Werewolf Small Game VI -- A Bowl of Red (GAME OVER CHEATERS WIN!) - Page 4

Swaggs · 02-14-2007, 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marathoner

Reference Survivor:Challenge/Common Thread posts #826 and #833.

Ah yes... I had blocked that day from my memory.

ntndeacon · 02-14-2007, 11:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blade6119

Then why didnt you vote me if you thought my actions didnt add up? From what you say, you thought my actions were odd. So why did you stay on ITC?

That is why i feel there are at least 2 wolves in your group, i gave you all reason to swap and you didnt. If you thought me a wolf, you should have swapped. If you thought me good, you should have swapped. So in staying put, you give me no explainable outcome other then evil was among you

now I am not denying that there is probably wolves in the group that voted with me to oust ITC. I disagree with you on one aspect however. If I thought you good, I should have switched? The problem I have, is who to switch too. I felt that a tie needed to be broken so I tried to do it asap. Is that poor reasoning? possibly, but it is still what I was thinking.

Chief Rum · 02-15-2007, 03:28 AM

Well, that ended up being an awful move.

That said, I still can't fault the WW logic that went into the vote, and I don't see why Blade is so worked up (other than the obvious that we could have saved the seer). IMTheCrew made a drive by second vote and never explained himself. Contrary to Blade's suggestion, I don't know of any IMTheCrew style. I'm not sure I have ever played in a game with him, and, as Blade knows, I have been in most games going back to the summer.

I'm not saying the new guy didn't have a defined style, but I would hardly say that was common knowledge.

It's a WW truth that Day One votes are crap. We have very little to nothing to go on. But someone has to go/die.

I voted and left before Blade did his kill bsak ploy, so I didn't get a chance to react to that, but I think Blade overplayed it way too much for the effect he was desiring. IMTheCrew doesn't have a style yet I know of--but Blade does. Everyone knows he does and says off the wall stuff. He is exactly the guy I would read that from and forget about it as Blade being Blade.

Blade6119 · 02-15-2007, 03:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Rum

IMTheCrew made a drive by second vote and never explained himself.

Thats exactly the point...that became the reason, when he wasnt the 2nd vote...sndvls was...thats part of it for me, as he got lynched be being a 2nd vote with no reason when he wasnt the 2nd vote.

Chief Rum · 02-15-2007, 04:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blade6119

Thats exactly the point...that became the reason, when he wasnt the 2nd vote...sndvls was...thats part of it for me, as he got lynched be being a 2nd vote with no reason when he wasnt the 2nd vote.

Actually, I miswrote that. In my original vote, I even pointed out SnDvls was the first "suspicious" vote, but he saved himself by recanting. IMTheCrew's vote was suspicious to me more because he made it without saying why. It certainly could be construed as an attempt to get a bandwagon rolling on DC. Obviously, that wasn't what was happening, but at that point in time, there was little else to go on.

I don't know if my vote would have stayed on IMTheCrew if I had been here all day, but I know for the point in time I had to put in a vote this morning, he had the leading "suspect" vote to that point. It's just so disappointing when you're in a critical role, but you make a mistake like that.

I think as IMTheCrew plays more he will see why that was jumped on and learn from it. Right now, though, we're out the seer.

Lorena · 02-15-2007, 06:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barkeep49

I find it interesting how quick you are to turn on those who essentially were trying to save you.

Interesting? Why? It was a bandwagon that quickly formed against ITC and I'm pretty sure at least 1 wolf is in there. Don't get me wrong, I'm thankful to be alive but bandwagons, whether against me or someone else are often suspicious.

