WW C - Sign-ups - Page 3

The Jackal · 08-15-2009, 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by claphamsa

no editign posts!!!!

Be nice clap, or else Barca won't win anything this year.

claphamsa · 08-16-2009, 08:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Jackal

Be nice clap, or else Barca won't win anything this year.

:P

and they will win! no one can stand in their way! (assuming their 17 year old FW can hold it down untill all the vets get not hurt)

The Jackal · 08-16-2009, 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by claphamsa

:P

and they will win! no one can stand in their way! (assuming their 17 year old FW can hold it down untill all the vets get not hurt)

I'm pretty sure Madrid is trying very hard to stand in their way. And Bojan is 18 going on 19, by the way.

Schmidty · 08-17-2009, 02:44 PM

I can't think of a title for this role idea, but what about a villager who can bring back one player from the dead as a night action, once per day. I know that that is powerful, so as a drawback, the player (not the resurrected one) can never change their vote once they have cast it.

Anyway, that's just my first idea. If it's ok, let me know.

RendeR · 08-17-2009, 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schmidty

I can't think of a title for this role idea, but what about a villager who can bring back one player from the dead as a night action, once per day. I know that that is powerful, so as a drawback, the player (not the resurrected one) can never change their vote once they have cast it.

Anyway, that's just my first idea. If it's ok, let me know.

What about limiting it by saying if the player voted for that person to be lynched they cannot bring them back? So they have to be more certain of their votes?

The Jackal · 08-17-2009, 03:19 PM

Bring back multiple dead people to the game could be fatal to the wolves, though if BK feels it'd balance out with a serial killer and any other insta-deaths or what not, I could see it. Maybe put a limit on the # of people they can bring back, 1-3 or something? And I like RendeR's idea of not being able to resurrect someone you've voted for.

Schmidty · 08-17-2009, 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RendeR

What about limiting it by saying if the player voted for that person to be lynched they cannot bring them back? So they have to be more certain of their votes?

I think that's a pretty good idea, and wouldn't mind having that instead.

Schmidty · 08-17-2009, 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Jackal

Bring back multiple dead people to the game could be fatal to the wolves, though if BK feels it'd balance out with a serial killer and any other insta-deaths or what not, I could see it. Maybe put a limit on the # of people they can bring back, 1-3 or something? And I like RendeR's idea of not being able to resurrect someone you've voted for.

I was only thinking of it as a one-time deal.

The Jackal · 08-17-2009, 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schmidty

I was only thinking of it as a one-time deal.

Ah, okay, you did say once per day, so that signaled to me that it was something that could be used multiple times.

Schmidty · 08-17-2009, 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Jackal

Ah, okay, you did say once per day, so that signaled to me that it was something that could be used multiple times.

Doh!!!

My bad - that was a brainfart. I meant once per game.

The Jackal · 08-17-2009, 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schmidty

Doh!!!

My bad - that was a brainfart. I meant once per game.

Then it sounds like a very interesting role. You could even spin it like a Martyr role where that person could sacrifice himself to bring someone else back from the dead.

Barkeep49 · 08-17-2009, 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JAG

So would this work for a rule?

At the start of day 4, the winning condition of one wolf and one villager (both randomly chosen) are swapped (so the wolf wins with the village, the villager wins with the wolves).

BK, if you want to sort out the details of that, feel free. I'll just throw some ideas after the basic one in case you want to use any of them but don't feel like you have to. In particular I'm unsure how to handle the wolf who learns that he now wins with the village.

Option a. Neither of these players know that their winning condition has been changed. (I don't support this option if it can be avoided, I don't think it's fun to try your best to win only to find out you really were hurting yourself)

Option b. For the villager who wins with the wolves, if all the remaining real wolves are killed off then they become the final wolf.

Option c. Only a 50% chance that this swap occurs.

Option d. The wolves have one opportunity to immediately kill who they perceive to be their traitor (has to be unanimous minus one). If they are correct, they immediately kill (3? 4?) additional villagers. Essentially this is the only way I could think of disuading the traitor wolf from doing a full reveal of the other wolves.

If you don't think this would work well, let me know and I'll come up with something else.

We've had wolf traitors before and it's a very awkward role, for several reasons, honestly. I think Option D has some potential to make it work, and I will do my best to make it work if you want this as your rule.

