|
View Poll Results: WHICH MOVIE(S) WOULD YOU LIKE TO SEE? (Please limit votes to 4 or less) | |||
THE WIZARD OF OZ | 28 | 50.00% | |
NATURAL BORN KILLERS | 3 | 5.36% | |
THE UNTOUCHABLES | 11 | 19.64% | |
BACK TO THE FUTURE | 13 | 23.21% | |
ROCKY | 6 | 10.71% | |
HARRY POTTER AND THE CHAMBER OF SECRETS | 1 | 1.79% | |
STAR WARS | 5 | 8.93% | |
THE SEARCHERS | 1 | 1.79% | |
THE RUNNING MAN | 11 | 19.64% | |
STAR WARS EPISODE I: THE PHANTOM MENACE | 6 | 10.71% | |
WILLOW | 2 | 3.57% | |
12 ANGRY MEN | 29 | 51.79% | |
METROPOLIS | 12 | 21.43% | |
BULL DURHAM | 6 | 10.71% | |
DIE HARD | 5 | 8.93% | |
DELIVERANCE | 24 | 42.86% | |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 56. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools |
08-30-2012, 08:48 PM | #1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
Movie ReMake Challenge Part II: AND THE WINNER IS...
Last edited by NorvTurnerOverdrive : 09-03-2012 at 09:52 PM. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08-30-2012, 09:00 PM | #2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
Last edited by NorvTurnerOverdrive : 08-30-2012 at 09:02 PM. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08-30-2012, 09:01 PM | #3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
Last edited by NorvTurnerOverdrive : 08-30-2012 at 09:05 PM. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08-30-2012, 09:01 PM | #4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
Last edited by NorvTurnerOverdrive : 08-30-2012 at 09:26 PM. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08-30-2012, 09:12 PM | #5 |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
jesus. what a calamity. why is every computer in my life a steaming pile.
anyways, have at it edit: please bring any errors to my attention Last edited by NorvTurnerOverdrive : 08-30-2012 at 09:27 PM. |
08-30-2012, 09:36 PM | #6 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mays Landing, NJ USA
|
First you say not to post, now you say to post....
|
08-30-2012, 09:39 PM | #7 |
High School Varsity
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
I liked a bunch but Grovers Wizard of Oz is the only one that made me go "wait.....why isnt that actually happening?" so I only voted for one this time.
|
08-30-2012, 09:44 PM | #8 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the yo'
|
natural born killers worked great before TV was a reality whore shit pile. Now we get to see them hack up teen mom cunts and the Kardashians? sign me up
|
08-30-2012, 10:16 PM | #9 |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
and of course i get the days wrong and the poll ends on labor day night. :slaps head:
ah well. maybe long weekend will be good |
08-30-2012, 11:30 PM | #10 |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
If I went to some fantastic movie megaplex that was playing all these movies I'd check out Back to the Future and Metropolis right away and then have to think about what I wanted to see next....so I'm voting for those two.
|
08-30-2012, 11:43 PM | #11 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Bath, ME
|
A lot of great jobs here, I really enjoyed this one. I felt a lot of these though played close to the original - I could see the remake working, the actors in thsoe roles, but it didn't give me a compelling reason to watch it rather than the original.
I easily picked three though that I thought stood out from the rest. Perfect casting, something new and distinctive. I think it was the casting that did it: Wizard of Oz, Deliverance and 12 Angry Men, they all felt like inspired choices for casting, whereas some of the other movies felt more like plugging in big names for no reason. These three I think would come out great. I'm surprised how often people have picked classic movies to remake though. In my mind prime targets for remakes are either A) something that was a great idea but poorly done the first time around, or B) something that was great but seems outdated now. Yet it has felt like almost every movie chosen has not fallen into those categories. I hope one day I'll have the time to throw my hat in the ring on one of these, a ton of fun. |
08-30-2012, 11:44 PM | #12 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Bath, ME
|
Quote:
I agree, as soon as Pixar and Wizard of Oz were paired up it was just like, yes, of course. Why isn't there a fantastic animated version of this? I don't think you even need to make it a musical. It would make a great modern animated movie and you could even go back to the book more than the movie to give it a distinct feel. |
|
08-31-2012, 12:04 AM | #13 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the yo'
|
WB animation sucks so badly, but I'm surprised they haven't remade their catalog into digitally animated movies. It seems to be a surefire way to print money.