Barkeep49 · 02-15-2007, 08:19 AM

Let's remember that bandwagons are only bad against villagers. Against wolves they make sure that the wolves can't manipulate the vote. So to summarize:

Killing villagers = bad
Killing wolves = good

path12 · 02-15-2007, 10:15 AM

Just got in. Processing night actions now.

path12 · 02-15-2007, 10:30 AM

POT O GOLD CHILI
4 Tablespoons lard, oil, or shortening
6 pounds extra-lean beef chuck, cut into 1/4 inch cubes
2 pounds extra lean pork loin, cut into 1/4 inch cubes
3 large onions, finely chopped
4 ribs celery, finely chopped
10 cloves garlic, finely chopped
1 can (6 ounces) tomato sauce
3 cups rich brown stock (homemade)*
6 to 12 ounces high quality bourbon whiskey
1 bottle (12 ounces) dark beer
3 Tablespoons cumin
1 Tablespoon dried oregano
1 teaspoon freshly grated nutmeg
1 Tablespoon sugar
1 Tablespoon unsweetened cocoa
3 heaping Tablespoons New Mexico chili powder
3 Tablespoons heaping Pasilla chili powder
3 Tablespoons heaping crushed chili quebrado,
1 teaspoon mace
Salt and freshly ground pepper, to taste
Chopped cilantro (fresh coriander), for garnish

In an 8 quart or larger Dutch oven, melt the lard over medium heat. Brown the beef and pork cubes in the fat. Transfer the browned meat to a large, low sided stockpot or Dutch oven, and reserve the fat in the pan.

Saute the onions, celery, and garlic in the remaining fat until the vegetables are soft and golden but not brown. Add them to the meat. Stir in the tomato sauce, beef stock, and bourbon.

Pour the beer into a bowl and add the cumin, oregano, nutmeg, sugar, cocoa, chili powder, chili quebrado, mace, salt, and pepper. Stir the seasonings into the meat mixture, and simmer the chili uncoverd for 2 1/2 to 3 hours. If more liquid is needed to maintain consistency, add either water, beer, or bourbon. Serves about 20.

Aaron Gobragh was excited. He had practiced countless times for this very moment, and finally perfected his Pot O Gold chili. Now, he thought, now victory is within my grasp. He'd monitored his station carefully, almost dozing at one point, but he wouldn't have missed anyone trying to tamper, or would he?

He ladled samples to the judges standing before him. "Nice color" said one. Aaron watched them taste it and pictured himself with the trophy......until he saw their faces contort and spit out his chili. Then he noticed the empty bottle of soy sauce behind his station. The cheaters have struck!

Blade6119 has been eliminated. Day 2 deadline is 10PM Eastern tonight.

path12 · 02-15-2007, 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dodgerchick

Oh and nice touch on the recipes as some of us get eliminated path

Thanks. I'm probably violating some kind of copyright but I don't think anyone will notice....

Chief Rum · 02-15-2007, 12:32 PM

Ouch, that hurts. Considering Blade is an experienced player who can stir things up, he is almost as big a loss for us as the seer. It's fortunate at least that he wasn't the body guard. So did anyone get any information last night? I would have to review the roles to see if there is anyone left for good who can. We need some theories everyone.

Dr. Sak · 02-15-2007, 12:37 PM

I think that is one of the main reasons that Blade was struck. He was experienced and the wolves wanted rid of him before they were revealed. Another reason could be that he was right on his initial guess so before he was able to get steam behind that vote he was axed.

ntndeacon · 02-15-2007, 12:46 PM

did Blade ever say who he suspected? I cant find that anywhere.

Dr. Sak · 02-15-2007, 12:51 PM

He kept himself firm on Barkeep, plus Barkeep was the second one to pile on to ITC. He said he voted for ITC for piling on yet he did the same when doing his vote.

SnDvls · 02-15-2007, 01:02 PM

Classic frame job set up....good one wolves you leave several "suspects" in this one.

Chief Rum · 02-15-2007, 01:26 PM

Exactly. Not sure I buy that the wolves got rid of Blade because he was sniffing too close. It's an obvious frame up job. IMO, that puts Barkeep (his vote) and bsak (his "death" target) off of my list for today.

Unfortunately, I have to go again, so I have to place a vote. I am going to go with one of the ITC voters (yes, I know I was one of them) and...

