More Links

Lintyfresh85 · 08-10-2003, 08:31 PM

I've got a question for you when you are talking about rolling the dice would we do that or do we automatically get caught? Cause I think these rules are really good as well. Man who knew NCAA 2004 could bring so many ideas to the table...

renegade28 · 08-11-2003, 12:05 AM

Yeah, you would roll the dice (or more correctly, die).

If this was your first offense (16.7% Chance of getting caught), then only a roll of "1" would result in getting caught. Rolls of 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 would mean you got away with the violation.

If this was your second offense (50% Chance of getting caught), then rolls of 1, 2, or 3 would result in penalties. And so on...

Nutzzz414 · 08-11-2003, 12:46 AM

You Know what would help this. If Ea put in the option for blue chips who don't get playing time to transfer to another school. Also, players who don't get no Pt and who are not redshirting should do down in ratings.

On the other hand. I think that EA make the recruiting like this because they want people who has

love for a team like UB to have a chance to become good if they put in the work. Let's admit it if you get UB up to a 6 star caliber, you had to of put in some work.

GeePee20 · 08-11-2003, 12:53 AM

Quote:

Nutzzz414 said:
You Know what would help this. If Ea put in the option for blue chips who don't get playing time to transfer to another school. Also, players who don't get no Pt and who are not redshirting should do down in ratings.

On the other hand. I think that EA make the recruiting like this because they want people who has love for a team like UB to have a chance to become good if they put in the work. Let's admit it if you get UB up to a 6 star caliber, you had to of put in some work.

I dunno about dropping in rating. Maybe they'll only improve minimally but not get worse.

Nutzzz414 · 08-11-2003, 12:55 AM

how about no rating change at all. I mean this would make people have to put in backups when the score is lop sided.

GeePee20 · 08-11-2003, 12:59 AM

Quote:

Nutzzz414 said:
how about no rating change at all. I mean this would make people have to put in backups when the score is lop sided.

Yea I'd take that. But I'd still prefer minimal improvement or how they have it now, especially in college football because if you have 3 qbs. 2 are seniors so they graduate leaving you with 2 incoming qbs as recruits and your now senior/junior/sophmore qb as your starter. If he didn't get any playing time he is going to be horrible which is unlikely because even with zero to very limited playing time they're going to improve.

Nutzzz414 · 08-11-2003, 01:23 AM

Quote:

GeePee20 said:

Quote:

Nutzzz414 said:
how about no rating change at all. I mean this would make people have to put in backups when the score is lop sided.

Yea I'd take that. But I'd still prefer minimal improvement or how they have it now, especially in college football because if you have 3 qbs. 2 are seniors so they graduate leaving you with 2 incoming qbs as recruits and your now senior/junior/sophmore qb as your starter. If he didn't get any playing time he is going to be horrible which is unlikely because even with zero to very limited playing time they're going to improve.

True. But Like I said, now you would want to put your freshmen and sophs in when you are in a blowout so they can get that PT. This option, plus the ability for transfers, would add a much needed boost of realism to the Dynasty mode. I would also say that when you recruit these people. they would have to sit out a year like in real life. Right in the corner where they put JUCO, just put (Trans/Soph). that would let you know that they are a transfer and you would know that they would be sitting out that year. Also if you have a season ending injury early, you should be able to ask for a medical redshirt (it should cost you recruiting points)

jk22ld · 08-11-2003, 10:00 AM

Quote:

Yeah, you would roll the dice (or more correctly, die).

If this was your first offense (16.7% Chance of getting caught), then only a roll of "1" would result in getting caught. Rolls of 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 would mean you got away with the violation.

If this was your second offense (50% Chance of getting caught), then rolls of 1, 2, or 3 would result in penalties. And so on...

So are you saying everyone should violate the recruiting rules, and then everyone would roll the die to see if they were caught? Or are you saying to roll the die every offseason even if you didn't commit a rules violation?

08-10-2003, 08:31 PM	#73
Lintyfresh85 Where have I been? OVR: 37 Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Lynchburg Posts: 17,493 Blog Entries: 10	Re: Recruiting rules for better realism I've got a question for you when you are talking about rolling the dice would we do that or do we automatically get caught? Cause I think these rules are really good as well. Man who knew NCAA 2004 could bring so many ideas to the table...