m.imdb.com/title/tt1623205/ Disney is making Oz |
08-31-2012, 12:10 AM | #14 |
High School Varsity
Join Date: Oct 2009
|
I voted for only the Running Man. But reading through now, Wizard of Oz by Pixar was good. As much as I think the Back to the Future redo would be great, that original trilogy is just excellent.
|
08-31-2012, 03:52 AM | #15 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Rennes, France
|
I like loads of them
|
08-31-2012, 07:28 AM | #16 | |
lolzcat
Join Date: May 2001
Location: williamsburg, va
|
I voted 12 Angry Men and Deliverance.
I would have voted for The Wizard of Oz, but I just couldn't forgive the unforgivable sin of taking the $190 mil budget at 1.1. Honestly, imo, there were some terrible movies in this draft. I think we should be wary of immediately following up with the same draft - would have been better served with some time between.
__________________
Text Sports Network - Bringing you statistical information for several FOF MP leagues in one convenient site Quote:
|
|
08-31-2012, 08:30 AM | #17 |
n00b
Join Date: Aug 2012
|
That's focused on the Wizard's journey, and James Franco as Oz seems really poorly thought out.
|
08-31-2012, 10:20 AM | #18 |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
imdb has 1.7 million titles. i think people are gonna do what they wanna do regardless of time.
|
08-31-2012, 10:26 AM | #19 |
College Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Toronto
|
I think the 1st draft produced better ideas.
Alot of these are movies I have no interest in seeing, or movies where the casting isn't appealing to me. I'm not a science fiction guy, or a fantasy world guy, so Star Wars, Harry Potter and Willow have no appeal to me at all. I am not a fan of the casting in Rocky, Natural Born Killer, Deliverance, Back to the Future or Die Hard. I will skip those. Running Man has a bad cast IMO, but I would watch it to see Gene Hackman one more time. I would watch Untouchables, Bull Durham, and the Searchers. All those look good. My interest would be pretty high in seeing 12 Angry Men, and Metropolis. 12 Angry Men has a great cast, and looks like a pure acting movie. Metropolis is a movie I've never seen, starring DDL, I'm watching it.
__________________
FOOL- Toronto Marlboros FOOL Classic Champions 2073, 2078, 2079, 2114, 2116, 2117, 2129, 2152, 2155, 2169, 2192 46 35 FOOL H- New York Giants World Champions 1914, 1928 BBCF: Notre Dame TML |
08-31-2012, 10:31 AM | #20 |
General Manager
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Mountains
|
They only problem I had with 12 Angry Men (and I probably would have still voted for it 3rd or 4th), is that it was too easy. I think there's a million different acting combinations there that would work. Coming up with the roles for Back to the Future and Metropolis, I think, were much more hit-and-miss propositions, and I think those hit.
|
08-31-2012, 10:37 AM | #21 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere More Familiar
|
Ended up going with The Wizard of Oz, The Running Man, 12 Angry Men and Deliverance. Very, very difficult to narrow it down to there, I really would like to see Willow, the Phantom Menace, Bull Durham and the Searchers. Pixar Wizard of Oz makes way too much sense to have not happened in real life, and the casts assembled for 12 Angry Men and Deliverance are fantastic and seem to fit those movies perfectly.
Some of the movies, while cast well, didn't do enough to make me think a remake was necessary. Rocky (haven't I seen Wahlburg do this already?), Star Wars and Back to the Future fall in this group. While I'd totally watch them, I'm not breaking down the door to get at them. |
08-31-2012, 10:40 AM | #22 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: San Diego via Sausalito via San Jose via San Diego
|
I think people are missing the point of the remakes. It's not that they are necessary, it's "Who would you cast and what would you do if you got to remake X?".