VOTE MARATHONER

I don't like this vote much more than anyone else, but the theoiry that there are wolves in the ITC voting list is a decent one. So I'll start at the back and work my way forward (wolves are more likely at the back end then the front).

I could easily be moved off of this vote with more information/discussion, but I am afraid I won't be around before deadline. Working nights sucks sometimes.

Jonathan Ezarik · 02-15-2007, 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SnDvls

Classic frame job set up....good one wolves you leave several "suspects" in this one.

Who do you think the wolves were trying to set up?

SnDvls · 02-15-2007, 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jonathan Ezarik

Who do you think the wolves were trying to set up?

Like CR said Barkeep or Bask (sp?)

SnDvls · 02-15-2007, 03:26 PM

vote NTN

not sure I'll get another chance to get one in later

Blade6119 · 02-15-2007, 03:28 PM

thank you wolves, i really didnt mind that one at all. Best of luck to both sides

Lorena · 02-15-2007, 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SnDvls

Classic frame job set up....good one wolves you leave several "suspects" in this one.

Yeah, could be; but wolves do kill people who they feel threatened by.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barkeep49

Let's remember that bandwagons are only bad against villagers. Against wolves they make sure that the wolves can't manipulate the vote. So to summarize:

Killing villagers = bad
Killing wolves = good

Ahhhhh, so losing IMC was actually a bad thing! Gotcha, for a minute there I thought we were on the right track. Phew, thanks for clearing it up for us BK!!

Jonathan Ezarik · 02-15-2007, 03:43 PM

My top suspect is SnDvls, but since he won't be around to defend himself, I won't vote for him. So, I'm going after my number two suspect.

VOTE DODGERCHICK

First, seafood in chili is disgusting and shouldn't be allowed to exist. Second, her late vote yesterday against me. Not so much that it was against me, but that it wasn't on ITC or anyone else with votes. That looks like a throw-away vote to avoid being on the lynch of a good chef.

path12 · 02-15-2007, 03:47 PM

Current vote totals (numbers in parentheses are the order in which the vote was made for tiebreaking purposes):

Marathoner 1 -- Chief Rum(1)
ntndeacon 1 -- SnDvls(2)
Dodgerchick 1 -- Jonathan Ezarik(3)

Still to vote: Barkeep, MollyMurphy, Dodgerchick, ntndeacon, Marathoner, bsak16

ntndeacon · 02-15-2007, 04:03 PM

I think the strategy of voting of one of us that voted for ITC is not a bad strategy. I tend to think Marathoner is not a wolf since he was the last on the pile on. I don't think a wolf would be that blatent. I don't know who I will vote for yet, but iwill have sometime to think about it over dinner.

Lorena · 02-15-2007, 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jonathan Ezarik

My top suspect is SnDvls, but since he won't be around to defend himself, I won't vote for him. So, I'm going after my number two suspect.

VOTE DODGERCHICK

First, seafood in chili is disgusting and shouldn't be allowed to exist. Second, her late vote yesterday against me. Not so much that it was against me, but that it wasn't on ITC or anyone else with votes. That looks like a throw-away vote to avoid being on the lynch of a good chef.

Don't be hatin' on my chili!!!

Umm... you do realize that before roles were sent out I said I started a job and am adjusting to my new schedule and wasn't gonna be around much right? Yeah...

So Sndvls is your top suspect but you voted for me eh? Nice one! I'll put a vote down for Sndvls:

vote sndvls

His second vote on me, the pileon IMC, and the mere mention of planting the "classic setup" seed to get people to look elsewhere.

As mentioned earlier, not sure how much I'll be around today but tomorrow is my day off and will have a chance to look at things more clearly.

Dr. Sak · 02-15-2007, 04:07 PM

I have been debating this one for a bit. I agree a little with JE that SnDvls was/is going to be my first choice but I am also a little skeptical of Barkeep and CR.

