Transfers Idea

[cdiddy71323]

I don't know how many of yall have played the College Basketball 2K games, but in it when doing a franchise, they include players that have transferred. So, after your first year of playing in the game, they join your team the year after.

For a college football example, let's use Mitch Mustain. So if you do a franchise with USC, after one year of playing in it, he becomes available on your team. Like you aren't allowed to use him that first year, but from then on out hes yours to use.

I don't know how hard that would be to do, but I was looking for your thoughts

[TheGamingChef]

I really like that idea.

[iRepOklahoma]

yeah college hoops has it down right

[bvb24]

hoops has the dynasty down to a science. The coaching carousel takes it to a level EA has never imagined. I love that game and if there was a football game like it I would buy it in a second.

[kbigsexy9]

ye college hoops is the best

[cdiddy71323]

I mean, would that really be that hard to accomplish? It doesnt seem hard at all, make an extra person, make it to where they cant play unless its a dynasty after one year

[tlef316]

college hoops is a great fracnhise, and the dynasty does some great stuff. However, the recruiting we are gonna see in NCAA just destroys anything that hoops does. I actually outlined a similar system for that game a few months ago in a post over on that board......

Quote: Originally Posted by tlef316

IMO, the issue is that there is no way to personalize contact, so the impact of phone calls, emails and visits seems way too random. I think i should be able to go to a kid's house and tell him "You will start next year" and if early PT is a top concern, i should get a huge boost. But at the same time, if i already have 3 players at his position, I should get an email saying "sorry, coach, i just dont see myself getting on the court next year at your school" and i should drop off his list. Just brainstorming here, but i think recruiting needs to be revamped. I think you should be able to "pitch" things to recruits such as...... 1) program tradition/history 2) available Playing time 3) history of producing pro prospects 4) facilities 5) location of campus 6) education 7) playing style 8) coach reputation and then you should be able to promise things to players. examples... 1) you'll be a solid rotation guy by your soph year 2) you'll start as a freshman 3) We wont recruit behind you for 2 years 4) you'll be the focal point of our offense by your junior year 5) we'll make a final 4 before your senior year ect, ect. If you make a promise to a player, and it doesnt happen, the player becomes unhappy and some sort of overall "coach reputation" rating should take a hit. A lower rating means more dificulty recruiting in the future and a hit to performance of your team (because who wants to play for someone they dont trust)

[Village Idiot]

Transferred players (and them not playing their first year) was in '07 ... at least for last-gen. I wanna say it was even in '06. Am I missing something?