Front Office Football Central  

Go Back   Front Office Football Central > Main Forums > FOFC Hosted Multiplayer Leagues > FOFC NCAA Football Online Dynasties
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Statistics

View Poll Results: In order to be promoted, Level 3 teams (MWC, C-USA) need to...
... win their conference championship game 3 33.33%
... win their division 5 55.56%
I just want to see results without voting 1 11.11%
Voters: 9. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-04-2013, 03:41 PM   #1
Kodos
Resident Alien
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
The Ladder: Promotion/Relegation rules for new league setup

If you are not in the league, please vote for the third option only.



Hi guys. We never really established official rules for promotion/relegation under our new league structure. For the second level (PAC, Big East, Big 12, ACC), it's clear enough: Win the conference championship game and you move up within your group to either the Big Ten or SEC.

For the third level (MWC and C-USA), things aren't quite as clear. When I was designing things, my thought was "win your division to move up", but now I'm thinking it'd be better to have to win the conference championship game in order to move up. This would mean that sometimes second level teams will not be relegated because the team trying to move up and replace them lost in the conference championship game.

I figured we should have a vote to decide, especially because I am in the MWC and thus have a conflict of interest. Should the rule be:

1. Third level teams need to win their conference championship game to move up
or
2. Third level teams move up if they win their division


Last edited by Kodos : 06-26-2014 at 12:04 PM.
Kodos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2013, 03:55 PM   #2
Kodos
Resident Alien
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
As far as tie-breakers for the bottom level of the Ladder (WAC, MAC, Independents, Sunbelt) go, I propose we use the in-game division order (not the one from the website, which seems to get things wrong sometimes).


Please feel free to make suggestions. Alternatively, we could use something like this to decide who moves up from the bottom level, as well as who gets relegated from the higher levels:

1. Conference record
2. Overall record
3. Head-to-head record
4. Coin toss

Last edited by Kodos : 03-04-2013 at 03:56 PM.
Kodos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2013, 08:09 AM   #3
gstelmack
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Cary, NC
2 down, 2 up, so win the division makes the most sense to me.
__________________
-- Greg
-- Author of various FOF utilities
gstelmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2013, 08:17 AM   #4
MacroGuru
Coordinator
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Utah
I am about winning the division...
__________________
"forgetting what is in the past, I strive for the future"
MacroGuru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2013, 11:51 AM   #5
Kodos
Resident Alien
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacroGuru View Post
I am about winning the division...

Don't forget to vote and make it official.
Kodos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2013, 07:34 AM   #6
gstelmack
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Cary, NC
For those voting for "win the conference championship game", what rules do you propose for relegation? There are two conferences above each, so if only one moves up, which conference does it go to, and how do you decide which one to move down?
__________________
-- Greg
-- Author of various FOF utilities
gstelmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2013, 09:14 AM   #7
Kodos
Resident Alien
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
I was thinking we could use our own tiebreaker system to determine the worst team. Something like the system I mentioned above.
__________________
Author of The Bill Gates Challenge, as well as other groundbreaking dynasties.
Kodos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2013, 09:17 AM   #8
Kodos
Resident Alien
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kodos View Post


Please feel free to make suggestions. Alternatively, we could use something like this to decide who moves up from the bottom level, as well as who gets relegated from the higher levels:

1. Conference record
2. Overall record
3. Head-to-head record
4. Coin toss

We could probably come up with a better 4th option to move the coin toss down some more.
__________________
Author of The Bill Gates Challenge, as well as other groundbreaking dynasties.

Last edited by Kodos : 03-06-2013 at 10:10 AM.
Kodos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2013, 10:02 AM   #9
gstelmack
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Cary, NC
I just think it's simpler and more consistent to move up-and-down within the color groups you have above.
__________________
-- Greg
-- Author of various FOF utilities
gstelmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2013, 12:03 PM   #10
Kodos
Resident Alien
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
I don't have a strong opinion either way, so we'll let the majority rule.
Kodos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2013, 02:29 PM   #11
Kodos
Resident Alien
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Please vote if you haven't already.
__________________
Author of The Bill Gates Challenge, as well as other groundbreaking dynasties.
Kodos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2013, 05:59 PM   #12
CU Tiger
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Backwoods, SC
I voted division but not strong either way.
CU Tiger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2013, 06:11 PM   #13
Kodos
Resident Alien
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
The rule is now: Win your division in Tier 3, move up. Thanks for voting, everyone.

Last edited by Kodos : 03-14-2013 at 06:11 PM.
Kodos is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:06 PM.



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.