Lorena · 02-15-2007, 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dodgerchick

His second vote on me, the pileon IMC, and the mere mention of planting the "classic setup" seed to get people to look elsewhere.

Just re-read this part and I do believe that sndvls and BK could be baddies.

Jonathan Ezarik · 02-15-2007, 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dodgerchick

Don't be hatin' on my chili!!!

Madam, to call that....product chili is a disservice to all chili.

Quote:

Umm... you do realize that before roles were sent out I said I started a job and am adjusting to my new schedule and wasn't gonna be around much right? Yeah...

So Sndvls is your top suspect but you voted for me eh? Nice one!

Actually, I forgot about you starting a new job. Still, it doesn't change how I see your vote. And I explained why I wasn't voting for SnDvls this time.

Lorena · 02-15-2007, 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jonathan Ezarik

Actually, I forgot about you starting a new job. Still, it doesn't change how I see your vote. And I explained why I wasn't voting for SnDvls this time.

Yeah, he said he might not be around so does that mean that people shouldn't vote for him because of that? I might not be around either so does that mean you're gonna unvote me and vote for someone else?

Jonathan Ezarik · 02-15-2007, 04:18 PM

No, because you're here now. You have a chance to defend yourself.

Lorena · 02-15-2007, 04:21 PM

dola,

people should vote for whom they think is a wolf. If ya'll seriously think I'm the top suspect, then vote for me, whether I'm here or not I really don't care. Your only loss would be tasting the pure brilliance that is my Green Seafood Chili.

Lorena · 02-15-2007, 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jonathan Ezarik

No, because you're here now. You have a chance to defend yourself.

Alright, it's cool. So if I leave make sure to unvote me because I won't be around to defend myself further k?

MollyMurphy · 02-15-2007, 04:27 PM

I too see merit in the theory that one of the folks who piled on to the ITC vote could be a WW. I don't think Marathoner is the one since he came on so late in the vote. Chief Rum sealed ITC's fate by putting him up by 2 votes with only 3 voters left. Short of them all voting for Dodgerchick, ITC was done.

VOTE CHIEF RUM

Jonathan Ezarik · 02-15-2007, 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dodgerchick

Alright, it's cool. So if I leave make sure to unvote me because I won't be around to defend myself further k?

Except I won't be around later, either.

Lorena · 02-15-2007, 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jonathan Ezarik

Except I won't be around later, either.

I guess it sucks for me then eh? Smart ass

Barkeep49 · 02-15-2007, 04:55 PM

I agree that it's a classic setup job. And so I look to one of the most experienced players around (besides myself) to execute it.

Vote Chief Rum

P.S. DC I hope you know my tongue was firmly in my cheek.

Dr. Sak · 02-15-2007, 05:00 PM

As I said before there are a few that I have my eye on. I am not going to join in on the pile on vote for CR because that just seems a little fishy right now so I am going to go with my gut here

VOTE BARKEEP49

path12 · 02-15-2007, 05:00 PM

Current vote totals (numbers in parentheses are the order in which the vote was made for tiebreaking purposes):

Chief Rum 2 -- MollyMurphy(5), Barkeep49(6)
Marathoner 1 -- Chief Rum(1)
ntndeacon 1 -- SnDvls(2)
Dodgerchick 1 -- Jonathan Ezarik(3)
SnDvls 1 -- Dodgerchick(4)
Barkeep49 1 -- bsak16(7)

Still to vote: ntndeacon, Marathoner

MollyMurphy · 02-15-2007, 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bsak16

As I said before there are a few that I have my eye on. I am not going to join in on the pile on vote for CR because that just seems a little fishy right now so I am going to go with my gut here

VOTE BARKEEP49

I wouldn't call 3 votes a pile up.

Lathum · 02-15-2007, 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MollyMurphy

I wouldn't call 3 votes a pile up.

lol, I think she means pile on.

Pile up is what happens when I let her drive

Barkeep49 · 02-15-2007, 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lathum

lol, I think she means pile on.

