Warriors’ mailbag: The reason behind the Shai trade, realistic rookie expectations and how far can Jevon Rolle go?
Isaiah Charles | December 1, 2029
How many years of patience did the Warriors’ eight NBA titles in 12 years buy them? We’re about to find out. After a second-straight year without an NBA title, now considered a drought by Golden State’s standards, the Warriors enter the 2029-30 season after a summer of splashes, which opens the door for plenty of questions.
We’ve opened the PO box to a rush of submitted questions about the state of the Warriors moving forward, the summer they just had, and what a title hunt looks like now.
Let’s get to it.
Were the Warriors ever committed to Shai Gilgeous-Alexander if they traded him away just two summers after signing him?
In short, yes, for a time, they were very committed to Shai Gilgeous-Alexander. That time just wasn’t as long as many may have hoped or expected.
When the Warriors signed Gilgeous-Alexander in 2027, it came on the heels of an NBA title with the Warriors looking towards the next three years to see how they could replicate that. Stephen Curry and Klay Thompson had just retired, and the team was concerned about the long-term viability of Ben Simmons (PF, 84) as the lead man on a title team. Add on to that the fact that Jevon Rolle (PG, 89) had yet to crack the starting lineup, and the Warriors were understandably concerned about if they had the right pieces in place.
Enter Gilgeous-Alexander. He had shared a backcourt with Cade Cunningham since 2021, lending the Warriors to believe he would fit well next to Rolle as he assumed the starting point guard position in place of Curry.
And truthfully, Gilgeous-Alexander was a great fit next to Rolle. But last summer’s decision to sign Jalen Suggs (SG, 86) complicated that. Gilgeous-Alexander was forced to play the three, a spot that at the time he was comfortable with but as the season wore on he grew less enthused with guarding bigger wings.
I don’t believe the Warriors signed Suggs with the vision that he would replace Gilgeous-Alexander, but the rise of Rolle as an All-NBA point guard, Suggs’ better age fit (he’s 25, Gilgeous-Alexander turned 31), and an opportunity to add a younger and bigger playmaker in the draft were enough to intrigue the front office.
Rhadi Staley has now been in charge of the Warriors for close to a decade, what has been his biggest mistake?
For the most part, Staley’s reign as President of Basketball Operations, and General Manager before then, has been positive. He’s helped put together one of the more dominant runs in NBA history and kept the Warriors in title contention. That being said, there is one glaring mistake that he has made that should be factored into everything: the decision to draft Ibrahim Mobley (F, 84) with the second overall pick in 2022.
The Warriors owned the Charlotte Hornets' selection by way of a draft night trade the previous year in which Golden State swapped the fifth pick with the Hornets for the rights to draft Jonathan Kuminga (F, 86) third overall. Entering the lottery, the Hornets’ selection was projected to be ninth overall before leaping to the top of the draft.
Mobley had been the presumptive No. 1 pick for much of the draft leadup by scouts and executives. An athletic scorer who led college basketball with 26.8 points on 53.1% shooting, Mobley drew comparisons to Kevin Garnett, Chris Bosh and Anthony Davis and was considered a no-brainer for the first overall pick.
But the Pistons shocked many by taking Fresno State senior shooting guard Desmond Cooper (SG, 90), who had averaged 25.7 points with the Bulldogs while shooting 43.6% from deep, with the first pick, a selection that looking back now is tough to discredit. That dropped Mobley to two, and the Warriors, with Anthony Edwards (SF, 84) and Kuminga installed on the wings and with Stephen Curry and Klay Thompson at the guard positions and still playing in their primes, gladly took what they felt was the missing piece to a dynamic wing trio.
Here’s where it went wrong. Six picks later the Orlando Magic would take Tre Hunter (PG, 95) out of UCLA. Hunter was seen by many as a lottery pick, a point guard who could shoot the lights out but supposedly lacked playmaking feel, a description the Warriors should have been all too familiar with.
While Mobley developed into a reliable starting wing, playing a key role on a pair of championship teams, Hunter has become a top-five player in the NBA, already anointed with an MVP award. Those around the Warriors will say that Mobley ended up playing a key role as the centerpiece of the trade that landed them Jevon Rolle (PG, 89) on draft night in 2025, and that at the time of the 2022 NBA Draft, Curry was coming off an NBA MVP season and the Warriors didn’t have a need for a young backup point guard, as Curry wouldn’t retire for another five seasons.
But the truth remains that they passed up the chance to get another all-time great point guard.
