I Love How Progression Is Done

[Howie5]

This is very frustrating! I am only in game 4 of my Clemson dynasty...and don't want to continue if players come into college so poorly & still don't progress. Everyone talks about a patch, but ARE WE GETTING ONE?

[ps2king]

Unless the Madden demo blows me away (which I doubt).. This argument will become irrelevant. The only reason I'd be overly concerned with attributes like (Awr elusiveness etc..) being low, is if I were using these roster to carry over to Madden. I'll deal for now.

This needs to be fixed no doubt.. But in a way it's still better than last years game prior to all those patches. I gave up on NCAA 10 long before it was patched for the second time. The only reason I'm sticking around this year is because of the improved gameplay.

[Larry121283]

So, how serious is this issue, really?

Is this just an issue with years 3 and 4?

If the issue is the disparity between the stock rosters and the recruits, there is going to a time when its all game-made recruits, and then essentially the roster evens out, no?

So, where is the real issue here IN NCAA alone? I don't care about the transfer to Madden, personally.

[claystone]

Here is my HB's stats from my Dynasty. His OVR is 73 and his AWR is 52. You can check it out. Now this was CPU vs CPU, so ratings mean more.
Not bad for a HB with 52 AWR.


San Diego Rushing:
HB #23: 268 Carries / 1,174yds / 5 TD / 4.3 Avg.

[ZekeRoberts]

Quote: Originally Posted by Alex the Great

The problem is, the sim engine doesn't think that way. And that is the real difference. If the sim engine took into account how much the talent levels were deflating, and adjusted accordingly, then there would be no issue. But that isn't the case.

Sorry, the HS Stats teacher has to throw the flag here (and I won't do this again in any other threads I promise). Do you have evidence of this?

[Old School SD Fan]

Quote: Originally Posted by jerryrice4949

I guess I will beat a dead horse. Progression is done adequately, certainly not well but it is not the biggest problem. Main problems are; 1) too many one start players. 2) Generated recruits have the awareness of a door knob 3) kickers and punters suck leaving kicking game broken a couple years into dynasty 4) Poor positional ratings for OL and WRs 5) CPU hoarding certain positions such as QBs and CBs. This was better in 2010 but is now f*%$ up like in NCAA 2009.

I think I agree with this assessment. It's not progression that's FUBAR, it's the incoming recruits being initially rated far too low in key attribute areas.

[mjarz02]

Quote: Originally Posted by claystone

Here is my HB's stats from my Dynasty. His OVR is 73 and his AWR is 52. You can check it out. Now this was CPU vs CPU, so ratings mean more. Not bad for a HB with 52 AWR. San Diego Rushing: HB #23: 268 Carries / 1,174yds / 5 TD / 4.3 Avg.

Hey claystone, what are you seeing for your WRs elusiveness ratings??

[PhantomLord]

Quote: Originally Posted by mjarz02

Hey claystone, what are you seeing for your WRs elusiveness ratings??

And kicker accuracy ratings. And AWR ratings across the board. And WR juke, spin, elusiveness, etc...