Pile up is what happens when I let her drive

You let her play. She's acquitting herself just fine.

ntndeacon · 02-15-2007, 07:14 PM

wow. well my problem is that Idon't want to sign Rum's death warrant just yet. I am more suspicious of SnDvls so that is where my vote is going to go.

Vote SnDvls

I will be willing to discuss further after survivor.

Dr. Sak · 02-15-2007, 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ntndeacon

wow. well my problem is that Idon't want to sign Rum's death warrant just yet. I am more suspicious of SnDvls so that is where my vote is going to go.

Vote SnDvls

I will be willing to discuss further after survivor.

I'd like to hear why because it was a toss up between him and barkeep for me.

ntndeacon · 02-15-2007, 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bsak16

I'd like to hear why because it was a toss up between him and barkeep for me.

well to me this was more of a pile on vote than Rum's vote. And I see SnDvls vote as the coup de grace on ITC.

Marathoner · 02-15-2007, 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Rum

Exactly. Not sure I buy that the wolves got rid of Blade because he was sniffing too close. It's an obvious frame up job. IMO, that puts Barkeep (his vote) and bsak (his "death" target) off of my list for today.

Unfortunately, I have to go again, so I have to place a vote. I am going to go with one of the ITC voters (yes, I know I was one of them) and...

VOTE MARATHONER

I don't like this vote much more than anyone else, but the theoiry that there are wolves in the ITC voting list is a decent one. So I'll start at the back and work my way forward (wolves are more likely at the back end then the front).

I could easily be moved off of this vote with more information/discussion, but I am afraid I won't be around before deadline. Working nights sucks sometimes.

You're honestly going to vote for me?! I was the last to vote for ITC, his fate was decided. I just thought his name was fishy.

path12 · 02-15-2007, 08:24 PM

Current vote totals with about 25 minutes to go (numbers in parentheses are the order in which the vote was made for tiebreaking purposes):

Dodgerchick 2 -- Jonathan Ezarik(3), Marathoner(9)
Chief Rum 2 -- MollyMurphy(5), Barkeep49(6)
SnDvls 2 -- Dodgerchick(4), ntndeacon(8)
Marathoner 1 -- Chief Rum(1)
ntndeacon 1 -- SnDvls(2)
Dodgerchick 1 -- Jonathan Ezarik(3)
Barkeep49 1 -- bsak16(7)

Still to vote: Nobody

Dodgerchick is currently on the block due to longest held vote.

Marathoner · 02-15-2007, 08:28 PM

VOTE DODGERCHICK

I agree with JE, she is trying to draw attention away from herself, if I were a wolf that is what I'd do.

Marathoner · 02-15-2007, 08:30 PM

Besides, it just so happens I want ot fix seafood chili tomorrow and can't find a recipe anywhere.

path12 · 02-15-2007, 08:36 PM

Edited post #196 to reflect current vote.

path12 · 02-15-2007, 09:02 PM

Deadline. Results in a moment.

02-15-2007, 03:28 AM	#153
Chief Rum Hall Of Famer Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Where Hip Hop lives	Well, that ended up being an awful move. That said, I still can't fault the WW logic that went into the vote, and I don't see why Blade is so worked up (other than the obvious that we could have saved the seer). IMTheCrew made a drive by second vote and never explained himself. Contrary to Blade's suggestion, I don't know of any IMTheCrew style. I'm not sure I have ever played in a game with him, and, as Blade knows, I have been in most games going back to the summer. I'm not saying the new guy didn't have a defined style, but I would hardly say that was common knowledge. It's a WW truth that Day One votes are crap. We have very little to nothing to go on. But someone has to go/die. I voted and left before Blade did his kill bsak ploy, so I didn't get a chance to react to that, but I think Blade overplayed it way too much for the effect he was desiring. IMTheCrew doesn't have a style yet I know of--but Blade does. Everyone knows he does and says off the wall stuff. He is exactly the guy I would read that from and forget about it as Blade being Blade. __________________ . . I would rather be wrong...Than live in the shadows of your song...My mind is open wide...And now I'm ready to start...You're not sure...You open the door...And step out into the dark...Now I'm ready.

