PM   #213
DeToxRox
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Michigan
1:54pm: Cryptic tweet from Ed Price of AOL FanHouse: "Rumor that Mets acquire Edwin Jackson." Price then updated that the rumor was "heard in the lobby" but not confirmed.

This will be interesting between Dombrowski and Minaya. Is it possible for both GM's to be raped in a trade?
DeToxRox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 02:10 PM   #214
Logan
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NYC
Never a good sign for the acquiring team when an already young pitcher is being shopped for more young pitching, especially when it's coming off a 2nd half slide.
Logan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 02:11 PM   #215
DeToxRox
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Michigan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Logan View Post
Never a good sign for the acquiring team when an already young pitcher is being shopped for more young pitching, especially when it's coming off a 2nd half slide.

Jackson will be a fine 3 to 4 starter in the NL. Detroit doesn't want to pay him what he'll make in arbitration and he's a Boras guy so I doubt they wanted to even attempt to resign him.
DeToxRox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 02:11 PM   #216
Ronnie Dobbs2
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Bahston Mass
A young pitcher that will then be on his fourth team.
__________________
There's no I in Teamocil, at least not where you'd think
Ronnie Dobbs2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 02:12 PM   #217
Logan
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NYC
If the Mets get him, I guarantee they pay more than 3/4 starter price.
Logan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 02:13 PM   #218
DeToxRox
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Michigan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Logan View Post
If the Mets get him, I guarantee they pay more than 3/4 starter price.

Well do you have any young pitchers who touch 100 and need to develop secondary pitches or white middle infielders who are any good?
DeToxRox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 02:19 PM   #219
Ronnie Dobbs2
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Bahston Mass
FWIW Price is backing down hard on that one.
__________________
There's no I in Teamocil, at least not where you'd think
Ronnie Dobbs2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 02:20 PM   #220
Logan
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NYC
Well, David Wright's been hitting like a 1980s middle infielder recently...
Logan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2009, 02:39 PM   #221
DeToxRox
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Michigan
Sounds like it's not gonna be the Mets, but he will be gone pretty soon.
DeToxRox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 11:29 AM   #222
RomaGoth
Favored Bitch #2
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Here
Looks something was brewing with the Yankees, but they backed out.

Quote:
Granderson's price tag too high for Yankees

December 8, 2009 10:20 AM | No Comments

By Phil Rogers

INDIANAPOLIS -- No team has been more aggressive in its pursuit of Curtis Granderson than the Yankees. But they backed out of a three-way deal involving Detroit and Arizona when the demands expanded to include four players.

According to Jon Heyman of SI.com, the Tigers asked for center fielder Austin Jackson and three pitchers -- Phil Coke, Ian Kennedy and lefty Mike Dunn, who struck out 99 in 73 1-3 innings between Double-A and Triple-A.

The Cubs, Mariners and Angels also have had recent discussions with the Tigers about Granderson. Talks between the Tigers and the Cubs stalled over Detroit's interest in 19-year-old Starlin Castro.
RomaGoth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 01:15 PM   #223
cmp
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
It's looking like Granderson to the Yankees may be a done deal now. Detroit would get Austin Jackson and Phil Coke from New York and Max Scherzer and Daniel Schlereth from Arizona. Arizona would get Edwin Jackson and Ian Kennedy.

Last edited by cmp : 12-08-2009 at 01:16 PM.
cmp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 01:22 PM   #224
cmp
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmp View Post
It's looking like Granderson to the Yankees may be a done deal now. Detroit would get Austin Jackson and Phil Coke from New York and Max Scherzer and Daniel Schlereth from Arizona. Arizona would get Edwin Jackson and Ian Kennedy.
Well reports are now saying Schlereth may not be in the deal. Would be disappointing for me if he wasn't.
cmp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 01:25 PM   #225
Ronnie Dobbs2
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Bahston Mass
I'm seeing Schlereth still in the deal, per Ed Price a moment ago.
__________________
There's no I in Teamocil, at least not where you'd think
Ronnie Dobbs2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 01:27 PM   #226
Atocep
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Puyallup, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmp View Post
It's looking like Granderson to the Yankees may be a done deal now. Detroit would get Austin Jackson and Phil Coke from New York and Max Scherzer and Daniel Schlereth from Arizona. Arizona would get Edwin Jackson and Ian Kennedy.


If this is the deal then Detroit did really, really well here.
Atocep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 01:33 PM   #227
DeToxRox
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Michigan
I would like to take the time to thank Arizona for being utterly retarded and getting involved in a deal that made no sense from their perspective.

Without what they gave us, this is an awful deal for Grandy, but now with Mad Max (who I love) and Schlereth I am quite a fan.