Barkeep49 · 08-17-2009, 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darth Vilus

Hello everyone, I'm the friend Danny was talking about earlier. I'll sign up for the 100th if there's still room. I know how the game works but since I haven't actually played one before and don't have strategy yet I don't think I should really add a rule or role to the game. Thanks.

Welcome! It's great to have you join us. While I understand your reasoning I would, in the Wikipedia fashion, encourage you to Be Bold and submit a rule anyway.

Barkeep49 · 08-17-2009, 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nfg22

Im in.
My role will be one of my favorite...
Psycho- Thinks they are psychic(seer) and will scan as a seer up on any and all role reveals but only has a 50% chance of being right on any scan. They will be given one scan a night and told they are the Seer.

Can you clarify what the bold part means?

Barkeep49 · 08-17-2009, 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jeheinz72

Actually I'll change mine. I really only like the Fool when it's polar opposite. So if NFG likes it at half-chance then he can use that and I'll bite the bullet and add a Bodyguard.

But let's not call him the Bodyguard let's call him the Supreme Being of Safety.

Love the name. Can you detail the powers you want the SBOS to have?

Barkeep49 · 08-17-2009, 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schmidty

I can't think of a title for this role idea, but what about a villager who can bring back one player from the dead as a night action, once per day. I know that that is powerful, so as a drawback, the player (not the resurrected one) can never change their vote once they have cast it.

Anyway, that's just my first idea. If it's ok, let me know.

I added it to be a role for either the wolf or village. If you want it to be a village only role let me know.

Barkeep49 · 08-17-2009, 06:34 PM

A lot of people, and you know who you are, haven't submitted any rules yet. I hope to have final rules out Wednesday morning (quite possibly very early Wednesday morning). So you have until then to submit your rules. Please submit a rule or role. I think the game will be a lot cooler that way.

If you have submitted a rule I would encourage you to check-out the rules to make sure I worded it in a way that you like. If not please speak-up.

As a final note, since he withdrew please note that Abe's role has also been withdrawn.

henry296 · 08-17-2009, 07:41 PM

I'm in.

I'll propose the Soothsayer rule, but the statement to be scanned can't have the word wolf or villager.

Chief Rum · 08-18-2009, 11:43 AM

Okay, thought of a role.

The Chameleon

Regular villager until Night Three. On Night Three, may choose to change ("chameleon") into any role in the game, with full rights of that role.

The catch: Either, (1) the Chameleon is revealed (no role announced) on Day Four--so people know you're the Chameleon, they just don't know what role--or (2) on Day Four, the fact that a new particular role has been added to the game is announced--so your role is out there, but not your identity.

Some possible additions/caveats:

No PM rights can be gained this way, even if that role normally has them
Certain roles can be made off limits.
The Chameleon is neutral at the start, with own win conditions (set by the GM), or neutral until choosing a role and then, either (a) take on the allegiance of that role; or (b) take on the opposite allegiance of that role.

How does that sound?

jeheinz72 · 08-18-2009, 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barkeep49

Love the name. Can you detail the powers you want the SBOS to have?

Nothing too crazy. Maybe the ability to see or kill who he blocked. I'll leave that up to you as wiggle room for balancing. Not picky here

nfg22 · 08-18-2009, 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barkeep49

Can you clarify what the bold part means?

I just mean that if anyone can find out roles, that they will scan as a seer. Basically no one but the moderator will know whether they are really the seer or not.

JAG · 08-18-2009, 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barkeep49

We've had wolf traitors before and it's a very awkward role, for several reasons, honestly. I think Option D has some potential to make it work, and I will do my best to make it work if you want this as your rule.

Alright, I'm going to nix the idea altogether. I have a role I wouldn't mind seeing, but I'd prefer to make a rule since we have quite a few roles out there already.

Let's go with this random one: You can't vote for someone who has voted for you earlier in the day. This restriction is removed if the voter unvotes you or if there are 8 or fewer players remaining.

Feel free to massage the rule as needed.

dubb93 · 08-18-2009, 03:19 PM

I am being unfairly branded as having not submitted a rule when I clearly submitted a role. I have no issue submitting a rule at this point if it is insisted I do.

