WW LXVII - Heroes (GAME OVER! HEROES WIN!)

[st.cronin]

I'm more than happy to reveal my character name: Mohinder Suresh.

I won't talk too much about my ability, except to note that I do not have an ability to discover people's powers, which would seem like the most logical thing.

[jeheinz72]

Hey folks, just finished reading, post count coming soon. Deadline is in about an hour and a half.

Alan T is of course still in the game.

[path12]

Originally Posted by hoopsguy

I don't think Alan should drop out of the game. I hope that he will see this and send JEHeinz a note apologizing for bringing drama to his game. Why not just drop his thoughts on certain things until after the game is over?

Why don't people read Alan's posts????

Jesus, Alan. Suck it up, man.

[nfg22]

I apologized already. I will refrain from name calling.

[Lathum]

Render- I find it interesting you call Schmidty out for voting no lynch and not on a competing player, then vote for Neon Chaos who really hasn't been discussed as a possible candidate. IMO you pretty much did the same thing Schmidty did.

[jeheinz72]

Thomkal (4): claphamsa (318), Chief Rum (434), Lathum (474), Jackal (480)
No Lynch (4): Narcizo (445), Neon Chaos (447), Ardent (452), Schmidty (488)
Ardent (2): St. Cronin (328), SnDvls (487)
Neon Chaos (2): mauboy1 (471), RendeR (499)
Jackal (2): hoopsguy (489), nfg22 (498)
nfg22 (1): Alan T (426)
Oliegirl (1) : Mr. Wednesday (444)
Chief Rum (1): Thomkal (459)

Not voting: path12, DaddyTorgo, oliegirl, Greyroofoo, Barkeep49

[DaddyTorgo]

gah i'm here. busy morning. trying to arrange mtgs in chicago in april for client. lemme try to catch up on the sly.

[RendeR]

Originally Posted by Lathum

Render- I find it interesting you call Schmidty out for voting no lynch and not on a competing player, then vote for Neon Chaos who really hasn't been discussed as a possible candidate. IMO you pretty much did the same thing Schmidty did.

If so then why am I the SECOND person to vote for him?

Silly Lathum, read the thread

[Neon_Chaos]

updated vote count

thomkal - claphamsa (318), chief rum (434), lathum (474), jackal (480), schmidty (488)
ardent - st.cronin (328), sndvls (487)
nfg - alan t (426)
oliegirl - mr.wednesday (444)
No lynch - narcizo (445), neonchaos (447), ardent (452)
chief rum - thomkal (459)
neonchaos - mauboy (471), render (499)
Jackal - hoopsguy (489), nfg (498)

[Neon_Chaos]

oh. didn't see jeheinz posting there.

[path12]

Originally Posted by hoopsguy

Also, I was really hoping yesterday that Chief Rum or one of the late-night guys was going to have some meaningful information for us to act on - playing blind for two days in a row kinda sucks.

Little tough to have a lot of info after one night. My thoughts:

1) Way too much is being made of the Pass/Alan thing. The infinitely small things that end up being "issues" day 1 almost always end up being just nothing. Therefore, I think it's either lazy or wolfish to push Thomkal for a vote. Yeah, I called names there. I do believe though that those who seemed to push this as an issue deserve a tick or two towards the don't trust list (DaddyTorgo, nfg, I'm looking at you, kids).

2) Two no lynches in a row does NOTHING to help the heroes win the game. What happens tomorrow when little info comes out? Another no lynch? Neon following on Narcizo's first no lynch vote so quickly pings me mightily.

3) While it's important to keep in mind that NAMES might be good or bad, it seems pretty clear so far that a person's name does have at least some relation to their ability. An important distinction that I think has been glossed over.

That said, for the reason stated in point 2 I'm going to

VOTE NEON CHAOS

[Alan T]

Looks like Thomkal at 4 and a bunch of people at 2. I'm making this move partially because of Ardent placing a vote on me for no reason previously, but also I am kind of curious to see how St.Cronin will react if Ardent actually gets in trouble and risked lynching.

Unvote Nfg

Vote Ardent

[st.cronin]

Well, considering my vote is ON ardent, what do you think?

[RendeR]

Originally Posted by Lathum

Render- I find it interesting you call Schmidty out for voting no lynch and not on a competing player, then vote for Neon Chaos who really hasn't been discussed as a possible candidate. IMO you pretty much did the same thing Schmidty did.

2nd quote of this to add, I simply disagree that pushing a no lynch position will tell us anything in a runoff vote with a player, we need player vs player so I chose someone with one vote already to try and bump them into the fray.

We now have 1 with 4 votes and 2 with 2 votes, perhaps some of the rest of you will move to one of these folks andwe'll be able to really learn something here.

Does that make more sense?