Grandy is my favorite Tiger in many, many moons. Wish him the best in the Bronx.
DeToxRox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 01:35 PM   #228
ISiddiqui
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
Yep, not a bad haul by the Tigers there.
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages"
-Tennessee Williams
ISiddiqui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 01:36 PM   #229
Mustang
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Wisconsin
I hope Arizona at least got a reach around included.
__________________
You, you will regret what you have done this day. I will make you regret ever being born. Your going to wish you never left your mothers womb, where it was warm and safe... and wet. i am going to show you pain you never knew existed, you are going to see a whole new spectrum of pain, like a Rainboooow. But! This rainbow is not just like any other rainbow, its...
Mustang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 01:40 PM   #230
ISiddiqui
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Decatur, GA
ESPN is saying:

Sources: Trade sending Curtis Granderson to New York Yankees nearing completion - ESPN

Arizona just giving up Scherzer and not Schlereth.
__________________
"A prayer for the wild at heart, kept in cages"
-Tennessee Williams
ISiddiqui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 01:45 PM   #231
DeToxRox
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Michigan
Quote:
Originally Posted by ISiddiqui View Post
ESPN is saying:

Sources: Trade sending Curtis Granderson to New York Yankees nearing completion - ESPN

Arizona just giving up Scherzer and not Schlereth.

Interesting. Sure hope it's not the case. It'd be a bad time for an ESPN report to actually be true.
DeToxRox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 01:46 PM   #232
MrBug708
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Whittier
Way to go Tigers!
MrBug708 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 01:46 PM   #233
cmp
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeToxRox View Post
Interesting. Sure hope it's not the case. It'd be a bad time for an ESPN report to actually be true.

Gammons just said Schlereth is in the deal. MLB.com is also saying Schlereth is a part of it.
cmp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 01:46 PM   #234
RomaGoth
Favored Bitch #2
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Here
I like this move from a Yankees standpoint. Now we don't feel compelled to bring back Damon as a position player, and Granderson is in his prime, right when this team is stacked to win.

I hope Austin Jackson turns into a good player for the Tigers.
RomaGoth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 01:47 PM   #235
DeToxRox
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Michigan
If Schrlreth is in the deal, MLBTR has it mentioned that the four players are going to be under Tigers control for a combined 22 years. That is a huge, huge aspect to this deal.
DeToxRox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 01:47 PM   #236
DeToxRox
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Michigan
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmp View Post
Gammons just said Schlereth is in the deal. MLB.com is also saying Schlereth is a part of it.

Figured. I think it was obvious the Tigs wanted to replace the two holes in the pen with any move so a fourth guy had to be in it.
DeToxRox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 01:49 PM   #237
DeToxRox
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Michigan
The other interesting thing now is that the Tigers have 4 lefties in their bullpen. Seems like an overkill although Seay and Coke are both guys who can come in vs righties. Only Ni seems like a LOOGY.
DeToxRox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 02:45 PM   #238
BishopMVP
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Concord, MA/UMass
Dammit. Good deal for the Yankees. Even if Jackson and Kennedy are solid 3/4 starters with deflated numbers from pitching in the NL west I agree it makes little to no sense from Arizona's perspective.
BishopMVP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 03:09 PM   #239
Galaril
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Great deal for Yankees damn it. They gave up good prospects but nothing they can't replace or anything that negatively alters the team on the field from last season . I hope the Sox get a move on and sign Matt Holiday. I would like them to get Gonzalez from San Diego also. Plus they need a decent starter not necessarily a ace but a #3 would be good. Halladay is too rich for my blood.

Last edited by Galaril : 12-08-2009 at 03:12 PM.
Galaril is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 03:16 PM   #240
DaddyTorgo
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Galaril View Post
Great deal for Yankees damn it. They gave up good prospects but nothing they can't replace or anything that negatively alters the team on the field from last season . I hope the Sox get a move on and sign Matt Holiday. I would like them to get Gonzalez from San Diego also. Plus they need a decent starter not necessarily a ace but a #3 would be good. Halladay is too rich for my blood.

you'd rather holiday than bay?

i guess i haven't dug in and done enough research to know (to my shame), but is holiday an upgrade over bay, or just a bigger "name?". fine...5 minutes of research shows me that they're basically identical players offensively. give me whoever will come cheaper please.

i'd also like to see gonzalez, but i don't think he's moving. price for halladay is also too rich for me...concentrate on what you've got and a reclamation-project or three for short money (Ben Sheets?).
__________________
If I've ever helped you and you'd like to buy me a coffee, or just to say thanks, I have my Bitcoin and Ethereum addressed listed below :)
BTC: bc1qykhsfyn9vw4ntqfgr0svj4n9tjdgufryh2pxn5
ETH: 0x2AcdC5cd88EA537063553F5b240073bE067BaCa9

Last edited by DaddyTorgo : 12-08-2009 at 03:27 PM.
DaddyTorgo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 03:18 PM   #241
Atocep
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Puyallup, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo View Post
you'd rather holiday than bay?

i guess i haven't dug in and done enough research to know (to my shame), but is holiday an upgrade over bay, or just a bigger "name?"

i'd also like to see gonzalez, but i don't think he's moving. price for halladay is also too rich for me...concentrate on what you've got and a reclamation-project or three for short money.


