More Links

J-Unit40 · 08-07-2007, 02:09 PM

My Theory:

EA didn't fix the same issue that was prevalent in last year's game on the 360. Too many CPU thrown INTs. Freaking ridiculous! And destroying the experience of NCAA football...again.

kapo · 08-07-2007, 02:30 PM

My Theory:

If the cpu knew how to push down the right stick there would be less interceptions

J-Unit40 · 08-07-2007, 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kapo


	My Theory: If the cpu knew how to push down the right stick there would be less interceptions

LOL. So true.

ODogg · 08-07-2007, 03:29 PM

One solution i've found to keep the computer from throwing so many interceptions is to PLAY ONLINE AGAINST COMPETENT PEOPLE

dkrause1971 · 08-07-2007, 03:39 PM

I think you guys are reaching. The simpler theory would be- The coverage ratings are higher for the D this year. Considering the CPU threw more than enough last year and couple it with tighter coverage this year. You get more picks. Also, the D player speeds in general are higher than last year. Which also feeds into that. I would guarantee on average that is true since i edit rosters and they clearly appear higher.

My Opinion is they spent most their time on legend mode, increasing FPS to 60 and Stamina (For QB cheesing, etc). They then just tried to tweak the ratings to cover the rest.

RedmanR · 08-07-2007, 04:04 PM

I second that ODogg

RedmanR · 08-07-2007, 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dkrause1971


	I think you guys are reaching. The simpler theory would be- The coverage ratings are higher for the D this year. Considering the CPU threw more than enough last year and couple it with tighter coverage this year. You get more picks. Also, the D player speeds in general are higher than last year. Which also feeds into that. I would guarantee on average that is true since i edit rosters and they clearly appear higher. My Opinion is they spent most their time on legend mode, increasing FPS to 60 and Stamina (For QB cheesing, etc). They then just tried to tweak the ratings to cover the rest.

So with that said Dkrause that can somewhat explain why WRs and RBs constantly get ran down from behind in mostly all breakaway plays by superfast DBs and Safties. Do you think maybe player attributes may play a major role here more than expected or have you ruled that theory out

booker21 · 08-07-2007, 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J-Unit40


	My Theory: EA didn't fix the same issue that was prevalent in last year's game on the 360. Too many CPU thrown INTs. Freaking ridiculous! And destroying the experience of NCAA football...again.

Agree.... last year was the same. I´m not sure why people didn´t talk about this last year as much as this year.

On my 07 colorado dynasty my 1#SS and 2#FS lead the NCAA in this category

08-07-2007, 02:09 PM	#9
J-Unit40 Boom!! OVR: 30 Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Cleveland, OH Posts: 8,261	Re: New theory on INTs My Theory: EA didn't fix the same issue that was prevalent in last year's game on the 360. Too many CPU thrown INTs. Freaking ridiculous! And destroying the experience of NCAA football...again. __________________ "Hard work beats talent, when talent isn't working hard.”

08-07-2007, 02:30 PM	#10
kapo Pro OVR: 6 Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: NC	Re: New theory on INTs My Theory: If the cpu knew how to push down the right stick there would be less interceptions __________________ North Carolina Tarheels ▪ Carolina Panthers ▪ Carolina Hurricanes ▪ Charlotte Hornets

08-07-2007, 03:29 PM	#12
ODogg Hall Of Fame OVR: 51 Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Columbus, OH Posts: 37,300 Blog Entries: 8	Re: New theory on INTs One solution i've found to keep the computer from throwing so many interceptions is to PLAY ONLINE AGAINST COMPETENT PEOPLE __________________ JOIN ME ON MY STREAM MOST EVENINGS AT 6PM EST: WWW. KICK.COM/ODOGG My YouTube Vids: https://www.youtube.com/@OdoggyDogg/videos "It's a hell of a thing, killing a man. Take away all he's got and all he's ever gonna have." -William Munny- Unforgiven

08-07-2007, 03:39 PM	#13
dkrause1971 All Star OVR: 24 Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 5,201	Re: New theory on INTs I think you guys are reaching. The simpler theory would be- The coverage ratings are higher for the D this year. Considering the CPU threw more than enough last year and couple it with tighter coverage this year. You get more picks. Also, the D player speeds in general are higher than last year. Which also feeds into that. I would guarantee on average that is true since i edit rosters and they clearly appear higher. My Opinion is they spent most their time on legend mode, increasing FPS to 60 and Stamina (For QB cheesing, etc). They then just tried to tweak the ratings to cover the rest. __________________ Gamertag and PSN Name: RomanCaesar

08-07-2007, 04:04 PM	#14
RedmanR MVP OVR: 11 Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Florida	Re: New theory on INTs I second that *ODogg* __________________ *Where they DO that? ? ?*

	MLB The Show 24 Review: Another Solid Hit for the Series
	New Star GP Review: Old-School Arcade Fun
	Where Are Our College Basketball Video Game Rumors?

More Links

New theory on INTs