More Links

twl221 · 08-18-2009, 11:17 PM

On the All prospects page or on the Search prospects page.

thenextqb19 · 08-19-2009, 12:04 AM

Yeah I ended up getting a recruit they added after the NC. He was number 1 recruit in the country, a DT. I ended up getting him but he was 6'4" 274 so I ended up moving him to the OLB(I run a 3-4 and he didnt project well as an end at 80 compared to 83 with decent speed for a OLB)... Right now he is a pass rushing monster with 80 speed now....

Anyways I had a 79 3 star WR and also a SS. I also think promises have to do with some overalls getting inflated.

DOSMedia4SC · 08-19-2009, 05:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by clc86


	How do see 40 times?

When you are in "search prospect" or anything like that where the prospects are listed (just not on your recruiting board unfortunately) just move the cursor over to the right and its like the first column thats not on the page. You can even hit "x" (360) and it will sort the prospects by their 40 times. Useful tool.

bps259 · 08-19-2009, 09:18 AM

Was short a QB after the first year of my dynasty but didn't really care since I run the option a lot. Wound up getting a walk on who was rated 82!!! No joke...

Arkavian · 08-19-2009, 11:16 AM

In my 6th year of offline dynasty with NCAA10, I was short on the full back position. I had several TE's though and a couple of them were buried deep on the chart, probably never making 1st string to play.

One them was a blocking TE rated ovr 75. During the offseason I changed his position to FB and it showed him as a 79 in that position.

The following season he turned out to be the most devastating blocker on my offense. He would open big holes for my power running game and on short yard carries, he would level defenders.

Macc24JR · 08-19-2009, 03:32 PM

One thing I dont like is it seems no matter how the ATH is sized he always seems to be best fit for a WR. I do like how EA has corrected attribute ratings for position changes - I've also converted TE's to FB's and switched around certain linemen positions to fit my depth chart.

Macc24JR · 08-21-2009, 12:16 PM

Anyone else notice this?

Roggie · 08-21-2009, 01:07 PM

Not all athletes are best at WR. I find more that are good at CB than WR.

08-18-2009, 11:17 PM	#17
twl221 MVP OVR: 13 Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Illinois Blog Entries: 3	Re: Diamond in the rough On the All prospects page or on the Search prospects page.

08-19-2009, 12:04 AM	#18
thenextqb19 Rookie OVR: 3 Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: VA	Re: Diamond in the rough Yeah I ended up getting a recruit they added after the NC. He was number 1 recruit in the country, a DT. I ended up getting him but he was 6'4" 274 so I ended up moving him to the OLB(I run a 3-4 and he didnt project well as an end at 80 compared to 83 with decent speed for a OLB)... Right now he is a pass rushing monster with 80 speed now.... Anyways I had a 79 3 star WR and also a SS. I also think promises have to do with some overalls getting inflated. __________________ James Madison Dukes Hampton University Pirates Virginia Tech Hokies Golden State Warriors Washington Redskins

08-19-2009, 09:18 AM	#20
bps259 Rookie OVR: 0 Join Date: Jul 2009	Re: Diamond in the rough Was short a QB after the first year of my dynasty but didn't really care since I run the option a lot. Wound up getting a walk on who was rated 82!!! No joke...

08-19-2009, 11:16 AM	#21
Arkavian Rookie OVR: 4 Join Date: Jul 2008	Re: Diamond in the rough In my 6th year of offline dynasty with NCAA10, I was short on the full back position. I had several TE's though and a couple of them were buried deep on the chart, probably never making 1st string to play. One them was a blocking TE rated ovr 75. During the offseason I changed his position to FB and it showed him as a 79 in that position. The following season he turned out to be the most devastating blocker on my offense. He would open big holes for my power running game and on short yard carries, he would level defenders.

08-19-2009, 03:32 PM	#22
Macc24JR Rookie OVR: 5 Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Windsor, Ontario	Re: Diamond in the rough One thing I dont like is it seems no matter how the ATH is sized he always seems to be best fit for a WR. I do like how EA has corrected attribute ratings for position changes - I've also converted TE's to FB's and switched around certain linemen positions to fit my depth chart. __________________ PSN - LongGONE24 The most diverse favourite teams on OS.com MLB - Atlanta Braves NFL - Philly Eagles / Seattle Seahawks NHL - Chicago Blackhawks NBA - Detroit Pistons College - USC Trojans

	MLB The Show 24 Review: Another Solid Hit for the Series
	New Star GP Review: Old-School Arcade Fun
	Where Are Our College Basketball Video Game Rumors?

08-21-2009, 12:16 PM	#23
Macc24JR Rookie OVR: 5 Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Windsor, Ontario	Re: Diamond in the rough Anyone else notice this? __________________ PSN - LongGONE24 The most diverse favourite teams on OS.com MLB - Atlanta Braves NFL - Philly Eagles / Seattle Seahawks NHL - Chicago Blackhawks NBA - Detroit Pistons College - USC Trojans

08-21-2009, 01:07 PM	#24
Roggie MVP OVR: 17 Join Date: Dec 2008	Re: Diamond in the rough Not all athletes are best at WR. I find more that are good at CB than WR. __________________ North Carolina Tar Heels Virginia Tech Hokies Michigan Wolverines Chicago Bulls Detroit Tigers Detroit Red Wings Detroit Lions A Dual Career Coaching Legacy

More Links

Diamond in the rough