__________________
I'm no longer a Chargers fan, they are dead to me Coming this summer to a movie theater near you: The Adventures of Jedikooter: Part 4 |
08-31-2012, 10:40 AM | #23 |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
i'd love to hear the sean astin vs. peter dinklage debate
|
08-31-2012, 10:40 AM | #24 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere More Familiar
|
Duh, forgot to mention the Running Man. I think Coffee Warlord absolutely nailed this one. The actors he chose aren't all that great...but that's the point. A perfect combination of campy-ness and grit. Dwayne Johnson acting is one of my guilty pleasures anyway, and he would be perfect for this role.
|
08-31-2012, 10:42 AM | #25 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere More Familiar
|
Quote:
I don't know that Dinklage would be utilized to his full abilities playing an earnest, somewhat unsure of himself farmer. Not that he couldn't pull it off, just that he'd be worthy of so much more. |
|
08-31-2012, 10:44 AM | #26 |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
remakes in hollywood parlance are shameless money grabs. personally, i like stuff that can be done better/differently
|
08-31-2012, 10:44 AM | #27 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Colorado Springs
|
When I was planning Willow out (before it got snaked), I was thinking Dinklage myself. But yeah, while I know he could pull the role off, I'm not sure if he was fully suited for it.
As far as the Running Man goes, yes. Vince summed up exactly where I was going with it. Camp, over the top, fun. |
08-31-2012, 10:45 AM | #28 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Lisboa, ME
|
I have apparently finally found something I am good at.
__________________
Come On You Irons! West Ham United | Philadelphia Flyers | Cincinnati Bengals | Kansas City Royals FOFC Greatest Band Draft Runner Up FOFC Movie Remake Draft Winner FOFC Movie Comedy Draft Winner |
08-31-2012, 10:49 AM | #29 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere More Familiar
|
Quote:
Yeah, I always thought that Val Kilmer carried Willow totally (well, him and Kevin Pollack ). Upon review, watching a remake where the guy playing Willow is a great actor might be quite intriguing, and I wonder what Dinklage could bring to the role. Last edited by Vince, Pt. II : 08-31-2012 at 10:49 AM. |
|
08-31-2012, 10:54 AM | #30 |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
exec: we need a little person...
dinklage: i'm a little person! and a great actor! exec: screw it. we'll just stick astin in front of a green screen to be fair though, i read somewhere that dinklage avoids little person roles because he wants to be considered for traditional roles. |
08-31-2012, 10:59 AM | #31 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Dec 2009
|
Quote:
From Prince Caspian as Trumpkin the dwarf (with Warwick Davis next to him) Last edited by CrimsonFox : 08-31-2012 at 11:01 AM. |
|
08-31-2012, 10:59 AM | #32 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Sep 2004
|
Quote:
Since my admittedly shitty production notes typed on a phone that I have a hard time thinking on because of the small screen doomed me to like almost no votes and people appeared to hate the idea of a Willow remake anyway, I'm curious to hear what direction you would have gone, CW. FWIW, I really wanted one of the wildcards to be Bob Anderson choreographing the sword fights and magic duels, but he died in January.
__________________
2006 Golden Scribe Nominee 2006 Golden Scribe Winner Best Non-Sport Dynasty: May Our Reign Be Green and Golden (CK Dynasty) Rookie Writer of the Year Dynasty of the Year: May Our Reign Be Green and Golden (CK Dynasty) |
|
08-31-2012, 11:02 AM | #33 |
College Prospect
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Louisburg, KS
|
I had given some thought to Wizard of Oz through Pixar's eyes as a concept as well, but I couldn't decide on who to cast as voices. I'm still not 100% sure you have the right casting choice on Dorothy, but the fact that you went this route and delivered a strong and believable cast earned my vote for sure. I also voted Deliverance as I think the casting was absolutely perfect.
__________________
TRA, the Royal Ape |
08-31-2012, 11:04 AM | #34 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Dec 2009
|
If Nathan Lane is the Cowardly Lion then you lose.