02-15-2007, 10:15 AM	#158
path12 Coordinator Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Seattle, WA	Just got in. Processing night actions now. __________________ We have always been at war with Eastasia.

02-15-2007, 10:30 AM	#159
path12 Coordinator Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Seattle, WA	POT O GOLD CHILI 4 Tablespoons lard, oil, or shortening 6 pounds extra-lean beef chuck, cut into 1/4 inch cubes 2 pounds extra lean pork loin, cut into 1/4 inch cubes 3 large onions, finely chopped 4 ribs celery, finely chopped 10 cloves garlic, finely chopped 1 can (6 ounces) tomato sauce 3 cups rich brown stock (homemade)* 6 to 12 ounces high quality bourbon whiskey 1 bottle (12 ounces) dark beer 3 Tablespoons cumin 1 Tablespoon dried oregano 1 teaspoon freshly grated nutmeg 1 Tablespoon sugar 1 Tablespoon unsweetened cocoa 3 heaping Tablespoons New Mexico chili powder 3 Tablespoons heaping Pasilla chili powder 3 Tablespoons heaping crushed chili quebrado, 1 teaspoon mace Salt and freshly ground pepper, to taste Chopped cilantro (fresh coriander), for garnish In an 8 quart or larger Dutch oven, melt the lard over medium heat. Brown the beef and pork cubes in the fat. Transfer the browned meat to a large, low sided stockpot or Dutch oven, and reserve the fat in the pan. Saute the onions, celery, and garlic in the remaining fat until the vegetables are soft and golden but not brown. Add them to the meat. Stir in the tomato sauce, beef stock, and bourbon. Pour the beer into a bowl and add the cumin, oregano, nutmeg, sugar, cocoa, chili powder, chili quebrado, mace, salt, and pepper. Stir the seasonings into the meat mixture, and simmer the chili uncoverd for 2 1/2 to 3 hours. If more liquid is needed to maintain consistency, add either water, beer, or bourbon. Serves about 20. Aaron Gobragh was excited. He had practiced countless times for this very moment, and finally perfected his Pot O Gold chili. Now, he thought, now victory is within my grasp. He'd monitored his station carefully, almost dozing at one point, but he wouldn't have missed anyone trying to tamper, or would he? He ladled samples to the judges standing before him. "Nice color" said one. Aaron watched them taste it and pictured himself with the trophy......until he saw their faces contort and spit out his chili. Then he noticed the empty bottle of soy sauce behind his station. The cheaters have struck! Blade6119 has been eliminated. Day 2 deadline is 10PM Eastern tonight. __________________ We have always been at war with Eastasia.

02-15-2007, 12:32 PM	#161
Chief Rum Hall Of Famer Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Where Hip Hop lives	Ouch, that hurts. Considering Blade is an experienced player who can stir things up, he is almost as big a loss for us as the seer. It's fortunate at least that he wasn't the body guard. So did anyone get any information last night? I would have to review the roles to see if there is anyone left for good who can. We need some theories everyone. __________________ . . I would rather be wrong...Than live in the shadows of your song...My mind is open wide...And now I'm ready to start...You're not sure...You open the door...And step out into the dark...Now I'm ready.

02-15-2007, 01:26 PM	#166
Chief Rum Hall Of Famer Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Where Hip Hop lives	Exactly. Not sure I buy that the wolves got rid of Blade because he was sniffing too close. It's an obvious frame up job. IMO, that puts Barkeep (his vote) and bsak (his "death" target) off of my list for today. Unfortunately, I have to go again, so I have to place a vote. I am going to go with one of the ITC voters (yes, I know I was one of them) and... VOTE MARATHONER I don't like this vote much more than anyone else, but the theoiry that there are wolves in the ITC voting list is a decent one. So I'll start at the back and work my way forward (wolves are more likely at the back end then the front). I could easily be moved off of this vote with more information/discussion, but I am afraid I won't be around before deadline. Working nights sucks sometimes. __________________ . . I would rather be wrong...Than live in the shadows of your song...My mind is open wide...And now I'm ready to start...You're not sure...You open the door...And step out into the dark...Now I'm ready.

