Home

2004 or 2006?

This is a discussion on 2004 or 2006? within the EA Sports College Football and NCAA Football forums.

Go Back   Operation Sports Forums > Football > EA Sports College Football and NCAA Football
MLB The Show 24 Review: Another Solid Hit for the Series
New Star GP Review: Old-School Arcade Fun
Where Are Our College Basketball Video Game Rumors?
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-07-2005, 09:47 AM   #17
Banned
 
OVR: 1
Join Date: Nov 2004
Re: 2004 or 2006?

Quote:
Originally Posted by fishepa
I think 04 is better than 06. But that is just my opinion.

2004 was epic? That's ridiculous. None of the game prior to this one had O-line blocking, which in itself is very very bad. And the ping-pong running was proposterous. 2004 might have been an overall fun game than the others, but it was far from Epic.
DawgcityClev is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2005, 09:50 AM   #18
I'm Ron F'n Swanson!
 
fishepa's Arena
 
OVR: 44
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 18,996
Blog Entries: 1
Re: 2004 or 2006?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DawgcityClev
2004 was epic? That's ridiculous. None of the game prior to this one had O-line blocking, which in itself is very very bad. And the ping-pong running was proposterous. 2004 might have been an overall fun game than the others, but it was far from Epic.
I never said it was epic. I said I like 2004 better than 2006.
fishepa is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2005, 10:11 AM   #19
Rookie
 
OVR: 2
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Jacksonville, NC
Re: 2004 or 2006?

I think he may have quoted the wrong person because the quote "2004 was epic." is somewhere in this thread...
__________________
../Dallas Cowboys Fan | Atlanta Braves Fan | Florida State Seminoles Fan | Dallas Mavericks Fan\..

The Prince of the 910 has taken his throne...
invurzion is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2005, 10:12 AM   #20
Rookie
 
gobucks123789's Arena
 
OVR: 2
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Re: 2004 or 2006?

Quote:
Originally Posted by onthegreenrb
2004 was epic. I thought 2005 sucked. And now people are saying 06 is better than 04? I'm even more excited now.
i think this would be "Mr. Epic"
gobucks123789 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2005, 10:31 AM   #21
Moderator
 
Deegeezy's Arena
 
OVR: 15
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,269
Re: 2004 or 2006?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DawgcityClev
2004 was epic? That's ridiculous. None of the game prior to this one had O-line blocking, which in itself is very very bad. And the ping-pong running was proposterous. 2004 might have been an overall fun game than the others, but it was far from Epic.
The O-Line blocking may not have LOOKED as good as it does now....but the overall "sim" of it was darn near perfect. The whole sim was just right.
Deegeezy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 07-07-2005, 10:33 AM   #22
I'm Ron F'n Swanson!
 
fishepa's Arena
 
OVR: 44
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 18,996
Blog Entries: 1
Re: 2004 or 2006?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deegeezy
The O-Line blocking may not have LOOKED as good as it does now....but the overall "sim" of it was darn near perfect. The whole sim was just right.

fishepa is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2005, 11:46 AM   #23
Rookie
 
tommygunn's Arena
 
OVR: 3
Join Date: Jul 2002
Re: 2004 or 2006?

Quote:
Originally Posted by fishepa
I haven't played 06 yet but what I'm hearing is a bit alarming.

My biggest gripe with 05 (reason I returned it) was because the passing game was too hard. I'm the kind of gamer who doesnt have the time to practice and practice and practice. I just want to pick up a game and at least have a bit of success passing.

Sounds like 06 still has the super DB's where no receiver is ever open. And only haveing 2 seconds to pass sure doesnt sound like a lot of fun. I'm going to pick it up but it will be on ebay within days if its as frustrating as some are saying.

I agree that 04 was the bomb. They never should have changed that engine, just tweaked it. It was nearly pefect as it was. That's still my football game of choice. The only gameplay flaw in that game was that you couldn't run a sweep or toss.

Last edited by tommygunn; 07-07-2005 at 12:02 PM.
tommygunn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2005, 12:03 PM   #24
Then..Now...Forever
 
countryboy's Arena
 
OVR: 62
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Greenville, IN
Posts: 51,642
Blog Entries: 1
Re: 2004 or 2006?

Quote:
Originally Posted by josh1559
2006 is better than 2004. Far better in my opinion.

definitely... the only reason people are comparing 06 to 04 is because in 04 the game was downright fun to play.. whereas last year the game to me at least felt "broken" .... now here for 2006 we get the best of 04 (gameplay speed and overall fun) along with the 06 dynasty extras(in season recruiting... etc..) do yourself a favor and buy ncaa 06.. you won't regret it
__________________
I can't shave with my eyes closed, meaning each day I have to look at myself in the mirror and respect who I see.

I miss the old days of Operation Sports :(


Louisville Cardinals/St.Louis Cardinals
countryboy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

« Operation Sports Forums > Football > EA Sports College Football and NCAA Football »



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:16 AM.
Top -