Probably Dumb but Quick Question

[james17]

I have a great punter who is a lousy holder. If I sign a second punter who is inferior kicking but great on holding the ball, which one will the program assign as the holder for kicks?

[JepGarrett]

From what I have seen over a few saves the ability of your K is the main concern you should have. I only ever have 1 of each K, P as they rarely get injured and have never really considered holding for the P (obv would be a nightmare if the K or P got injured but it's worth the risk imo). I have the most long term success in saving those extra roster spots for younger skill positions, OL and DL who can jump up in ratings between training camps for trade capital or replacing leaving players.

Hope this helps even tho it's not a real answer to your q, cheers!

[QuikSand]

Originally Posted by james17

I have a great punter who is a lousy holder. If I sign a second punter who is inferior kicking but great on holding the ball, which one will the program assign as the holder for kicks?

correct answer: the program will assign the good punter, after you release the poor punter, which you will do because there is never any sufficient reason to carry two active punters on any FOFx roster

[Ben E Lou]

Originally Posted by QuikSand

correct answer: the program will assign the good punter, after you release the poor punter, which you will do because there is never any sufficient reason to carry two active punters on any FOFx roster

[james17]

Thanks guys!