02-15-2007, 08:19 AM	#157
Barkeep49 Coordinator Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Not too far away	Let's remember that bandwagons are only bad against villagers. Against wolves they make sure that the wolves can't manipulate the vote. So to summarize: Killing villagers = bad Killing wolves = good

02-15-2007, 12:37 PM	#162
Dr. Sak Grizzled Veteran Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Stuck in Yinzerville, PA	I think that is one of the main reasons that Blade was struck. He was experienced and the wolves wanted rid of him before they were revealed. Another reason could be that he was right on his initial guess so before he was able to get steam behind that vote he was axed.

02-15-2007, 12:46 PM	#163
ntndeacon Pro Starter Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Alabama	did Blade ever say who he suspected? I cant find that anywhere.

02-15-2007, 12:51 PM	#164
Dr. Sak Grizzled Veteran Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Stuck in Yinzerville, PA	He kept himself firm on Barkeep, plus Barkeep was the second one to pile on to ITC. He said he voted for ITC for piling on yet he did the same when doing his vote.

02-15-2007, 01:02 PM	#165
SnDvls Pro Starter Join Date: Jul 2001	Classic frame job set up....good one wolves you leave several "suspects" in this one.

02-15-2007, 03:26 PM	#169
SnDvls Pro Starter Join Date: Jul 2001	vote NTN not sure I'll get another chance to get one in later

02-15-2007, 03:28 PM	#170
Blade6119 Coordinator Join Date: Dec 2000 Location: Scottsdale, Arizona	thank you wolves, i really didnt mind that one at all. Best of luck to both sides __________________ *Underachievement* The tallest blade of grass is the first to be cut by the lawnmower. *Despair* It's always darkest just before it goes pitch black. *Demotivation* Sometimes the best solution to morale problems is just to fire all of the unhappy people. http://www.despair.com/viewall.html

02-15-2007, 03:43 PM	#172
Jonathan Ezarik College Benchwarmer Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Bossier City, LA	My top suspect is SnDvls, but since he won't be around to defend himself, I won't vote for him. So, I'm going after my number two suspect. VOTE DODGERCHICK First, seafood in chili is disgusting and shouldn't be allowed to exist. Second, her late vote yesterday against me. Not so much that it was against me, but that it wasn't on ITC or anyone else with votes. That looks like a throw-away vote to avoid being on the lynch of a good chef.

02-15-2007, 03:47 PM	#173
path12 Coordinator Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Seattle, WA	Current vote totals (numbers in parentheses are the order in which the vote was made for tiebreaking purposes): Marathoner 1 -- Chief Rum(1) ntndeacon 1 -- SnDvls(2) Dodgerchick 1 -- Jonathan Ezarik(3) Still to vote: Barkeep, MollyMurphy, Dodgerchick, ntndeacon, Marathoner, bsak16 __________________ We have always been at war with Eastasia.

02-15-2007, 04:03 PM	#174
ntndeacon Pro Starter Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Alabama	I think the strategy of voting of one of us that voted for ITC is not a bad strategy. I tend to think Marathoner is not a wolf since he was the last on the pile on. I don't think a wolf would be that blatent. I don't know who I will vote for yet, but iwill have sometime to think about it over dinner.

02-15-2007, 04:07 PM	#176
Dr. Sak Grizzled Veteran Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Stuck in Yinzerville, PA	I have been debating this one for a bit. I agree a little with JE that SnDvls was/is going to be my first choice but I am also a little skeptical of Barkeep and CR.