[RendeR]

Ok, I have to get ready for work and deal with the kids. I most definitely won;t be back before lynch so make the vote close people , lets learn something from the lynch today!

[Neon_Chaos]

Originally Posted by path12

Little tough to have a lot of info after one night. My thoughts:

1) Way too much is being made of the Pass/Alan thing. The infinitely small things that end up being "issues" day 1 almost always end up being just nothing. Therefore, I think it's either lazy or wolfish to push Thomkal for a vote. Yeah, I called names there. I do believe though that those who seemed to push this as an issue deserve a tick or two towards the don't trust list (DaddyTorgo, nfg, I'm looking at you, kids).

2) Two no lynches in a row does NOTHING to help the heroes win the game. What happens tomorrow when little info comes out? Another no lynch? Neon following on Narcizo's first no lynch vote so quickly pings me mightily.

3) While it's important to keep in mind that NAMES might be good or bad, it seems pretty clear so far that a person's name does have at least some relation to their ability. An important distinction that I think has been glossed over.

That said, for the reason stated in point 2 I'm going to

VOTE NEON CHAOS

In case you haven't read through most of the thread, I did point out the reasons why I chose to vote that way. I was simply doing it because it was safer for the village rather than casting a blind vote on someone at that point in time.

I also said that I would probably be switching my vote once a race has been established, if the No Lynch vote doesn't gain any momentum.

[nfg22]

Neon, I think your vote count is off. Or Heinz's is. Which one?

[oliegirl]

VOTE ARDENT ENTHUSIAST

Reasoning: He's voted No Lynch today which I really really don't like, and already has 2 votes on him so if he is a wolf trying to encourage us to be "sitting ducks" by not lynching, there is a shot of other people agreeing and we have a shot at lynching him today.

I'm around and happy to answer questions, explain further if I need to...

[st.cronin]

Do we know what happens in a tie?

[Thomkal]

well my vote on chief rum is not putting any pressure on anyone, so time to move it. Not looking to vote Neon right now after he called for people to put pressure on others besides me, so...

UNVOTE CHIEF RUM
VOTE THE JACKAL

[Neon_Chaos]

Originally Posted by nfg22

Neon, I think your vote count is off. Or Heinz's is. Which one?

mine is. Schmidty's vote is supposed to be for the No Lynch.

[jeheinz72]

Originally Posted by nfg22

Neon, I think your vote count is off. Or Heinz's is. Which one?

His is, updating mine shortly.

[st.cronin]

I think Neon's is wrong, I have Schmidty voting no lynch.

[jeheinz72]

Originally Posted by st.cronin

Do we know what happens in a tie?

No, you don't.

[jeheinz72]

Thomkal (4): claphamsa (318), Chief Rum (434), Lathum (474), Jackal (480)
Ardent (4): St. Cronin (328), SnDvls (487), Alan T (512), Oliegirl (518)
No Lynch (4): Narcizo (445), Neon Chaos (447), Ardent (452), Schmidty (488)
Neon Chaos (3): mauboy1 (471), RendeR (499), path12 (511)
Jackal (3): hoopsguy (489), nfg22 (498), Thomkal (52)
Oliegirl (1): Mr. Wednesday (444)

Not voting: DaddyTorgo, Greyroofoo, Barkeep49

[Lathum]

Originally Posted by jeheinz72

Thomkal (4): claphamsa (318), Chief Rum (434), Lathum (474), Jackal (480)
No Lynch (4): Narcizo (445), Neon Chaos (447), Ardent (452), Schmidty (488)
Ardent (2): St. Cronin (328), SnDvls (487)
Neon Chaos (2): mauboy1 (471), RendeR (499)
Jackal (2): hoopsguy (489), nfg22 (498)
nfg22 (1): Alan T (426)
Oliegirl (1) : Mr. Wednesday (444)
Chief Rum (1): Thomkal (459)

Not voting: path12, DaddyTorgo, oliegirl, Greyroofoo, Barkeep49

Originally Posted by RendeR

If so then why am I the SECOND person to vote for him?

Silly Lathum, read the thread

I DID read the thread

You are saying that we need to narrow things down between players and you actualy made things murkier.

your vote still left thomkal at 4 votes and made it a log jam at 2 votes for 3 other candidates.

[SnDvls]

okay now I'm a little uneasy on my vote with the quick run...I'll be watching this closely now.

[DaddyTorgo]

going to try to make things more interesting and see if we can't shake out some wolves. He's too smart a player to vote no lynch and we'll see if it causes any movement.

VOTE NO LYNCH

*note: i usually leave for work right around 1pm EST

[Barkeep49]

A very close vote. I really don't like the votes on Neon and Ardent since it feels to me people more have a problem with the times they're available than the players themselves. As I said that I don't think Thomkal is the solution, I'm going to go ahead and vote for the only other guy in contention at the moment.

