|
Quote: |
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted by oklahoma19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I disagree. Reid hasnt shown much of anything since hes been at OSU besides the fact that he can get injured. I think tha Zac Robinson is actually the better Quarterback of the two. Not quite as athletic but Robinson, to me, just is a better leader and overall QB.
Majority of the Big 12 schools is a lil drastic:
OU-No, Bradford is better
UT-No, McCoy
Neb-No, Keller
Tech-No, Harrell
A&M-No, McGee
ISU-Probably
Mizzou-No, Daniel
Ok State-He starts there but as I said, I believe OSU would be better with Z Rob
Colo-Probably
KU-Probably
K State-Probably
Baylore-Probably
So counting OSU its 6. I wouldnt count OSU, so it would be 5. Thats far from majority my friend. But I digress...
He had Patrick at an 85 I think. I would put him at the top tier 80 if not 90 level. He fumbles too much and hes not my favorite back (See Chris Brown, Demarco Murray, Mossis Madu) but so far he is the best of the bunch so he should be ranked as such.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I totally agree on Robinson. If he got as many snaps in practice, he would have been starting by conference. Robinson is a much better QB for the system. On the other hand, Reid has progressed a ton in two years.
I think people are a little too high on Keller, and while I think Chase Daniel is a big stud, he seems to be his own worst enemy on the field. I'll give you Harrell only because of Leach's system.
I am not sold on anyone OU plans to throw out there. If the OL plays up to their ability, Patrick should have a real good year and you or I could play QB and be successful.
Royce, sorry if you think we hijacked your thread. I am still interested in everyone's analyses.