College Football Off Topic - Operation Sports Forums

College Football Off Topic

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
Collapse
+ More Options
Posts
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Speedy
    #Ace
    • Apr 2008
    • 16168

    #10156
    Re: College Football Off Topic

    CFB has GMs now?
    Originally posted by Gibson88
    Anyone who asked for an ETA is not being Master of their Domain.
    It's hard though...especially when I got my neighbor playing their franchise across the street...maybe I will occupy myself with Glamore Magazine.

    Comment

    • canes21
      Hall Of Fame
      • Sep 2008
      • 22455

      #10157
      Re: College Football Off Topic

      Originally posted by Speedy
      CFB has GMs now?
      Has been a thing for awhile now. Sometimes they are called by different names like director of personnel or something along those lines, but it's become common for most programs to have one.
      “No one is more hated than he who speaks the truth.”


      ― Plato

      Comment

      • TripleCrown9
        Keep the Faith
        • May 2010
        • 23622

        #10158
        Re: College Football Off Topic

        Congrats to North Carolina for going from having the oldest head coach in FBS to now having the oldest coach in FBS.
        Boston Red Sox
        1903 1912 1915 1916 1918 2004 2007 2013 2018
        9 4 1 8 27 6 14 45 26 34

        Comment

        • kehlis
          Moderator
          • Jul 2008
          • 27926

          #10159
          Re: College Football Off Topic

          Originally posted by Speedy
          CFB has GMs now?

          Andrew Luck took the job of Stanford GM just a few weeks ago.


          Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

          Comment

          • Tovarich
            Hall Of Fame
            • Jul 2008
            • 10812

            #10160
            Re: College Football Off Topic

            Originally posted by Speedy
            CFB has GMs now?
            Herm Edwards was the failed experiment of a CFB CEO, so we're trying GM's now.

            Comment

            • illwill10
              Hall Of Fame
              • Mar 2009
              • 19152

              #10161
              Re: College Football Off Topic

              I do think NFL was done with Belichick more than he was done with the NFL. If ATL, would've offered him the job last offseason, he would've taken it. I'd imagine he wanted the same type of power structure as he had in NE and I imagine teams don't want to give him that type of power. He pretty much was the de-facto GM. A lot of his drafting over the past 8-9 years was a big reason why the Patriots are where they are now. I never seen someone as bad as drafting WRs as BB. He's done good with less. But in CFB, talent matters. With the NFL, the talent gap between teams is significantly less than it is in the CFB. You can win with fundamentals, discipline, and toughness in the NFL.



              I wonder how his personality meshes with 17-22 year olds. He's a grumpy no nonsense coach. Those 17-22 year olds want to have fun and show their personality.

              Comment

              • georgiafan
                Hall Of Fame
                • Jul 2002
                • 10559

                #10162
                Re: College Football Off Topic

                Bill wasn't going to get the GM power in Atlanta so from what I understand that was the dealbreaker. Nobody is exactly sure who is calling the shoots in atlanta, but it wasn't going to be just Bill with 3 people in the mix already.
                Retro Redemption - Starting over with a oldschool PowerBone Offense

                My Youtube

                Twitter

                PS5 ID = BubbasCruise

                Comment

                • ProfessaPackMan
                  Bamma
                  • Mar 2008
                  • 63869

                  #10163
                  Re: College Football Off Topic

                  What’s the difference between an AD and a GM as far as the day to day operation goes?
                  #RespectTheCulture

                  Comment

                  • l3ulvl
                    Hall Of Fame
                    • Dec 2009
                    • 17163

                    #10164
                    Re: College Football Off Topic

                    I've been coming around on this, college football is becoming more and more pro football, we even have chatter about billionaires buying college teams


                    recruiting doesn't even matter anymore, you let everyone else recruit and then steal the best players in the portal, this could work
                    Wolverines Wings Same Old Lions Tigers Pistons Erika Christensen

                    Comment

                    • illwill10
                      Hall Of Fame
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 19152

                      #10165
                      Re: College Football Off Topic

                      Originally posted by l3ulvl
                      I've been coming around on this, college football is becoming more and more pro football, we even have chatter about billionaires buying college teams

                      recruiting doesn't even matter anymore, you let everyone else recruit and then steal the best players in the portal, this could work
                      Yeah, just like you can be a middle of the pack team like TT or Mizz and land a 5 star and the very next offseason, that 5 star will enter the portal. Just like, G5 team is more likely to lose it's best players. NIL/Transfer Portal has evened the playing field, but at the same time, it's still the Have and Have nots. When a recruit/transfer lands at a certain school, fair or not, the perception will be that the school offered a bag. For example, Texas A&M has that perception