The Jackal · 08-18-2009, 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dubb93

I am being unfairly branded as having not submitted a rule when I clearly submitted a role. I have no issue submitting a rule at this point if it is insisted I do.

I'm sure it was just a clerical error.

dubb93 · 08-18-2009, 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Jackal

I'm sure it was just a clerical error.

But I was looking forward to a "Dubb93 makes the rules up as the game progresses" rule.

lerriuqs · 08-18-2009, 03:54 PM

I'll add in the Brutal Wolf.

Also, not sure when this game is starting but I won't be around all day Wednesday or Friday this week...or Tuesday next week - got some golfing to take care of...

lerriuqs · 08-18-2009, 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JAG

Alright, I'm going to nix the idea altogether. I have a role I wouldn't mind seeing, but I'd prefer to make a rule since we have quite a few roles out there already.

Let's go with this random one: You can't vote for someone who has voted for you earlier in the day. This restriction is removed if the voter unvotes you or if there are 8 or fewer players remaining.

Feel free to massage the rule as needed.

What if said voting comes down to you and them in a two player runoff...Doesn't seem like good sport to hurt them in a lynch when their neck is on the line...

JAG · 08-18-2009, 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lerriuqs

What if said voting comes down to you and them in a two player runoff...Doesn't seem like good sport to hurt them in a lynch when their neck is on the line...

I would advise trying to avoid that situation from happening early on.

But if Barkeep thinks that's too out there he can add something to the rule about the restriction being removed if the two players are the top vote getters after a certain amount of time or whatever other alteration.

J23 · 08-19-2009, 09:12 AM

Well, here's a rule I thought of though I'm not sure how it will play out. Accept/Reject/Modify as necessary.

When a lynch occurs, if the village lynches a wolf, all of those who voted for that person have their vote counted as double for the next lynching. If the village lynches a villager, those voting for that person would have their votes count as half for the next lynching. Any kind of power used to change the lynch target from the majority would nullify this rule for that vote.

Passacaglia · 08-19-2009, 03:42 PM

Chatty -- May choose to PM freely with a different person each day, can be wolf or villager

Passacaglia · 08-19-2009, 03:43 PM

i.e. the person who has the role can be wolf or villager

saldana · 08-19-2009, 08:44 PM

my submission for a role...and to increase the chances of it being used, i would suggest about 20% of the village have it.

you are the whiny bitch..you constantly annoy other WW players by whining about how you die on the first day or night all the time and then you go to the whining thread and bitch about it some more...if you are the target of the night kill on the first night, or the winner of the lynch vote on the first day, you will be spared, just so no one has to listen to you cry like a little girl for the next 8 or 10 days while the game continues to be played.

path12 · 08-19-2009, 08:44 PM

Put me down for this. I have no rule/role to add though.

EagleFan · 08-19-2009, 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saldana

my submission for a role...and to increase the chances of it being used, i would suggest about 20% of the village have it.

you are the whiny bitch..you constantly annoy other WW players by whining about how you die on the first day or night all the time and then you go to the whining thread and bitch about it some more...if you are the target of the night kill on the first night, or the winner of the lynch vote on the first day, you will be spared, just so no one has to listen to you cry like a little girl for the next 8 or 10 days while the game continues to be played.

Sounds like someone got some sand in their va....

claphamsa · 08-20-2009, 06:50 AM

I think I qualify for that rule :P

Autumn · 08-20-2009, 10:18 AM

That's classic, Saldana

Passacaglia · 08-20-2009, 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saldana

my submission for a role...and to increase the chances of it being used, i would suggest about 20% of the village have it.

you are the whiny bitch..you constantly annoy other WW players by whining about how you die on the first day or night all the time and then you go to the whining thread and bitch about it some more...if you are the target of the night kill on the first night, or the winner of the lynch vote on the first day, you will be spared, just so no one has to listen to you cry like a little girl for the next 8 or 10 days while the game continues to be played.

That's awesome. I was actually thinking of creating a corollary to my PassPoints, which would have me put down my initial vote on whoever was whiniest from last game (unless someone starts racking up PassPoints before I can even check in).

SnDvls · 08-20-2009, 12:19 PM

do we have a start time yet for this? Probally Monday at the soonest now I bet

Alan T · 08-20-2009, 12:22 PM

Based on conversation I had with BK about something entirely unrelated to WW, my impression was that he is back home next week, so I would guess he is aiming for something like that as well... but that is just a guess.

