Front Office Football Central  

Go Back   Front Office Football Central > Archives > FOFC Archive
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Statistics

View Poll Results: Who will get the #1 pick in the 2010 NFL Draft?
Kansas City Chiefs (currently 3-9) 0 0%
Cleveland Browns (currently 1-11) 44 47.83%
Washington Redskins (currently 3-9) 0 0%
St. Louis Rams (currently 1-11) 34 36.96%
Detroit Lions (currently 2-10) 0 0%
Tampa Bay Buccaneers (currently 1-11) 12 13.04%
Troutville Fishies (currently fleeing Asian Carp) 2 2.17%
Voters: 92. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-16-2009, 07:23 AM   #51
Samdari
Roster Filler
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Cicero
Quote:
Originally Posted by bhlloy View Post
I don't see Cleveland taking a QB either. Quinn has actually looked pretty decent in the last couple of weeks IMO.

I am wondering if this opinion changes if Holmgren comes aboard.
__________________
http://www.nateandellie.net Now featuring twice the babies for the same low price!

Samdari is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2009, 07:35 AM   #52
Matthean
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samdari View Post
I am wondering if this opinion changes if Holmgren comes aboard.

Only if he's Matt Millen in disguise.
__________________
Board games: Bringing people back to the original social network, the table.
Matthean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2009, 08:36 AM   #53
Butter
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Dayton, OH
Brady Quinn is awful. He might be just good enough to get you to 6-10, but that's about it.
__________________
My listening habits
Butter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2009, 09:24 AM   #54
Bearcat729
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Quote:
Originally Posted by Butter_of_69 View Post
Brady Quinn is awful. He might be just good enough to get you to 6-10, but that's about it.

But the idea now is that Quinn has earned one more chance to prove he can be better. Plus the Browns need so many different things that a top QB isn't going to make the team drastically better.
__________________
Bearcat729 on XBox Live and PSN
Bearcat729 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2009, 10:21 AM   #55
bulletsponge
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: TX
plus there isnt a top qb in this draft anyways right?
bulletsponge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2009, 10:32 AM   #56
Samdari
Roster Filler
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Cicero
Quote:
Originally Posted by bulletsponge View Post
plus there isnt a top qb in this draft anyways right?

I think Clausen will go in the top 5. Would not be surprised to see Bradford creep that high either.

Heck, I would not be stunned to see Locker in. After all, officially declaring your intentions to go back to college is like proving a negative - you can't do it. Nothing is official until the NFL deadline passes without his paperwork being in declaring.
__________________
http://www.nateandellie.net Now featuring twice the babies for the same low price!
Samdari is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2009, 12:35 PM   #57
Maple Leafs
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samdari View Post
I think Clausen will go in the top 5.
The the Browns should take him. Grabbing the QB from Notre Dame works well for them.
__________________
Down Goes Brown: Toronto Maple Leafs Humor and Analysis
Maple Leafs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2009, 12:36 PM   #58
MizzouRah
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Troy, Mo
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samdari View Post
I was serious about Vick. I don't think Philly pays his bonus and keeps him next year, and I think the Rams would score more points with him next year than any other option.

I was responding to the thought that the Rams take Suh 1st and pick up a QB in the 2nd. I did not think one would be available. Then again, McCoy might be, and might be worth an early 2. But, why not sign Vick for 2010 AND draft McCoy with the 2.1-2.2?

I wouldn't mind Vick.
MizzouRah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2009, 12:40 PM   #59
Matthean
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Butter_of_69 View Post
Brady Quinn is awful. He might be just good enough to get you to 6-10, but that's about it.

Better talent around him will get them to 6-10 by default.

__________________
Board games: Bringing people back to the original social network, the table.
Matthean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2009, 01:00 PM   #60
bhlloy
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Let me preface this by saying I despise Brady Quinn, but I honestly don't think you can call him awful just yet. Give him a year with a head coach who actually supports him and commits to him as the starter and see what happens. He's been up and down this year but he's still only played 13 games in his NFL career - are you ready to write a rookie off after 13 games?
bhlloy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2009, 05:35 PM   #61
Matthean
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
First of many mock drafts.

