BackBreaker WILL have a franchise mode: The Dealbreaking stuff

[Blzer]

Quote: Originally Posted by falconfansince81

don't know if you guys have read this article yet but it was new to me, i like the fact they are working on multiple camera angles so its not one fixed 3rd person view: http://kotaku.com/5416226/backbreaker-going-for-broke

I'm trying to figure out if that's what they mean, or if they specifically mean for replays.

I sure hope we can have a view for the normal camera we've grown used to in football games, as it would certainly help me on defense.

[gamerk2]

^^ They are clearly focusing on having you play you're guy for the duration of the play. People are going to hate it, but it will add a layer of strategy to the mix (play the blitzing LB? DT? Or the Saftey in zone deep?)

[Blzer]

Quote: Originally Posted by gamerk2

^^ They are clearly focusing on having you play you're guy for the duration of the play. People are going to hate it, but it will add a layer of strategy to the mix (play the blitzing LB? DT? Or the Saftey in zone deep?)

Not saying I don't like it, I just like options. I also don't want to hold myself responsible for messing up a game-deciding play because of the camera angle.

Besides, I like to switch players on defense all of the time.

[turftickler]

Quote: Originally Posted by Blzer

Not saying I don't like it, I just like options. I also don't want to hold myself responsible for messing up a game-deciding play because of the camera angle. Besides, I like to switch players on defense all of the time.

In all seriousness here, in real life, we cannot switch players. That is the "Real Football Experience" they are going for. I am all for it. At first I did not like the idea, but after thinking about it, I remember wanting someone to do this for about 10 years now. I want real football, not the NFL, CLF, or NCAA license, real football. The game is going to be a great and welcomed change for me.

[Blzer]

Quote: Originally Posted by turftickler

In all seriousness here, in real life, we cannot switch players. That is the "Real Football Experience" they are going for. I am all for it. At first I did not like the idea, but after thinking about it, I remember wanting someone to do this for about 10 years now. I want real football, not the NFL, CLF, or NCAA license, real football. The game is going to be a great and welcomed change for me.

Again, there's nothing wrong with a "lock" option like basketball and hockey games have, but I like to switch players because I also don't trust the CPU to handle things for me properly. If something is my fault, I want to lay the blame on me, not the game fudging up. Besides, I don't want to have to be locked on a player just because I couldn't switch to the player I wanted to be in time during pre-snap.

And that doesn't really have much to do with a standard camera angle. You can be locked on a player regardless.

[elgreazy1]

I would be all for the non-switching of defenders being enfored ONLY IF there can be a dedicated 11 vs 11 online game.

[e0820]

So If BB has custom rosters/uni colors and does well in term of sales. I wonder how that will make 2k feel about a opportunity that could of been implemented awhile ago?

Nice to see the BB team has been listening

[canes21]

Honestly, the guys saying bad stuff sound like blind haters more than anything. I don't want to point anyone out Blzer.