More Links

QuasiHero · 07-14-2005, 12:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iwilson6


	So why did so many of you skip 2005? What was so bad about it? I haven't played NCAA since 2003.

i couldn't tell you, since i've nevert played 2005. the "upgrades" in 2005 didn't entice me enough to fork over another $50. the $50 was not the issue for me, it was the principle of getting enough value for the cost.

Cardot · 07-14-2005, 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by QuasiHero


	i couldn't tell you, since i've nevert played 2005. the "upgrades" in 2005 didn't entice me enough to fork over another $50. the $50 was not the issue for me, it was the principle of getting enough value for the cost.

I was exactly the same. The upgrades just didn't motivate me. On top of that, there seemed to be alot of folks who had problems with slowdowns and dropped passes which obviously didn't help.

stoncold32 · 07-14-2005, 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by USF11


	Standing Applause 04' sucked the big one for me way to much of a wide open game. It was too much of a spd game. No momentum no sense of power. 06' is the best game in the series to date good mix of run/pass speed/power and best of all the Computer has been totally revamped and plays much more aggressive and dymanic. Virginia for example came out in a 3-4 and on passing downs put Ahmad the MLB at DE. I can't recommend 06' enough and you guys really need to stop with 04' it was a broken game.

You mmust be playing on Freshmen. Sense of momentum huh? So you think its good when you can predict at certain points of the game that the game will score on you no matter what you do to stop it?

And wide open??? Again you must be playin on easy cause I had plenty of 10-7 games just as I had 35-31 games.

pfunk880 · 07-14-2005, 09:25 PM

I see no need to get rid of '04.

cable guy · 07-14-2005, 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iwilson6


	So why did so many of you skip 2005? What was so bad about it? I haven't played NCAA since 2003.

The dropped passes alone, almost made this title un-playable.

stoncold32 · 07-14-2005, 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cable guy


	The dropped passes alone, almost made this title un-playable.

almost?

07-14-2005, 09:25 PM	#36
pfunk880 MVP OVR: 31 Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 4,458 Blog Entries: 2	Re: Ncaa 2004? I see no need to get rid of '04. __________________ Green Bay Packers \| Milwaukee Brewers \| Bradley Braves \| Wisconsin Badgers Marquette Golden Eagles \| Milwaukee Bucks \| Milwaukee Panthers

	MLB The Show 24 Review: Another Solid Hit for the Series
	New Star GP Review: Old-School Arcade Fun
	Where Are Our College Basketball Video Game Rumors?

More Links

Ncaa 2004?