08-11-2003, 12:05 AM	#74
renegade28 Rookie OVR: 2 Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Nesbit, MS	Re: Recruiting rules for better realism Yeah, you would roll the dice (or more correctly, die). If this was your first offense (16.7% Chance of getting caught), then only a roll of "1" would result in getting caught. Rolls of 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 would mean you got away with the violation. If this was your second offense (50% Chance of getting caught), then rolls of 1, 2, or 3 would result in penalties. And so on...

08-11-2003, 12:46 AM	#75
Nutzzz414 Rookie OVR: 2 Join Date: Jul 2002	Re: Recruiting rules for better realism You Know what would help this. If Ea put in the option for blue chips who don't get playing time to transfer to another school. Also, players who don't get no Pt and who are not redshirting should do down in ratings. On the other hand. I think that EA make the recruiting like this because they want people who has love for a team like UB to have a chance to become good if they put in the work. Let's admit it if you get UB up to a 6 star caliber, you had to of put in some work.

08-11-2003, 12:53 AM	#76
GeePee20 MVP OVR: 15 Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Bay Area, CA	Re: Recruiting rules for better realism Quote: *Nutzzz414 said:* You Know what would help this. If Ea put in the option for blue chips who don't get playing time to transfer to another school. Also, players who don't get no Pt and who are not redshirting should do down in ratings. On the other hand. I think that EA make the recruiting like this because they want people who has love for a team like UB to have a chance to become good if they put in the work. Let's admit it if you get UB up to a 6 star caliber, you had to of put in some work. I dunno about dropping in rating. Maybe they'll only improve minimally but not get worse.

08-11-2003, 12:55 AM	#77
Nutzzz414 Rookie OVR: 2 Join Date: Jul 2002	Re: Recruiting rules for better realism how about no rating change at all. I mean this would make people have to put in backups when the score is lop sided.

	MLB The Show 24 Review: Another Solid Hit for the Series
	New Star GP Review: Old-School Arcade Fun
	Where Are Our College Basketball Video Game Rumors?

08-11-2003, 12:59 AM	#78
GeePee20 MVP OVR: 15 Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Bay Area, CA	Re: Recruiting rules for better realism Quote: *Nutzzz414 said:* how about no rating change at all. I mean this would make people have to put in backups when the score is lop sided. Yea I'd take that. But I'd still prefer minimal improvement or how they have it now, especially in college football because if you have 3 qbs. 2 are seniors so they graduate leaving you with 2 incoming qbs as recruits and your now senior/junior/sophmore qb as your starter. If he didn't get any playing time he is going to be horrible which is unlikely because even with zero to very limited playing time they're going to improve.

08-11-2003, 01:23 AM	#79
Nutzzz414 Rookie OVR: 2 Join Date: Jul 2002	Re: Recruiting rules for better realism Quote: *GeePee20 said:* Quote: *Nutzzz414 said:* how about no rating change at all. I mean this would make people have to put in backups when the score is lop sided. Yea I'd take that. But I'd still prefer minimal improvement or how they have it now, especially in college football because if you have 3 qbs. 2 are seniors so they graduate leaving you with 2 incoming qbs as recruits and your now senior/junior/sophmore qb as your starter. If he didn't get any playing time he is going to be horrible which is unlikely because even with zero to very limited playing time they're going to improve. True. But Like I said, now you would want to put your freshmen and sophs in when you are in a blowout so they can get that PT. This option, plus the ability for transfers, would add a much needed boost of realism to the Dynasty mode. I would also say that when you recruit these people. they would have to sit out a year like in real life. Right in the corner where they put JUCO, just put (Trans/Soph). that would let you know that they are a transfer and you would know that they would be sitting out that year. Also if you have a season ending injury early, you should be able to ask for a medical redshirt (it should cost you recruiting points)

08-11-2003, 10:00 AM	#80
jk22ld Rookie OVR: 3 Join Date: Oct 2002	Re: Recruiting rules for better realism Quote: Yeah, you would roll the dice (or more correctly, die). If this was your first offense (16.7% Chance of getting caught), then only a roll of "1" would result in getting caught. Rolls of 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 would mean you got away with the violation. If this was your second offense (50% Chance of getting caught), then rolls of 1, 2, or 3 would result in penalties. And so on... So are you saying everyone should violate the recruiting rules, and then everyone would roll the die to see if they were caught? Or are you saying to roll the die every offseason even if you didn't commit a rules violation?

More Links

Recruiting rules for better realism