02-15-2007, 04:18 PM	#180
Jonathan Ezarik College Benchwarmer Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Bossier City, LA	No, because you're here now. You have a chance to defend yourself.

02-15-2007, 04:21 PM	#181
Lorena Unregistered Join Date: May 2004	dola, people should vote for whom they think is a wolf. If ya'll seriously think I'm the top suspect, then vote for me, whether I'm here or not I really don't care. Your only loss would be tasting the pure brilliance that is my Green Seafood Chili.

02-15-2007, 04:27 PM	#183
MollyMurphy Mascot Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Seattle	I too see merit in the theory that one of the folks who piled on to the ITC vote could be a WW. I don't think Marathoner is the one since he came on so late in the vote. Chief Rum sealed ITC's fate by putting him up by 2 votes with only 3 voters left. Short of them all voting for Dodgerchick, ITC was done. VOTE CHIEF RUM

02-15-2007, 04:55 PM	#186
Barkeep49 Coordinator Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Not too far away	I agree that it's a classic setup job. And so I look to one of the most experienced players around (besides myself) to execute it. Vote Chief Rum P.S. DC I hope you know my tongue was firmly in my cheek.

02-15-2007, 05:00 PM	#187
Dr. Sak Grizzled Veteran Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Stuck in Yinzerville, PA	As I said before there are a few that I have my eye on. I am not going to join in on the pile on vote for CR because that just seems a little fishy right now so I am going to go with my gut here VOTE BARKEEP49

02-15-2007, 05:00 PM	#188
path12 Coordinator Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Seattle, WA	Current vote totals (numbers in parentheses are the order in which the vote was made for tiebreaking purposes): Chief Rum 2 -- MollyMurphy(5), Barkeep49(6) Marathoner 1 -- Chief Rum(1) ntndeacon 1 -- SnDvls(2) Dodgerchick 1 -- Jonathan Ezarik(3) SnDvls 1 -- Dodgerchick(4) Barkeep49 1 -- bsak16(7) Still to vote: ntndeacon, Marathoner __________________ We have always been at war with Eastasia. Last edited by path12 : 02-15-2007 at 05:01 PM.

02-15-2007, 07:14 PM	#192
ntndeacon Pro Starter Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Alabama	wow. well my problem is that Idon't want to sign Rum's death warrant just yet. I am more suspicious of SnDvls so that is where my vote is going to go. Vote SnDvls I will be willing to discuss further after survivor.

02-15-2007, 08:24 PM	#196
path12 Coordinator Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Seattle, WA	Current vote totals with about 25 minutes to go (numbers in parentheses are the order in which the vote was made for tiebreaking purposes): Dodgerchick 2 -- Jonathan Ezarik(3), Marathoner(9) Chief Rum 2 -- MollyMurphy(5), Barkeep49(6) SnDvls 2 -- Dodgerchick(4), ntndeacon(8) Marathoner 1 -- Chief Rum(1) ntndeacon 1 -- SnDvls(2) Dodgerchick 1 -- Jonathan Ezarik(3) Barkeep49 1 -- bsak16(7) Still to vote: Nobody Dodgerchick is currently on the block due to longest held vote. __________________ We have always been at war with Eastasia. Last edited by path12 : 02-15-2007 at 08:36 PM.

02-15-2007, 08:28 PM	#197
Marathoner High School JV Join Date: Nov 2005	VOTE DODGERCHICK I agree with JE, she is trying to draw attention away from herself, if I were a wolf that is what I'd do.

02-15-2007, 08:30 PM	#198
Marathoner High School JV Join Date: Nov 2005	Besides, it just so happens I want ot fix seafood chili tomorrow and can't find a recipe anywhere.

02-15-2007, 08:36 PM	#199
path12 Coordinator Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Seattle, WA	Edited post #196 to reflect current vote. __________________ We have always been at war with Eastasia.

02-15-2007, 09:02 PM	#200
path12 Coordinator Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Seattle, WA	Deadline. Results in a moment. __________________ We have always been at war with Eastasia.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)