McShay's Mock Draft - ESPN Video - ESPN
__________________
Board games: Bringing people back to the original social network, the table.
Matthean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2010, 12:03 AM   #62
lighthousekeeper
College Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
bump

FOFC favorite Browns don't even end up in the top 5, going 4-0 after poll was posted.
__________________
...
lighthousekeeper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2010, 05:15 PM   #63
MizzouRah
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Troy, Mo
Suh should be getting ready to put on the "1" Rams jersey.
MizzouRah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2010, 05:26 PM   #64
Eaglesfan27
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: New Jersey
Quote:
Originally Posted by MizzouRah View Post
I wouldn't mind Vick.

I think he is going to be downright bad as a full time starter for whoever he goes to. He just doesn't have the speed any more and that was the #1 thing that made him special as a QB.
__________________
Retired GM of the eNFL 2007 Super Bowl Champion Philadelphia Eagles (19-0 record.)
GM of the WOOF 2006 Doggie Bowl Champion Atlantic City Gamblers.
GM of the IHOF 2019 and 2022 IHOF Bowl Champion Asheville Axemen.
Eaglesfan27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2010, 06:34 PM   #65
Honolulu Blue
Dynasty Boy
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Michigan
Quote:
Originally Posted by MizzouRah View Post
Suh should be getting ready to put on the "1" Rams jersey.

NO! The Rams would rather have one of several pretty quarterbacks out there.
Honolulu Blue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2010, 10:35 PM   #66
MizzouRah
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Troy, Mo
Quote:
Originally Posted by Honolulu Blue View Post
NO! The Rams would rather have one of several pretty quarterbacks out there.

I sure hope not.. but I wouldn't put it past them.
MizzouRah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2010, 10:36 PM   #67
MizzouRah
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Troy, Mo
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eaglesfan27 View Post
I think he is going to be downright bad as a full time starter for whoever he goes to. He just doesn't have the speed any more and that was the #1 thing that made him special as a QB.

Now that time has passed, I think you're right. I say we pick one up in the 2nd round.
MizzouRah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2010, 10:57 PM   #68
M GO BLUE!!!
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
I think the Rams should take a QB #1. Or a receiver. Not Suh.
M GO BLUE!!! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2010, 01:39 PM   #69
MizzouRah
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Troy, Mo
Quote:
Originally Posted by M GO BLUE!!! View Post
I think the Rams should take a QB #1. Or a receiver. Not Suh.

Ok, name the QB you would take at #1.
MizzouRah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2010, 02:10 PM   #70
M GO BLUE!!!
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by MizzouRah View Post
Ok, name the QB you would take at #1.

I wouldn't. The Lions did that last year. I just want Suh!
M GO BLUE!!! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2010, 06:06 PM   #71
MizzouRah
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Troy, Mo
Quote:
Originally Posted by M GO BLUE!!! View Post
I wouldn't. The Lions did that last year. I just want Suh!

MizzouRah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2010, 06:23 PM   #72
JonInMiddleGA
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
Quote:
Originally Posted by M GO BLUE!!! View Post
I just want Suh!

A boy named Suh?

(figured I might as well beat the draft day headline writers)
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis
JonInMiddleGA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2010, 05:12 AM   #73
Logan
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NYC
Kiper's latest mock...spoilered for space

Spoiler


Personally, this is about as good as it can get, with a great combination of picks for the Niners in Spiller and Williams, and two Rutgers guys going in the first round, with Anthony Davis in the top 5.
Logan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2010, 08:35 AM   #74
Doug5984
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Louisiana
I'd love if the Saints could get Witherspoon- although we do have some young guys who were on IR last year... Really I hope we pick the best available player. If anything I say go for another CB- I think Jenkins really has a future at S more than CB, and it showed good our top 2 are when they and our # 3 went down. It'd be nice to add more depth to that position.
Or another DT to play opposite Ellis.
Doug5984 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2010, 08:58 AM   #75
albionmoonlight
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: North Carolina
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug5984 View Post
I'd love if the Saints could get Witherspoon- although we do have some young guys who were on IR last year... Really I hope we pick the best available player. If anything I say go for another CB- I think Jenkins really has a future at S more than CB, and it showed good our top 2 are when they and our # 3 went down. It'd be nice to add more depth to that position.
Or another DT to play opposite Ellis.

