|
View Poll Results: What should the criteria for team selection be? | |||
Free for all! All teams (in selected conferences) are fair game | 0 | 0% | |
BCS - Here we come! 90 + overall teams | 0 | 0% | |
Fringe BCS - Hope and pray! 85 - 89 overall teams | 1 | 10.00% | |
We're going to the Outback Bowl! 80 and below overall teams | 9 | 90.00% | |
Voters: 10. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools |
06-17-2008, 03:06 PM | #1 | ||
Head Coach
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Michigan
|
East Coast League: Criteria of picking teams
This is the last one for today I believe.
How do we want to choose teams? We had discussed any team 80 overall and under. I honestly don't care how we set this up. Ideally we'd have some parity in team ratings but I also like to see dynasties, so while I favor 80 and lower team ratings, we can also switch it to 85 and lower, or 90 and lower, etc. Please vote and voice your opinions. |
||
06-17-2008, 04:33 PM | #2 |
College Prospect
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Raleigh, NC
|
I like 80 and below... I might could go for another limit somewhere between 80 and 85 though... Seems like if you get up around 85 though there will be a few powerhouses pretty quick?
|
06-17-2008, 06:08 PM | #3 |
High School Varsity
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: St. Pete, FL
|
I voted below 80 I could see some movement to 85 if needed to balance conferences.
|
06-17-2008, 06:30 PM | #4 |
College Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
|
80 and below.
I'd like a challenge (and the opportunity to get my butt kicked) by the AI teams in the conference. |
06-18-2008, 10:35 AM | #5 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NYC
|
I came into this thinking 80 and below was already decided. But another vote for it...think this will be a slam dunk.
|
06-18-2008, 09:16 PM | #6 |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tennessee
|
I like somewhere between 80 and 85. More like 85 down.
What happened to the A, B, C, D ratings? If it is letters, then B- and lower. Last edited by Grammaticus : 06-18-2008 at 09:31 PM. |
06-19-2008, 08:07 AM | #7 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Conyers GA
|
The other conversations actually had centered around teams below 80 (not 80 and below) and the list of teams from each conference that has popped up in a ton of threads was teams 79 and below.
And I think that sounds like a good approach, so I vote Teams Under 80 (though I voted for the last option - 80 and below). |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|