                      For UNC, the ACC isn't a Juggernaut. Beside Clemson and SMU(maybe), ACC is winnable or at least can compete in. Not sure how much of an impact a team can make on the 2ne signing day nowadays. So, it depends on what they can do in the transfer portal.
                      Last edited by illwill10; 12-15-2024, 08:10 AM.

                      Comment

                      • Ghost Of The Year
                        ¤ Em ¤ El ¤ Be ¤
                        • Mar 2014
                        • 6182

                        #10166
                        Re: College Football Off Topic

                        Originally posted by l3ulvl
                        I've been coming around on this, college football is becoming more and more pro football, we even have chatter about billionaires buying college teams


                        recruiting doesn't even matter anymore, you let everyone else recruit and then steal the best players in the portal, this could work
                        Yeah, definitely more akin to pro sports now than amateur hour. It's just a matter of time before they remove the four year eligibility thing. In thirty years college football will be dominated by 28 year old athletes instead of 21 year olds.
                        Graeves.

                        Comment

                        • illwill10
                          Hall Of Fame
                          • Mar 2009
                          • 19152

                          #10167
                          Re: College Football Off Topic

                          Originally posted by Ghost Of The Year
                          Yeah, definitely more akin to pro sports now than amateur hour. It's just a matter of time before they remove the four year eligibility thing. In thirty years college football will be dominated by 28 year old athletes instead of 21 year olds.
                          I get medical hardships, covid years, old transfer rules, etc. But something has to give with these 6-8 year college athletes. Cam Rising is getting another year of eligibility next year. I think I saw something where he was in the same class as Trevor Lawrence or someone who already has 4 years in league.

                          Comment

                          • EUBlink
                            Heyoka.
                            • Dec 2005
                            • 1036

                            #10168
                            Re: College Football Off Topic

                            Originally posted by Ghost Of The Year
                            Yeah, definitely more akin to pro sports now than amateur hour. It's just a matter of time before they remove the four year eligibility thing. In thirty years college football will be dominated by 28 year old athletes instead of 21 year olds.
                            It has become semipro football with hardly any restrictions of any kind on players. The athletes are running the entire system, whether we will admit it or not.

                            Originally posted by illwill10
                            I get medical hardships, covid years, old transfer rules, etc. But something has to give with these 6-8 year college athletes. Cam Rising is getting another year of eligibility next year. I think I saw something where he was in the same class as Trevor Lawrence or someone who already has 4 years in league.
                            Someone will eventually have to break the hard news to the players that their actions [fueled by greed, no doubt] across the sport are severely damaging the game for future generations of athletes.
                            Last edited by EUBlink; 05-12-2025, 03:19 PM.

                            Comment

                            • canes21
                              Hall Of Fame
                              • Sep 2008
                              • 22455

                              #10169
                              Re: College Football Off Topic

                              Originally posted by ProfessaPackMan
                              What’s the difference between an AD and a GM as far as the day to day operation goes?
                              AD oversees the entire athletic department. Is responsible for booster relations and fundraising.

                              GM and equivalent roles in CFB are doing roster management. They are analyzing the roster, mapping out development plans for players, leading the recruiting board setup to prioritize what they see as the biggest needs, etc.

                              Unless UNC is doing it different than anyone else, the GM of the program is there to help with getting the roster in the bests position possible and doesn't really do any of the political stuff like managing the boosters. He will lead scouting meetings, make the final call on who does and doesn't get offers, say who the priority targets are, etc. The AD should be doing nothing of that sorts in a typical setting.
                              “No one is more hated than he who speaks the truth.”


                              ― Plato

                              Comment

                              • Ghost Of The Year
                                ¤ Em ¤ El ¤ Be ¤
                                • Mar 2014
                                • 6182

                                #10170
                                Re: College Football Off Topic

                                Michael Vick to coach Norfolk State?

                                Is it too much to ask he someday coaches for Mississippi State against Georgia?
                                Graeves.

                                Comment

                                Working...