Front Office Football Central  

Go Back   Front Office Football Central > Archives > FOFC Archive
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Statistics

View Poll Results: Who will make it to the Hall first?
Lou Whitaker 5 16.67%
The Cars 12 40.00%
neither will make it by 2050 13 43.33%
Voters: 30. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-23-2008, 10:16 AM   #1
Honolulu Blue
Dynasty Boy
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Michigan
Question Another HOF debate

Lou Whitaker is well known to most of you who are baseball fans. For those who care, but don't know, let me summarize his case:

* Former Rookie of the Year
* 5 All-Star teams
* 3 Gold Gloves at 2B
* Over 2300 career games and over 2300 career hits
* Career OPS+ of 116

I think he's among the top 200 players of all time, and I also think he's the best eligible 2nd baseman that's not in the Hall. Others disagree, obviously.

The Cars as a musical group started with a bang - a couple of other albums like their first, and they would certainly be in their Hall. Alas, their albums careened between "too light" and "too dark" the rest of their career, though (a) I enjoyed all their work, and (b) they had some hits & sold some records.

Honolulu Blue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2008, 12:19 PM   #2
chesapeake
College Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Arlington, VA
The Cars will make it first, in no small part because Ric Ocasek set the gold standard for hideously ugly guys marrying a woman that is at least six leagues above his.
chesapeake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2008, 12:20 PM   #3
MikeVic
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Hometown of Canada
Pic of wife?
MikeVic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2008, 12:33 PM   #4
Honolulu Blue
Dynasty Boy
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Michigan
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeVic View Post
Pic of wife?

Put "Paulina Porizkova" in your favorite search engine and enjoy.
Honolulu Blue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2008, 01:21 PM   #5
Surtt
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by chesapeake View Post
The Cars will make it first, in no small part because Ric Ocasek set the gold standard for hideously ugly guys marrying a woman that is at least six leagues above his.


Same thing I was thinking.
Definitely HOF credentials.
__________________
“The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding.”

United States Supreme Court Justice
Louis D. Brandeis

Last edited by Surtt : 04-23-2008 at 01:22 PM.
Surtt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2008, 06:23 PM   #6
kcchief19
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Kansas City, MO
The Cars are in. Personally, I think if Bill Mazeroski is in then Lou Whitaker and Frank White belong in the Hall of Fame too.

But I'd put the J. Geils Band in the HOF before all of them.
kcchief19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2008, 06:27 PM   #7
st.cronin
General Manager
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Mexico
Lou Whitaker was a nice player, but I think the most basic qualification for a Hall of Famer is that you should play more than 130 games a year.
__________________
co-commish: bb-bbcf.net

knives out
st.cronin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2008, 06:48 PM   #8
lighthousekeeper
College Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
oof:
Black Ink: Batting - 1 (731) (Average HOFer ≈ 27)
Gray Ink: Batting - 31 (747) (Average HOFer ≈ 144)
__________________
...
lighthousekeeper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2008, 07:58 PM   #9
Captain2711
High School JV
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Jersey
In my opinion, if you ever have to explain to a knowledgable sports fan or if you have to think about someone for the Hall of Fame then he isn't worthy. It should be a quick answer that requires no research or cohersion.
__________________
"If the Bible has taught us nothing else, and it hasn't, it's that girls should stick to girls sports, such as hot oil wrestling and foxy boxing and such and such."
Captain2711 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2008, 08:06 PM   #10
ntndeacon
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Alabama
Trammell has much more of an arguement than Whitaker. No way he even sniffs Cooperstown less he is paying for his ticket like everyone else.
ntndeacon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2008, 08:06 PM   #11
Buccaneer
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Colorado
Quote:
Originally Posted by kcchief19 View Post
The Cars are in. Personally, I think if Bill Mazeroski is in then Lou Whitaker and Frank White belong in the Hall of Fame too.


And that is why I have always argued for a Small Hall and not letting in borderline players. Once you let one in (for recent inductees, not counting the crap that went on in the 60s and 70s), you start making arguments for a horde of similar players.

I vote no because RoY is nothing special, All-Star appearances had and still are popularity contests and the other categories scream above-average.
Buccaneer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2008, 09:35 AM   #12
Honolulu Blue
Dynasty Boy
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Michigan
Thanks everyone for your thoughts. Just a few comments and I'll get out of the way again.

* Black/gray ink - Most HOF middle infielders don't have much here because they usually aren't among the league leaders in hitting categories. So Whitaker's lack of same doesn't deter me.

* HOF size - I think a fair number is 2 players per year. So going back to 1876, that would mean about 250 players, which is about what we have now. I think Whitaker fits in well with the 2Bs who have already been honored (better than some, not as good as some others) and I'll leave it at that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ntndeacon View Post
Trammell has much more of an arguement than Whitaker. No way he even sniffs Cooperstown less he is paying for his ticket like everyone else.

I've never understood this. Trammell and Whitaker have always had career batting stats that were close to each other and they played positions that are of nearly equal defensive value, and their overall defensive prowess at their respective positions was about the same (good, but not elite). So... why the difference. Trammell does have some advantages:

1) His career BA is higher
2) His "big" years were "bigger"
3) His big years aligned better with the Tigers' big years
4) He got more MVP votes (mainly because of 1-3 above)
5) His defensive value is higher

Against that, Whitaker...