The Saints front office seems very committed to BPA.
albionmoonlight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2010, 09:03 AM   #76
Dr. Sak
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Stuck in Yinzerville, PA
I'd love for the Eagles to get Taylor Mays.
Dr. Sak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2010, 11:20 AM   #77
gkb
High School Varsity
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Colorado
I'd much rather the Broncos go with Rolando McClain than Dez Bryant. I have no idea what McDaniels will do though - I guess a lot will depend on how free agency works out.
__________________
BALLERZ YO, fo shizzle. - QuikSand
gkb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2010, 01:19 PM   #78
Logan
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NYC
Quote:
Originally Posted by gkb View Post
I have no idea what McDaniels will do though

If history is any indication...something stupid.

Last edited by Logan : 02-18-2010 at 01:20 PM.
Logan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2010, 01:52 PM   #79
Samdari
Roster Filler
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Cicero
No way the 49ers go RB in the first.

And no Kindle lasts until 15th.
__________________
http://www.nateandellie.net Now featuring twice the babies for the same low price!
Samdari is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2010, 02:04 PM   #80
kingfc22
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Morgan Hill, CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samdari View Post
No way the 49ers go RB in the first.

No way indeed. 49ers need to get any combination of two (OL, Pass Rushing DE, Playmaking S) with their first round selections.
__________________
Fan of SF Giants, 49ers, Sharks, Arsenal
kingfc22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2010, 02:23 PM   #81
Logan
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NYC
I've read so much that they would be interested for the reasons Kiper mentioned (Gore complement, return ability) that it either makes me think it's legit...or they're trying to entice someone to move up for Spiller.
Logan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2010, 03:10 PM   #82
Lathum
Favored Bitch #1
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
I think the Giants need to look hard at Kyle Wilson, the secondary was horrific last year and it is much easier to get a LB in free agency than a CB.
Lathum is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2010, 08:28 PM   #83
tarcone
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Pacific
Pundits are suggesting that DT McCoy would be a better fit for the Rams.
tarcone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2010, 08:42 PM   #84
B & B
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: A sports era long ago when everything didnt require a Nike logo
Pundits are funny.



I will be the first person on the planet to order a Suh jersey in honolulu blue.
__________________
Nobody cares about Kyle Orton because he's black.
-PT
B & B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2010, 08:53 PM   #85
miked
College Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The Dirty
McCourty sucks.
__________________
Commish of the United Baseball League (OOTP 6.5)
miked is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2010, 09:36 PM   #86
Logan
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NYC
Quote:
Originally Posted by miked View Post
McCourty sucks.

At what?
Logan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2010, 09:54 PM   #87
Izulde
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
I'd be stoked to get McClain on the Dolphins. Or, if he and Bryant are both gone, trade down for more picks and grab Golden Tate.
__________________
2006 Golden Scribe Nominee
2006 Golden Scribe Winner
Best Non-Sport Dynasty: May Our Reign Be Green and Golden (CK Dynasty)

Rookie Writer of the Year
Dynasty of the Year: May Our Reign Be Green and Golden (CK Dynasty)
Izulde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2010, 09:16 AM   #88
miked
College Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The Dirty
Quote:
Originally Posted by Logan View Post
At what?

Defense? He has 6 picks in 4 seasons, he had about 9 PDs last season in 12 games, 3 of which came against FIU. They seem to love him because he can return and block kicks, but in the NFL there are what, like 3 blocked punts a season?
__________________
Commish of the United Baseball League (OOTP 6.5)
miked is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2010, 09:42 AM   #89
Logan
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NYC
No, they seem to love him because he is an outstanding cover corner who can actually tackle people and isn't a liability in run support. But keep on thinking that INTs are what defines a great corner. McCourty actually officially defended 10 passes last year, and that number is tied with the consensus #1 CB in Joe Haden.

edit: And just for shits and giggles, Darrelle Revis had 2 INTs and 4 passes defended in 12 games during his last year at Pitt.