Vote Jackal

[DaddyTorgo]

omg...i'm retarded

UNVOTE NO LYNCH
VOTE NEON CHAOS

is what i meant to do

[Lathum]

I find this mini run on neon chaos odd.

[Barkeep49]

I'm disappointed that we haven't been able to get No Lynch out of contention.

[DaddyTorgo]

hey neon's here...i'm wide-open to moving my vote around. just trying to put some pressure out there, make it a multi-horse race, as that's where we gain insight

*if no one voted for people just b/c of when they were available then those people would be perfect wolves

[Barkeep49]

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo

omg...i'm retarded

UNVOTE NO LYNCH
VOTE NEON CHAOS

is what i meant to do

I'm glad to see the voting for a player rather than No Lynch. Need to start making our omelette at some point.

[st.cronin]

Ok, so now we have a 5-way tie.

[nfg22]

I find everything odd...Especially the 4 no lynches. What happens when tommorow we have these same arguments again. The wolves and Sylar will be a few steps ahead and we will be in the same place.

[st.cronin]

I think anybody on No Lynch needs to move their vote, this is absurd.

[Neon_Chaos]

Originally Posted by Lathum

I find this mini run on neon chaos odd.

Tell me about it.

[Barkeep49]

We're still an hour away from deadline so I'm not too concerned about our tie at this point.

[nfg22]

I would be suspicious of all no lynchers but such a mass move by the company wouldnt seem to be wise...Then again I am new and inexperienced.

[Lathum]

Originally Posted by st.cronin

I think anybody on No Lynch needs to move their vote, this is absurd.

I wouldn't count on that.

I can't speak for AE bur Narcizo and Neon are on the other side of the world and schmidty is always in his own world

[jeheinz72]

Thomkal (4): claphamsa (318), Chief Rum (434), Lathum (474), Jackal (480)
Ardent (4): St. Cronin (328), SnDvls (487), Alan T (512), Oliegirl (518)
No Lynch (4): Narcizo (445), Neon Chaos (447), Ardent (452), Schmidty (488)
Neon Chaos (4): mauboy1 (471), RendeR (499), path12 (511), Neon Chaos (530)
Jackal (4): hoopsguy (489), nfg22 (498), Thomkal (520), Barkeep (529)
Oliegirl (1): Mr. Wednesday (444)

Not voting: Greyroofoo

[SnDvls]

Originally Posted by Lathum

I find this mini run on neon chaos odd.

we've had 2 of them..one on AE and one one NC

[Lathum]

Originally Posted by Barkeep49

We're still an hour away from deadline so I'm not too concerned about our tie at this point.

I agree, Thomkal can still move his vote

[nfg22]

Another question, GRF will be crucial. I am not saying he is a wolf at all but whatever he votes will most likely decide things.

[Lathum]

Originally Posted by SnDvls

we've had 2 of them..one on AE and one one NC

the one on NC came within 60 posts, that to me is more then the one on AE but your point is taken

[SnDvls]

Originally Posted by jeheinz72

Thomkal (4): claphamsa (318), Chief Rum (434), Lathum (474), Jackal (480)
Ardent (4): St. Cronin (328), SnDvls (487), Alan T (512), Oliegirl (518)
No Lynch (4): Narcizo (445), Neon Chaos (447), Ardent (452), Schmidty (488)
Neon Chaos (4): mauboy1 (471), RendeR (499), path12 (511), Neon Chaos (530)
Jackal (4): hoopsguy (489), nfg22 (498), Thomkal (520), Barkeep (529)
Oliegirl (1): Mr. Wednesday (444)

Not voting: Greyroofoo

blue one should be Daddy Torgo FYI

[nfg22]

I guess that isnt a question but an observation..lol dang no editing

[jeheinz72]

Good eye SnDvls

Thomkal (4): claphamsa (318), Chief Rum (434), Lathum (474), Jackal (480)
Ardent (4): St. Cronin (328), SnDvls (487), Alan T (512), Oliegirl (518)
No Lynch (4): Narcizo (445), Neon Chaos (447), Ardent (452), Schmidty (488)
Neon Chaos (4): mauboy1 (471), RendeR (499), path12 (511), Daddy Torgo (530)
Jackal (4): hoopsguy (489), nfg22 (498), Thomkal (520), Barkeep (529)
Oliegirl (1): Mr. Wednesday (444)

Not voting: Greyroofoo

[DaddyTorgo]

hey i'm down with moving. i just knew i needed to get A vote in, and i wanted to vote a person. so i voted a person who had voted no lynch and had a couple votes on them already, to try to start "making the omlette" as BK says