1) Has a higher career OBP
2) Has a higher career SLG and ISO
3) Played more games

If there's a difference between their qualifications, then it's less than the difference between a Canadian buck and a US buck (at current exchange rates).
Honolulu Blue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2008, 09:45 AM   #13
Honolulu_Blue
Hockey Boy
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Royal Oak, MI
I don't have much to add to either debate, but Paulia Porizkova was, and still is, delightful.

That, and, what's up, Good Twin?
__________________
Steve Yzerman: 1,755 points in 1,514 regular season games. 185 points in 196 postseason games. A First-Team All-Star, Conn Smythe Trophy winner, Selke Trophy winner, Masterton Trophy winner, member of the Hockey Hall of Fame, Olympic gold medallist, and a three-time Stanley Cup Champion. Longest serving captain of one team in the history of the NHL (19 seasons).
Honolulu_Blue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2008, 02:51 PM   #14
tarcone
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Pacific
I loved Whittaker and Trammell
tarcone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2008, 03:16 PM   #15
Draft Dodger
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Keene, NH
I don't think Whittaker would be considered at all if he and Trammell hadn't played so long together.
__________________
Mile High Hockey
Draft Dodger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2008, 12:29 PM   #16
Hammer755
High School Varsity
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Quote:
Originally Posted by st.cronin View Post
Lou Whitaker was a nice player, but I think the most basic qualification for a Hall of Famer is that you should play more than 130 games a year.

And Whitaker only did that 11 times.

I think Whitaker's a borderline HOF'er, but his numbers stack up nearly identically to Sandberg. One is in the Hall, and one has never gotten any serious consideration.
__________________
I failed Signature 101 class.
Hammer755 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2008, 12:57 PM   #17
Coffee Warlord
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Colorado Springs
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hammer755 View Post
I think Whitaker's a borderline HOF'er, but his numbers stack up nearly identically to Sandberg. One is in the Hall, and one has never gotten any serious consideration.

Sandberg
---
All star from 1984-1993 (10 straight)
Gold Glove from 1983-1991 (9 straight)
NL MVP in 1984

Whitaker
---
5-time All-Star (1983-87)
3-time Gold Glove Award (1983-85)
Rookie of the Year (1978)

Yeah, I'd say Sandberg has a little bit of an edge there.
Coffee Warlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2008, 01:04 PM   #18
Ksyrup
This guy has posted so much, his fingers are about to fall off.
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: In Absentia
I think Whitaker has pulled down Trammell, to the extent everyone thinks of them both when thinking of one of them. Years ago I had an email exchange with Rob Neyer about that thought when discussing why Trammell hasn't gotten the support he should for the HoF. I think Trammell is a no-brainer and Whitaker is close but no cigar.
__________________
M's pitcher Miguel Batista: "Now, I feel like I've had everything. I've talked pitching with Sandy Koufax, had Kenny G play for me. Maybe if I could have an interview with God, then I'd be served. I'd be complete."
Ksyrup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2008, 02:07 PM   #19
Hammer755
High School Varsity
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coffee Warlord View Post
Sandberg
---
All star from 1984-1993 (10 straight)
Gold Glove from 1983-1991 (9 straight)
NL MVP in 1984

Whitaker
---
5-time All-Star (1983-87)
3-time Gold Glove Award (1983-85)
Rookie of the Year (1978)

Yeah, I'd say Sandberg has a little bit of an edge there.

Those are still pretty unconvincing to me. The All-Star game is a popularity contest, the Gold Glove is often given on reputation and hitting ability, and IMO Sandberg shouldn't have been in the top 5 in MVP voting in 1984.

If your point is that those awards are why Sandberg was voted in and Whitaker wasn't, then that's certainly valid. But if your point is that Sandberg is a better HoF candidate than Whitaker because of them, then I'm not buying.
__________________
I failed Signature 101 class.
Hammer755 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2015, 11:12 AM   #20
Honolulu Blue
Dynasty Boy
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Michigan
I'm bumping this because the Rock and Roll HOF has finally nominated The Cars. Yay! I don't think they'll get in next year, or any time soon, but I still think they're one of the best bands in the history of ever, and I would love to see them get more recognition - even if it's from such a dubious source.

Do me a favor and vote for them at Vote for the 2016 Rock and Roll Hall of Fame Inductees | Rolling Stone . Thank you very much.

And now back to our regularly scheduled programming.
Honolulu Blue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2017, 10:40 AM   #21
Honolulu Blue
Dynasty Boy
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Michigan
I'm bumping this for two reasons. First the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame has selected The Cars to be among their number. Yay! And second, Alan Trammell was selected for the Baseball HOF. Double yay! Obviously if Alan (and Jack Morris) are HOF worthy, then Lou's argument to be in is much better. I think they'll rectify this oversight eventually.

So yeah, this has been a pretty good month for me. OK, back to lurk mode...
Honolulu Blue is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:37 AM.



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.