But go ahead, you can tell me why you don't think McCourty is a 1st rou...oh wait, no please tell me why he "sucks" which I assume to mean he isn't worthy of being selected before the 4th round or so (I'll give you the benefit of the doubt on that one).

Last edited by Logan : 02-19-2010 at 09:49 AM.
Logan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2010, 09:57 AM   #90
miked
College Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The Dirty
LOL, I'm just going by watching the RU defense I guess. Not sure what makes him a first rounder and I think the McCourty twins were probably the most overrated DBs. I am anti-twin.
__________________
Commish of the United Baseball League (OOTP 6.5)
miked is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2010, 10:18 AM   #91
Logan
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NYC
Well at least you're honest.
Logan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2010, 09:11 PM   #92
MizzouRah
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Troy, Mo
Quote:
Originally Posted by M GO BLUE!!! View Post
I wouldn't. The Lions did that last year. I just want Suh!

Listening to Adam Schefter today on the radio.. he actually made sense stating once Sam Bradford starts working out for NFL teams, the Rams will start to salvate over the now healthy Bradford who could wow the QB hungry Rams.

It's definitely interesting...
MizzouRah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2010, 09:14 AM   #93
Suburban Rhythm
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pittsburgh
Did Al Davis find his 1st and 2nd round picks yesterday?

Bruce Davis and Dorin Dickerson put up some really good combine numbers at T and TE yesterday.
__________________
"Do you guys play fast tempos with odd time signatures?"
"Yeah"
"Cool!!"
Suburban Rhythm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2010, 07:36 AM   #94
Samdari
Roster Filler
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Cicero
Quote:
Originally Posted by MizzouRah View Post
Listening to Adam Schefter today on the radio.. he actually made sense stating once Sam Bradford starts working out for NFL teams, the Rams will start to salvate over the now healthy Bradford who could wow the QB hungry Rams.

It's definitely interesting...

This is stunning to me. They would be passing up a guy with the highest grade in 20 years for the next Alex Smith. Maybe they are putting this out to try to get teams (the Redskins?) to trade up?
__________________
http://www.nateandellie.net Now featuring twice the babies for the same low price!
Samdari is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2010, 11:04 PM   #95
MizzouRah
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Troy, Mo
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samdari View Post
This is stunning to me. They would be passing up a guy with the highest grade in 20 years for the next Alex Smith. Maybe they are putting this out to try to get teams (the Redskins?) to trade up?

I'm not sure.. apparently there is a war in Rams camp about SUH vs Bradford.. although the SUH camp says forget Bradford and get McNabb from Philly.
MizzouRah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2010, 08:08 AM   #96
albionmoonlight
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: North Carolina
Where is Colt McCoy expected to go? Considering that he won eleventy-billion games over 4 years in a BCS conference, I would expect him to be seen as a top guy. What "measurables" is he lacking that are keeping him from being seen as one of the top picks?
albionmoonlight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2010, 08:46 AM   #97
JPhillips
General Manager
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
The Rams have recently passed on Sanchez, Ryan and Cutler in favor of a safe pick and look where it's gotten them. Suh may be the better pick, but at some point they need a franchise QB and if they believe Claussen or Bradford is that guy they need to take him.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers
JPhillips is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2010, 05:17 PM   #98
Logan
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NYC
<3 Deadspin headline writers.

Report: NFL Draft Prospect Once Put His Tremendous Upside In His Sister - Tony Washington - Deadspin
Logan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2010, 06:21 PM   #99
endemicFOF
n00b
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
If they think Bradford is a franchise QB, and I think they do(as do I), you have to take him. An NFL team doesn't get many chances to grab a stud QB, and while a stud DT may be the 2nd most valuable position in football, the QB is still king.
endemicFOF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2010, 08:40 AM   #100
Logan
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NYC
Sport Science: Ndamukong Suh - ESPN Video - ESPN
Logan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:46 AM.



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.