Schmidty · 08-25-2009, 11:48 AM

Helloooooooo-helloooo-helloooo-hellooooooooo!!

Is anyone here-here-here-here?

DaddyTorgo · 08-25-2009, 01:30 PM

KWhit · 08-25-2009, 02:16 PM

Is this like the Y2K bug?

PurdueBrad · 08-25-2009, 02:56 PM

I just figured you guys were playing the 100'th game in secret on some other forum. I take back all the mean things I mumbled about you all. Except EF and Jackal.

EagleFan · 08-25-2009, 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PurdueBrad

I just figured you guys were playing the 100'th game in secret on some other forum. I take back all the mean things I mumbled about you all. Except EF and Jackal.

You didn't say anything bad about Jackal and me? I knew you were a great guy.

The Jackal · 08-25-2009, 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EagleFan

You didn't say anything bad about Jackal and me? I knew you were a great guy.

Miracles can happen!

SnDvls · 08-25-2009, 10:00 PM

hey people are padding their posts even before the game starts. I call B.S. on this

Alan T · 08-25-2009, 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SnDvls

hey people are padding their posts even before the game starts. I call B.S. on this

KWhit · 08-25-2009, 10:21 PM

This game's dead.

Times 100.

claphamsa · 08-26-2009, 08:49 AM

claphamsa · 08-26-2009, 08:49 AM

08-17-2009, 02:44 PM	#104
Schmidty Coordinator Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Early, TX	I can't think of a title for this role idea, but what about a villager who can bring back one player from the dead as a night action, once per day. I know that that is powerful, so as a drawback, the player (not the resurrected one) can never change their vote once they have cast it. Anyway, that's just my first idea. If it's ok, let me know. __________________ Just beat the devil out of it!!! - Bob Ross

08-17-2009, 07:41 PM	#118
henry296 College Starter Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Pittsburgh, PA	I'm in. I'll propose the Soothsayer rule, but the statement to be scanned can't have the word wolf or villager. __________________ "It's a great day for hockey" - "Badger" Bob Johnson

08-18-2009, 11:43 AM	#119
Chief Rum Hall Of Famer Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Where Hip Hop lives	Okay, thought of a role. The Chameleon Regular villager until Night Three. On Night Three, may choose to change ("chameleon") into any role in the game, with full rights of that role. The catch: Either, (1) the Chameleon is revealed (no role announced) on Day Four--so people know you're the Chameleon, they just don't know what role--or (2) on Day Four, the fact that a new particular role has been added to the game is announced--so your role is out there, but not your identity. Some possible additions/caveats: No PM rights can be gained this way, even if that role normally has them Certain roles can be made off limits. The Chameleon is neutral at the start, with own win conditions (set by the GM), or neutral until choosing a role and then, either (a) take on the allegiance of that role; or (b) take on the opposite allegiance of that role. How does that sound? __________________ . . I would rather be wrong...Than live in the shadows of your song...My mind is open wide...And now I'm ready to start...You're not sure...You open the door...And step out into the dark...Now I'm ready.

08-19-2009, 03:42 PM	#130
Passacaglia Coordinator Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Big Ten Country	Chatty -- May choose to PM freely with a different person each day, can be wolf or villager Last edited by Passacaglia : 08-19-2009 at 03:43 PM. Reason: yeah i'm editing, whatcha gonna do?

08-19-2009, 08:44 PM	#133
path12 Coordinator Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Seattle, WA	Put me down for this. I have no rule/role to add though. __________________ We have always been at war with Eastasia.

08-17-2009, 03:19 PM	#106
The Jackal Coordinator Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: New Hampshire	Bring back multiple dead people to the game could be fatal to the wolves, though if BK feels it'd balance out with a serial killer and any other insta-deaths or what not, I could see it. Maybe put a limit on the # of people they can bring back, 1-3 or something? And I like RendeR's idea of not being able to resurrect someone you've voted for.

08-17-2009, 06:34 PM	#117
Barkeep49 Coordinator Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Not too far away	A lot of people, and you know who you are, haven't submitted any rules yet. I hope to have final rules out Wednesday morning (quite possibly very early Wednesday morning). So you have until then to submit your rules. Please submit a rule or role. I think the game will be a lot cooler that way. If you have submitted a rule I would encourage you to check-out the rules to make sure I worded it in a way that you like. If not please speak-up. As a final note, since he withdrew please note that Abe's role has also been withdrawn.