I’m going to give a quick nod to the 2026 trade that Staley made that sent Darius Stith (SG, 81) and the 24 and 28th picks in the 2026 NBA Draft to the Milwaukee Bucks for a lottery pick in 2027. The hope in Golden State was that the Bucks would struggle and the Warriors might get a chance at the top pick, which ended up being DeAngelo Ayon (SF, 82) by the Clippers. Instead, the pick ended up at 12 where the Warriors took Keon Fogg (SG, 70). Fogg has had each of his two NBA seasons cut short by knee injuries, one a dislocated patella and the other a torn ACL, while Stith just had an impressive season with the Wizards, averaging 17.9 points a game.
Are there any unicorns in today’s NBA like we’ve seen in the past, like Kevin Durant, Giannis Antetokounmpo, Joel Embiid or prime Kristaps Porzingis?
Durant, Antetokounmpo, who is riding out the final years of his late prime with Dallas, Embiid, now in Milwaukee, and Porzingis, doing the same in Seattle though he may be traded this season, defined an era of evolution in the NBA with taller players able to play like guards. While there aren’t players in today’s NBA who stand out physically than those before them, there are a handful of players that stand out in their own way.
I’ll posit that Jaylen Justice (PG, 90) in Toronto, the reigning NBA and NBA Finals MVP, is in fact a unicorn. We haven’t seen a point guard score with the ability that he has while shifting the defense around his essence before. He shoots like Stephen Curry but attacks the rim like Russell Westbrook. He can make plays and rebound like Magic Johnson while playing stout perimeter defense. He truly does everything like few, if any, before him have.
I’ll add Oklahoma City’s Cade Cunningham (PG, 90) to the short list as well. He’s the size of a wing with the playmaking feel of a guard. He’s become a dangerous three-point threat with elite defense on the perimeter. He doesn’t quite have the athletic explosion as Justice, or even guys like Ja Morant (PG, 96), but he’s explosive in his own way.
It’s far too early to claim he will be a unicorn, but just from watching him in college and seeing him dominant at Summer League and play well in the preseason, I’m going to throw Robert Mack (C, 78) into that conversation. The Hornets’ rookie big has a lot of the similar traits that guys like Embiid and Porzingis had: three-level scoring with reliable handles and the athleticism to take guys off the dribble. I think the best-case version of him is unicorn-like, but we’re still years away from seeing it come to fruition.
People around the league often say rookies don’t contribute to winning. If so, why the move to get Deonte Dixon and what can we expect from him, assuming the Warriors want to win a title?
I’ll answer the last part first: yes, the Warriors intend to compete for an NBA title and felt that trading Gilgeous-Alexander for Deonte Dixon (SF, 76) did not prohibit that.
Now that the easy part is out of the way, let’s get to the why. Golden State got massacred against both the Clippers and Rockets by bigger, physical wings who were guarded by Gilgeous-Alexander. That’s not his fault, he’s a guard who was asked to be a forward, but it was still a mismatch in favor of the opponent. Dixon enters the NBA as an explosive athlete, one of the best to enter the league in some time, and profiles as an incredible long-term fit next to Jonathan Kuminga (F, 86), whom the Warriors have had play the four for the past few years.
That’s not to mention the fact that Dixon is seen to have one of the highest ceilings among this year’s class with his defensive versatility and playmaking skills with the ball. If Dixon develops into what the coaching staff has been raving about, this is a great pick and trade.
As for expectations. Dixon will not start, Steve Kerr has already said that. Shane Ruffin (SG/SF, 82) and Jaheim Briggs (SG/SF, 81) will enter camp vying for the starting spot at the three, with the other getting a comparable amount of minutes, though both players are better served as off-guards than wings. That means Dixon will compete with fellow rookie Patrick Morris Sr. (SF, 75) for minutes on the wing, where the Warriors decided against signing a veteran piece and instead brought back Alfonzo Harrell (PF, 77).
Kerr has not ruled out that Dixon won’t start at some point this season. The coaching staff has always given rookies a chance to prove themselves, and I’m told if Dixon, or Morris Sr. for that matter, prove they belong in the starting lineup, they will get that opportunity.
When he’s on the court, I’d expect the Warriors to give him an opportunity to prove himself as an initiator early on and if that doesn’t pan out, use him in a similar vein as they do Kuminga: a slashing off-ball threat who is also involved in the pick-and-roll. While Dixon turned a lot of heads at Summer League, winning Summer League MVP and scoring more than 30 points a game, it’d be unreasonable to expect that out of him in the NBA as a rookie.
How did Jevon Rolle’s All-NBA selection factor into the Warriors’ offseason?
Rolle had the type of year that the Golden State coaching staff had been promising would be coming. He was an electric scorer, intense defender and impressive playmaker, and was rewarded with a third-team All-NBA selection. That improvement gave the Warriors the confidence to trade away Gilgeous-Alexander after he had requested a trade, I’m told, and know they have their guy moving forward (and it also earned Rolle a huge pay increase this past summer on his rookie extension).
