Front Office Football Central  

Go Back   Front Office Football Central > Main Forums > FOF9, FOF8, and TCY Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Statistics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-11-2011, 01:51 PM   #1
Prinzar
n00b
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Rating questions

Just wondering what the deal is with my scout and the ratings system. In a MP league that I'm in my starting QB is rated 36/36, will his rating be the same to all 31 other players in my league or does the scout rating affect this?

Also do the players always play to their current ability or should I consider their potential ability too? For example, my backup QB was rated 26/47. I didn't play him often because his 26 is quite low and in the time he did play he sucked. He'd never had a start until I became GM so I'm wondering if I would have played him from the start of the season would he perform more like the 47 or the 26.

Thanks for any help

Prinzar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2011, 02:14 PM   #2
MIJB#19
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Maassluis, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
As far as I know there are two ways how scouts look at players: on roster and off roster. Once on roster, the scout changes his opinion. In your case, the QB is rated 36/36. Other owners could see him as a 26/26 or as a 46/46, depending on how good/bad your scout and that player actually is.

A 26/xx quarterback will play like a 26 quarterback, providing he actually is a 26. From the given information, it's impossible to tell whether he really is a 26 right now or that your scout is wrong and he's actually a 16 or a 36. As far as I know, that player will like a 26 and not like a 47, but I don't have anything to back that up with.
__________________
* 2005 Golden Scribe winner for best FOF Dynasty about IHOF's Maassluis Merchantmen
* Former GM of GEFL's Houston Oilers and WOOF's Curacao Cocktail
MIJB#19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2011, 02:28 PM   #3
Prinzar
n00b
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Thanks for the reply.

The backup certainly didn't play well so he may be even worse than the 26 the scout thinks.
From what I thought before your reply, the scout seems able to get things wrong above and below. My 3rd stringer is 16/37, and outplayed his abilities by a long way
Prinzar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2011, 10:10 AM   #4
MIJB#19
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Maassluis, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
Don't forget that newer players don't get the same cohesion boost, so if the 36/36 player is a long-time team member and the 26/47 isn't, the difference in performance could be much wider than the 10-point gap they're scouted at, independant of scouting margin of error.
__________________
* 2005 Golden Scribe winner for best FOF Dynasty about IHOF's Maassluis Merchantmen
* Former GM of GEFL's Houston Oilers and WOOF's Curacao Cocktail

Last edited by MIJB#19 : 12-14-2011 at 10:11 AM.
MIJB#19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2011, 08:52 PM   #5
aston217
College Prospect
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Quite a bit of masking can be going on, on top of scout error.

It's been said before that scouts can differ on players by as much as 15%, and this happens moreso with veteran players than the young guys.

Additionally, because ratings are unmasked slowly over the years - and some players unmask REALLY slowly - some players may always play better than their bars (and vice versa).

It's also sometimes a question of if a guy has the bars in the right places. High OVR does not automatically mean anything.
__________________
OSFL (join us!) CFL
Float likeabutterflysting likeabee.


aston217 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:10 PM.



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.