The Thread for Pictures of Hot Women

[EagleFan]

nope

[Honolulu_Blue]

Originally Posted by EagleFan

Here ya go... maybe this will keep the other thread free for actual "cool pictures" as it was intended...

I have addressed this "original intent" of the "cool images" thread question multiple times.

It has been held, without a scintilla of a doubt, that the original intent of that threat included both "pictures of hot women" and ".gifs."

See the controlling precedent below:

Originally Posted by Honolulu_Blue

Really? I totally disagree.

Look who started and titled this thread: MJ4H.

Has anyone posted more pics or what not of hot women than MJ4H? (And we love him for it.)

Therefore, putting on my Justice Scalia robes, I would have to think that the original founder of this thread, without a scintilla of doubt, intended pictures of "hot women" to very much be included within the definition of "images so cool."

If you don't think an image is cool, stop complaining and scroll on by it.
Just sayin'...

Originally Posted by MJ4H

I tend to hold back on the hot chicks thing in this thread because I have gotten banned over hot chicks in the past.

I support their inclusion in this thread as long as they follow all moderation guidelines.

Originally Posted by Honolulu_Blue

MJ4H is the original founder of this thread, thus his "intent" is what governs what should and should not be posted in this thread. In the past, in order to gain clues of the original founder's intent, I have carefully reviewed his posting history in this thread and have come to the determination that "the hot chick thing" as well as "gifs" (Noopie Noopie Noop!) clearly "fit" the intent of this thread.

In sum, we hold that hot chicks and gifs can and should be posted in this thread.

Carry on!

[Travis]

We've also seen how these threads tend to end.

Moderating, picture deletion, ensuing argument, thread deletion and boxings.

[BishopMVP]

Originally Posted by Honolulu_Blue

I have addressed this "original intent" of the "cool images" thread question multiple times.

It has been held, without a scintilla of a doubt, that the original intent of that threat included both "pictures of hot women" and ".gifs."

See the controlling precedent below:

In your legal opinion, is this thread considered entrapment even though it wasn't started by a moderator?

[NorvTurnerOverdrive]

natalie portman's in a thong in the trailer for 'your highness'

said images are widely available on the internet.

[MikeVic]

Originally Posted by NorvTurnerOverdrive

natalie portman's in a thong in the trailer for 'your highness'

said images are widely available on the internet.

Don't just talk about it, post it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[AFShadow]

nope

[Honolulu_Blue]

Originally Posted by BishopMVP

In your legal opinion, is this thread considered entrapment even though it wasn't started by a moderator?

I do not consider this thread to be entrapment for the very reason you mentioned, it was not started by a moderator. If it was, we would need to explore the remaining factors relevant to the analysis.

[NorvTurnerOverdrive]

Originally Posted by MikeVic

Don't just talk about it, post it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

fof sensibilities can be difficult to gage. luckily mr. shadow has no such qualms.

[heybrad]

This thread definitely DOES NOT deliver.

[JediKooter]

That is one flat ass. Not that I'd mind if that ass was flat up against me though.

[Sun Tzu]

What this all about then?

[Greyroofoo]