Holliday is easily an upgrade over Bay.

Last edited by Atocep : 12-08-2009 at 03:18 PM.
Atocep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 03:20 PM   #242
McSweeny
College Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Somerville, MA
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo View Post
you'd rather holiday than bay?

i guess i haven't dug in and done enough research to know (to my shame), but is holiday an upgrade over bay, or just a bigger "name?"

i'd also like to see gonzalez, but i don't think he's moving. price for halladay is also too rich for me...concentrate on what you've got and a reclamation-project or three for short money.

Holliday, at worst, is a league average fielder. Bay is at the very least a below average fielder and if you buy into some of the advanced fielding metrics, he's one of the worst fielders in the leauge. I know that from just watching Bay for a season and a half his defense leaves a lot to be desired.
McSweeny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 03:24 PM   #243
BishopMVP
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Concord, MA/UMass
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo View Post
you'd rather holiday than bay?

i guess i haven't dug in and done enough research to know (to my shame), but is holiday an upgrade over bay, or just a bigger "name?"
Holliday's a year younger and far better defensively than Bay (i.e. league average or slightly better). Bay has "proven he can hit in Boston" - I personally don't think Holliday would have an issue like Renteria did. We'd also gain a 1st and 1st round supplemental in exchange for a 2nd if sign Holliday instead of Bay. But really the main difference is going to be contract length. If we could get Bay for 3 or Holliday for 5 I would love it, but since this is likely the last big deal for each they both obviously want more years. Bay seems to be garnering more interest at the price they're floating, so it's quite possible we could leverage Holliday down if Bay signs with the Angels/Mariners now that the Yankees are out, but Boras is his agent so it wouldn't be easy or quick.
BishopMVP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 03:26 PM   #244
McSweeny
College Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Somerville, MA
dola

2009 OPS+

Holliday - 139
Bay - 134

so you could say they're close to a wash offensively. Holliday is a year and a half younger and a far better fielder. My biggest fear is giving Bay 17 million a year for 4 or 5 years and then watching his defense continue to deteriorate to the point that he's basically a 17 million dollar DH in two years.
McSweeny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 03:30 PM   #245
DaddyTorgo
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Massachusetts
fair enough
__________________
If I've ever helped you and you'd like to buy me a coffee, or just to say thanks, I have my Bitcoin and Ethereum addressed listed below :)
BTC: bc1qykhsfyn9vw4ntqfgr0svj4n9tjdgufryh2pxn5
ETH: 0x2AcdC5cd88EA537063553F5b240073bE067BaCa9
DaddyTorgo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 04:00 PM   #246
RomaGoth
Favored Bitch #2
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Here
Gammons is leaving ESPN

Quote:
Gammons, 64, leaving ESPN


ESPN.com

Peter Gammons is leaving ESPN following the end of baseball's winter meetings this week.


Gammons
Gammons, who joined ESPN in 1989 after a distinguished print journalism career with the Boston Globe and Sports Illustrated, has decided to pursue other endeavors.
"My decision to leave ESPN and move on at this point in my life has been conflicted," said Gammons in a statement. "I owe a great deal of my professional life to ESPN, having spent more than half of my 40 years in journalism working for the network, and the choice to move on was made with nothing but the strongest feelings for the people with whom I worked. ESPN gave me a great deal more than I gave it, and will always be a huge part of who I am."
Gammons, 64, was named the 2004 J.G. Taylor Spink Award winner for outstanding baseball writing during the 2005 Hall of Fame induction ceremony.
"As a print journalist moving to television, Peter was a pioneer who became a Hall of Famer," said Norby Williamson, ESPN's executive vice president, production. "His contributions to ESPN will never be forgotten. We're sad to see Peter go, but understand his desire for new challenges and a less demanding schedule."
RomaGoth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 04:29 PM   #247
RedKingGold
College Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
I'm actually pretty sad about that. Liked Gammons a lot.
RedKingGold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 04:36 PM   #248
DanGarion
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Great Northwest
MLBtv?
__________________
Los Angeles Dodgers
Check out the FOFC Groups on Facebook! and Reddit!
DON'T REPORT ME BRO!
DanGarion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 04:36 PM   #249
Atocep
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Puyallup, WA
Gammon has annoyed me. The way he was a PR person for the Red Sox was tiresome and he seemed to have grown quite a hatred for the statistical community in recent years.

Despite that, the guy did a lot for baseball sportswriting (which could also be bad or good I guess).
Atocep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 10:02 PM   #250
samifan24
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NC
Gammons will be working for NESN and the MLB Network next season per the Globe's Amalie Benjamin.
__________________
"You spend a good piece of your life gripping a baseball...and in the end it turns out that it was the other way around all the time." -Jim Bouton
samifan24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:18 AM.



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.