The belief now is that they envision Rolle taking a similar jump that Jaylen Justice (PG, 90) took last year, going from a promising prospect to NBA MVP while dominating in the playoffs. I think that type of meteoric rise is unfair for the fifth-year guard, but the expectation is clear: Rolle is their guy and will be the first man in line as they go after an NBA title.
Is there a timetable on the returns for Wiseman and Fogg?
On media day, the team gave the first update on both James Wiseman (C, 80) (achilles) and Keon Fogg (SG, 70) (ACL) since the end of last season: both are making progress but are unlikely to be in the rotation on opening night.
Both players suffered injuries last January, and both injuries typically involve a one-year recovery. The sense I’ve gotten is that Fogg is expected back after Wiseman, but for either of them the message the team has given, publicly and privately, is that they are aiming for a return in mid-January at the absolute earliest, though that could certainly change.
Does the team see James Wiseman as the long-term center of the future?
Basically, yes.
Before it was Gilgeous-Alexander, Wiseman was a name commonly dropped in trade rumors involving Golden State. Those rumors should be put to bed, for three reasons. Primarily, few teams are or will be interested in Wiseman until they have a chance to see him on the court after his torn achilles. He’s still just 27 years old, but he relies so much on his athleticism to pull in rebounds and defend in the paint, that it's understandable that both Golden State and any potential trade partner would want to see how he looks before making any commitment.
The second reason is a bit of an extension from the first, but Wiseman signed a four-year deal worth more than $80 million in 2028, before the injury. Few teams will want to give up the necessary financial investment to bring in a center on that price tag with that injury history. We saw the market for Karl-Anthony Towns (C, 88) being non-existent this past summer after he suffered the same injury, the same I would expect to be true for Wiseman and Towns is a better center.
Lastly, the Warriors need Wiseman. Golden State went to a small ball look with Kuminga and Harrell splitting time at the five last year, and while that is still a potential lineup, I think the Warriors would rather use that as a break in case of emergency. It can be a disruptive lineup, especially against slower-footed centers, but until the Warriors have switchable wings on the perimeter it’s not a legitimate option.
It’s also worth mentioning that Wiseman is an NBA Finals MVP, due in large part to his ability to dominate the glass, create second chance opportunities, and be a vertical threat. If he can return to 80% of his previous self, Golden State will want him on their roster more than off it.
We’ve seen teams like Memphis, New Orleans, and Oklahoma City shy away from re-signing free agents because of the luxury tax bills they’ve accumulated. Do you think Golden State would ever do that?
There are a few differences between those three teams and Golden State. The Warriors are in a much bigger market and have better local TV deals and local revenue than all three organizations you mention. That lends them more revenue and more opportunity to offset massive luxury tax bills.
That being said, we’ve seen Golden State make financial decisions when it came to their roster before, most recently following the 2027 NBA championship year when they left a 15th roster spot open for the entire year so as to remain below the luxury tax.
The moves made by New Orleans and Memphis to not re-sign Tyrese Haliburton (SG, 84) and Dillon Brooks (SG, 83), respectively, got headlines but neither was necessarily surprising. Both teams paid more than $500 million in luxury taxes alone over the past four years, something that was not sustainable for the long-term health of the organizations.
The Thunder got off of Ben Simmons’ (PF, 84) contract but brought back D’Angelo Russell (PG, 82) and Sekou Doumouya (PF, 86), who combined to make more, with Russell under contract for two more years. Since they are still not yet under the luxury tax line, or even close to it, I’d expect them to continue to swallow a large luxury tax bill this season and re-evaluate how to get under that line next summer.
But I wouldn’t anticipate the Warriors reaching that point, if only because they’ve been reluctant to give out similarly sized contracts that put Memphis and New Orleans into the situations they were. They were able to get Ruffin and Briggs on relatively good long-term deals, each making around $11 million annually. Wiseman’s deal is big but not back breaking, and Suggs’ deal, paying him $15 million annually, is a bargain now.
Rolle is now the highest paid player, making north of $30 million, and Kuminga will likely get there when his current deal expires, so the days spent living under the luxury tax line may be limited, but the Warriors have set themselves up to be able to duck under that line if they need to. However, history tells us they aren’t afraid to go over it, so even if they do reach a selling-off point, it won’t be for 3-4 years down the road, at the absolute earliest.
How much longer do you think Golden State will hold onto Keon Fogg?
Look, I’m not going to defend Golden State for trading away a pair of mid-20s picks and Darius Stith (SG, 81) just to move up to the 12th pick to get Keon Fogg (SG, 70) two years ago, but Fogg is still highly regarding in the organization, even if those outside the team see him as an injury-prone waste of a lottery pick.
