More Links

thmst30 · 07-10-2006, 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGamingChef


	Can't answer the first one, I've only played MLB 2K6 (which I hated by the way and traded back in, then whipped out my good ole MVP 05) but FIFA is easily more fun than WE9. WE9 is much deeper admittedly, but for the casual fan, FIFA is the better game. MEANING that EGM are probably casual when it comes to sports games. I bet they player one game, maybe two, on default everything.

Exactly they are casual. Which means that their reviews are worthless to 99% of the people on a Sports game message board.

bangpow · 07-10-2006, 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thmst30


	Exactly they are casual. Which means that their reviews are worthless to 99% of the people on a Sports game message board.

Which in this case we can call EGM "sucky".

NBASLAM2001 · 07-10-2006, 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bangpow


	Do you agree that FIFA '06 is better than Winning Eleven 9??

Well gamespot sure did agree that FIFA was the better game.

BrianFifaFan · 07-10-2006, 11:57 AM

Spotty collision detection. Not cool. Maybe it'll be more spotty than not. Those sack animations are crappy.

As for the rest, I agree about EGM.....

TheGamingChef · 07-10-2006, 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NBASLAM2001


	Well gamespot sure did agree that FIFA was the better game.

Again, WE9 is more realistic and deeper. FIFA is much more fun. It's really up to personal preferences, and I take it that the hardcore crowd here at OS prefers realism over fun. Just IMO.

DaveDQ · 07-10-2006, 11:58 AM

I honestly don't see this game getting anything more than low 8s (if that).

The rumored lack of depth in the game is going to hurt reviews. My main concern is gameplay, but I have seen some flaws in that too. Again, it all comes down to when you get it in your hands and do your own homework.

NBASLAM2001 · 07-10-2006, 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGamingChef


	Again, WE9 is more realistic and deeper. FIFA is much more fun. It's really up to personal preferences, and I take it that the hardcore crowd here at OS prefers realism over fun. Just IMO.

I prefer a little of both myself.

bangpow · 07-10-2006, 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NBASLAM2001


	Well gamespot sure did agree that FIFA was the better game.

OK, those scores could be debated between those two games, but MLB 2K6 receiving a higher score than The Show??

07-10-2006, 11:57 AM	#44
BrianFifaFan Semi-retired OVR: 50 Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Dayton,OH Posts: 4,144 Blog Entries: 7	Re: EGM 360 Review Spotty collision detection. Not cool. Maybe it'll be more spotty than not. Those sack animations are crappy. As for the rest, I agree about EGM..... __________________ Note to Tiburon Marketing: A great product sells itself, no "back of the box" features required! (See Fifa...)

07-10-2006, 11:58 AM	#46
DaveDQ 13 OVR: 34 Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: NC Posts: 7,672	Re: EGM 360 Review I honestly don't see this game getting anything more than low 8s (if that). The rumored lack of depth in the game is going to hurt reviews. My main concern is gameplay, but I have seen some flaws in that too. Again, it all comes down to when you get it in your hands and do your own homework.

	MLB The Show 24 Review: Another Solid Hit for the Series
	New Star GP Review: Old-School Arcade Fun
	Where Are Our College Basketball Video Game Rumors?

More Links

EGM 360 Review