Front Office Football Central  

Go Back   Front Office Football Central > Archives > FOFC Archive
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Statistics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-04-2009, 03:22 AM   #1
Epi_862
Mascot
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Fantasy Football Roster & Scoring - What do you think?

Hi there

I thought it would be interesting to brainstorm with other fantasy players. Im running a Yahoo league, and i'd like to hear what settings you guys use, spesifically roster & scoring.

I just threw together some settings for my league, they are just a starting point for me. Yahoo has 25 player limit, and 25 score trigger limit.

I have:
QB, 3 WR, 2 RB, TE, K, 4 LB, 2 DT, 2 DE, 2 S, 2 CB, 5 BN

As you can see, lots of defense. Now, the problem is balancing the scoring.

OffenseLeague ValueYahoo! Default Value
Passing Yards25 yards per point
Passing Touchdowns4
Interceptions-1
Rushing Yards10 yards per point
Rushing Touchdowns6
Reception Yards10 yards per point
Reception Touchdowns6
Return Touchdowns6
2-Point Conversions2
Fumbles Lost-2
Offensive Fumble Return TD6
KickersLeague ValueYahoo! Default Value
Field Goals 0-19 Yards3
Field Goals 20-29 Yards3
Field Goals 30-39 Yards3
Field Goals 40-49 Yards4
Field Goals 50+ Yards5
Point After Attempt Made1
Defensive PlayersLeague ValueYahoo! Default Value
Tackle Solo1
Tackle Assist0.5
Sack2
Interception43
Fumble Force2
Defensive Touchdown6
Safety2
Pass Defended1



So there you have it. What do you guys use, what do you think is over/undervalued? I really think i should put the QB td score up. Plus i really think attempts should garner points. But im really worried that things go unbalanced.

What do you do in your league?

Epi_862 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2009, 03:30 AM   #2
Danny
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Overall very good. My personal taste would make interceptions worth -2 as they really are a killer in real life and should have a reasonably sizable negative affect in fantasy. Only other thing is I believe that DB's have a little too much value over DL's, I might make sacks worth 3 points, forced fumbles worth 3 and add fumble recoveries for 3 as well.
Danny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2009, 09:36 AM   #3
RomaGoth
Favored Bitch #2
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Here
Agree with Danny. Sacks 3 points, FF 3 points, Fumble Recovery 3 points. Interceptions worth -2 or possibly -3 points. Also, when I have run leagues, I always added one or two spots on offense for a "floater". This is a position that can be filled by either a WR/TE/RB. It really helps if you have injuries or a player on your roster that you want to get in the games but have every position filled already by equal or better players. I find it is better than having to troll the free agent list every week.
RomaGoth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2009, 10:53 AM   #4
Mustang
Grizzled Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Wisconsin
I'd have to look at the stats more, but might be too many D players. I'd be more tempted to make it 3 DL/3 LB/3 Secondary. Lots of LBs will get you 110+ points given all the stats where a middle RB drops to around 150 so collectively I think 4 LBs stats potentially > RBs so, not sure if that is what you want
__________________
You, you will regret what you have done this day. I will make you regret ever being born. Your going to wish you never left your mothers womb, where it was warm and safe... and wet. i am going to show you pain you never knew existed, you are going to see a whole new spectrum of pain, like a Rainboooow. But! This rainbow is not just like any other rainbow, its...
Mustang is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:17 AM.



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.