The vitriol the fanbase has for Fogg surprises me, considering he is a team-oriented player who has given back to the community in his two years in the Bay Area. And while I understand it can be hard to watch as Stith is in Washington leading the Wizards in scoring, blaming him for suffering season-ending knee injuries in each of his first two years in the league is unfair.
Fogg, when healthy, is a lightning quick scorer who can be the lead man of a bench unit, and the team feels he still has plenty of good basketball left in him. Sure, maybe that’s them doubling-down on their investment, but considering the depth they’ve managed to acquire, they don’t need to rush Fogg or his development.
The team has indicated they plan to pick up his third-year team option at the end of this season, regardless of how it goes. Do I think it’s a great use of a roster spot and backup point guard minutes? Not necessarily. But the Warriors do, and until they’re proven otherwise, Fogg will be here, whether the fanbase likes it or not.
If you had to rank the worst general managers in the NBA, who would be atop the list?
For clarification, I’m not one to say that being a general manager in the NBA is easy. Far from it. You’re dealing with personalities, injuries, and at the end of day people’s professional livelihoods. It is one of the hardest jobs in sports.
That does not mean people can’t fail, so I’ll respect the question and rather than call out one individual general manager, I think we’re safe to recognize some of the more struggling franchises.
Sacramento Kings
The Kings haven’t made a playoff appearance since 2006. They haven’t had a winning season since the same year. The most wins they’ve had since 2006 is 39 in 2018-19, more than a decade ago.
While so much of NBA success is also built on luck, the Kings have made questionable move after questionable move. They drafted power forwards in three lottery drafts in four years, in 2020 (Precious Achiuwa, 14th overall), 2021 (Usman Garuba, 7th overall), and 2023 (R.J. Wallace, 9th overall). Both Achiuwa and Garuba have been more successful when they left Sacramento. Then they became infatuated with wings, taking Marcel Hampton (SF, 78) first overall in 2024 before taking Spiro Giannou (PF, 78) (since moved to power forward) and Jayson Strong (SF, 76) both in the lottery the next year, suffocating any minutes any of them had to develop. Hampton and Strong have both since been traded to Memphis and Orlando, respectively, but the Kings then drafted Jair Dooling (SF, 76) with the fifth pick and Wesley Randle (SG, 72) with the 10th pick in 2028.
It gets worse, though. The Kings just drafted Antonio Bennett (SF, 76) with the seventh pick this past summer. I really like Bennett, but jeez if he doesn’t have a great runway to work from.
It’s frustrating to see Sacramento make questionable move after questionable move, refusing to commit to singular talent and building around them. They instead have taken the “best player available” approach, but even then I don’t know that they’ve taken that guy.
Los Angeles Lakers
The Lakers are a deserving inclusion here as well. While the Lakers have been a mediocre team in the NBA, never quite dropping to cellar dweller with Anthony Davis (PF, 88) but never quite rising to title contender, it’s still a disappointment when you consider the assets available.
They’re in what is widely considered the most ideal market, they have a glowing history and have traditionally been the team many superstars want to play for.
Instead, they’ve been surpassed by the Los Angeles Clippers in terms of star attraction, as the Clippers have powered through losing seasons and patiently built a contender through savvy acquisitions and good draft picks. The Lakers, instead, have dealt away those opportunities, the most glaring of which was the decision to trade Zavier Carter (C, 78) to the Boston Celtics as part of a three-team deal that netted them Wendell Carter Jr. (C, 83).
Carter Jr. made sense when they wanted to win immediately and tying Carter’s development to Davis’ near-ending prime would’ve been difficult to pull off, but it’s better than the alternative: a sub-.500 team who again missed the playoffs.
Seattle Sonics
The Sonics have been back in existence long enough to have established themselves as a poorly performing organization. That being said, the decision they made to immediately pursue wins upon re-entering the NBA seemed short sighted and misguided. The NBA is a star driven league, and Seattle felt that because of the rich history of basketball in the city and the storyline about a player being able to resurrect a once-dead franchise would entice stars to the Pacific Northwest. Unfortunately for them, that calculation was wrong.
They landed Michael Porter Jr. in free agency prior to their first year back in the league, and ended up trading for Kawhi Leonard the following year, but no major star truly wanted to go to Seattle. There wasn’t a trade demand by one of the NBA’s current elites to head to Seattle and free agency was barren when the Sonics had money. So while their vision may have been admirable, the timing and execution was not.
I’ll give them credit for not trading away draft picks to land an aging star, and while the trade for Leonard from Boston involved a first, the protections turn it into a likely second now that the Sonics have embraced the long road. But even by landing those stars, they still finished with the worst record in the NBA each of the last two years, so by accident they still managed to go to a full-on rebuild.
So the true negative has been the stigma around the team. They entered the NBA like a bull in a china shop, thinking they’d be the hottest destination. Instead, they received a tepid response, and have to continue the rebuild with their tails between their legs.