08-18-2009, 03:54 PM	#126
lerriuqs High School Varsity Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Saskatchewan	I'll add in the Brutal Wolf. Also, not sure when this game is starting but I won't be around all day Wednesday or Friday this week...or Tuesday next week - got some golfing to take care of...

08-19-2009, 09:12 AM	#129
J23 College Benchwarmer Join Date: Jul 2009	Well, here's a rule I thought of though I'm not sure how it will play out. Accept/Reject/Modify as necessary. When a lynch occurs, if the village lynches a wolf, all of those who voted for that person have their vote counted as double for the next lynching. If the village lynches a villager, those voting for that person would have their votes count as half for the next lynching. Any kind of power used to change the lynch target from the majority would nullify this rule for that vote.

08-19-2009, 03:43 PM	#131
Passacaglia Coordinator Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Big Ten Country	i.e. the person who has the role can be wolf or villager

08-19-2009, 08:44 PM	#132
saldana Pro Starter Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Bethlehem, Pa	my submission for a role...and to increase the chances of it being used, i would suggest about 20% of the village have it. you are the whiny bitch..you constantly annoy other WW players by whining about how you die on the first day or night all the time and then you go to the whining thread and bitch about it some more...if you are the target of the night kill on the first night, or the winner of the lynch vote on the first day, you will be spared, just so no one has to listen to you cry like a little girl for the next 8 or 10 days while the game continues to be played.

08-20-2009, 06:50 AM	#135
claphamsa Grizzled Veteran Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: non white trash MD	I think I qualify for that rule :P __________________ Dominating Warewolf for 0 games! GIT R DUN!!!

08-20-2009, 10:18 AM	#136
Autumn Head Coach Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Bath, ME	That's classic, Saldana

08-20-2009, 12:19 PM	#138
SnDvls Pro Starter Join Date: Jul 2001	do we have a start time yet for this? Probally Monday at the soonest now I bet

08-20-2009, 12:22 PM	#139
Alan T Hall Of Famer Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Mass.	Based on conversation I had with BK about something entirely unrelated to WW, my impression was that he is back home next week, so I would guess he is aiming for something like that as well... but that is just a guess. __________________ Couch to ??k - From the couch to a Marathon in roughly 18 months.

08-25-2009, 11:48 AM	#140
Schmidty Coordinator Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Early, TX	Helloooooooo-helloooo-helloooo-hellooooooooo!! Is anyone here-here-here-here? __________________ Just beat the devil out of it!!! - Bob Ross

08-25-2009, 01:30 PM	#141
DaddyTorgo Hall Of Famer Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Massachusetts	LOL __________________ If I've ever helped you and you'd like to buy me a coffee, or just to say thanks, I have my Bitcoin and Ethereum addressed listed below :) BTC: bc1qykhsfyn9vw4ntqfgr0svj4n9tjdgufryh2pxn5 ETH: 0x2AcdC5cd88EA537063553F5b240073bE067BaCa9 Last edited by DaddyTorgo : 08-25-2009 at 01:30 PM.

08-25-2009, 02:16 PM	#142
KWhit Coordinator Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Conyers GA	Is this like the Y2K bug?

08-25-2009, 02:56 PM	#143
PurdueBrad Grizzled Veteran Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: DeKalb, IL	I just figured you guys were playing the 100'th game in secret on some other forum. I take back all the mean things I mumbled about you all. Except EF and Jackal.

08-25-2009, 10:00 PM	#146
SnDvls Pro Starter Join Date: Jul 2001	hey people are padding their posts even before the game starts. I call B.S. on this

08-25-2009, 10:21 PM	#148
KWhit Coordinator Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Conyers GA	This game's dead. Times 100.

08-26-2009, 08:49 AM	#149
claphamsa Grizzled Veteran Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: non white trash MD	what __________________ Dominating Warewolf for 0 games! GIT R DUN!!!

08-26-2009, 08:49 AM	#150
claphamsa Grizzled Veteran Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: non white trash MD	is __________________ Dominating Warewolf for 0 games! GIT R DUN!!!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)