Front Office Football Central  

Go Back   Front Office Football Central > Main Forums > Off Topic
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Statistics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-16-2012, 05:03 PM   #1
Comey
College Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: CT via PA via CA via PA
Micro SDHC/SDXC cards

I'm getting the Samsung Galaxy SIII this week, and because of the camera on the thing, and its ability to take excellent video, I'm going to upgrade to either a 32GB or 64FB micro SD card.

However, all of the information out there is making my head spin. So, I come to you. I'm going to get a class 10 or UHS-1 card...but should I lean towards Samsung or SanDisk? I use SanDisk for my regular camera, and have never had a problem (also discovered there is an Extreme Pro card, which I really want). Should I look at SDHC or SDXC? There doesn't seem to be a big difference between the two, but I've read pros and cons for each.

What do you recommend? I have a few days before I purchase anything, so there's no rush. Thanks in advance for any information you can provide.
__________________


Comey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2012, 05:12 PM   #2
Scoobz0202
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Dayton, Ohio
I was always under the impression that they were exactly the same just that SDXC used a different type of storage (exFAT). Android phones used to only format in FAT 32, which is the SDHC cards.

Somebody smarter than me may be able to confirm or deny my knowledge.
Scoobz0202 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2012, 05:47 PM   #3
Comey
College Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: CT via PA via CA via PA
I discussed this with a photography expert friend of mine, who says that sdxc cards allow for you to record bigger files (>4GB). I do take files that big at concerts, so this would be a plus.

The prices on these amaze me. $75 for a 64GB card? That's *fantastic* for a micro-sd card, and they continue to drop.
__________________

Comey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2012, 05:53 PM   #4
Bigsmooth
College Prospect
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Sweet phone. I'm deciding between that and the new EVO myself. Pretty sure the Galaxy phone only supports up to 32GB:

Battery information

2100 mAh Lithium Ion Battery
Talk time

up to 9.2 hours
Dimensions

5.4” x 2.8” x .3”
Display

4.8" (1280x720) HD Super AMOLED touchscreen
Weight

4.7 oz
Processor

1.5 GHz dual core processor
Memory

16GB and 32 GB internal memory (ROM). Supports up to 32GB MircroSD card

Last edited by Bigsmooth : 06-16-2012 at 05:54 PM.
Bigsmooth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2012, 06:09 PM   #5
Comey
College Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: CT via PA via CA via PA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigsmooth View Post
Sweet phone. I'm deciding between that and the new EVO myself. Pretty sure the Galaxy phone only supports up to 32GB:

Battery information

2100 mAh Lithium Ion Battery
Talk time

up to 9.2 hours
Dimensions

5.4” x 2.8” x .3”
Display

4.8" (1280x720) HD Super AMOLED touchscreen
Weight

4.7 oz
Processor

1.5 GHz dual core processor
Memory

16GB and 32 GB internal memory (ROM). Supports up to 32GB MircroSD card

64GB has been confirmed to be utilized on the device by multiple sources. It can also be used on several other devices that claim to support up to 32GB.
__________________

Comey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2012, 06:23 PM   #6
jeff061
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: MA
Yeah, most those 32gb specs are simply out of date. My Bionic is listed as 32 as well, but I have 64 in it.
__________________

jeff061 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:12 PM.



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.