Last edited by CrimsonFox : 08-31-2012 at 11:04 AM. |
08-31-2012, 11:04 AM | #35 |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
|
08-31-2012, 11:05 AM | #36 | |
College Prospect
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Louisburg, KS
|
Quote:
I don't disagree with this at all. In fact, one reason I went this route was to potentially spur a spin-off where we draft teams of the perfect 12 jurors.
__________________
TRA, the Royal Ape |
|
08-31-2012, 11:13 AM | #37 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Dec 2009
|
12 angry men is an absolute knockout! I totally agree that film should be remade every 10 years.
LOVE the twist of having Denzel Washington as one of the jurors. The casting of that is VERY good. Edward James Olmos would fit in nicely there too. Jeff Daniels too. (as Number 2). George Clooney as #1? Maybe even French Stewart. |
08-31-2012, 11:14 AM | #38 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Dec 2009
|
Quote:
oh yeah there was that little person episode of CSI too. That was around the Prince Caspian time I think. Yeah not surprised he said this especially after The Station Agent. (Terrific film!) |
|
08-31-2012, 11:15 AM | #39 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Dec 2009
|
Quote:
I never saw people's fascination with that movie. Was kinda bland. But maybe it was just a childhood memory thing. |
|
08-31-2012, 11:20 AM | #40 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Lisboa, ME
|
Jason Segal would have probably been my Cowardly Lion.
__________________
Come On You Irons! West Ham United | Philadelphia Flyers | Cincinnati Bengals | Kansas City Royals FOFC Greatest Band Draft Runner Up FOFC Movie Remake Draft Winner FOFC Movie Comedy Draft Winner |
08-31-2012, 11:22 AM | #41 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Colorado Springs
|
Quote:
I had Jason Lee flagged as Madmartigan. He seemed perfect for that slightly arrogant humor role Val Kilmer rocked. More importantly though, why was the guy who said 'Out of the way, peck!' not cast?!?! Blasphemy. |
|
08-31-2012, 11:22 AM | #42 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Dec 2009
|
|
08-31-2012, 11:22 AM | #43 | |
College Prospect
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Louisburg, KS
|
Quote:
Edward James Olmos was in the 1997 version - juror 11. Clooney would make for a great #12 - the advertising exec.
__________________
TRA, the Royal Ape |
|
08-31-2012, 11:23 AM | #44 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Dec 2009
|
ooooh John Lithgow as Cowardly Lion!
btw Glenn Close as the queen in willow is very good. |
08-31-2012, 11:24 AM | #45 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Dec 2009
|
Quote:
ha! Great idea! And Lee would be required to have on his My Name is Earl Fu Manchu mustache!@ |
|
08-31-2012, 11:52 AM | #46 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Great Northwest
|
But the movie God Bless America already came out...
|
08-31-2012, 12:00 PM | #47 |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
i think steve is mistaken. that's not what nbk is about. though as my sole maybe i shouldn't protest
|
08-31-2012, 12:49 PM | #48 |
College Starter
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Sweden
|
I voted for the Untouchables, Deliverance, Phantom Menace and Die Hard. Had a hard time choosing between them, Wizard of Oz and Natural born killers, though.
__________________
San Diego Chargers (HFL) - Lappland Reindeers (WOOF) - Gothenburg Giants (IHOF) Indiana: A TCY VC - year 2044 - the longest running dynasty ever on FOFC! |
08-31-2012, 01:04 PM | #49 |
Dark Cloud
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
I just gotta say that using the unlimited budget on Harriet Potter was a severe miscalculation.
Or if you're gonna do it like that, at least make her and Hermoine get together as some sort of lesbian flick. At least then you'd make your money back. Except not on Ellen Page (who I love) just as a 26-year old harry potter. Last edited by Young Drachma : 08-31-2012 at 01:05 PM. |
08-31-2012, 01:13 PM | #50 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the yo'
|
Quote:
I should say that the media in 2012 would glorify them so much more than the original film. There is an abundance of cheap media made targets. Im thinking more of the outtakes, with the body builders, etc. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|